Wadax components get great reviews, cost a fortune, and look like a cheap boom box. https://wadax.eu/reference/
Plus 1000 @otherworld74
Until you see the back panel!!!
Ugliest Component of the Year 2024!
I realize beauty is in the eye of the beholder but this one should ranks in top 10.
https://www.mcintoshlabs.com/products/cd-players/MCD85
I always loved the MC275 and its predecessors but this new trend which has extended to MC830 is a bit of head scratcher.
Feel free to add your pick…no judgements!
Plus 1000 @otherworld74 Until you see the back panel!!! |
Let's not forget this weird banana thing from Vivid: https://vividaudio.com/giya/giya-g1-spirit/ |
When I read the copy on these speakers I double checked to see that I was not on The Onion. https://www.yankodesign.com/2009/10/26/sounds-from-behind/
DeKay |
I'll throw klipschorn and other giant boxes by them in the mix. Don't like how they sound either which makes it worse for me. And yea the rant on ASR was not a good moment for Tekton. To be fair I didn't think their base model Lore was that bad measurement wise. Go check the stereophile article on the impact monitors if you want to see the response of the seven tweeter array. I have a +/-3 DB response from 20 hz to 20 khz with minimal room EQ from the listening position. I also have a fully treated space and two rhythmik F12s working sub 80 hz. Speaker designers are human too and he clearly takes pride in his products to light Amir up like that lol |
As far as Tekton, unfortunately I’ll never unhear the cretinous fight they took to ASR, in which they successfully demonstrated that the speakers ASR trashed in a review were in fact trash, but not for the reasons ASR said. They lost their credibility and gained nothing. Why anyone would think that the self-infliction of a PR disaster is good business is incomprehensible. |
Shoot me, but I like the McIntosh designs. A bit retro, which I like. Come on, who here wouldn’t want a big honkin’ Sansui or Marantz receiver in their rack, even if it was just for show? I have a C220 preamp, and love the LED lit front panel. It sits on the top of my rack.
Frankly, I think the Chord designs look like R2D2 vomited out his lunch. I tend dislike asymmetrical designs. |
OMG,, @lalitk , those look like the server room at your locale telecom company have a fungal infection. https://wolfvonlanga.de/wvl-loudspeakers/wolf-von-langa-33221-berlin How did anyone sign off these as "ok, they will love it". WTF are they.
|
The Washington Post did an article where a non-audiophile reporter went to a local high end shop. The reporter described the Avantegarde speakers as looking like an air raid siren from a Tex Avery cartoon. I thought that was a terrific description, albeit one that younger readers might not understand. |
+1 @lubachl As any good Tralfamadorian would say "The universe exists as a random and senseless place." Regards, barts
|
Agreed, Lalitk, The Frankenstein look of the MCD85 is, IMO, unbeatable in this little contest of yours. It is (obviously?) a reference to the MC2100, which I owned for some years, but never appreciated for beauty. It sat on a bottom shelf, largely in the shadows of a dark listening room, and nobody ever approached it to "get a closer look". |
I am digging your sense of humor and take on Tekton’s. And I agree, horns belongs in a nice wood cabinet with one exception. Check out WVL 33221 Berlin. If I have the room with high ceilings, I wouldn’t mind these bad boys. https://wolfvonlanga.de/wvl-loudspeakers/wolf-von-langa-33221-berlin
|
@gemoody hear hear well said 👏 I would add Legacy speakers as well to this list, to me they look Frankensteins born of a DIYer with too much money and zero aesthetic sensibilities. |
@gemoody +1 Hifi-Mac: The worst combination of ostentatious and ugly. I have yet to see a Mac product I could bring myself putting in my home. Maybe Bose will rectify that? |
@mesonto COMPLETELY agree. Would only add everything from Wilson Audio! |
Great list so far. Mc is definitely not for everyone. If it has those blue meters I could go for it. Glowing green tubes just add to the fun. My question with Tekton is, when do they know they’ve added enough drivers? When they reach the top of the step stool? My add would be any equipment with giant horns visible. (Tried adding a picture or link without success). Honkin’ on Bobo indeed. I love the spinning sound of a Leslie but the horns are usually placed in a beautiful wood cabinet. |
Tekton dude, Eric, clearly doesn't want to do gloss paint lol. As a businessperson, probably one of those things where it's like "if they want it, they'll pay for it otherwise I can just do the part I like doing" I own the double impacts and impact monitors and I love how they sound. Not extremely gorgeous but they honestly look much nicer in person. My friend has the moabs. They are a bit more to take in but I wouldn't say I hate them by any means with the ceramic and beryllium drivers. I understand if you're able to fork out 10's of thousands to get insane sound and gorgeous cabinets. I can only afford one of the two. And I prefer insane sound over gorgeous cabinets |
Post removed |
Yes beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I’m in process of trying out some new gear. Looks, size and cost all count in addition to sound quality of course. At one extreme I was strongly considering an Accuphase integrated amp. Lovely! Also fairly big and pricey. I ended up choosing a plain Jane Schit pre-amp and a fairly non-descript looking new GanFet Class D amp that delivers a lot for the $$$ and in a very small package! Beautiful. I’d call the gear utilitarian looking perhaps but not ugly. Something to be said for plain and simple. But that Accuphase….. Tekton: No thanks. To each their own |
I have a set of tekton 1812 and beauty is in the eye of the beholder.it is designed after the v 12 engine so for car guys in the man cave it fits in.there are some famous people that own these i won't mention names but are in rock bands and develop audio equipment.i agree they don't look as pretty as my focal utopia or kharma but they sound great.they cost 30 times less.im sure I'll catch some criticism on this.like a fool and his money ha ha.stay healthy and enjoy the music.i also like my mcintosh 12000 cd bet it was alot more expensive than the one discussed. Alot of companies have low level components for entry level up to high end .focal and oothersmcintosh just released the all in one amp streamer.interesting to see what bose does |
@lalitk Good topic...we should call out the bad and ugly as well as the good. |
@oldrooney I owned an EHF-200. They are not pretty up close. The whole space/mil build thing is just marketing and the sound is meh and the "transferrable lifetime warranty" is BS. The unit has to go back to Roger to be "re-certified for $500-$750 + 2 way shipping." It’s just a ploy to make your buyer contact Roger and then he’ll sell one of his "used/demo" units at less than your asking price and way less hassle. I traded mine in at TMR (bless them for taking it off my hands) and the transformer was barley attached with a bolt that was too short - they fixed it for resale and had to take the unit apart to do so. |
@macg19 I don’t know, I kind of like the red powder coat, features, construction, and warranty of the Rogers products; although I will admit that the layout of some of the units is a bit of a head-scratcher. Tubes are open, but the transformers are caged? Must be the way they do it in outer space. Had never heard of the company before. @otherworld74 I think you’ve definitely got a winner there. You’ve got my vote on the entries thus far. |
@otherworld74 I'm not as offended by Wadax - seems like at least there is a method to the madness |
@fredapplegate Nice one! |