Count me out.
I wonder what you would think if we scheduled a monthly Zoom Meeting?
I was thinking about what it might be like if our discussion group scheduled a monthly Zoom Meeting? This would allow everyone to finally put a face to a name and it might really allow everyone to be more interactive. This might also allow our discussion group to take things to the next level. We might also want to develop some rules of engagement.
I would like to hear your responses. We can then weigh in to see if this might be something we might do.
I think it is a good suggestion and likely to work. 1. Less people would actually do it than you think. 2. People have to be much more polite on a zoom meeting. You don't troll. or flame others on a zoom meeting. The would eiminate a lot of members. 3. If it didn't work, it wouldn't be hard to cancel. --Jerry |
Post removed |
If I can clear it through my agent, attorneys and life coach I'll require advance notice in order to schedule hair, makeup, wardrobe and lighting. Maybe even auto-tune - just for fun. Seriously though, I've met a handful of old regulars here, in person, years ago and they were all princes among men (IMO). Now, unfortunately, the site seems to be attracting princesses among men.
DeKay |
Post removed |
This thread is becoming a good list of people *not* to invite -- the instant-doubters, the hermits, the naysayers, the nattering nabobs of negativism. How quickly they jump in to say "impossible" or "I don't wanna." Copy out the names of these folks and just don't invite them. As for exchanging personal information on messages, it's not hard. Easy to do. Not an obstacle. Anyone who can spell a number or write the word geemail can figure it out. Let see if you get a few from the positive camp and we can have a go. |
@ronboco Maybe they are getting better. Let me try a message to you. |
I knew I would get mixed feedback. However, think about finally getting to see each other, talk to each other and to get to know each other. This could add a new dimension to this group. I also think we might see people more hesitant to reply with sarcastic statements because they have finally seen their face and have learned there are some great people in this group. |
hilde45: Thought more about your OP and wonder if such could be incorporated via the "Insider" forum here @ A'Gon. Not familiar with it (Insider), but as it's pay to play it might be a better venue for what you suggest. It might start with chats/zooms with manufacturers (on a monetary level), but perhaps it could evolve to chats/zooms involving (only) non commercial members (those who are willing to pay a reasonable fee for such a service) eventually. I've only experienced one Zoom (8 participants of non-blood family) and found it overwhelming, to say the least, but that's just me.
DeKay |
Good one DeKay. I think you might be quite entertaining during our Zoom Meetings. I get the feeling you like the idea. Remember, this is totally voluntary and it is your choice to participate. However, I do feel it would be a lot of fun to be able to talk to each other. I also think this would stimulate people to share, teach and to learn. There is a lot of talent to draw upon. |
Post removed |
An open 'Pardon' to my removed post...*chagrined foot shuffle* I'm intrigued by the thought of 'us going RT', but still wondering about the 'ground rules'. Who makes the cut? How 'adamant' can one become? Where does one persons' chide become 'over the line'/attack? Does 'imho' step over the 'red line' on a monitor for one when a disagreement is in stalemate? Again: What happens when the 'keyboard curtain' is pulled back? Are we ready to do this? |
@dekay .... ...or the laptop in the john on a tv tray....;) @larry5729 ...! ASL! Brilliant! I'm already wearing hearing aids, and with ASL you've got to know it to understand the jokes and the 'questionable language'....😏👍 ...members....DeKay will like that.... ...as long as no one 'pans down'....*L* |
I apologize for cheep cracks, but it begins to smack of ’us’ v. ’them’, and I’m real borderline imho (and being realistic ’bout it)... I pose no real threat to those who’d discuss ’deep tech’ concerns, but have enough experience and decades to discern that which seems in excess. If only imho, which is subject to being in a Roman arena... "Send in the clowns....we’ve ought to have clowns..." (melody implied)... One might have different daily topics...but how strict do you see moderation applied? Otherwise, I’d just lurk and spare y’all.....🤔 *edit interrupt: lurk v. luck...which seems applicable, anyway...* |
Post removed |