Revealing.
Like a veil has been lifted.
Regards,
barts
Like a veil has been lifted.
Regards,
barts
What are the current useless terms in this "audio world"
I enjoy discussing this subject. Doublespeak is so entrenched in our daily lives that I find myself speaking in commercials to express the "reads as" meaning. WAF seems to impact way too many people these days. I mean from the kitchen how can they even see the system? But I would be open to a new version of WAF. "TSF" . It relates to a part of the anatomy in reverse growth mode. |
The most meaningless, ridiculous and all out absurd is to try and equate
a difference heard as a percentage! A poster might say the new speaker
cables were 8 to 10% better or the upgraded DAC sounded 15% more
detailed. Really. I think this is bandied about to appear very astute and able to accurately discern to the n'th degree the difference. Nuts. Then 'gears', puleeze. To say "I'm gonna buy some new gears" is just wrong. It's quite acceptable to say for instance "You're welcome to come over for a listen to my gear" And while in gripe mode it is astonishing that most people get 'then and than' mixed up. In conversation your meaning will get across but when written down just appears as dumb. Then: has to do with Time Than: has to do with Comparison |
A term I don’t like, but doesn’t squarely fall under “useless” is “high end” audio. I much prefer “high fidelity” audio because I can tell that to those not in our hobby “high end” is interpreted as we are more concerned about price and bling than what is most important - the pursuit of high fidelity sound. I for one am certainly not seeking out “high end” audio when looking through this perception lens. |
Full loom Unequivocally I am not a native English speaker, so I pay attention to different things than native speakers. These words constantly pop up in audio related articles and discussions. The first one is a strange expression and almost exclusively used in audio talk. The second is a word which should be banned. |
fynnegan, I don't understand your comment. Unequivocally is a perfectly useful word in the right context, and has nothing to do specifically with audio. Why should it be banned? Full loom refers to using one brand of wires exclusively for interconnects speaker cables power cords etc. What's so strange about that? |
Tube watts, unequivocally "the best" in high end, are not warm sounding but natural as scientifically determined in a God smackingly double-blind testing shootout. Try it you'll like it. With a full loom. I am clearly on a roll here and so- It seems on ebay, here, craigslist and others a current pet of Sellers is taking something to "the next level"Pretty sure Sellers pet is a parrot. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFKJuzrCGj4 Yes. Definitely a parrot. https://youtu.be/CARc1uUq1lA?t=15 |
My fear is that the Swallow being referred to is the common Barn Swallow.....what an "8-track" of birds....... barn swallow - Google Search |
Don’t be silly. Everyone knows its an unladen swallow. The only question is African or European? https://youtu.be/0D7hFHfLEyk?t=165 |
JS Smith, I think you forgot one... grainy. It use to be that an 18" subwoofer could not delineate the upper bass very good because it was to big (hence slow)-- it couldn't come back to it's starting point 'fast' enough to transduce the next note. Because of that 'pitch definition' was lacking. Seems fast is ok... |