I've always wondered why there are so many people out there, that more than any other speaker manufacturer, really hate the Wilson line. I own Maxx 2's and also a pair of Watt Puppys. They are IMHO quite wonderful.
Bo1972 "I will never share this for free. I spend a lot of time and it gave me a huge leap against all my competitors. Do your own research and I wish you goodluck"
Bo, it is obvious you do not think it is improper on any level to fill pages and pages with what boils down to your advertising (call it self promotion or whatever). What makes it really ridiculous is that you don't even seem to have anything to sell in the U.S.
You should be required to put a dealer disclaimer or whatever type of sales entity you are on each of your mini novels. I would not want to talk negatively towards you but you have not had any problems directly and rudely bashing purchases by A'gon member.
Bo, it's not like you invented fire. Those of us who are old enough to have been around high end audio for 40+ years have been aware of 3 dimensionality in the sound stage for ages. You just now discovered it. Good for you. But it is pretty delusional of you to think you have discovered a secret and you somehow possess knowledge that is unique. Congratulations on your discovery. Most of us have known it all along; we just didn't feel the need to beat others over the head with it.
It has nothing to do with a personal taste. People in audio think and believe the best way of creating an audio system is based on personal preference.
Really, this whole hobby is about preference, isn’t it? Yes, there are objective measurements and observations that we can make. But even the best audio system is just an imitation of the real thing, so some kinds of trade-offs have to be made along the way.
The preferences never end ... from choosing formats to taste in music, from deciding what’s reasonable to spend to deciding how much time we’re willing to commit to maintenance and tweaking. The notion that any one person can decide what’s best for me or you - especially in an internet forum with people we can’t possibly know - is just beyond silly.
Frankly, no matter the context: I don’t trust self-proclaimed gurus. That’s rarely where knowledge is found, ime. Some of the most knowledgeable people here are the most patient and polite.
Bo has simply discovered the weird directivity effects of ribbons. Nothing new about that. A ribbon tweeter is much too tall for the frequencies it is transmitting. This means you get weird flanger comb filter type effects - some frequencies totally cancel out while others reinforce. This is the 3D he has discovered. It is laughable really because this is an artifact. It isnt high fidelity at all. It really messes with the sound and your perception of where it is coming from as a function of frequency. Some frequencies will come from ceiling and some from only side walls and others from the speakers. Basically a total mess if you are a purist and seek high fidelity. But great if you like weird SFX and point sources to become larger than they should.
You also get weird artifacts with an Appolito design. He may have discovered this also. Nothing he has discovered has not been known for already 30 years. However he thinks he is on to something new because most speaker companies shun these type designs that give inconsistent 3D artifacts in favor of accuracy and high fidelity.
************************* to Crazyeddy’s thread subject.
Personally. I have known two Wilson speaker owners over the years, of which I actually heard their systems. This was a long time ago. Both were using their shared living rooms and were married. The first guy had speakers on castors and was anal about room positioning. He would roll them out to the tape markings on the floor when listening and push them back to the front wall when not in use. The second fellow, he had them arranged along the front wall, very similar to the system shown in Bo1972’s url link above. Both could be described as audiophiles and music lovers. Different expectations.
An AMT tweeter is not a ribbontweeter. It is a totally different technique. Again 3-dimensional sound has nothing to do with a ribbontweeter.
We also have clients who use speakers with a dome-tweeter who also own a 3-dimensional stage now. It is based on properties and working very accurate. 3-dimensional sound is not new, there are different brands and products who can build a 3 dimensional stage as well.
It is a 100% fact that people prefer a 3 dimensional stage. The same as that people prefer a sound with more diversity. This has nothing to do with personal taste. But like I said again: it is based on our emotion.
Some people have difficulties to read, so I will repeat it for those. 3-dimensional sound is only 1 part of Tru-Fi. All the different 8 parts are important and influences our emotion.
It was a 100% fact that the AMT tweeter outperformed the tweeter of the Wilson Sasha. Again it has nothing to do with personal taste.
The AMT tweeter vs the outdated dome tweeter of the Sasha showed:
- The AMT could reveal more details - could reveal diversity in height of instruments and voices. With the Wilson they showd the same level in height. - with different recordings the Sasha showed harshness ( ssssss sound) in the high freq. The Pl-200 II showed with all these recordings no any kind of harshness. - The low frequencies were so much faster and showed more layers compared to the Sasha. - The Pl-200 II could create a wider and deeper stage. - The sound of the Pl-200 II was more natural and more open - The individual focus of instruments and voices was so much sharper with the Pl-200 II. - The Pl200 II showed much more diversity in sound.
We want more shootouts of audio, and no more bullshit paid stories. Audio is all about facts and shootout.
All our clients with more expensive audio have a Statement Audio Pro measurement. The difficulties most of you suffer, are gone for us already for many years. The resolution in audio shops and at shows is inferior compared to our resolution.
Advantages AMT against a dome-tweeter are: bigger power handling, significantly less distortion, bigger stage, more natural sound, better dynamics, a better timing and a more flat impedance.
At this moment people are working on our new website.
Most things we do we will never show. The products have a much lower value than how they are used. At the end it is all about detail and how you use it.
You cannot see the Statement Audio Pro-measurment, adapting electricity, magnetism, high frequency noise, smog, modifications and many tweeks we use inside the amps, sources, cables and many other places.
When you create and sell a sound, it is a totally different approach than the silly extreme ineffective way of trial and error.
Even when you would buy the same stuff I own, I does not make sense and it will never work.
I had a lot of contact with Desmond Harrington(president) of Pass Labs. I was talking also about our Statement Audio Pro measurement. In 2015 he send me an email that he was thinking about buying a 5509 as well.
I had to laugh and I wrote, without my brains and insight the 5509 is fully useless. He cannot think and work in patterns/properties like I do. This is needed to understand it.
All people in audio focus on products and brands. Sound does not work like that, this way it always will be very ineffective. You never can reach the full potential of each part in your set. This is why money will never solve this problem.
Most sets are incomplete and beside this they miss properties you need for a higher level in emotion and realism.
At the end it is all about what you can hear. We have proven many times that our way of Tru-Fi with each single Monitor Audio loudspeaker sounds superior to the same speaker at any other shop. This is based on the fact they we can use the full potential or all properties the speakers own. All shops connect some stuff based on trial and error, they are only able to reach between 10-30% of the quality. And again we have proven this many times.
Audio is all about sound and what you can hear. This will be always less important than the technique they use. Technique does not garantee you a better quality.
In magazines and on websites you often read the information about the technique. And only a few lines about how it sounds. This shows again how limited these people are.
Of course the technique Monitor Audio uses is the reason why it creates the level what is possible. But it still does not garantee you anything. This counts for other brands as well.
The
beryllium tweeter of the Focal speakers also showed harshness at many different shows and demos we auditoned. The AMT tweeter laughs about these limitations :)
With the Sonus Faber Lilium we had the same experience. When we played Diana Krall we all could hear ssssss all the time. The people who gave the demo said; this is based on the fact that she is very close to the mic and it is based on the recording.
Lol, these recordings never showed any kind of harshness and sss sounds to all systems we sold.
I will do my best to create a shootout with these speakers against the Platinum series. This is how audio should ne used. We like things to be clear and honest :)
Looks like a very nice system Bo, comparable to many seen here on the Virtual Systems pages. Don't see much (anything?) in the way room of acoustical treatment.
I did take a look at your systems. Mann this is the work of an amature. Most of the brands and products you use are by far not the best in their price range. We are talking about 2-dimensional standard audio.
If I would sell it to clients, it would be time to quite directly.
First you need to listen to it before you judge. The products you bought many of them are even rather poor.
We test and listen to as many products possible to find the best of it’s class.
The one who creates the best sound&vision in each price range understands it the best way. This is how sound&vision needs to be exposed. This is how we work. And all people can compare it with all other products.
We created Statement Audio Pro-measurement. It brings stereo and surround to a new superior level. This is again not based on personal taste, but again on facts.
If you would have read better you would have known that we have not the acoustic limitations most people have. That is why I said: ( I will repeat it again for those who forget) when we visit new clients, shows, distributers and other shops we always go back in time.
In their world the acoustics limits them a lot. I have done a lot of research in over 6 years of time in the acoustics. That is why we will share Statement Audio Pro-measurement with the world this year so many will get a superior sound quality they never experienced.
It is not possible to reach this level with old fashion audio without S.A.P.
It outperforms pre amps in all 8 parts of Tru-Fi. It looks like it is not possible for people to understand what it means when you do research all the time in sound&vision. Because you never read and saw people who work like this.
I met many people who invested a lot of money on acoustical treatment. This is inferior to the results of S.A.P. It is even a big laugh how big the difference is in result.
Our clients react the same way when they visit other shops and shows. They are all already in the new world of audio This world we will share soon.
Audiogon is a lot of fun for me. I need to laugh all the time when I read the reactions.
Lol:)
When I take a look at most systems overhere at Audiogon it proves that systems are chosen by trial and error.
We will demo and proof that with Tru-Fi you always will create a superior level. We have proven this to many people already. The difference is we will share it now with every one.
We want as many people possible to bring them to a new level in experience their music. Tru-Fi brings audio much more close to how music sounds in real. And it proofs that the level of emotion and exitement is superior.
Bo being empowered to hijack another thread for free advertising.....
Such innovation should easily support paying for publicity but granted free is more cost effective.
I would not rank Bo’s campaign as most self defeating I’ve seen but its up there. At least in these parts. I’m sure there are some out there with a budget seeking a guru who might buy into it.
In Bo’s defense, at least he puts it all out there with little obfuscation. His goals are clear if not so much his unique innovative approach so good job there.
You just keep showing your ignorance when you criticize my gear. Just as you look ignorant dismissing Wilson. Take a good look at those tweeters on your favorite spurious artifact producing speakers - too tall for the job - technically inadequate for the job. You like spurious artifacts that give you your 3D circus performance. No doubt it is impressive. No doubt many audiophiles crave this kind of show. Others have different needs like accuracy, correct timbre, balance and ability to play at realistic sound levels without ultra low levels of distortion. Sorry but 3D SFX is not what I am looking for in audio.
Audiogon is a lot of fun for me. I need to laugh all the time when I read the reactions
Yes for me too. I got a good laugh when I saw your system set up so "proffesionally". All nicely lined up against the wall. Tru-Fu is probably hiding behind the curtains?
In 3 years of time we auditioned only one system who showed all the parts of Tru-Fi. It had the same kind of structure we use but without Statement Audio Pro-measurement.
Tru-Fi is a totally different way of creating an audio system. Like Statement Audio Pro-measurement is a new approach to disclude the acoustic limitations.
Beside the acoustic limitations, creates S.A.P. much more details which are gone with any other highend pre amp.
In a comparison with an Audio Research Ref -5SE the differences could not be bigger.
We used the same Pass Labs Poweramp, AQ Redwood, 2 pairs of AQ Wel Signature xlr and Purist Audio Limited Edition luminist powercables.
The 5509 with S.A.P. had a much deeper and weider stage. The Ref 5Se created 0.5m of stage depth. The 5509 eith SAP can create 5-6metrres of stage depth with the same recording.
The 5509 could reveal details like the articulation of vloices which were fully gone with The AudioReseach.
Even in layers and emotion the 5509 outperformed the 5SE with ease.
The low freq went a lot deeper and had more layers compared to the 5SE.
The individual focus of instruments and voiced was so much shaper and precise than the 5SE. Soon a person with an Absolore pre amp of 30.000 dollar will come to my house. I will ask him if he is prepared for a shootout.
We have proven to many tube owners that our sound shows much more layers and creates more emotion thanb their tube pre amp and poweramp.
We want to use more shootouts in audio. We will make profesional videos of it.
You life in the past and we live in the future. When you audition S.A.P. you will understand that it does not makes sense anymore where they stand.
Many people with highend sets were amazed that we could create a level they never experienced before. The were the most impressed that even the loudspeaker is on the side and the other is a little more free does not make a difference.
S.A.P. adapts the speakers. It knows were it stsands in the room. With a professional microphone the volume of the left and right speaker is exactley the same. Even when the stand differently placed.
Another stunning thing is Stealth low freq. This creates a new reference in low freq. Many people called it the best low freq. they ever auditioned.
Because it puts the subwoofer in phase with the loudspeakers. Beside this the system knows exactley were it stand in the room.
The energy is exactley were it is on the recording. Never before you hear the energy of instruments fully free in space just like in real. This is not possible with old fashion audio without S.A.P.
Plutos the Pass labs X150 is one of the weakest amps Pass Labs ever created. The 150.5 had the same kind of limitations. I know them all.
Your Marantz Sa-1 is a 2 dimensional source. This means that the stage it build is not able to create over 1 metre of stage depth. It even creates less than 1 metre of stage depth. We tested it and we could proof to the client who owned it that it limited his 3D stage.
He sold it and bought an Olive 06HD. His stage became a lot deeper and wider.
Again this proves that most people buy 2 dimensional products.
read the review which I put here before. The truth is difficult for some people to handle. They can use words to attack me. Then I will attack you based on facts. Be a man and just focus on the remarks.
Its true that ribbon tweeters and folded ribbon tweeters are two different though related things.
That’s about as much as I know about it other than that folded ribbon tweeters tend to be more directional than domes and I’ve heard really good sound come from both set up well.
Its also true that I think Bo needs some human interaction training to go along with his hifi expertise. If I were his manager I’d stick him back behind that curtain with a gag in his mouth.
Much earlier I asked a question about what gear you use/recommend? Your response, best that I could discern as it was so convoluted, was that you considered that information exclusive and proprietary. Now we discover, thanks to detective work by ct0517, that your system is comprised of excellent gear, yet gear that is available to mere mortals.
Now that that mystery is unraveled, please answer the last question that I asked:
How does S.A.P. eliminate early reflections (such as those from your uncovered wood flooring) that smear time coherence?
Bo, ......your head is 2 dimensional lol :) Do you seriously think that some crappy messed up network player can compete with
Marantz SA-1? I have owned the Olive 06HD as I have loads of other digital. Olive is sonically light years from SA-1. And yes I have also done a lot of shootouts from Accuphase to Zanden. As for Pass X150 I sold it over 10 years ago. For it´s used price it is great amp. Much better than some alephs.
I looked at the stereophile article and I am entirely correct. The folded ribbon AMT style tweeter is indeed too large for the high frequencies it is producing. Although not an Appolito design for this particular model, MA have used this style frequently.
In short, none of what you have said or alluded too (including insults of other people's systems/approach, or their manliness and your exclusivity to truth) indicate anything other than you are a narrow minded shrill for MA.
Your all are such gentlemen/women, I have a whole different attitude towards anyone whose main message is that what you own is crap, whether it is or not. Having to believe that one's own opinion and material things are superior than everyone else's is a symptom.
But he will keep on saying it, over and over. Bo, stay on Europe's A'gon.
In a A-B shootout the Pl-200 II outperformed the Sasha. This is how audio is being exposed.
When people read the things they do not want to hear or read they directly go on an attack. That is fine with me.
Audio is being fought out by sound. The best one always wins.
I do this since I was 6. I had the freedom to test hundreds of amps, sources, cables and many tools in audio for almost 19 years of time.
I sold many brands you own so we know exactley the DNA and quality of them. The level in accuracy how we work is new in this world. It proves a new and superior level.
We will proof it by sound, than you can respond :)
Again,with the kind permission of Bo, the group and the moderators kindly please allow me to expand a bit on TruFi, what it means for the world of music reproduction systems and how it will change the industry.
Kindly please remember that I am not not a spokesman for TruFi. I am a client of Bo's and it has been proven to me and it has been proven to everyone that the world of music reproduction systems is shifting from one of widdley-tiddley voodoo to TruFi, which is recognized by all who hear it.
Bo does shootouts. Using properties identified under TruFi and measurement techniques, Bo can demonstrate a diversity in sound that no one else can deliver. He can do this because he alone has developed TruFi, the only means so far developed to allow music reproduction systems to show the true diversity of sound that only TruFi can deliver, so far.
Until now music reproduction systems have been built using information from paid for advertising and "reviews" and trial and error approach. This is why all
music reproduction systems
other than TruFi are 1D or 2D while TruFi systems are 3D. This has been proven many many times, so there's no need to debate that here.
As I said earlier but some seem to have not understood Bo is an innovator, trailblazer, and a visionary. As such of course he is a threat to the current establishment of hi-fi and music reproduction systems. These people need to defend their businesses and hi-fi religion so they do that here! Some have accused Bo of using this group for advertising but the opposite is the truth. It is Bo's attackers who use this group to promote their own self interests above those of the true lover of music, which is all about emotion, and the
music reproduction systems we use to reproduce it.
TruFi works with properties and develops diversity no other music reproduction systems can. This has been proven many times and is a fact. It is also a fact as Bo has so clearly stated that this is not an opinion but a FACT that TruFi can do this.
I will not call the Audio Research Reference 5SE garbage but it is close. For much less money you can have TruFi and for the same money you can have a music reproduction system that will make the ARC sound like a cheap Chinese slave-built toy. But you cannot just buy this equipment as Bo has stated because it is only with TruFi that this level of performance can be obtained. There is only one source of Tru-Fi and that is Bo.
In the future you will read what you have written here and be embarrassed that you were all so ignorant of the potential of TruFi. This is the burden that visionaries, innovators and trailblazers must endure. So it was with Edison and Tesla and the Wright Brothers. Of course it is easy to criticize! Man will never fly! We will never have electric light! We cannot have Tru 3D sound! Do you see? You are all like a box of rocks serving as obstacles to the growth of TruFi, the only method for
music reproduction systems to deliver TRUE 3D sound.
I again thank Bo, the group and the moderators for allowing me to elucidate on the true nature of TruFi. if we were lying about TruFi or using the group for advertising surely the moderators would not allow it! Please kindly consider that as you post the anger driven attacks against Bo in this group. Perhaps the moderators know a thing or two that the rest of you do not, other than Bo.
"
I am a client of Bo's and it has been proven to me and it has been
proven to everyone that the world of music reproduction systems is
shifting from one of widdley-tiddley voodoo to TruFi, which is
recognized by all who hear it. "
Bring it to a US audio show. Then we can hear it and see.
We are all deeply thankful to Bo for his continuous enlightenment! Bo is a king of audio!
Yo!
Problem with Bo is, he keeps praising himself or his system about "this and that". The forum would like to "see" and "hear" some of what he talks about. It is easy for Bo to look at our system, and judge it. If his system is really so great, he should post it here or provide link on the site where he has posted it. Come on Bo, be a man. It's alright if your system is different that what us mortals have. How do you expect people to believe you, if you just say you are great, your system is great, your devices are great, etc? You either prove it or stop your self advertisement.
Thank you timrhu and czarivey for the visual aids, it helps my comprehension immensely.
I thought I was ok until clearthink brought up "the world of music reproduction systems is shifting from one of widdley-tiddley voodoo to TruFi, which is recognized by all who hear it."
Unfortunately, I have spent years tuning my modest system to produce the most accurate widdley-tiddley voodoo possible. And now I ask, what next!
Bo should meet Audiotroy who works for Audio Doctor from Jersey City NJ. I call that shop the king of audio hyperbole. Whatever they are selling at any time (and that changes like the wind) is the best ever based upon the best engineering and is, simply, well undeniably the best there is at 3x, 5x or whatever the cost. Audiotroy pollutes threads with claims of superior knowledge and superior experience and then spouts pure unadulterated salesmanship. Audiotroy is pushing the new Paradigm speakers which I have heard and are worthy of some praise. Bo does the same thing as he relentlessly pushes Monitor speakers which I can also attest are excellent speakers for the $ throughout the line. Bo is the king of a kind of vague, meandering, audio verbosity. BUT...... Many of us have auditioned many speakers with many combinations of electronics before making our choice. Many of us have selected speakers which we believe (as do many others) are superior to Paradigm's or Monitor's latest. So----Wouldn't it be great if Audiogon limited Audiotroy's and Bo's membership to a special thread in which only they could participate. There they would be condemned forever to speak and sell only to each other. It would be sad and hilarious. But at least we would be entertained by them instead of bothered by them. I used to engage in threads with many of the members who are here for the right reasons---to share their joy, love and experience in this wonderful hobby which revolves around the love of music and how we hear it. But lately, I've come to feel like a bit of a hall monitor calling out the bad guys because I am so sick of blatantly close minded members who claim to have superior knowledge and spend their time lecturing others as to why their favorite brands are scientifically and factually superior to any other. They are not engineers and indeed often simply repeat the promotional highlights that are available to us on their brand's website. I hold in especially low regard audio salesmen who do this as they do not belong here. Can I get a witness?
I take exception to your claims about AMT’s compressing.
The real problem is, like many technologies, there are AMT’s and then there are AMT’s! Just like any speaker technology, no 1 aspect of a tweeter can tell you if it’s good or not. There are very very good Be tweeters but most are mediocre, as is the case for ANY other type of tweeter.
I have measured AMT’s from a top-end manufacturer and they are among the very best drivers in the world, ESPECIALLY when it comes to compression and time domain problems. They are also very flat and well behaved electrically.
Now, I am a fan of Monitor Audio for their engineering and price, but I have never heard or measured their latest. What I am most impressed with in the PL200 however is their step response. Absolutely outstanding for a non-time coincident 3-way.
Also, Monitor Audio doesn’t play the same frequency games Wilson/B&W/Focal/GE do. No dip at 2.4k and they use a very smooth instead of ragged tweeter which is in vogue and touted by some reviewers as most revealing. Kill me, they sound horrid to me.
Now, which of these should YOU buy?? I have no opinion, but I would not discount AMT’s at all. The very best AMT's hold their own against the very best of any other tweeter technology in time domain, frequency domain, distortion and lack of compression.
The difference where we are compared to the rest is galaxies away. 2017 will be the year we will share it, soon you will hear from it as I told before.
You have no idea that Tru-Fi will be a benefit for you all overhere. After that you will understand the words I wrote. Now we see that people react based on the knowledge and insight they own.
For us this is the past, like you go back 20 years in time. This is how we experience each single sustem over and over again. The people who create it still work on trial and error. We will proof on facts soon that this is extreemly ineffective. That it has nothing to do with personal taste.
Now I write this, you still don’t understand. But I promiss soon you will understand and than it will change your mind and thought about audio.
The audio industry slept for a long time, at that time I looked so much wider than any person ever did before. When I say; I have done thousands of tests, this is not a silly line what I write. No, it is the truth. For people overhere this is difficult to understand.
When I say: this is a part of who I am as a person, it means that it has become my second nature. This makes me able to see 3-4 steps further in sound than any other person can. And I can proof this by sound. And I can do it over and over again.
People still think audio is all about personal preference. We can proof by facts that their system is still incomplete and misses parts what influences our emotion. So when we create new parts of Tru-Fi ir sytem the level of emotion will become higher.
Each single person will prefer this over the sound that had. Tru-Fi has nothing to do with personal taste. That would be even silly or stuppid.
Each single person will prefer this, because it is based on the human emotion. People have no idea what the level of perfectionism I created. Because it improves faster than any one can imagine.
I wanted audio to sound like voices and instruments sounds in real. This is not only the sound, but also how voices and instruments they are projected and being formed as a shape.
It is based on patters in sound and in vision. I learned to take part all the different parts of a single tool in an audio system. This was needed to understand how it is build. I needed to understand the dna.
Tru-Fi will help you to use the full potential of a loudspeaker. Now we see that most systems only use a small part of the full potential of a loudspeaker. And again we can proof this by facts. For me it is simple like 1 and 1 is 2.
When you have no idea what the properties are of the speaker you bought, you will never be able to use them. It is that simple. This is what we show to our clienst. To make them aware of what is missing and also what is there.
When i said; they have to pay for it, I meant I will not give it away for free. Because I will use the money for our foundation. This is my goal in life. To give peope who have nothing a better life.
I created Tru-Fi to give as many people possible a much higher in sound realism. I love music since I was a child, and now I want more people to experience how music sounds in real. Fully free tangible in front of you with all the diversity the music owns. So you can really experience the emotion of the music.
We all see that the world becomes harder each year. And people are more divided than ever. Life is not about what you take, but all about what you give. That is why a foundation is my goal in life.
I had it in my mind for many years, but I didn’t know how to create it. But now I reached a level in insight that I understand how to create it.
It is the same thing as I created Tru-Fi. It is all about becoming aware of why it is as it is. I will use the money we make for different projects for people who have no option to create a better life than they have now. Because they will never have an option to make it better.
I do not do this to show how great I am, I want to show that how simple it is to help others who have nothing. It is not about me.
I did not create Tru-Fi for myself, but I did it so people can experience a new level in sound realism. Music is all about emotion, this is what Tru-Fi gives to people.
The emotion music possesses is what will touch you. Music makes people become more humane. It will bring the emotion inside you to come alive.
I am sorry that my words offended others and I want to apologize to those who felt offended. It was never my intention, I wish a better sound for each single person. Like I wish a better quality for each single manufacturer who make audio products.
That is why I want audio to become more transparent and honest for customers who buy it.
I promiss soon you will understand what Tru-Fi will do with your system and the level you can reach in audio.
People need to learn not to focus on products and brands. Only when you focus on sound you will reach a superior level in quality.
When you use audio by Tru-Fi even each Monitor Audio loudspeaker will sound totally different than the way the rest creates an audio system.
That is why the focus of how you think about Monitor Audio does not make sense. Because you see it as a product or brand. Like you auditioned it by trial and error. The limitation is that all of you only will hear a small part of the whole quality it could create.
Like I said before; it will be a demo what is still incomplete. This counts the same for other products. Tru-Fi will give access to all the properties a product owns. This makes a huge difference to all the trial and error ways of creating an audio system.
For us Monitor Audio is only a small part of Tru-Fi. Tru-Fi is in charge how an audio set is being created. All products are only used based on the properties they own. Only the properties matter and this is what we use.
That is why audio is all about sound and not about a brand or product. Products are of minor importancy in our world. This sounds crazy and difficult to understand for you. And we understand this.
Tru-Fi is a different approach, but based on the human emotion so much more effective.
Now it is time to reveal what Tru-Fi is and how it works.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.
