Why Does Expensive Gear Seems To Sound Better?


 

So I came across this for pure amusement! 

Thanks to…
Andy G.

Why Expensive Gear Seems to Sound Better

High-end amplifiers keep flying off the shelves despite measurements showing most sound identical. Why? Simple: human psychology, not engineering, is doing the heavy lifting.

Our brains pull some pretty amazing tricks when we listen to music. What we expect to hear, what we see, and our own biases shape our experience more than the actual sound waves hitting our ears.

Here’s why expensive gear can seem to sound better:

Expectation bias

It’s not the amp that’s making things sound different—it’s how we perceive it. (From: Unsplash)
It’s not the amp that’s making things sound different—it’s how we perceive it. (From: Unsplash)

When someone thinks they’re listening to fancy gear, they’ll usually hear improvements, even when nothing’s changed. It works just like those wine tastings where folks go crazy for “expensive” wine that’s actually cheap stuff in a fancy bottle.

Study after study confirms this effect, and audio equipment proves especially susceptible.

Visual impressions

A massive, shiny amplifier with blue glowing displays and hefty controls triggers something primal in us.

“This thing looks serious, so it must sound serious.”

Psychologists call this the halo effect, where positive impressions in one area influence our perception of unrelated qualities. The impressive appearance creates an expectation that colors everything we hear.

Price justification

Nobody wants to feel like a sucker after dropping big money on gear. So, your brain will work overtime to justify that purchase and find improvements that aren’t really there.

The audio industry isn’t shy about leveraging all this. It’s built an entire vocabulary of poetic, often vague terms to describe sound qualities that may not show up in measurements.

That’s why, words like “musical,” “transparent,” and “warm” let us articulate what we think we hear, whether it’s there or not.

None of this means audiophiles are imagining things. The differences they perceive feel very real because they are real psychological experiences. But in scientific terms, the audio signal reaching the speakers hasn’t changed. The brain just fills in the rest.

 

 

Where Amplifier Upgrades Actually Make a Difference

Knowing how amplifiers really work helps you make smarter audio purchases. The upgrade cycle can be tempting, but understanding where your money actually makes a difference can save you from expensive disappointments.

That’s not to say amplifier upgrades are always pointless. There are situations where they absolutely make sense:

  • Your current amp lacks sufficient power and starts distorting when you crank up the volume.
  • You need specific features (like balanced inputs, streaming, or built-in room correction).
  • You love the sound of tube amps or want to experiment with different amp topologies (Class A, Class D, etc.).

At the end of the day, the truth about amplifiers is kind of freeing. You can stop chasing an imaginary “perfect” amp and focus on what truly shapes your listening experience.

So the next time you’re struggling to hear the difference between two amps, consider the possibility that the difference might not be there at all.

Audiophiles often experience psychological components such as brand loyalty, confirmation bias, and the desire for superior sound quality, which can influence their choices and perceptions of audio equipment. This can lead to a focus on the equipment itself rather than the music it is meant to enhance, sometimes resulting in obsessive behaviors or emotional attachments to gear.
Ultimately, the conversation surrounding the legitimacy of audiophile opinions highlights an amusing paradox—while listeners may endlessly debate the significance of blind testing and expert opinion, the real magic happens in subjective enjoyment. As many users attest, at the end of the day, personal taste reigns supreme and dictates the type of gear enthusiasts gravitate towards. Whether one is an experienced audiophile or just starting their sonic journey, unabashedly enjoying tunes is at the heart of this passionate community. And isn’t that what music—or any other art form—is truly about? Listening with an open heart (and ears) tips the balance back to the essence of sound—freedom, expression, and connection.

 

The journey for superlative sound can be an incredible experience, and can take decades to reach that “Audio Promised Land”. But boy, it is so worth the ride!

Either way, it’s not about better or worse. It’s about what you enjoy.

 

Love Your Music, Love Your Gear! It’s Your Life! Life goes fast, I try to enjoy every moment! Jam on!

Tomorrow is never promised. 
 

bjpd57a1

What a trite and annoying thread. All of this has been said before, and of course it isn’t true. Amplifiers all sound different, some better than others, and frequently but not always more expensive ones are the ones that sound better. That can be due to superior parts or layout etc. 

I do believe that there are old classics that sound subjectively better than some newer more expensive amps to some of us, because I have experienced this myself, but to say relax, they all sound the same is just regurgitated nonsense.

 

 

 

There's a little truth and a lot of BS on both sides.

I did like the sound of the $144K reference cables I listened to yesterday at AXPONA.  The sound was pristine all the way until the speakers. 

 I stopped reading after this :

High-end amplifiers keep flying off the shelves despite measurements showing most sound identical.

 

How does a measurement show sound ?

Every case is different. I just got a Townshend Allegri Reference mk2 passive preamp, easily the most expensive piece of equipment other than my speakers. The results are highly apparent over lesser expensive preamps like the well regarded Wyred4sound stp-se grade 2, also passive up to 64 db.

@jji666  Good one! Thx for the smile  

I did like the sound of the $144K reference cables I listened to yesterday at AXPONA.  The sound was pristine all the way until the speakers. 

My question: Do manufacturers deliberately "dumb down" their less expensive offerings to make the expensive stuff sound "better"? 

Never Argue with idiots,
They drag you down to their level,
And beat you with experience.

Seems we could make the exact same psychological assumptions for those who claim there is no value in higher priced components and/or measurements tell the whole story. Oh, but then these people are beyond human foibles such as subjectivity, or at least that's what they tell themselves.

I used to thank that until I auditioned the SPL Elector and S900 amp. Out went all my Pass Labs gear. I will let my ears make those decisions not my wallet anymore. 

IME, it’s only speakers and phono cartridges that have a mostly consistent price/performance correlation. Even with those there are caveats, such as aftermarket styli or DIY speaker kits. 

These days, with the availability of high performance class D, ultra low noise SMPSs, and perfectly transparent but affordable preamps and DACs, the electronics are mostly a crapshoot and it comes down to subjective preference more so than price. Expectation bias is definitely the reason why high priced DACs and streamers continue to sell, IMO (sold my $3K DAC after an A/B with the Topping E70V). It’s easy to be fooled when one neglects to perform a level-matched A/B and temper the excitement of a freshly unboxed toy. 

Then there’s the matter of synergy. A pair of Magnepan speakers is going to sound better with a relatively low price/high power amp (say, an old Parasound) than they will with a high priced 50 WpC amp from the likes of Crayon. 

 

 

Did I somehow wander into ASR or something?

 

Upon further reflection and re-reading the OP he says he posted it because it amused him so perhaps not an ASR cultist.

Post removed 

@deep_333 - you can explain anything by this. Don't hear difference in "musical Ethernet router"? Here:

low quality listener, i.e. has very low quality ears through combination of genetics, age/exposure associated degradation, lack of training

So basic understanding of an amp is the same as engineers designing components?  I think not.  Limited measurements do NOT encompass all that we hear.

@faustuss I have listened to a large number of amplifiers from days gone by and some current ones, and I could easily live with most of them. I can’t afford them being a Disabled Veteran but I enjoy listening to music on fine equipment.

 

 

I have always been a believer that what a person likes is their choice and trying to force your own likes to them rarely works out. It’s sort of like ice cream, you

know, some people like rocky road and some like pistachios and cream.

Some folks like hotdogs and some people like hamburgers, to each their own.

Audio is a personal experience, I can appreciate fine equipment of course,

but at the same time I can enjoy music on a well matched system that is not too terribly expensive. But that’s just me.

In our current state of division in the world, I think we should all respect one another’s choices, even if it is not what we would choose. Because it’s not your choice it’s theirs. Why shame someone because they like what you hate?
You don’t have to live with the person, so why should it matter what they listen to.

But I understand that many people have to always be “right” and that makes them feel superior to others. How is that working out for you?
 

Music is such an incredible gift in this world, I am glad music brings pleasure unlike anything else in this world to me. 
 

When listening to music the likes of say, Hiromi, with Anthony Jackson, and Simon Phillips “Voice” CD or Philippe Saisse (Any Of His Discs) I experience what can only be described as an out of body experience. I am grateful beyond measure to be able to enjoy music at this level.

I have read countless threads on the Audiogon forums and one thing is always 100% certain is no matter how general the subject is, there is always some folks that are infuriated by the post. 
 

I saw this article and it made me laugh, but I am easily amused sometimes.

My wish is that Everyone can find enjoyment in their music of choice with their system of choice, regardless what anyone else thinks.

If this post offended anyone, please know that it was never intended to do so.

Meanwhile know that I am rocking from 10hz - 30khz give or take with visceral clarity and impact where every instrument sounds like it should with discrete separation.  I call it “The Butter Zone” because it’s so smooth.

There is no substitute for raw power! Rarely high spl’s are employed as fullness in sound is achieved by abundant amplification along with 
multiple powered subwoofers, and dynamic speakers to achieve an ideal synergy for my ideal listening space.

 My setup is crazy way outside of the box, and I won’t bother going into any details about it, suffice to say it’s capable of seismic levels of often frightening transient levels. Sound is really cool when you throw powerful amplification with control and clarity to drivers capable to deliver effortless performance all day long.

 

Enjoy Your Music! I Am! 


 

Interesting reading on a cold snowy day in mid April!  Takes me back to my early teens when my friends would argue over who was the fastest and best guitar player.  I too love black faceplates and blue meters.  Equipment has to sound good and look cool for me to be happy.  Buy what you can afford, trust your ears and eyes and enjoy your music.  

Henry David Thoreau would disagree.

Indeed, he only listened to his mother's stereo when he was visiting her for lunch.

@bjpd57a1 Thank you for an interesting post and thank you for your service and sacrifice.  Here are my precepts on the post;

  1. When copying and pasting, this technological advanced forum webpage often wrecks havoc with font/formatting.   Please correct this by highlighting and reformatting to make the read easier and less annoying.  
  2. Your conclusion or the conclusion of the posted article … Either way, it’s not about better or worse. It’s about what you enjoy . Love Your Music, Love Your Gear! It’s Your Life! Life goes fast, I try to enjoy every moment! Jam on! Tomorrow is never promised … is not trite or annoying @roxy54 and all others that posted similar feelings. Rather, love of music is the essence of being an audiophile and it is a fact that I realize more at my age that tomorrow is never promised. 
  3. The psychology of thinking something more expressive is true with some.  The listening skills of many on these pages that I respect know that is not fact.  However, if someone has the means and gets enjoyment from having the most expensive kit, let them dwell in their feelings and do not ridicule.   The point is stated in the conclusion- enjoy the music and your equipment.  

  4. The psychological of thinking something expensive is better is stated incompetently.  The factors listed are correct but there are many more theories in play including:  the impact of social comparison, expectation management, cognitive bias and framing, and emotional and cognitive processing.  I will not bore all with theory but suffice to say, it is understated in the article.

  5. The support for the conclusion occurs in the middle of the article and includes the following statements: there real magic happens in subjective enjoyment and personal taste remains supreme and dictates the type of gear enthusiasts gravitate towards.  The fact remains that no matter how objective we attempt to make our equipment evaluation process, it will always be a subjective evaluation of our own interpretation of how well recorded and reproduced music sounds in comparison to instruments played live.   Those on these pages whose subjective opinions I respect tend to be those who have stated they are/were musicians or in the recording industry, or laypersons like me that listen to live musical performances often.   However, we should all be tolerant of those with other positions including those who like beautiful equipment with black faceplates and blue meters and lights.   It’s ok to love beautiful equipment and I respect you for your choice.   Respect my opinion that the sound is not to my liking.   

  6. I was of the same opinion that raw power was everything but over the years I have realized that it is not.  Power must be correlated to speaker loading and efficiency, and room size, but I know of many lower power amplifiers that produce dynamic and dense sound. It is complex from an electrical design perspective and includes other factors such as power supply, power reserve, slew rate, thermal stability, load stability and much more.  I have found power output ratings not as significant as I once thought. 
     


 

I would draw an analogy with the art world.  The British Broadcasting Corporation's series Fake or Fortune uses a combination of forensic science, provenance and expert subjectivity to try to determine whether a painting is by a famous artist, and therefore worth a fortune, or is a fake by somebody else, and therefore virtually worthless.

What is being compared is the same paint on the same canvass in the same frame!

The only difference is the resale value

....whenever I read of an expensive piece of equipment being superior to anything else being touted, I think back to the BBCs' 'Top Gear' shows' track performance board and the vehicles upon it....

The Lotus Elise was near the top of it, kicking the tush of more expensive hypercars at much higher entry costs....

Personal preference is for nimble and light of weight v. sheer horsepower.

An even more telling contrast is a superbike v. nearly any sportscar.

A good bike will suck the doors off nearly Any car.

I depended upon that in the past.