@bjpd57a1 Thank you for an interesting post and thank you for your service and sacrifice. Here are my precepts on the post;
- When copying and pasting, this technological advanced forum webpage often wrecks havoc with font/formatting. Please correct this by highlighting and reformatting to make the read easier and less annoying.
- Your conclusion or the conclusion of the posted article … Either way, it’s not about better or worse. It’s about what you enjoy . Love Your Music, Love Your Gear! It’s Your Life! Life goes fast, I try to enjoy every moment! Jam on! Tomorrow is never promised … is not trite or annoying @roxy54 and all others that posted similar feelings. Rather, love of music is the essence of being an audiophile and it is a fact that I realize more at my age that tomorrow is never promised.
-
The psychology of thinking something more expressive is true with some. The listening skills of many on these pages that I respect know that is not fact. However, if someone has the means and gets enjoyment from having the most expensive kit, let them dwell in their feelings and do not ridicule. The point is stated in the conclusion- enjoy the music and your equipment.
-
The psychological of thinking something expensive is better is stated incompetently. The factors listed are correct but there are many more theories in play including: the impact of social comparison, expectation management, cognitive bias and framing, and emotional and cognitive processing. I will not bore all with theory but suffice to say, it is understated in the article.
-
The support for the conclusion occurs in the middle of the article and includes the following statements: there real magic happens in subjective enjoyment and personal taste remains supreme and dictates the type of gear enthusiasts gravitate towards. The fact remains that no matter how objective we attempt to make our equipment evaluation process, it will always be a subjective evaluation of our own interpretation of how well recorded and reproduced music sounds in comparison to instruments played live. Those on these pages whose subjective opinions I respect tend to be those who have stated they are/were musicians or in the recording industry, or laypersons like me that listen to live musical performances often. However, we should all be tolerant of those with other positions including those who like beautiful equipment with black faceplates and blue meters and lights. It’s ok to love beautiful equipment and I respect you for your choice. Respect my opinion that the sound is not to my liking.
-
I was of the same opinion that raw power was everything but over the years I have realized that it is not. Power must be correlated to speaker loading and efficiency, and room size, but I know of many lower power amplifiers that produce dynamic and dense sound. It is complex from an electrical design perspective and includes other factors such as power supply, power reserve, slew rate, thermal stability, load stability and much more. I have found power output ratings not as significant as I once thought.