DarTzeel’s new direction


Looks like DarTzeel is looking to start producing more affordable equipment. After reading a statement by the man himself he has decided to shift from ultra hiend to a more affordable alternative to his designs.

hiendmmoe
Post removed 

@tdudnyk 

Audiophilia is not about having the most cost effective audio system. It is about having the maximum audio performance that you can afford. I have always stretched for the very best achievable that I could possibly afford. That involves endless research, auditioning and always purchasing at the very limit of my ability. Then for around seven years I would be in heaven until I began to realize I could afford to assemble a significantly better system… enjoy, repeat. I am an audiophile.

@tdudnyk I think he’s incensed that his competitors are offering discounts which, in turn, put a bit dent in his business. My educated guess is that he misread the market and misunderstood the value of the channel. Clearly his competition has enough margin to work with and that’s another interesting point in all this.

This stuff is all subjective whether hi-end, mid, or low. And there’s so much of it. It really is akin to what you find in the luxury market. It’s not a necessity, it very much relies on marketing and a good dealer network—or a very, very strong direct approach.

If you’re complaining that the competition has undercut you, then either adjust or get out. I guess he is going to adjust. And that tells me, he thinks he can build something “as good” and less expensive which is rather ironic…

 

My only knock on the brand is the 250K+ mono amps. Here's why: if they are truly that transcendantly amazing, he should have no problem getting what he is asking for them and having a profitable, thriving business. But are they 2.5x better than Gryphon Apex's (which are class A and cost 100K)? I have the same problem with Burmester 159s and their 350K+ monos. 

Goodness, such rancor. Really, why? He's attempting to expand his market, big deal. As someone pointed out, there's only so many $250K amplifiers one could sell. And let's think about this: How many of our spouses shake their heads at the money WE spend "down" at our levels? How many have said "You want to spend HOW much on some ugly old speakers in our living room!?"

I came across this recently and it's made all the difference in my days:

"In a world where you can chose to be anything, choose to be nice."

Happy listening.

"Affordable," not necessarily "covetable."

 

@curiousjim 

Nice riff on audiophile stupidity.

 

Well who are any of us to argue with Grandpa? Just as easy to spot people who worked their entire lives and have nothing. Let people buy what they want as you have no idea of their motivation nor economic status. Jealousy is much uglier than what many of you would call first world indulgence. 

 

There can only be so many buyers of $250,000 amplifiers. At that level, a certain level of performance is expected, and appearance, but that isn't all of it. How much better are they than the units that sell for a quarter the price? Veblen goods and all. Limited production, limited availability, exclusivity, visibility. Still, he has to find some buyers, a rarefied few whose business is solicited by more than a few atelier producers. These are buyers who don't need his product. He has to attract them. Maybe he figures the way to do that is to make them even more exclusive: you can have one only if you order and pay for one. We'll call you when it's ready. One doesn't go to a Rolls Royce or Bugatti dealership and kick tires.

What I don't get is the brand dilution inherent in a lower-priced, stock item. He isn't he first to try this in high-end audio. OMA has done the same with the Fleetwood  brand. But OMA created a second brand, and doesn't appear to conflate the two. Both brands have similar approaches to materials: milled and torrefied hardwood, iron castings, slate. The Fleetwood line is sold through independent audio dealers, OMA is not. Unless DartZeel creates a separate brand that stands on its own there is risk of cheapening  the original brand. He has a problem also with being in Switzerland. Production costs there are very high. Even lower-tier brands like Pro-Ject make their products in lower-cost countries like Slovakia instead of Austria.

If I have extra money Iam willing to audition them.Other wise Iam happy with Plinius, mark Levinsons, and old Krell.And what I have.

Post removed 

Yup, and the talking heads are already talking it up. It’s the greatest thing since sliced bread. And it can be bridged so you can buy two!

I’ve heard Dartzeel a couple of times. I must say the stack that I heard was fantastic ….. but damn they’re ugly. I wouldn’t buy them even if I could afford. Aesthetics are important. 

Another gold plated toilet story….and pay for that ugly S… Not likely at any price. 

@gkelly  @stereo5 

 

Absolutely.  How kind that the owner is looking to "break into" the Mid-Fi Market by offering integrated boat anchors that retail for $35,000 instead of $60,000.  As we say in the South, "Bless his little heart....".

 

Meanwhile, there will be a line out the door of Bitcoin and Internet "new money" millionaires chomping at the bit to buy status.  Have at it.  I'll remain a happy Hillbilly burying my millions in Mason Jars in the hills of East Tennessee and being perfectly content with my vintage McIntosh, ARC, and Klipsch gear.  Grandpa always said it was easy to spot the rich people who never worked for their money...they were they ones spending it like there was no tomorrow.

Affordable integrated from him would be at least $25-30,000.  That is not affordable to we “common folk”.

I would bet nickel that his version of affordable gear will still be unobtainable for the vast majority of us on this forum.