To my hearing,the lowest bass of the piano lacks the texture of a stringed bass..It strikes me as the kind of one note,thump thump bass you hear coming from a ricers trunk..
I will however note that when it comes to physical weight & body,the piano is my benchmark..
Why not the piano as a reference for bass
I see a lot of commentary/reviews on a systems bass response that all seem to hinge on the 41 hz double bass and such range. At 27.5 the A0 note on a piano seems a better point to judge. Lots of piano in normal music vs say an organ note. I know when I feel that deep chord played it is one of things I enjoy about listening the most! Was listening to Wish you were here live and the piano was sublime.
So is it more of how much musical energy is perceived in the 40 hz range or what that makes this more of a reproduction benchmark?
I welcome your input!
New Joe Bonamassa out BTW!
Personally, I think it is because piano live is amazing but it is difficult to reproduce well, so most systems would fall short. I have learned that over the years about horns. I tend to agree with you though. A good sample of test songs should include horns and piano to test a system’s ability to enjoyably reproduce those instruments. I don’t listen much to piano, just not my thing, but have really started to enjoy horns - feels odd to even type that because when I first started my system made horn sound terrible. |
The piano is a stringed instrument. It is one of the best to evaluate gear. If our gear can't make a piano sound real, we are missing something. I don't know the lowest note on a piano (in hz) but it is quite low. Cello lowest notes are 30 hz, I believe, also a nice indicator of how your system sounds. Pipe organ is probably best for the very lowest notes or some synthesized music as there is pretty much no limit to what digital is able to do. Lowest pipe organ notes are 8 hz from 64 foot pipes but more recordings will include 16 hz from 32 foot pipes. It's the lowest I've heard on a recording (D2D vinyl).. I believe the piano is one of the toughest instruments to reproduce through a stereo system and many do use it as a reference, including myself. Not necessarily for the bass but the bass is indeed quite low. |
Double bass can go as low as 31 Hz, but only on five-string instruments or when equipped with a low C extension. The lowest note on a standard four-string double bass is typically an E1, which vibrates at approximately 41 Hz. However, some five-string basses have a low B string (tuned to B0), which is around 31 Hz. Similarly, some four-string basses have a low C extension that can reach down to 33 Hz. So double bass is a good instrument as a reference for low bass. On the other hand, yes piano can go as low as 27.5 Hz. However, modern piano started to take its present form much later than Beethoven or Mozart time periods. While the specific frequency of the lowest note on Beethoven's piano is unknown, the range was limited compared to modern pianos. The lowest note was typically F1 (around 43.65 Hz) or C1 (around 32.70 Hz), depending on the instrument. So typically one may not hear the lowest note of the modern piano when listening to Beethoven or Mozart's works. And I am not 100% sure how many times one will hear the lowest note in jazz piano either, but I could be wrong. Hence, in my opinion the double bass is a more reliable reference of the bass than piano considering the how often one can hear these lower notes. One can clearly hear the purring of the double bass in jazz ensembles most of the time right in the middle of the sound stage. It would be interesting to hear from those who know how often one hear the lowest note of the modern piano (27.5 Hz) in classical and jazz music. |
The difficulty in using piano as a reference for bass response is that very few pieces stay down in the low bass for long enough. And the bass part is usually complementary to what's being played in the right hand so cognitively it's difficult to just listen to the bass part by itself. And if it' a grand piano, it usually has a lot of reverberation so the ADSR envelope of the notes is very different to an acoustic or electric bass. But of course, piano is still useful for gauging the bass response of system at frequencies that a string bass does not reach. Synthesisers are arguably even more useful. |
Okay so I didn't clearly articulate my opinion of the extreme low bass on the piano..YES I know it is a stringed instrument but again I stand by my take on it's lack of texture compared to a plucked or bowed bass.. |
problem with the piano as a particular bass instrument is its relative lack of portability. that aside, unless it is miked closely, the bass fundamental lacks sufficient volume to poke through a dense mix. that said, the Beatles used the left hand piano notes as the bass line in at least one song ["for you blue"], and pianist Jess Stacy used his left hand as the bass line in several songs performed in concert with Benny Goodman at his seminal '38 Carnegie Hall jazz concert. unfortunately in that case the abysmal recording quality resulted in Gene Krupa's booming kick drum and floor tom drowning out most of Stacy's otherwise well-done bass line. |
I understand the Bosendorfer Imperial piano has an extra register at the bottom end of the scale and will play down to 16.5Hz. I’ve not heard one on a recording, but my College had one in the Hall, and it was mighty powerful when well played! @Freediver, thank you for reminding me of this. Now I’ve got to hunt for a recording! |
I wasn't trying to give you a hard time. Just struck me as funny that you wouldn't think of a piano as a stringed instrument and I know that you realize that it is. As others point out, the deepest bass notes on the piano are often accompanied by other notes and are often short in duration, unless the sustain pedal is used for more than a second or so. I'm sure we all know all this stuff. Also, pointing out the new Bosendorfer and I think some other makers having the extended bass pianos. I've not heard one yet except on computer video, doesn't quite do it justice. This is all interesting reading.
|
@guscreek Interesting question.
@toddalin Terrific answer. Do you play? |
Played clarinet from 5th through 12th and keyboards in a garage band in the late 60s early 70s. Had equipment to die for back then (Hammond, Hohner, Vox, Farfisa, Moog and EML synths), but sold it off to pay for college.
Another thought on the topic. You hear basses go down to their low E-string literally all the time, so people have a feel for it (did someone say reference?). But how often you you hear a piano playing low A? |
After seeing Dick Contino I took up the Accordion. By the fifth grade the Clarinet was the only instrument open. I simply didn't practice enough and got the boot. Devastating at that age. Meh... When I got to High school Paul Jackson soon to be Herbie's Bassist on Head Hunters was playing upright in the school combo. Why he took the time to introduce a freshman / surfer to the Bass took me a while to understand. He later mentioned quarter notes were the first notes I played without any coaching. Sweet man. B3? My aching back. |
Piano bass limited in bass energy and duration and thus limited to be used in evaluation. However, if piano bass is individually important, no reason for that particular person to not target piano bass excellence. Also, bass preferences can differ - some seek bass energy, while others target better fidelity |
The late great Oscar Peterson was gifted a Bosendorfer late in life and he used that low register a lot. If you can find recordings by Telarc you might hear it. Also the series "Exclusively For My Friends" originally recorded on BASF in the Black Forest has him playing on a Bosendorfer that I believe has those low notes. There is also a great recording by Ahmad Jamal entitled "Ballades" on Harcourt of Paris that captures the full scale of the piano magnificently. |
Piano is great and offers something Bass fiddle does not! Check out recording such as Jin Ju playing Schumann Fantasie in C opus 17 (available on Qobuz) 3rd movement, between 2:20-30 min mark, Steinway 1901 Concert Grand Piano D per the liner notes. …the Piano can play bass notes quietly (hence the full name of the instrument - piano forte). While these low notes may seem anti-climactic for some, the low register of a good piano has an attack to it, especially when played softly, that is beautiful along with tone and overtones, and decay of the note. A fiddle is generally played loud and consistent in attack, and generally all the low notes all the time (so it’s convenient for use in evaluation as well as what the instrument offers in its own right), whereas piano is playing usually higher notes as well and more often. So you need the right recording. I’m not saying a bass fiddle can’t play notes quietly but the piano is pretty unique in what it does. If a system can produce these notes well, it is challenging. “One note bass” from some drums or techno or pop music is one indicator of bass but misses a lot in sonority and tone. |
Great post and comments. I also wondered about this too. Having access to a Grand and a choir (church) playing weekly, I get to listen to the Grand. I believe based on my hearing, i can get close BUT not the same, no matter what format i use.. Yes the lower registers and overhangs is where there is a noticeable difference. |
If we are talking double bass, in most classical music it is mainly bowed and in a big orchestral piece there might be eight or so playing in unison. There is no other sound like that with as much character! |
I find piano recordings to be largely unrealistic- either too closely mic’d or a portrait in miniature but often lacking the gravitas of a big concert grand. I’ve had some large concert sized grands in homes- there is a growl to the lower bass that is not evident on most recordings. I use piano recordings (a few select ones) to judge the attack and decay envelope of a system. I typically use simple recordings of small combo jazz to evaluate how "real" the bass sounds- I’m a big fan of Cecil McBee-- almost every record he appears on has something interesting and I’ve gotten my system to the point where the bass sounds very filled in and dimensional, not just a faint hologram, and you can hear the positioning of the instrument relative to others on the stage as well as its height-- very convincing sounding as a full-sized instrument. This was the result of a bigger room, the use of a pair of DSP’d 15" subs that were dialed in by ear after some basic measurements and a change of phono cartridge that gave me the gravitas that seemed to be lacking using Avantgarde Duos and Lamm ML2s. |
Pianos are percussion instruments according to the Hornbostel-Sachs system of categorizing musical instruments. It belongs to the percussion family because it produces sounds by striking the strings with a felt covered hammers. It is often miscategorized as a string instrument because it has strings. A pipe organ is the better choice for testing bass response. A Pipe organ which is a wind instrument, can produce very low notes, all the way down to 16 Hz, which is lower than what most full-range speakers can reproduce without a very good subwoofer. |
You are mistaken. The piano is classified as 314.122, considered a "cordophone" because they "produce their sounds by means of the vibration of a string or strings that are stretched between fixed points." More info here. Percussion instruments are classified idiophones. |
I was once tasked with designing a speaker system for amplifying electric piano. So I had to figure out how low in frequency the speaker system needed to go. Well it turns out that the fundamental of the 27.5 Hz low-A is down in level so much that it is of negligible audible significance. And, likewise its first overtone at 55 Hz! In fact a piano's lowest audibly significant frequency is the 62 Hz first overtone of low-B. So that was my target, and the customer liked the cab enough that he ordered a second one. Anyway, my point is, while piano DOES have very low frequency fundamentals, the energy of those fundamentals (and in some cases even their first overtone) is so low in level that, imo, piano is not really a suitable instrument for evaluating a speaker's bass response. Duke
|
Yep, that bass is a plucked double bass but on the released track it was 'doubled' by a bass electric guitar, according to the clip. My point was that there is much more you can do with a double bass than just pluck it. With classical music you can go to concerts which are not subject to electronic manipulation so there is a real reference for judging reproduced sound quality. A bowed double bass will make all your drivers work hard, including the tweeters! |
One of the interesting things about the piano is that the pianist’s ’touch’ does not alter the harmonics present in the note being struck. The best example I can give of this is the astonishing recording of Grieg’s Piano Concerto released in multiple surround sound formats by the Norwegian label 2L.no - see GRIEG Piano Concerto - Percy Grainger, Kristiansand Symfoniorkester, R – 2L Music Store Originally recorded on piano rolls in 1921, the new recording has a full symphony orchestra and a modern Steinway piano, played mechanically! This is one of those unusual recordings where both the performance and the sound quality are superb. Percy Grainger was a very interesting character, being Australian, a pianist, a composer, an athlete and a sadomasochist. His ideal instruments would have been synthesizers, but they were yet to be invented. I can’t let this go without mentioning the Australian designed and built Stuart and Sons’ Concert Grand Pianos, some of which extend the ’standard’ 88 note keyboard to 108 keys with the lowest note a subsonic 16-Hz |
No doubt the electric piano was attempting to sound like a real piano? When I play the lowest note on an acoustic piano, the amount of sound energy output is pretty directly related to how quickly I press the key. There is no artificial limit, and no shortage of sound either. The key mechanism is mechanical, not some electronic switch or sensor. And the whole piano resonates |
@richardbrand , my investigation into the loudness of the fundamentals and first few overtones of the lowest piano notes was based on the spectra of those notes played on a grand piano, as I figured that would be applicable to amplified electric piano. I presume the electric piano was "attempting to sound like a real piano". My customer said that he used the same model electric piano as Elton John. He mentioned it to me but I don't remember the specific model. I think it was a Yamaha. |
Thanks for the clarification! I don’t agree that the low notes on a modern grand piano (piano-forte or soft-loud) contain so little energy that they do not merit being reproduced. Bosendorfer and Stuart keep extending the keyboard downwards! I don’t think Beethoven would have agreed either - he was very quick to extend the range he wrote for when gifted pianos which went further up and down! There is of course a fundamental difficulty in judging sound quality against amplified sources - there is no original to compare to. Anyway, I use soft piano music to judge atmospherics and double bass for bass impact ... but the main thing is to enjoy your music |
@richardbrand wrote: "I don’t agree that the low notes on a modern grand piano (piano-forte or soft-loud) contain so little energy that they do not merit being reproduced. Bosendorfer and Stuart keep extending the keyboard downwards!" Just to be clear, I’m not saying that the lowest notes on a normal grand piano contain so little energy that they do not merit being reproduced. I’m saying that the lowest fundamentals (and sometimes the corresponding first overtones) of the lowest notes of a non-Bosendorfer grand piano contain so little energy that they do not merit being reproduced in a live music setting. I don’t know whether this is a grand piano or not, but it shows the spectra of the lowest notes starting with A0. Pause it after each note and look at how much energy is in the fundamental and first overtone: piano sound spectrum - YouTube Anyone else interested in why piano might or might not be a good instrument for evaluating a speaker’s bass response is invited to do the same. There’s just not a whole lot of true low bass energy. |
@audiokinesis From the comments, the guy who posted that video had no idea what microphone was used, let alone what piano or where the microphone was positioned! What I do find interesting is the low modes that are excited when high pitch notes are played. As I wrote above, the whole piano resonates - after all, it is filled with more than 88 tuned resonators and felt can only damp so much. Sure the low notes also carry a lot of harmonics, which is why the piano sounds like a piano and not like a pure pipe organ. Agreed, many people may not hear the fundamentals of low notes, and few indeed will directly hear the 16-Hz fundamental of a 108-key Stuart piano's lowest note. Few subwoofers will even go close with any sort of accuracy. Same goes for the 8-Hz fundamental of Sydney Town Hall's organ with its 64 foot long Gravissima pipe. You can't hear it but you can certainly feel it! |
I have always used well recorded piano compositions as an analytical tool for determining system. I will attempt to explain how I use piano recordings as an analytical tool. Rather than concertos and symphonies, it is best sonatas. I have some sonatas that, rather than solo piano, add a violin. That is in my opinion the best analytical tool. So how and why? … Crossover and Driver Integration: The piano, as others stated, is a singular instrument covering a broad frequency range. Problems with speaker driver integration and crossover design, or issues with ragged frequency response of electronics become easily evident by using well recorded piano recordings. As an example, in my past, I had hybrid Apogees. The lower piano registers were slow and smeared compared to the wonderful midrange and highs. Dynamics: While not the best test for percussive crescendos or rock dynamics, the piano by definition as a percussion instrument, is one of the best instruments to use for analyzing system dynamics, especially microdynamics. While I agree in part with @audiokinesis that the fundamental and first overtones do not have the same impact as other instruments, well recorded closed miked piano will have strikingly vivid first wave percussive impact. The real value is in analyzing the microdynamics of secondary harmonics and how ppp notes are developed in a composition. Detail Retrieval: Well recorded piano is an excellent test for detail retrieval including, harmonic decay, the sound of the hammers vs the strings vs sound board, as well as how the notes decay into the venue. Piano recordings can easily discern engineering techniques such as close miking vs far miking. A well designed audiophile system should be able to discern these attributes of well recorded piano. Here, combined with my discussion on dynamics, is where the piano is excellent for bass analysis. Analyze bass note first wave (fundamental impact). Is it sharp and striking. Analyze how it decays and the sound of all the secondary harmonics. Determine if you can discern the hammer strike from the string sound and sound board. This is an excellent test for comparing equipment. Imaging: Closed miked piano recordings will be able to develop an image that shows the position of the mike relative to the keyboard. Image palpability will be evident. In conclusion, piano recordings are an excellent analytical tool in general, and for bass as well. Yes, you will need to use other records of other instruments to analyze bass impact, but these others are not as good for bass detail and especially for bass integration. Apologies for my usual pontifications and typos in advance. |
Have you witnessed the 64 foot pipe? I've always wondered what the experience would be like. You probably never hear/feel that pipe by itself so maybe hard to describe. I'm sure you do feel it but it's hard to imagine hearing nothing at the same time. Am I making any sense? Just curious about this and have started conversations before about what we can hear/feel below 20hz. I have read that in some instances, some people are able to hear down to 12hz. I heard 17hz on my system with a test record, rather subtle but there. Nothing below that and nothing felt, probably just exceeded system capabilities. Played louder, I might have heard something, hard to say. Anyway, fun stuff. |