What is the current retail cost of your reference system?
It would be interesting to share this as I am not sure some of us understand how decisions are made within the framework of cost and resolution. Please avoid used prices as that muddys the water significantly. Also cabling costs would be revealing as well if willing to share.
i somehow surmise you are rather proud of that luxman ss amp!! 😂
seems to me like if the zu’s are your chosen speaker in the room shown, at their very high efficiency they would also be very well matched to some ultra sweetie pie lower powered tube amps (luxman makes some!)
Well chosen components in a well thought out system can sound absolutely fantastic. Not that long ago that is what mine was worth… a system to be proud of. What does your system look like? I don/t see it in your virtual systems.
While a custom built room is obviously the SOA way to go the average member here could get a massive upgrade by simply getting a room "kit". The first one is from Auralex, the second one from SonitusUSA. There are many others and treatments can of course be hidden behind acoustically transparent fabric:
@kota1You are correct. The improvement from my prior home to my new listening room is immense. That is probably the reason my 30 year old Legacy Focus speakers sound so wonderful. It's nearly the least expensive part of my system (which many believe the speaker should be the most expensive component/best component possible in a system).
$70,000 main system with back-up amps, pre-amps, DACs and transports. One LP turntable and two sets of high end speakers. $5,000 living room system. Missing from discussion-cost of listening room-$150,000
Hard to say since to claim Klipsch Lascalas II retail for roughly $5000 each. The new version is much higher, I bought B stock which has played flawlessly for over 5 years. My amp was about $4000. Source components are about another $5000. Cabling was about $2000. Sub and cabling about $1500, So how much is that? None of us worry too much about it unless a piece of kit dies. The, for me, is the side items such as new media, new tubes, headphones, headphone amp, record cleaning machines, special tweeks everywhere like Mad Scientist nano pods, contact goop, vibration reducing pads, and on and on,,,All very worth it to me.
I'm at about $97k retail for the whole system, all is current or semi-current production, with as much as possible purchased used. Cables are easily $20k at retail, to say nothing of what many would consider tweaks.
@jerryg123 I started I thread trying to encouage members to create their Virtual System. I see you have not done so. I know you partisipate a great deal on the forum, so may I ask why you are not posting your system?
I can't believe how many supposed grown men are whining about what other adults spent on their gear. "Insensitive"??? Why does that even appear here? My main rig has under $10k invested and if someone spent a million plus, good for them. It doesn't bother me in the least. Why should it? If you're unhappy with your lot in life, do something about your life. Tearing down someone else' life won't fix it.
Besides the below listed I have spare amps and speakers that are waiting for attention of one sort or another totaling approx. $2000-$2500. These are retail prices when new, not what I paid for most of it. For example, I got the Marantz PM-KI Pearl for half price, used, and a $600 pair of Kimber 8TC speaker cables for $100, also used. DIY speaker prices are parts cost, not including paint, time, etc..
In the end, prices are irrelevant. I thoroughly enjoy listening to music and my gear makes it happen. I get to share that love of music with my child, as well as our shared appreciation for the equipment. We also spent time together building speakers and a father/daughter relationship. It's not about what brings us the music, it's about what the music brings us.
1. For costing out a system, MSRP is an irrelevant number. I am encouraged by how many people have bought used or at a model closeout, as I did in assembling my systems.
2. No matter whether the system is 4 or 6 digits of expense, part of the fun is seeing how far your budget can take you.
3. (irrelevant) Some years back some economists studied the transaction prices of cameras on eBay. Looking at the unconditional distribution of prices (that is, ignoring which camera it was, etc.) they saw that it had two peaks: One around $200 and another around $800. Of course different people have different needs, and there is a distribution of budgets out there, but nonetheless, why a bimodal distribution. Further research uncovered that the piling up at $200 came about because that is what men thought they could get away with without disclosing price to their wives. The question I wished the OP had also asked is, "How many of you are candid with your spouse about how much you spend?"
I too thought the percentages were interesting, and I do keep a spreadsheet although I gave up on calculating losses selling gear. I bought everything I have now new.
I dont like sharing how much I paid for anything, but I've listed all components in my profile.
Integrated Amp 15%
TT 15%
CART 12%
Phono stage 9%
Speakers 31%
Streamer/DAC 7%
Cables 6% (This would be much higher if I didn't switch mostly to Zavfino, sold the more expensive Nordost cables)
Being a CPA I have an affinity for numbers. The interesting aspect of this thread for me, aside from the usual morality plays, are the percentages across components.
I am in the camp of allocating the highest percentage to speakers (50%). The next is my turntable/cartridge (11%), followed by power, pre, SACD/DAC (all 9% each). Sub (6%), interconnects (3%) and streamer (3%).
Price paid $40k, current retail $60k. I love my system.
My system is captured in my profile. It’s as much as a nice car not including music media - $75k or so
I enjoy music and I share with friends. The amount I spend is irrelevant because I enjoy when someone else shares their system with me. Consequently the cost is less important than the passion to me.
I've never thought more or less about other audiophiles based on the cost of their systems. One thing that is unique to audiophiles and their equipment is that I'd bet the majority of audiophile systems are bought and paid for and do not represent debt.
Why is it that people think that it's cool for someone to own an expensive boat, but take issue with someone spending an equal sum of money on an audio system? I'd bet far more boat owners have loans on their boats that are stretching them financially than there are audiophiles that have loans on their audio systems. Maybe I'm wrong and more audiophiles are in debt with their systems that I am thinking, but it seems to be that most audiophiles built their systems over many years.
Different people have different values and live different lives. Some commit themselves to education and hard work and make a lot of money. Others prefer a more balanced life between work and family and may have less resources.many spend money across a dozen interests… some over just a a few. Then there is your nature… frugal or indulgent. Many more parameters.
Folks that are passionate about work, and with few pursuits can end up with high dollar system. Folks with more diverse interests and less focus can end up with wonderful system but with less dollar value. Too much ego and we end up with folks just accusing others of not being the same as yourself.
Personally I respect folks with $10K systems that have a passionate love of music and put a huge effort into assembling it. I have a lot of respect regardless of the cost provided folks truly love and pursue great high quality systems… even if the cost five or ten times what mine does. I don’t assume just because someone has more money than I do that they are stupid. My experience has been exactly the opposite.
"Point is, why do we judge people for the amount of money they spend on their hobby?"
I judge people when they are jerks. Not when they disclose how much money they spent on X.
Here is my "favorite" quote: "But I didn’t buy a boat"
meaning the dude thinks he is so modest by depriving himself of a boat, he deserves his 100K rig. I know many of you don’t understand the audacity (hint: 97.6% of the people can afford to pay even the docking fees) which is exactly the point.
If you have the money, you do whatever you want with it. When you justify (again your money, don’t need justify it) it with BS or your explanation is just pure insensitive bragging, it might make you look like a unpleasant human being.
having been a high end residential real estate developer for twenty plus years, having seen hundreds if not thousands of very expensive homes, i can personally attest that people with money to burn and people with good taste are quite often in non-overlapping sets
that said, in the minority of cases where tremendous spending power meets great knowledge, well expended effort, and highly refined taste, the result can be truly exquisite
this reality certainly applies to stereo equipment and systems too
I wouldn't focus on a $ amount. You'll just get frustrated as you see people spend a small fortune. You should set a budget and then proportion it out % wise, with a majority spent on speakers. I will say that I've seen people spending $50-$100K on a system that sounds like crap due to improper pairing or horrible room acoustics. I have a system that I spent less than $10K (Dynaudio, Rotel, Sota) and it sounds great, but I was meticulous about placement, etc.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.