Really helpful for what? Looking at speakers? Not evaluating their sound quality cause that’s just ridiculous. Think about it .
So many YouTube clips to evaluate sound quality. Why???
There are several audio gear Youtubers chronically playing clips displaying speakers and amplifiers and even cables to have YouTube listeners evaluate sound quality. And then they go to shows and display music clips from the very small Hotel rooms. And yes I watch a few and some can be interesting. It's gotta be tough for these manufactures to go to these hotels all the time and deal with all the people. Basically, it's a mixture of all kinds of higher end components and somehow it's possible to appreciate what individual components sound like. $200,000 speakers surrounded by lots of other high-priced gear. How does one charge anything?
Are they trying to fool people with sound comparison music clips? What is the point and why are they wasting their time? Maybe headphones might detect something. I fail to appreciate why these individuals do this, and why do they dedicate so much time to this. Are they being paid to promote speakers and amplifiers? And then reading the comments where all these people seem to really believe they hear differences.
Time might be better spent explaining technical merits of the gear and opinions on how it sounds. And why their recommended gear is so expensive.
57 responses Add your response
Ugh. That must sound especially awful. I use Roku and a SPDIF breakout box to send the YT digital straight to my Bryston BDA-3. It still sounds awful because it’s lossy compressed audio. |
The only proper way to evaluate the sound quality of YT videos is to use a decent dedicated small desktop computer with a minimum of 8 GB of RAM - and connect it to your sound system through its high level input. Then simply view (and listen to) the videos with a small video monitor thru the browser of your choice. Better yet, download the audio portion of the posting, and play it through the outstanding, free VLC media player - which is tweakable to vastly improve sound quality. Finally, the built in DACs in Windows 10,11 do an excellent job of conversion - or, even install a quality sound card to further improve it. I have built a comprehensive music library this way, without "breaking the bank". Cheers, enjoy, and have some fun with this!
|
Thanks for the note! WT live recording (Dominique Fils-Aimé | Birds). Mics (Nikon D7100 w/ Shure ext. mics.): 8ft from speakers. AJ live recording (Birds). Mics: 11ft from speakers Alex/Wavetouch |
The streaming requires money too. Don't rely on tiny built-ins. Buy $30 Logitech computer speakers to hear YT more clearly. Hear the sound quality difference of below 2 YTs with different recorders. WT live recording (Dominique Fils-Aimé | Birds) Alex/Wavetouch |
Great point. Fun is usually what initially gets us into this hobby. Those early years of discovery were certainly exciting for me. It was only much later that a certain amount of world weary cynicism began to creep in. At the start of it all, it felt like being a kid in a giant toy shop.
I think the OP was questioning the validity of online listening tests via YouTube but that's not the main point of it anyway. As we always like to say, there's no real substitute for listening in person - YouTube is for fun. Everyone happy now? |
Insane as recording a video of their systems and tweeks are, YouTube are Paying Them for their content uploads. And you know what? We have Watched them. Youtube not paying us. Not me anyway. As for Shows and Salon auditions. Had gotten to know and in most cases hear Just the system in any environment. And have come pretty close to what they sound like in my home. But that took years of brick and mortar visits. 10s of thousands dollars spent.to gain that. So yes, show exhibitions Are very valuable to me. And Audiophiles Are F'ing Nuts. |
Nicely put. YouTube clips certainly do not all sound alike. I'd go further and say that a well recorded YouTube video will tell you a lot more than any written subjective account ever could. The difference between any impression gained by the written word and that of hearing it for yourself is fairly significant. You could say a similar thing about hearing a recording in the studio and then reproduced on CD or vinyl etc but there's nothing like hearing something for yourself. Presumably, when it comes to YouTube, on a pair of decent headphones.
|
Yes. YT videos reflect exactly what I heard and felt at The SHOW. ** I listen with $60 Logitech computer speakers. |
I must be the only one that watches YouTube on my TV played through my main system and my DAC. sounds quite good to be honest and some reviewers take the time to record well. most of the stuff I see is 44khz on my DAC. its good if they compare to another speaker, or if they use the same recording set up for all recordings you can get a feel for the differences to other equipment reviewed. not perfect but a good starting point IMO. |
I was interested in your historical posts, not many, and you visit lots of shows and recommend speakers. are you saying you can hear the difference with YouTube and it’s helpful? You saw it in person and are you saying YouTube reflects this accurately? I did check out your recommended video and it sounded very nice. The junkie guy YouTube video was well recorded, the guy knows what he's doing. |
What is absurd is not buying 400,000 bucks speakers so much as putting them in a non dedicated completely tuned for them acoustic room... This nourrish the complete ignorance of acoustic by consumers...Who think putting panels on a small room or in a large one is enough... it is not my experience in small room at all.. In general nobody sell acoustic save acoustician... In general acoustic cannot be sold ( panels can be) we must learn it in s specfic room by ourself... it is painstaking and long.... At least it was for me but more fun than anything with improvement each day or two, and more revwarding than any possible upgrade, no comparison.. Anyway new upgrade must be acoustically integrated ... Now knowing that most people can do that, it is sad, i recommend headphone... Anyway most live happy with their speakers in their living room why not? Only music matter at the end... But if we speak about audio truth, truth matter matter , there is no short cut for acoustic, but they are many shrortcut about costlier purchase choices..
|
I was in The SHOW Costa Mesa 2023 last weekend. I thought WT audio (rm #327) sounded noticeably clean and musical. I visited WT room twice to confirm what I heard. Today I watched Youtube videos of The SHOW and they prove I was right. YT is an one way to evaluate the audio system. Visit AJ’s channel to see all videos from The SHOW. Audiophile Junkie in rm #327 - The Home Entertainment Show 2023 |
@bruce19 your post is what audio formats YouTube accepts, not what it actually provides on the viewer end. It takes your source files and transcodes them to whatever lossy codec they use as part of H.264 or VP9 video encoding. Knowing they accept lossy files to begin with doesn't exactly inspire confidence. LOL. |
I used to be completely dismissive about these videos but then I began noticing that you can hear some differences provided the poster has set it up correctly. Obviously no critical listening can happen over YouTube, but, as others have said, you can get a taste of what a particular speaker sounds like and can certainly pick a favorite among two or more that are properly compared. I’m much more cynical towards other equipment, cables, etc. than I am speakers, but who knows, maybe I’ll come around on those someday, too. I should add that I have a pair of fairly good Audioengine powered speakers connected to my iMac, with very good headphones available if I'm really interested. |
I answered my own question, and here is the answer for anyone interested. These are the specs for YouTube quality for audio. Actually, it looks like you can transmit high quality audio given the availability of flak and wave formats, however than the unknown becomes the microphone quality and the recording process. Audio file guidelinesThe following guidelines are for audio tracks that you provide to YouTube. These guidelines describe the formatting specifications that yield the highest quality for playing audio on YouTube and for matching your audio tracks to the audio tracks of user-uploaded videos. Note that an audio track would only be played back on YouTube if you have opted to include that track in YouTube's AudioSwap program. Generally, we recommend that you upload the highest quality audio possible.
|
| Post removed |
Another factor is the quality of the recording itself. Really good recording quality songs sounds great on any system. The audio Youtubers have minimal views anyway. It's kind of impressive they spend so much time doing these videos and yet they don't make any money from the videos clearly. And then you have the backend which is people signing up for additional services for special care treatment Via patreon style marketing efforts which can be rewarding but this is difficult. Seems to be a cesspool and I wish they just spend time speaking about the quality and characteristics of the equipment versus the dribble. Also the touting of 100 Thousand dollar systems, $300,000 speakers, $30,000 power cords is absolutely ridiculous it hurts the Industry.
|
@boxertwin12 +1 |
Another example is the people in camera groups posting photos on Facebook and talking about the "sharpness" of a lens when Facebook so horribly reduces/destroys the quality and detail of photos to reduce file size, so no way to really evaluate in such a way. Also that most lenses produced over the past 50 years are sharper than human eyes could ever tell differences yet they argue endlessly... just like audio guys. No way to evaluate sound from a YouTube clip, but the banter about the experience of the listeners in the actual room may be valid.
|
Like Facebook I totally ignore it. I would not even no it existed until it was mentioned here. I have an acoustic image in my head of what I want to hear and I am only interested in getting my system as close as I can get to that image. This usually involves dealing with the technical aspects of reproduction. |
@hilde45 +2 Mike |
@pabs85 , and since they don't, one still is faced with the same 'go/no go' choice(s).... Case in point: I've got a 'now ancient' YT post of a pair of an early DIY Walsh pair, with some comments on why they don't sound like they did/do here. Mono Point/Shoot camera below fluorescent lamps in a commercial space, which was rather 'raw' at the time. Did I expect kudos? Not really, just wanted to document my 'sota' at the time. Can I improve on that? Sure....if I want to rent a pair of mikes' from Guitar Center, and go through the process of doing a 2 chan digital recording with my puter that drives part of my current system....in the midst of all the other pending projects of a higher priority and time issues. IOW, when I get a round toit in hand... ;) And then it's on YT, when I'd rather post to SoundCloud instead.... |
| Post removed |
If there’s no differences between sound clips, then all sound clips sound the same right? Of course they don’t, and no one is suggesting you’re hearing the same thing as you would live. The people who film on YouTube generally say it’s not the same, but it’s a taste. If you know your system, you’ll understand the differences in sound clips based on your system. That taste is enough to tell you whether you think you would have liked the sound live or not. In itself, it’s as good a metric as reading someone’s description of the sound, and choosing to demo a product based on that. |
...and it's Still difficult to be a heretic in the eyes of ones' peers... "Here, just clamber up onto this pile of gas-soaked logs... Yes, a bit slippery... Now, we're going to tie you to this post, so you don't fall off. For sure, the crowd is pretty incoherent and loud....just enthusiasm....and the torches are here for the cameras.... Now we're just going to make sure you're warm, and not catch a cold...." ....generally what happens when one strays....😏 Follow your muse towards the music you seek and enjoy by whatever means you employ; end of any day that's what's important. Oh, and I don't listen on a laptop, or my phone; a smaller version of my walsh' 2 ways in a small room I call an office. So I can least try to act vaguely fair about listening to anything through multiple layers of digital processing..
|
