Louder to be louder is not better, but I certainly find that getting volume in the area to reproduce the event as recorded is most enjoyable. No doubt that is is nice listening at lower levels if your system has the resolution to reproduce low level detail at low volumes.
62 responses Add your response
dweller, it is not my experience that all systems sound good at moderate levels. The best systems sound great at moderate levels. Mediocre systems need to be cranked up to give the impression of sounding better, all they are doing is amplifying everything that’s wrong with the system. They are just louder. Think ghetto boom box blasting out of someone’s car trunk as they are driving by. Loud? Hell yeah. Better? They don’t realize - or care - that 95% of what they are listening to is distortion and the sound of their car’s body vibrating. |
Post removed |
Search "Equal Loudness Contour". We don’t hear everything equally well at all frequencies. Really low bass and really high treble have to be fairly loud to hear well. This is why the Loudness switch used to be so common. At low levels we have to turn up the bass, and the treble, to have them sound right. +1. Ignore at your own peril, unless your system is challenged at higher volume levels. |
Dear @syntax : With the same recording each room/system has its " perfect " SPL to listen it where it does not matters that you put the SPL higher you can't listen more detail. All room/systems has a threshold about that can be as wider as the quality levels of each one room/system. Now, in any room/system we can make that threshold wider about SPL if we puts at minimum all kind of distortions/noises developed through the room/system. But yes you can achieve more details with higher SPLs if you are out of that threshold stratting range. In the other side if you are out of the threhold to range not even you will have more details but the other way around. Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS, R. |
I tend to listen high 60s to high 70s. Any higher is disturbing. Have a pretty refined $130K system and cranking it up does not necessarily distort but my ears seem to not like it louder. I may have inadequate power. My speakers are 91db and minimum impedance 6 ohms and my amp is an Atma-Sphere M-60 which is 60 watts. I just rolled in NOS output tubes and the power is boosted to 80 watts. I clearly hear louder more comfortably. My speakers do like more power! Am waiting on Speltz Zero Autoformers which will change the impedance and raise to power to about 100 watts. Now anxious to hear even higher levels! |
Many interesting responses hear that have lots of relevance. But I don't believe their is a universal rule that can be applied to answer your question. Tends on the music, mostly. Recordings too can be sublime or harsh. Obviously one sounds better at high volumes. Some bands just need to be played at higher volumes. Some LP tell you to crank it up. |
Your question can be addressed in the same simplistic form asked or broken down into more details. Simple answer yes an no. I like different artists at different levels. It is easy to measure as I start an album at at set level and as the listening session goes on I find my self either turning it up or turning it down. Detailed answer has to breakdown the rig. SS class A class A/B, tubes in the chain, types of power source in the amp ( I don’t get caught up in watts per as in my mind this is and can be overrated) then speaker efficiency. Some speakers will sing at low to moderate levels with the right amp and others crave high current high power and high volume. This reminds me of college in the 80’s with my Bose 901’s running a Sansui 9090 amp. The power supply on this amp could double as a welder if needed. The 901’s only made acceptable sound at ear bleeding levels. So is louder better yes and no. |
Low levels late night with big A$$ Tannoy concentric drivers driven by a class A Sugden being fed from a tubed Tavish Design phono preamp and Jensen MC 2rr SUT receiving a signal from a Hana EL mc with Alnico magnets on the end of a Pro-ject 9 inch carbon fiber /aluminum tonearm attached to a well isolated Pro-Ject The Classic belt driven turntable. Clean power courtesy of my AQ Niagara 1200 and AQ Thunder PC connected to my dedicated 12/2 20 Amp circuit provided by my AQ Edison receptacle, ahhh heaven....all Analog baby....oh and the volcano Lava lamp and the lights down low😁 |
I'm surprised the elephant in the listening room hasn't been mentioned: loud cost more money. Doesn't everyone like loud once in awhile? Not a big believer in a "correct" listening level unique for every recording. That said, sure lots of speakers sound best at a certain level for THAT specific room. (Least appreciated factor when designing acoustical treatments for a room.) Many less expense systems are as competent as others with the difference being the ability to play at concert levels. Cheap ribbons or cheap electrostatics beat cheap boxes any day of the week. As prices increase, things are't that simple. (But this is another topic) |
https://boomspeaker.com/noise-level-chart-db-level-chart/ This is a solid resource I send to people. On previous forums, I've seen posters siting 90db or something crazy like that. Above all, go see an audiologist and have your hearing tested. I've known folks who had terrible hearing and top notch systems. |
There are some general guidance documents on setting up studio monitoring systems for level. Many adopt Bob Katz* approach (1). I came across the following link which is a bit easier to follow (2). The size of the room is very important, since the -20dB point will need to be at somewhere between 75dB for a smallish room (UK lounge :-) ) to 85dB for a big room which is a big range difference. * Well known mastering engineer. When you have a system setup like this, it is surprising how many recordings "snap into focus! In terms of loudness they sound right. Obviously, most systems can go louder, but I've observed that when doing so, although everything is louder, it seems less right. Bear in mind, that domestically available recordings are mixed for domestic consumption, not PA levels of energy. I feel that a system that sounds right at PA levels is probably not right. (1) https://www.digido.com/portfolio-item/level-practices-part-1/ and https://www.digido.com/portfolio-item/level-practices-part-2/ (2) https://www.gearslutz.com/board/mastering-forum/1024714-depth-bob-katz-k-system-tutorial.html |
...prefer Breakfast in America, but some ST better than none...*S* To each....*S* Agreed, this older stuff makes the image in the mirror really annoying. The aids certainly restored mids in a satisfactory fashion... ...esp. when spouse proclaims "You haven't heard anything I've said!" in a much closer proximity.... Saying 'what?' is tantamount to "Kill me Now..." *L* (Think of it as an 'onboard inline eq with nifty functions...."The best amp you own....You Wear!*VBS* (nft applied for). ;) |
I find that the optimum level for listening is about a tenth of a twist higher than the level at which I worry that it is going to bother the people in neighboring apartments. I do believe there is a minimum level that you must have to get the full benefit of your system. Paul McGowan of PS Audio has done a number of enlightening YouTube clips on this subject: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=PS+audio+low+level |
Post removed |
I like loud (90+db) but usually I listen more in the 70-80db (peak) volumes. It’s more comfortable over time. My system isn’t fatiguing at all. I am just bombarded by loud all the time. A little more mellow is good. And I totally disagree with “play at concert levels” thing... that will kill your ears faster than anything. I’m a professional drummer, so I am VERY familiar with loud. I always wear ear protection at concerts these days. We are only getting older and I like hearing with detail. |
jdane, I am a professional orchestral player, and I don’t wear ear plugs anymore. A good attitude apparently helps, when it comes to hearing loss. A German study of hearing loss in orchestra musicians found that if the musician had a negative feeling towards the repertoire being played, more often, than players who liked the repertoire more often, the negative emotion players suffered much greater levels of hearing loss than the positive feelings players. I imagine it has much to do with stress hormones being produced when in a negative mood, which probably make the ear cells and cilia more brittle and less resilient to sudden transients like timpani blasts, but I am not sure of the details. |
I still forget with my planar/ribbons, that they ARE in fact playing loudly, they just sound not as thinkly loud as the driver-based speakers I have owned. Took me a while, but now I recognize that tradional cone driver "thickness", as distortion. The downside is if I set the volume too loud, like rock concert levels, with difficult 20th century orchestral recordings, they can break up with things like ffff timpani shots. Those times when I want head-banger levels, I use my Tannoys or Cerwin Vegas. Otherwise I listen to undistorted sound at high but realistic levels on my planar ribbons. |
As with many things more is not necessarily better, but there is a "proper" volume that is determined by your individual circumstance of all the factors mentioned above. Probably didn't need my 2 cents on this one... as I'm confident you know when it is the correct volume for a given recording. I do find late night listening at moderate levels very rewarding. Regards, barts |
Is louder better? Search "Equal Loudness Contour". We don’t hear everything equally well at all frequencies. Really low bass and really high treble have to be fairly loud to hear well. This is why the Loudness switch used to be so common. At low levels we have to turn up the bass, and the treble, to have them sound right. Recording engineers know this. The levels they set are based on the music being played back at a certain level. That is one reason certain recordings sound "right" when played at a certain volume. Also part of why people say some gear has to be turned up loud to "bloom". A lot of it is equal loudness. So yes louder is better, at least until you reach this point. Above it things become a lot more complicated. Many systems will become congested or compressed at high volume. Many rooms will retain so much energy this adds to the feeling of overload, compression and congestion. At some point if it is loud enough your hearing acuity first becomes less, and the goes away altogether. If you experience ringing that is a sure sign it was too loud. Keep going, you can lose it altogether. Loudness and volume are complicated. That is why back in the 1970’s engineers studying the problem did extensive real-world testing to determine the optimal amount of loud. Where you feel it in every cell of your body, yet still crystal clear and just below the point of damage. This became the industry standard, which like so many things learned at great cost has been forgotten and must continually be relearned. It is called Supertramp Loud. That’s what you want. Just be sure to use your Crime of the Century reference LP. |