@knock1 That’s the cheapest thing I could think of.
on the cheap
I am looking for suggestions for an inexpensive streamer for my sister. I mean a couple hundred bucks. Does anybody make such a thing that would not have to be hooked up to the internet but would work via wi-fi or bluetooth? AND also have a built in dac. Stereo is not her life like some of us. The simpler the better. Would not have to be new. It would be nice also to have the ability to have cd storage. Is it also possible to not have to be run with tidal and be controlled by an app?
thanks
@goofyfoot for couple hundred bucks (OP’s budget)?! |
I use Bluetooth in car, with portable listening, and I also I have a Sony Bluetooth brick that I use in the kitchen, back patio, and bring occasionally on vacation. I purchased an Audioengine Bluetooth receiver over 10 years ago for the mid Fi system in our living room that rarely gets used, primarily when one of my adult kids are over and wants to play music from their phone. I use AirPlay and Chromecast to stream Apple Music, both of which are better than Bluetooth. Streaming is secondary to me vs Physical Media, but the OP said his sister would be happy with Bluetooth, as indeed most of the population is, minus those of us that post here |
I get what you are saying..it's not a device for me. My thoughts would be if you do a lot of Bluetooth to your stereo from your phone. I personally don't really use Bluetooth for my music listening or use storage devices. All my music is either streamed from Quboz or from TV app's to Dac. My TT is collecting dust on the sides & I've taken my CD player out of the chain. Albums to me have the sound quality & presentation between and beyond the speakers that is the most enjoyable or realistic...but the convenience of streaming is hard to beat for me. I did just turn 50 and haven't always been a fan of digital in general. I've only been streaming for a little over 2 years now.. slowly learning how to improve the sound. |
@mahler123 true & good points 👍 I like what @lanx0003 pointed out. Pretty nifty budget device for anyone needed something like that |
The next best thing is iphone with the adapter and usb hub like these https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BZRYKSF5?psc=1&ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_product_details https://www.amazon.com/dp/B083XTKV8V?psc=1&ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_product_details
|
@mahler123 unfortunately no. Maybe some one has heard of a model with storage in a "budget-ish" range but I can't think of any. Internal storage is normally found on some of the more or most expensive units. The next best thing I guess would be to have a streamer with a USB port to play your downloaded/stored music files. |
+1. @mattw73 Do the Wii have built in storage? |
Can't believe how many here gave the OP a hard time about the Ethernet/WiFi connection. I know y'all know what he meant..no physical connection, WiFi. He's looking for the cheapest streaming option for his sister that is obviously no "audiophile", will probably never purchase a hi res streaming service, and no interest in an external DAC that will cost more than the streaming device. Obviously your not going to find a CD storage device, streamer, Bluetooth, DAC for under $200. She probably just needs a Bluetooth device..but since dac is needed as well a WiiM is most likely the best option. For your sister with no real HiFi aspirations an $80 WiiM Mini should do the trick. You could go up to the a pro at $150 for a better DAC but also rca outputs instead of the 3.5mm of the Mini. |
@jastralfu This stuff doesn’t come particularly easy. I spent a long time getting comfortable with how all pieces fit. And that was working with it every day, professionally. So check the diagram. Layer 1 is the physical media - copper, fiber, radio. The Layer 1 protocols have to talk to the Layer 2 Data Link ’defines the format of the data on the network’ Layer. In other words the Ethernet frame. The WiFi Layer 1 protocols have map the data from their data format into the Ethernet frame at Layer 2 so the data can keep moving. That the interface happens at Layer 2 does not mean WiFi itself is at Layer 2.
And OP, just find a BluSound Node. Best money ever spent. It's a no-regrets buy. |
'I am looking for suggestions for an inexpensive streamer for my sister. I mean a couple hundred bucks... AND also have a built in dac. The simpler the better. Would not have to be new. It would be nice also to have the ability to have cd storage.' Your are giving us a kind of a challenge. Eagledriver likes this 😉 As jastralfu says above, second hand Bluesound Vault or Innuos ZENmini. Also, you might consider Cocktail Audio X30 or X35. Or as kingr mentioned the Bluesound Node. If you can spare the CD ripper/storage. Perhaps the Magnat MC400 or the Advance Paris My Connect 60? Both amps with CD player but no storage). In addition, the Fiio R7 (incl. USB 2.0 and 3.0 plus a memory card slot). Using these products without an app? I'm not sure if this will work in a simple way. To get exactly what you are looking for, you would need to be prepared to spend a bit more than a couple of hundred bucks. Even if the product is second hand.
|
Wi-Fi is layer 2 as well. I don’t think there is a difference of opinion about whether Ethernet or Wi-Fi works, it was a question of whether Ethernet refers to a wired protocol vice a wireless one. Ethernet is wired, Wi-Fi is wireless. Wi-Fi uses a different protocol than Ethernet. Sorry, I will shut up and and go enjoy some music. |
The Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model breaks down data transmission standards, processes, and protocols into seven layers. Layer 1, the Physical Layer, is where the differences between Coax, Twisted Pair, Fiber and Wireless all lie. Ethernet is a Layer 2 protocol, as was IBMs Token Ring. TCP/IP, and once popular but now forgotten NetBEUI and Novell IPX, all are Layer 3 and 4 Protocols. The beauty of all this is the ability to interchange technologies, Layer 1 media in this case, without having to redesign the entirety of the whole stack. Likewise, the shared bandwidth and scalability shortcomings of the CSMA/CD implementation of Ethernet at Layer 2 were addressed with the introduction of Ethernet Switching. The extensability of networks via routable protocols like the now ubiquitous TCP/IP and UDP enabled creation of the internet as we know it. And our DACs? That all happens up at the top of the stack at Layer 7 - and above. So this isn't about one of us being right or wrong, or having an opinion, or changes in the language. This is about trying to get everyone on the same page when it comes to how digital audio actually works. There is no discussing if Ethernet works, it's settled science. There is no opinion as to whether TCP/IP assures bit perfect delivery - it is inherent in the protocol, initially designed so a network could survive a nuclear war. These things simply have to be or nothing would - or could - connect. As our hobby becomes increasingly underlaid with digital infrastructure, it behooves everyone to take a few minutes to understand these basics so we can all focus on the music. |
I did a bit more reading and I take back my previous assertion. Ethernet is a wired protocol, wi-fi is a wireless protocol. @mahler123 the definitions you stated are the correct definitions and have always been. Once the data makes it to the network, regardless of whether it was wired or wireless it’s all IP. Sorry about taking up bandwidth here with incorrect information. As far as the OPs question, I use a MacBook Pro and a USB connection to my DAC. It works well enough at the moment and required no extra purchase for a streamer. I use Tidal and Qobuz native MacOs apps as well as internal storage to stream music. |
@panzrwagn "Wi-Fi is a type of wireless Ethernet. Ethernet is a wired technology that connects devices in a local area network (LAN). WiFi technology uses radio signals to transfer data and wired Ethernet connections use a physical twisted pair ethernet network cable." The first and second sentences contradict themselves, second and third sentences supports @mahler123 definitions. |
@mahler123 have to agree with @panzrwagn Ethernet is a protocol for transmitting data. Language may change but that doesn’t change the definition of Ethernet just cause folks decide to speak incorrectly about it. See IEEE 802.3 set of standards. No one is speaking pre Elizabethan English here, he’s speaking to the actual definition and standard that is used to this day. |
Language changes over time. These days when people say Ethernet, they are referring to having a component that is tethered to a Ethernet cable. WiFi refers to lack of such a cable. Whatever the definition was when you started in the IT industry back in the days of dial up modems, these definitions have evolved, as language does, over time. If you are the only person in the room speaking pre Elizabethan English, chances are not many will understand you, even though you think you are speaking correctly. And since absolutely everyone else here knows and accepts the common usage of the terms Ethernet and WiFi, I see no further need to discuss this with you |
@mahler123 @knock1 I am not confused. I've only been working with Ethernet for 40 years, longer than Wikipedia (founded in 2001) or Tech Target have even existed. I started working with WiFi (wireless Ethernet) in 2000 when I created the wireless strategy for a very large Seattle-based coffee company as a means of connecting kiosks back to the main store, and then as local WAPs to encourage customers to stay longer (and buy more than coffee to go). Wi-Fi is a type of wireless Ethernet. Ethernet is a wired technology that connects devices in a local area network (LAN). WiFi technology uses radio signals to transfer data and wired Ethernet connections use a physical twisted pair ethernet network cable. Any other differences between these connections arise from this basic difference. What they share is the use of an Ethernet frame, a data link layer protocol data unit, and the use of underlying independent Ethernet physical layer transport mechanisms, one being wired, the other wireless. In other words, a data unit on an Ethernet link transports an Ethernet frame as its payload, regardless of the underlying physical media. Above that are the Layer 3 protocols like the now ubiquitous TCP/IP. You may want to read up on the OSI 7-Layer network model to help you understand these basics.
|
@panzrwagn you are very confused. |
@mahler123 WiFi IS Ethernet, 100%. it simply uses a different Layer 1 Transport. Regardless if it is coax, twisted pair, fiber optic, or wireless, if it uses the Ethernet protocols for the other Layers 2 and 3 of the stack, it's Ethernet. |
Grace digital link... https://gracedigital.com/products/grace-link On sale at Amazon for $169. I love mine...has a screen to show the cover art and what is playing, also natively streams pandora, which most do not. It’s built in. Otherwise, topping bc3 Bluetooth receiver. https://apos.audio/products/topping-bc3-wireless-bluetooth-decoder-dac-amp I have one and love it as well.
|
@jbuhl +1 You can also explore a Blue Tooth dongle to hang off the receiver/integrated. "Stereo is not her life like some of us. The simpler the better. Would not have to be new. It would be nice also to have the ability to have cd storage. Is it also possible to not have to be run with tidal and be controlled by an app?" She can stream her Apple music or Spotify or Pandora or whatever from her phone via Bluetooth with ease. I bought something similar for a friend who is very happy with the solution. |
@wolf_garcia " streamer for my sister." i have no idea what you are talking about |
+6 for any WiiM product. The WiiM Mini (hockey puck design) is reputed to have a "thicker, darker sound" than the WiiM Pro or Pro Plus so I'd choose one of those instead and call it a day. The great thing about the WiiM's are their software. So easy to use. No matter how good something is, if the user interface sucks and is aggravating to use, you simply won't use it.
|
@waytoomuchstuff , yeah...Now 42" flat screens are cheap, VCRs' are at Goodwill for nil, and SOTA CDs' are sorta all over the board... Physically small boxes can cost as much as 'spine-stretching' boat anchor amps, and cabling can rival some necklaces per linear foot. Less is more, more is less....more or less at the same time and at the same place, Makes my head hurt....and wallet want to hide.... ;) |
Post removed |
The question asked includes a few red flags. “WiFi Streamer” that doesn’t hook up to the internet? Well Bluetooth doesn’t need internet, but where’s the stream coming from? Does this person have a stereo amplifier and speakers already? Obviously the many responses of Node or WiiM are all perfectly good if so. But if not, an amplified streaming DAC like WiiM Amp would be simpler. Nodes can play from USB storage, which WiiM does not, so if internet-free use is really desired, a used Node 2i is the best bet. |