travisg
OP
41 posts
Ok, so I bought the BMR monitors.
what happened to that???
https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/speakers-known-for-great-midrange
Help me spend $6000
I’m looking to get the best bang for the dollar. My amp is the Pass Labs INT-25. I listen to a lot of jazz,folk,classic rock,and funk.
Floor-stander or monitor is fine. Prefer new, but I’m open to used. I’m looking for a detailed presentation, but not bright. I also prefer a thick midrange.
Room is a bonus room with knee walls with carpet and bookshelves everywhere, but not officially treated. I sit near field.
Pro-Ject RPM 10 Carbon
Soundsmith Zephyr III
Parasound JC3+
Denefrips Iris DDC
Denefrips Pontus II
Hifi Rose RS250
Wilsenton R8
Klipsch Heresy IV
REL T5i x 2
Mac mini server running Roon
Degritter
Pass Labs INT25
what happened to that??? https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/speakers-known-for-great-midrange |
Lol the perfect quote for someone called @yogiboy 🤣 And wow 5 whole days ago and onto new speakers that's a record methinks! |
Post removed |
Are you looking for ideas or just killing time? The INT 25 means you should find 8ohm speakers with a 90+ sensitivity rating. If you sit near field the room means less. Come to our club's event August 27th and audition 16 speakers. Standmounts all under $3k. With your budget you could buy two pair. The BMRs are one of the 16. AZAVCLUB.com
|
That is great ^^^ . But as I see it you got great electronic and gear. So at this point my view is that you are asking how you can spend more money to get a different sound probably not better but just different and maybe hopefully to your more subjective liking. With the gear you happen to have currently.
I see that you are at the point there you will just carry in and out to this room different HW/gear. And the combination of gear will give you a differently frequency response.. And if we looking at it from that point you will use gear as a equalizer and that is a very expensive way to equalize the sound and very cumbersome to do equalize. (But maybe just that is your hobby and keep doing that rest of your life and enjoy. You can also stop reading here.)
Another problem with use gear for equalizing is that they're static. For example if a specific item is good in low level listening senario or something else that you value. But you value other stuff also so you will come to the point that swapping out X component will sacrifice low volume listening experience for something else that you like. In other words hard to keep both things in some situations.
What is that magical thing that can take you to the next level? Get a DSP and measuring mic as a preamp (that is the correct position in the system). The analog (TT), digital streaming and optical media. Then you can integrate your subwoofers perfectly and for your room at your listening position. The same goes for the mains. You for example have four presets on the Mini DSP FLEX (measures as a good) that you can use different volume levels (as a loudness control) and with your preferences.
So better sound quality (indirectly fixing your room issues, that you even don't know probably you have today..) and versatile that do stuff that none if your other HW can do today. That brings added value to your system and you.
But you can use something more automatically calibration as Dirac or you can do it manually and with REW. That has a steeper learning curve but you have time to learn.
(When you have a TT and 2 rels then the DSP can fix issues with rumble (acustic feedback from the bass to the TT depending on tonearm effective mass and the compliance of the cartridge the frequency will vary depending on them.) Implement a high pass filter in the DSP. So you see the DSP has many use cases, but you need to know about them.) |
@blackbag20 +1 |
Seriously, if you like Klipsch sound, then the Cornwall would be good. They are wide though. I have Crites Cornscala. Potential to sound even better than Cornwall with Dean Wescott crossover. That would cost ~$3000 for speakers and crossovers Other good choices: Volti Razz efficient and beautiful craftsmanship. Fritz easy to drive monitor. NOTE: I have XA25. Very compatible with lots of speakers but not difficult to drive ones. Good luck and ignore grumps.
|
I really think your answer begins with some questions: What have you owned and liked? What have you owned and not liked? What have you always wanted to try? What is absolutely out of the realm of consideration? Recently, I've owned Salk and Spatial Audio...both are fantastic and would probably easily meet your requirements...but maybe not depending on how you answer the four questions.
|
“What I don't get is why do you have to ask anyone on here??? Is there not enough info and reviews to make an informed decision? I have never asked anyone on here what to buy....maybe it's me...”
|
My take on it was that you guys did something that was of value to the audio community, and that it must have been as fun as it was informative. Additionally, I didn’t find the minor criticisms of methodology and cabling to temper the credibility of your work, especially considering the constraints of time and format. I actually ended up buying the Black Ice Glass FX DAC and thought it sounded great. Curious what your personal thoughts on that DAC are. Incidentally, I’m currently using an SMSL M400, which I found to be a cooler sound and slightly more detailed, but loses out to the Glass FX in terms of imaging/spatial cues. In my warm-ish system this was a trade off I was willing to make. Balanced outputs and MQA decoding also sweetened the deal. Still have the FX DAC, I’m having a hard time convincing myself to sell it. Anyhow, I was going to advise the OP to avail himself of your invitation, but it sounds like he’s got it all figured out. Don’t mind hijacking this thread; he’s obviously no longer using it. |
Maybe this is not a forum for me. When I focus on getting better sound quality as the primary goal. And changing in and out components year after year and just gaining something here and there maybe, in sound quality by losing something else somewhere else, By trying to match into a existing system something new.
That is not getting better sound quality it is just to get something different sounding it is what I call "chasing you tail", in my book.
And not gaining any new knowledge, by hook up another pair of speakers in this case (same procedure as for the previous once). Nothing else than learning that speaker X sounds little bit of this and a little bit of that (in your room, with your electronics and your biases.). In other words will not help anybody else anything and it is useless knowledge except for yourself. Maybe that is the case it is harder to learn new than just repeating old pattern. End of ranting. Good luck with your new speakers whatever the are.❤️🎵🎶🎼💸 |
we all feel the need to rant every now and then, its ok at the heart of this is -- how does one go about improving their system? what is the ’smart’ process? one can research and read a lot, ask for advice, but most folks giving advice are not objective or truly qualified (or neither)... so it boils down to biting the bullet and getting something you think will be much better and trying it i think it is best to view this process as part of the fun of this hobby, as opposed to a big negative... we are trying to enjoy beautiful music in our private spaces, and we all engage in various activities and processes to achieve that... also, alot of the fun in life, enriching experiences in life, come from trying new things |