hi everyone, kindly asking for your dac suggestions. im almost 100% a turntable listener, but recently picked up a DirectStream Dac for those times I cant find the vinyl, its too expensive, or it simply doesn't exist. im looking for suggestions as im not happy with the DirectStream dac, its just not to my liking. its too sharp up top, too thin in the lower midrange, other than that everything else is pretty great. id like to get, if possible, a dac that sounds more like my turntable. I feel like I would get mostly there if the midrange was fuller, and the top end was softer.
my current system is marantz tt15 , dynavector 20x2, icon audio ps3 mk ii, primaluna prologue premium, and elysian 4 speakers.
the current dacs I was looking to switch to were lab 12 dac, primaluna evo 100 dac, lampizators entry model, or Merason DAC 1. does anyone have experience with these and can recommend them?
Audio Note comes to mind considering your tastes. You can also purchase one preassembled from kits at ANK site. All tubes, well known "musical" AD chip.
https://ankaudiokits.com/product-category/dac/
Denafrips makes excellent DACs, but they may not be to your taste. Highs are not harsh, but they ARE solid state, there is no 'warm' roll off.
I have regular access to hear the EAR Acute in use in the system it belongs to, as well as in Systems it is loaned into for demo' purposes.
I also have been present when it has been compared to a Audio Note Valve Based CDP, a Bespoke Built Valve Based DAC with a CDT, SS DAC's (Denafrips Venus II and Bespoke Built Designs)
I have also been present over a period of time when Tube Rolling was carried out, where selected Tubes were Pairs that were perfect matches and measured improved over Factory Spec'.
Two Vintage Tube Types are now known to offer a little different to each other, but leave the stock Tubes as superseded, as a result of the leap forward discovered in sonic produced.
The Tube Rolled Acute has been compared to a Vinyl Source ( SP10 R > Glanz MH 1200s > Miyajima Cartridge > Bespoke Built Valve Input / Output Phon. Where a variety of SUT's and Head Amp's have been used, in a system using EAR Amp's and Quad TOTR ESL Speakers.
As a digital to vinyl comparison where the end sound is being compared to have discover if a Digital Source has the capability to impress in a similar manner that a Vinyl Source can.
The Acute scores as high a mark as I would be willing to give for being able to create such an impression.
In relation to the Laser Longevity, 15000 Hours vs a 1000ish hours for a Styli, with either enablers of a recording replay costing similar monies, leaves CDP's or CDT's with Longevity like the Acute seemingly a Great VFM Purchase.
I have immense experience in analog (several friends are also remastering engineers). We use the same cartridge (mine is low output-I love this cartridge for my mono and stereo LPs, 31,100 of them).
I went through tube CD players and hated CD sound for decades. The EAR Acute allowed my to get a semblance of analog sound. I tried high priced DACs to no avail for 4 years.
The first DAC that permitted me to share in analog sound quality is the only Toppin g DAC we like, the D70s. We haven't heard the latest ones.
I opted for an SOTA DAC with pre-amp in the Lampizator Poseidon. It is 50X more expensive than the Topping and only 30% to 50% better. Even the Lampizator Baltic compares very favorably to analog. I have 16,100 CDs.
I splurged and purchased the Jay's Audio CDt3 Mk3 to go with the Topping, then the Poseidon. My best friend purchased the lesser cost Shiit Urd transport. Great choices like a great cartridge but the lasers should last 10,000-15,000 hours (my EAR Acute for 15 years of daily use-amazing).
The PS Audio gear-open it up and looked at the components. You'll know why they don't perform well.
P.S. 2 out of 3 of the Topping units I mentioned sounded fantastic and 1 was sonically inferior. For $350 to $500 current going price, it's a small investment.
For digital, removing noise from your system in the form of EMI or RFI really helps produce smoother sound. You've taken the first steps by getting the Blluesound Node streamer. Other steps that can help are:
Turning off the Wi-Fi receiver in your streamer and using an Ethernet cable. One way to use an Ethernet cable without running cable all through your house is to use a Wi-Fi extender to create an Ethernet access port which then connects to your streamer via an Ethernet cable. That at least gets the Wi-Fi receiver and the RFI it generates away from your streamer.
Local files can sound better than streamed files.
USB cables matter. I'm using a Stordiau Phasure Lush.
An Audioquest Jitterbug noise filter on the USB output of my streamer seemed to make a positive difference.
For streaming, the fairly inexpensive Supra Cat 8 cable works well in my system.
My latest upgrade is an Audioquest Niagara 1200 power conditioner. That seems to have taken out any remaining harshness that was causing listening fatigue after several hours of listening.
I also rejected digital audio for a long time because it caused listening fatigue for me. From 1989 to 2021, I didn't have any digital in my home system. I would stream Qobuz using my laptop or phone and headphones. That changed during the pandemic when I was doing a lot of music listening while doing work and I started building up a digital source for my home system.
I had a DirectStream I DAC with a network card that I was NOT happy with. It sounded like your description. HOWEVER I upgraded to a DirestStream II and added a AirLens and VIOLA! actual analogue sound.
I have auditioned a number of DACs and the one that sounds better than the above upgrade (to me ) is 2.5X the price PlayBack Designs. The extra 17K price tag was as they say "juice not worth the squeeze". If I had 300 million dollars it would be no biggie. However I'm still a working stiff so I'm on a budget.
I know, this might not be your price range (and neither is it mine if I'd to pay list), but I just got a MSB "Discrete", the junior model in the MSB stable, and playing DSD256 it is almost indistinguishable from my analog versions of the same tracks.
I found mine on the Aussie AudioMart site for about 50% off (good present exchange rate helped): one of the best purchases I ever made. The "naturalness" , stage depth, and complete absence of the usual "in-your-face" DAC presentations (like the DirectStream, which I had five years ago, and most other ones in the sub-5K dollar range) makes my listening truly enjoyable and non-fatiguing. As an analog vinyl head, I can honestly say: this is almost it! Up to now, I was quite happy with the Gustard R26, another resistor-ladder-DAC, which is now for sale at USAudioMart. You might want to check it out.
Glad you isolated the difference the room can make. It can transform the sound of any system, typically at a lower expense (and significantly less risk) than new electronic gear. Good acoustics will allow you to accurately assess your system and adjust it to your listening preferences.
To your original question, I settled in on the Asthetix Romulus Eclipse CD/DAC unit. Being a tube hybrid, I was able adjust the top-end harshness of digital to my smoother "analog" preference by rolling the tubes to NOS Telefunken and Amperex Bugle Boy, and I found the process to be fun and educational.
FWIW, my streamer source is a Lumin U-1 and interconnects are Synergistic USB and Transparent XLR,
+1 on adding a better power supply to the Node. This should help with the sibilance, tame harshness and add more clarity. I highly recommend Fidelity Audio in UK. Their Reference interface board and LPS make an exceptional difference. But the Teddy Pardo and PD Creative options are also good, and less $$.
Well it’s all you. You kept at it and didn’t give up.
And yes, streamers make a difference.
The Canare 4s11 speaker cables aren’t terrible. I own a pair. They’re not resolution champs but they also don’t sound harsh.
Work on room acoustics next. Treating first reflection point (side walls) usually does wonders to tame harshness. Bass traps behind speakers help as well - the bass is more focused and controlled which will help balance out the mids and highs and with better bass the sound will be fuller and not as brittle.
Once you’re done with room acoustics I strongly recommend Acoustic Zen Satori over Zavfino. I owned pretty much all AZ cables and I can tell you they sound natural, don’t have the sibilance in vocals and have excellent details and warmth. On a used market they’re a bargain.
Zavfino is just OK. I tried their interconnects and they were mediocre at best. A friend of mine had their speaker cables and didn’t like them.
Don’t get too hung up on OCC. it isn’t a guarantee of perfect sound. Keep the neotech when it arrives but focus on good room then speaker cables.
@audphile1 speaker cables are diy canare 4s11, and im thinking of purchasing a pair of occ cables I think the brand is 1877phono zavfino. the speakers are elysian 4, horns are retired and just used in bedroom for tv/movies.
I let you know once the occ neotech cables arrive, then I will try to get a good coax/usb cable.
thanks again for all the suggestions. still blows my mind that the entry level streamer made such a huge difference
There are tons of streamers out there in very reasonable price range that will be better than the laptop. As for DACS, the lots of Lampizator owners are usually looking to move up the scale to more expensive models. Look for used Baltic or Atlantic if you're looking for more on the analog side of things. And then you can do some tube rolling to tweak the sound to your liking even further.
There are tons of streamers out there in very reasonable price range that will be better than the laptop. As for DACS, the lots of Lampizator owners are usually looking to move up the scale to more expensive models. Look for used Baltic or Atlantic if you're looking for more on the analog side of things. And then you can do some tube rolling to tweak the sound to your liking even further.
Blue jeans are decent cables (I keep a set of RCAs as a spare) but you can improve upon them.
So my recommendation is…You have to start from the amp/speakers and work your way upstream.
I would tackle the speaker cables first. For the horns I’d try something from Cardas or Acoustic Zen Satori. Smooth and detailed - no brittleness in the mids or highs.
Then interconnects from DAC to amp. Then USB from Node to DAC.
@audphile1 @soix im currently using the ac5 power cord, I have swapped with the generic power cord and admittedly I don't hear much of a difference, I think the ac5 is airier, even though its subtle im pretty confident I would pass a blind test.
currently using skw optical cable and bluejeans rca's to the integrated.
I have a pair of occ neotech rca's on the way hopefully they arrive next week. and looking into getting a good usb or coax to go from node to dsd.
Check out Audio Mirror Toubadour V. Sounds as good as a lampizator pacific for a lot less. I have had one for several months and it’s been very analog sounding. It also has some DDC technology within (similar to if you added a Denafrips DDC to the chain for example).
I also have the merason DAC 1 MKII and has a different sound from the Toubadour V. I think I prefer the AM Toubadour V by a shade.
I recently upgraded my streamer to a Innuos Zen Mk3. I'm using it with a Gustard R26 r2r dac. I'm quite happy with it. I think the Gustard is excellent for the money.
My vinyl playback is decent, but not crazy expensive. Marantz TT-15S1 turntable, Hana ML moving coil cartridge, and Sutherland TZ Vibe phono stage. It sounds really good, but I mostly stream now.
I had been playing cds and SACD through my Denon DCD-1700NE, but now that I have the Innuos streamer, I'm not using it much.
I do not think an entry-level DAC and streamer or even a step above that will get you close to vinyl. I have a Simaudio Moon 780dV2 with an outboard Moon 820s power supply which is driven by the Roon Nucleus+, and the sound it produces is excellent and rivals vinyl, and the convenience is amazing. One of the newer Moon North integrated systems that includes a DAC and Streamer would be worth looking into or the dCS Linea or Bartok. You will need a budget of roughly $10,000 - $20,000 new or used to get what you are looking for.
Ha!, I was going to suggest the Directstream MK1 closeout sale, and then I see you didn’t like it, and then I see the change with a different room and setup. Truly, this is a subjective experience and synergy matters. Everything’s connected.
@palutena, what you needed from day 1 was a dac or streamer with a parametric eq (PEQ) feature.
Fo example, the Wiim pro plus is a 200 dollar streamer with a 10 band PEQ feature. Use it to bump up the mids, lower the highs, etc all with very wide Qs, adjust to taste, create your vinyl sound. From there, run it to your denafrips.
It will become the best sounding ’vinyl’ you ever heard with no pops, crackles, no running back and forth between turntable and couch like a ceaseless laborer, etc.
Otherwise, the squirrels in your head will keep bouncing too much everytime the recordings change (I used to be a vinyl guy too).
im pretty happy with how the ps audio sounds now other than the tiny bit of upper midrange sharpness that still remains.
Your very cheap interconnects are doing you no favors with this and should be the next thing you explore. As you found with adding the Node, everything in streaming matters and matters a lot. You should also consider adding an upgraded LPS (Teddy Pardo, etc.) to the Node at some point as it provides a nice performance boost for relatively not much $$$. In any event, glad to hear you’re happier with your streaming performance but there is more to be had there.
What power cord is currently on the PS Audio DAC? What interconnects and speaker cables are you using? The PS Audio DAC is transparent and resolving. Using high quality cables should improve the sound.
I agree with the Aqua LaScala. The closest I’ve come to analog sound when streaming. I have heard a few DAC’s and am very pleased with my LaScala. If budget is an issue the Bryston BDA3 is excellent.
thanks for all the recommendations everyone! I plugged in the node to my system and I cant believe the difference it made. everything is a lot smoother, a lot fuller, more weight, more scale, and more effortless sounding. pretty much identical to my turntable in those regards, except the turntable is a little smoother in the upper midrange (the ps audio is still a tad bit sharp here with female vocals) , and still gives a better illusion of the musicians being in the room, I think this is due to the images being more 3d. the dac is better at soundstage depth, and imaging (placement within the stage especial form left to right)
im very happy that the dac is way more musical now and far less analytical and 2d sounding.
I demo'd the Merason dac1 today along with the dsd on bowers and Wilkins 800 d3, it was a tiny bit better than the ps audio in most of the categories (soundstage depth, midrange and treble air, vocal presence, bass and midrange fullness, and especially tone of the instrments). it really felt like in another league. however I don't think im going to upgrade or change at this time as im pretty happy with how the ps audio sounds now other than the tiny bit of upper midrange sharpness that still remains.
next step is figuring out how to make my main room sound as good as my bedroom.
I listened to the Merason Freot and original Merason DAC 1 . They were good. The Lab 12 DAC 1 Reference is what I took home that day. I really like this DAC.
If it’s not just all about the warmth ,detail counts then 100% , the T+A 200 dac,preamp you can get a good deal for under $6500 and will compete
very well with anything 2x it’s price and has a true resistive ladder ,relay preamplifier hat is very good if you chose to use it .My brother owns one and visiting many in audio clubs in and outside New England it’s a very natural sounding dac with excellent balance all around , read the Many accolades and get a dealer to ship you one to audition.
@audphile1 I have a bluesound node coming in the mail tomorrow I figure that’s a good inexpensive place to start. I turned this bedroom system up to 90db just to have a comparison with what I wa listening to in the main room, still a tinyyyy but sharp to my ears, but this is going through the diy horn speakers, and not my primaluna tube amp, and no room treatment, but the point is it’s at a level now where I can definitely see streamers/cables making a difference and getting me to where I want to be. I definitely don’t need to turn it up to 90db as 80 in this room feels louder bigger and fuller than 90 in my main room. I’ll report back once I listen to the streamer!
Good! The hustle paid off and now you know.
I will also tell you, +1 @soix
Streamer will improve things even further. I used mac mini for a while and didn’t believe a streamer can make this much difference but alas 4 streamers later I’m getting the performance I was expecting from my system…but the important part is every one of the streamers sounded different and better than the computer.
id also like to add that there's no subwoofer in the bedroom and the bass is bigger fuller more sustained more decay. these diy heresy/forte speakers I originally had in my main room but purchased elysian 4's as the diy speakers were very very thin sounding in that room. now im questioning my elysian purchase as even though they sound fuller in my main room than my diy speakers (and better in almost every other area) , I feel I might not have needed them had the room been better. im very confused overall , bare with me lol
guys I think I found out what my issue is!... for the heck of it I moved the dsd to my bedroom setup, which consists of heresy iii/forte iii diy speaker and a sabaj class d $100 amp, this set up was strictly used for watching movies. I think the room is the issue. the main listening room is a big L shaped room. 14 ft by 22 feet in the bottom section of the "L" where I listen, the other section of the L is 13ft by 30ft. my bedroom is 13 by 16ft.
the bedroom sounds 10x better. I knew the room was important, and mine had suckouts in the bottom frequencies but I didn't know it made THIS much of a difference. all that fullness with the dsd is there! im listening at 80db instead of typical 90db, as I don't have to turn it up to feel loud, I think the better balance is helping out with the over sharpness/fatigue I was getting in the other room.
the turntable in my main room I would say is barely passable when it comes to being enough fullness in the lower midrange/bass, but my worry now is If I move it to this room its going to be way too mushy/syrupy and full, as the dac sounded anorexic in the main room but sounds amazing in my bedroom.
this has made me rethink of everything , completely eye opening experience. I may move my room, or try to close off the "L" shaped room somehow so that the listening area is a rectanglular room.
It took a Valve Rectified Power Supply / Valve Output DAC to really get me weaned onto CD.
Admittedly, the DAC was also Bespoke built for me to have a sonic I have been able to be endlessly impressed with.
I checked out ’Abbas Audio’ a recommended on the Gon, DAC producers site recently and could not but help draw parallels on this site, to the experience I have had getting my DAC produced.
A D.U.C.C Wire used as a COAX will add a hint of Richness that will tame anything with an edge, that draws attention.
The same Wire will also be very revealing when used with a device that has a perception of Richness to the Tonality.
mostly laptop for streaming Qobuz, I tried Qobuz via Airplay just to test the optical with something other than cd player, and I actually preferred the sound this way. however its still night and day different compared to my turntable set up, I don’t think ill be able to achieve the sound im looking for in my room by changing things like cables and transports/streamers.
I respectfully disagree — you likely won’t be able to achieve the sound you’re looking for streaming from a laptop, or at the very least it will be a significant bottleneck and your cheap interconnects aren’t doing you any favors either. These things matter significantly in streaming just like every piece in an analog setup matters. So you can spend $$$ on something like a nice Lampizator DAC, but feeding it with your current setup would be an insult and counterproductive to achieving your goal. The fact that you and @audphile1, who has a very good streaming setup, are hearing very different results from the same DAC tells you everything you need to know here.
I recently upgraded from a Schiit Gumby to the Merason Reuss DAC, which is their new mid-range, though hardly mid-priced DAC. I do not have experience with enough DAC’s to compare, but my overall description of the sound would be natural. A friend has the DAC1, and he has heard a lot of DAC’s, he is sticking with the Merason. I would give one a try.
@audphile1mostly laptop for streaming Qobuz, I tried Qobuz via Airplay just to test the optical with something other than cd player, and I actually preferred the sound this way. however its still night and day different compared to my turntable set up, I don't think ill be able to achieve the sound im looking for in my room by changing things like cables and transports/streamers.
its certainly interesting you've had a very different experience than me, maybe due to differences in room, or perhaps personal tastes. I feel like your analogue setup of that caliber would blow away this dac in almost every way.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.