Stuff You Tried To Love


I know we talk a lot about confirmation bias- we buy something and then convince ourselves we like it. Or something like that. But did you ever buy something you wanted to love and just couldn’t make it work? For me, Esoteric X-05 SACD/CD player. Bought from a local who was upgrading to the X-03. Big, beautiful piece of gear, but I couldn’t get used to the sound after 6 months of trying. Sold it to another local- I insisted he listen before he bought and I believe he sold it soon after as well. Totem Forest and Hawk. I loved the whole concept. Slim, easy to live with. Couldn’t get them to work in my room. The Model Ones were much better. I had a couple of other pieces, but this is long enough. BTW, these were bought used without audition.

chayro

Great post!

We cannot love everything ...

We are defined by our love... Nevermind the rest of which we are indifferent...

I love so passionnately some musicians and composers all the others can be put way behind the scene for me... It does not means they are not great... They are for some others people...

 

«Love is more merciless than an executioner who kill at least according to a law»-- Groucho Marx🤓

 

No Chet Baker. No Ella. No Ellington. No Armstrong. No B. Holiday. No Basie. No Dolphy. Gee, I must really hate Jazz! Actually,I don’t hate any of the above. There are simply other Jazz artists to whom I’d rather listen.

@knock1 - I guess I should have said if you don't like Kind of Blue, you don't enjoy listening to jazz. You are equating not liking it to disliking it. There is a difference.

hey @stuartk  - you like progressive jazz , which is what I initially liked when it was current when I was in college. My taste evolved when I got older and started listening to "real" jazz (Sirius' designation, not mine). I still mix some of the progressive stuff in - Pat Metheny, Earl Klugh, George Benson, Lee Ritneour, Grover, Bob James, and even a little Spyro Gyra when the mood strikes). It's OK if your taste never evolved....

I like a lot European and many others countries jazz...Most are focussed on American jazz for sure... 😊

I am fond of bebop hard bop and all bop variations too numerous to name but viewing the list of jazz styles i like a lot more than i could name... etc...😁😋😎

 

 

List

Genre Characteristics Era
Acid jazz[1][2] Combined elements of soul music, funk, disco, including looping beats and modal harmony 1980s–1990s
Afro-Cuban jazz It mixes Afro-Cuban clave-based rhythms with jazz harmonies and techniques of improvisation. 1940s ->
Avant-garde jazz A style of music and improvisation that combines avant-garde art music and composition with jazz. It originated in the 1950s and developed through the 1960s. 1950s ->
Bebop Bebop or bop is a style of jazz characterized by a fast tempo, instrumental virtuosity, and improvisation based on a combination of harmonic structure and occasional references to the melody. 1940s ->
Big band   1910s ->
British dance band British dance band is a genre of popular jazz and dance music that developed in British dance halls and hotel ballrooms during the 1920s and 1930s. 1920s ->
Cape jazz Cape jazz (more often written Cape Jazz) is a genre of jazz that is performed in the southernmost part of Africa, the name being a reference to Cape Town, South Africa. 1990s ->
Chamber jazz Chamber jazz is a genre of jazz involving small, acoustic-based ensembles where group interplay is important. 1960s ->
Continental jazz Early jazz dance bands of Europe in the swing medium, to the exclusion of Great Britain.  
Cool jazz Contrasts with the hard, fast sound of bebop. A more relaxed, subdued style, with more formal arrangements and elements of swing and classical. 1940s–1960s
Crossover jazz Artists mix different styles of music into jazz. 1970s ->
Dixieland Dixieland music or New Orleans jazz, sometimes referred to as hot jazz or early jazz, is a style of jazz music which developed in New Orleans at the start of the 20th century. Stylistically it is essentially a form of Ragtime, typically transposed for brass band, banjo and/or clarinet. 1900s ->
Electro Swing[3] Modern interpretation of Swing merged with EDM. Performances typically include both a live band and a DJ. 1990s ->
Ethio-jazz A specific form of jazz that evolved in Ethiopia in the likes of the music of Mulatu Astatke, also referred to as the King of Ethio-jazz. 1950s ->
Ethno jazz Ethno jazz, a form of ethno music, is sometimes equaled to world music or is regarded as its successor, particularly before the 1990s. An independent meaning of "ethno jazz" emerged around 1990. 1990s ->
European free jazz European free jazz is a part of the global free jazz scene with its own development and characteristics. 1960s ->
Flamenco jazz   1960s ->
Free funk A combination of avant-garde jazz with funk music 1970s ->
Free jazz Free improvisation is improvised music without any specific rules. By itself, free improvisation can be any genre, it isn’t necessarily jazz. Free jazz musicians make use of free improvisation to alter, extend, or break down jazz convention, often by discarding fixed chord changes, tempos, melodies, or phrases. Ornette Coleman was an early and noted advocate of this style. 1950s ->
Gypsy jazz A style of jazz music often said to have been started by guitarist Jean "Django" Reinhardt in the 1930s. The style was originally called "hot club" or "hot jazz" and served an acoustic European interpretation of swing. The term "gypsy jazz" didn’t appear until after the 1970s, when Sinti people adapted their folk music to emulate that of Django’s. 1930s/1970s->
Hard bop Incorporated influences from rhythm and blues, gospel music, and blues, especially in saxophone and piano playing. 1950s ->
Indo jazz Fusion of jazz with Indian music (see also Sitar in jazz and Jazz in India). 1950s ->
Jazz blues Although not a distinct style, this is typically used to refer to songs that include idiomatic "jazz" embellishments to the standard form, such as the use of extended harmony and chord substitutions. At a minimum, jazz blues usually include a ii–V progression in place of the simple V chord and a I–VI/vi–ii–V turnaround at the end of the form.
Jazz-funk Jazz-funk is a subgenre of jazz music characterized by a strong back beat (groove), electrified sounds, and an early prevalence of analog synthesizers. 1970s ->
Jazz fusion Combines elements of jazz and rock. Characterized by electronic instruments, riffs, and extended solos. 1970s ->
Jazz poetry   1920s ->
Jazz pop    
Jazz rap Jazz rap is a fusion subgenre of hip hop music and jazz, developed in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The lyrics are often based on political consciousness, Afrocentrism, and general positivism. 1980s ->
Jazz rock The term "jazz-rock" (or "jazz/rock") is often used as a synonym for the term "jazz fusion". 1960s ->
Jump blues   1930s ->
Kansas City jazz Kansas City jazz is a style of jazz that developed in Kansas City, Missouri and the surrounding Kansas City Metropolitan Area during the 1930s 1930s ->
Latin jazz Draws heavily on salsa and merengue influences. Heavy use of percussion, including congas, timbales, bongos, guiros, and others.
M-Base   1980s ->
Marabi   1920s–1930s
Mainstream jazz A genre of jazz music that was first used in reference to the playing styles around the 1950s 1950s ->
Modal jazz Pioneered by Miles Davis, others. Characterized by use of modes, such as dorian modes.  
Neo-bop jazz A comparatively accessible, "retro" genre that emerged in the 1980s as a stylistic reaction against free jazz and jazz fusion. Notably associated with Wynton Marsalis. 1980s ->
Neo-swing The name given to the renewed interest in swing music from the 1930s and 40s. Many neo-swing bands practiced contemporary fusions of swing, jazz, and jump blues with rock, punk rock, ska, and ska punk music or had roots in punk, ska, ska punk, and alternative rock music. 1990s ->
Jazz noir[4] A form of slow or erratic contemporary jazz. Jazz noir (also known as "doom jazz" or "dark jazz") is noted for its often somber, mysterious or even sinister tone. It takes inspiration from film noir soundtracks and dark ambient music.[4] 1990s ->
Nu jazz[5] Music that blends jazz elements with other musical styles, such as funk, soul, electronic dance music, and free improvisation. 1990s ->
Orchestral jazz Also known as "Symphonic Jazz" 1920s ->
Post-bop A genre of small-combo jazz that assimilates hard bop, modal jazz, avant-garde and free jazz without necessarily being immediately identifiable as any of those forms 1960s ->
Punk jazz The amalgamation of elements of the jazz tradition (usually free jazz and jazz fusion of the 1960s and 1970s) with the instrumentation or conceptual heritage of punk rock 1970s ->
Ragtime   1890s ->
Samba-jazz   1950s ->
Ska jazz Music derived by fusing the melodic content of jazz with the rhythmic and harmonic content of early Jamaican Music introduced by the "Fathers of Ska" in the late 1950s. It is sometimes considered a subgenre of Third-Wave Ska. 1960s ->
Skiffle   1950s ->
Smooth jazz In general a smooth jazz track is downtempo (the most widely played tracks are in the 90–105 BPM range), layering a lead, melody-playing instrument (saxophones – especially soprano and tenor – are the most popular, with guitars a close second) over a backdrop that typically consists of programmed rhythms and various synth pads and/or samples. 1960s ->
Soul jazz Draws heavy influences from hard bop, blues, gospel, and rhythm and blues. It is often characterized by organ trios. 1950s ->
Spiritual jazz   1960s ->
Straight-ahead jazz A form of Jazz created in the 1960s with roots from the previous two decades. It omits elements from rock music and free jazz that began to appear in this period, instead putting more emphasis on acoustic instruments and a more conventional sound. 1960s ->
Stride jazz A style of jazz piano which incorporates left hand techniques from ragtime music, except the left hand spans a greater distance on the keyboard. 1920s ->
Swing Big band arrangements, always swung. Pioneered by Duke Ellington, Count Basie, and Benny Goodman. 1930s–1950s
Third stream The fusion of the jazz stream and classical stream. 1950s ->
Trad jazz Short for "traditional jazz", refers to the Dixieland and ragtime jazz styles of the early 20th century  
West Coast jazz A less frenetic, calmer style than hard bop, heavily arranged, and more often compositionally based subgenre of cool jazz.

I have had many. But what sticks out in my mind is the Sonic Frontiers equipment.

I had the CD Player and the Dac. The player must have had the Phillips transport and never really worked right. Disc's were constantly getting stuck inside. I had to take the cover off to get them out! Sonic Frontiers-Chris kept blaming it on bad discs. Never honoring the warranty.

It became quite the boat anchor...

ozzy

@cleeds I remember reading one of your posts from last year where you mentioned you replaced the Aurender with a Bryston BDP-3. I sent you a message earlier today with some questions about the Bryston. If you get a chance, could you please share your thoughts?

First generation CD players.  I set the bar in the stratosphere based on all the pre-release specs and technical discussion.

They sounded awful.

Schiit. Tried many of their products including, yet not limited to, Freya Freya +, Mani, Yaggy OG A2, Vidar and the Skoll. Not sure what it is but after a period of time, quite unbecoming to these ears. 

Ordinary people dont dare to spoke their mind... because opinions differ...

Imagine now a reviewer who must use a diplomatic language...

Threshold Fet 10/e phono

Audio Research SP-9, PH-1 and LS-2

Thiel 3.6

Classe CA-300

Rega Planar 3

I’m sure I could come up with many more but this is getting depressing.

@mahgister 

Bach “art of the fugue”, I plan to give a listen, but there seems to be a multitude of recordings on Qobuz. 
Do you have favorites?

Kind of blue puts me to sleep also… but in a good way… relaxing & wonderful. 

For me, anything Schiit.  My first phono stage and 2 DAC’s. Schiit 

Also Pangea power cables, actually made my system sound worse. 
 

I like Miles, Bach & Krall. Is my official audiophile card in the mail??

Try the Bach Brandenburg concertos and his violin concertos...

I listened them thousand times...

Incredibly moving and dancing music...

 The art of the fugue is not a good idea generally to begin with Bach for most ...

@mahgister 

Bach “art of the fugue”, I plan to give a listen, but there seems to be a multitude of recordings on Qobuz. 
Do you have favorites?

Kind of blue puts me to sleep also… but in a good way… relaxing & wonderful. 

For me, anything Schiit.  My first phono stage and 2 DAC’s. Schiit 

I've tried a number of things that have been well reviewed, or seemed to have found favor among different forum residents, across several forums. They've all had strengths and weaknesses.

Superphon Revelation II pre

McCormack DNA 0.5 Deluxe amp

Forte Model 3 amp, restored

Adcom 5400 amp, restored

Acurus L10 pre

These were all okay, but lacked any exceptional greatness or synergy with anything else I had on hand at the time. On the other hand, a Nak CA5, or a B&K Pro-10 MC, both of those were really pretty good SS preamps, and matched well with many other pieces.

Schitt equipment was mostly unlucky for me, although I did like the Asgard 2 for a good while.

@sokogear

I don't know what Progressive Jazz is. My favorite sub-genre is, without question, Post-Bop: 

A genre of small-combo jazz that assimilates hard bop, modal jazz, avant-garde and free jazz without necessarily being immediately identifiable as any of those form.

 

Wanted to love the Devore O/93 but they made my ears ring. Love all other Devore speakers and tried several amps and even put them in another room for a while.

Lygndorf was bad to me. So much hype way back in the day but I just couldn't handle the sound.

Me too @stuartk (as far as my jazz preferences-tilted toward blues). I guess I was thinking progressive as jazz fusion or jazz funk, really 70's-80's stuff. @knock1  - I'm not talking about audiophile labeling at all. Not sure why you mentioned me about punching someone's audiophile card.

Music preferences do not define audiophiles. And audiophile doesn't compose any specific music preferences. Any type of music along with an audiophile designation represent 2 overlapping circles in a Venn diagram. Or "audiophile" can be a large circle in the middle with each type of music having a circle overlapping it to some degree in the diagram. Some overlap more than others....

@sokogear 

I would classify "Kind of Blue" as Modal, rather than Post Bop. Yes, I own it but it's been years since I've listened to it with any regularity. I was introduced to it in 1976, at a point when I was first getting into Jazz  by listening to the most well-known Jazz recordings. A few years later, I took a college survey course in Jazz appreciation, in the interest of furthering my familiarity with the genre. It took awhile to get a sense of which artists and recordings particularly resonated with me. The Penguin Guide to Jazz was very helpful in this regard. It listed recordings you won't find mentioned in lists of "greatest Jazz records" or such. Just as with Visual Art, Poetry or any other esthetic field of expression, I trust and follow my own inclinations. 

@stuartk 

Please do me the following favor:  put on “Bye Bye Blackbird” from “Round About Midnight”, listen to it with fresh ears, and please let us know what you think.  

People who cannot fathom the fact that we dont like the same styles or genres that they idolize have no idea what music is...

Music adress us where we are ...

Thinking that we are in a contest or a race about what is the best is complete delusion...

listen to this and do me a favor, i think that this man is one of the great musician on this century as Yehudi Menuhin thought also , is it not better than Bye bye Blackbird ? 😊

As you can see we are not from the same mold... ( i like Miles and Chet by the way ) but this dude walk on another planet ... 😁

 

@mdalton

With all due respect, I don’t see the purpose of this exercise.

You could’ve just as easily suggested any one of 100’s of other Jazz recordings and my response would be the same: I recognize the talent and artistic merit but feel more deeply affected by something else.

I could say the same for much visual art, much poetry, etc. It is entirely possible to recognize the merit of an artwork while at the same time feeling less engaged by it than some other artwork.

There is nothing wrong with having preferences and we needn’t justify our preferences; indeed, the reasons for our preferences are not always easily discernible.

However, if our default mode is automatically judging whatever we like as "good" and whatever we don’t like as "bad", that’s a problem, in my view. To clarify, I’m not suggesting you are doing this! I’m merely drawing a comparison.

 

Interesting short Bio of Ostad Elahi:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jaw7eWzgWr0

This video explains that Elahi designed an instrument with two strings that are deliberately not quite in tune. I noticed this effect as soon as I began listening to the track. This is a very different approach than what I’m used to as a guitar player!

... And another, longer film:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlK7aYjqY1o

 

 

@stuartk 

Wow.  The purpose was simply to share with another member a piece of music I love, and to see if you might love it as well.  That’s all.  I’d be a little surprised if you didn’t, but wouldn’t judge you.  And of course it wouldn’t diminish my love one way or another.

Btw, it’s my desert island song. if I had to choose just one. 

Post removed 
Post removed 

His life is amazing...His father was himself a writer and a sufi mystic out of city life...

he was merely fasting and praying all day long younger... But he sees spiritual life too easy this way... He goes in the world to change it by his action and fortify his own resolve and meditate not in the confort of a cave but in city life ...

He is a mystic of high level and his music is not well recorded because he only play in private and family and with selected invitation only for prayers... He improvised to play... he was considered at ten years old as the greatest master of tanbur...

his music is only to tune our consciousness toward ectasy by God presence ...

all recording were made by disciples using tape recorder ... he never played for show or in public...

no other musician i hear is so impressive on a string instruments as improvisation ...very complex rythmic ...

 

His music is not so much beautiful as captivating and moving as a lava flow carrying all heart... We cannot understand is music out of understanding a true prayer : attention focus on pure love...

By the way Yehudi Menuhin goes to see the musician praying with his tanbur, and he said that it was the greatest musical experience of his life.. I bought the first cd because of this recommendation ...

As you had heard his tanbur was unique because no one had one with these two chords tuned as vibrating drones...

His music is not classical persian music...He improvize it all ...

 

 

Interesting short Bio of Ostad Elahi:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jaw7eWzgWr0

This video explains that Elahi designed an instrument with two strings that are deliberately not quite in tune. I noticed this effect as soon as I began listening to the track. This is a very different approach than what I’m used to as a guitar player!

... And another, longer film:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlK7aYjqY1o

My only point was that any jazz enthusiast ALMOST always is a fan of Kind of Blue. It is recognized as the most popular and accessible jazz album of all time to even the non-jazz listener. It is unique in the makeup of the band in all of Miles' records and sounds unique among them. At least @stuartk you admit to owning it. It's very possible you are tired of it or it isn't enjoyable to you so you don't regularly play it. Anyone else out there consider themselves a jazz fan and not like KoB? If so, what are your favorite jazz albums?

Surprisingly, I find Cannonball's Somethin' Else more similar to it than most if not any of Miles' other records. And not surprisingly I guess, it's my second favorite jazz album. 

And BTW @stuartk, I would bet any "greatest jazz recording" would be highly rated by Penguin.

Two previous models of Emotiva pre/pros. Sounded fine but buggy as hell and slower than Christmas to respond to user inputs.

Neil Young.  No matter how many times I've tried, I just can't stand his voice and can't get past it.

Three great jazz albums were released in 1959.  If you said your favorite was "Kind of Blue" or "Take Five," I would not be sure that you are a serous jazz fan--those great albums were loved by Jazz fans and those who only casually listened to jazz.  But, if you said "Shape of Jazz to Come,"  I would KNOW you are a jazz fan.

I proposed that any great jazz afficionado must admire Sun Ra...

😊

I like kind of blue this does not means that i do not in fact  listen more often to many others albums...

People dont understand that what is the "best of hits  "  and the most liked is good for sure but it cannot be the best for all and not also the favorite listening for many...

@sokogear 

Whatever I say, you repeatedly miss the point, so I don't see what's to be gained by continuing. I harbor no ill will toward you but this clearly isn't working. 

 

 

 

 

This is why there is so much great musicians to love... No one is greater than all the others...

It is also a soul affair between the musician and us... Not a public affair ...

Then it makes no sense to impose some piece of someone saying you must like this if not you are not a jazz lover...

i idolize Sun Ra album with Walt Dickerson ( my favorite vibraphonist) as an album as among the  greatest as many others cited here and well known if not for me greater 😊..

Am i a jazz ignorant ? 😊

 

 

My Denafrips Terminator II never convinced - I sold it on after comparing it in my system with a Gustard R26 w/ external clock, which for my tastes was on par with the Terminator for less than half the price.

Jazz is a easy avenue for fairly untalented "artists" to hide. They may be fairly proficient with an instrument, but, lacking heavily when you need to go beyond that...The average juicehead, of course, thinks he is "bourgeois" only if he claims he likes jazz! Jazz miyazz schnazz, lol

After insulting me which is not a big deal, you propose insulting claims about a genre including the musicians and his public , your disparaging meaningless remarks dont surprize me ...

I love jazz by the way among many others genres...

 

Jazz is a easy avenue for fairly untalented "artists" to hide. They may be fairly proficient with an instrument, but, lacking heavily when you need to go beyond that...The average juicehead, of course, thinks he is "bourgeois" only if he claims he likes jazz! Jazz miyazz schnazz, lol

 
 

 

 

con·fir·ma·tion bi·as:

noun

  1. the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.

Since "Kind of Blue" is being knocked about at the moment I need to ask a question. My digital copy has an odd thing that may or may not be natural. The opening horn is making a sound much like that of spittle being blown through the mouthpiece. It could also be distortion from mic-ing improperly. The sound is quite distracting. Anyone else hear this?

Jazz or not jazz or any genre, there are only 2 types of musicians: 

1. Those who can play...

2. Those who can't...

 

This is a very useful distinction...

Those who can think and those who cannot...

Those who can walk good and those who cannot...😊