It might surprise some that the company probably most responsible for the shift toward "data" is also the one with possibly the best "listening" training.
Harman uses it to train their staff.
The results are here.
Something Millercarbon has preached Be A Better Listener. Do not get mired in data.
At times I agree with @millercarbon. Not often but at times.
One thing he has always preached is "Do you know how to listen"?
Well this article sheds a little light on that very subject.
Yes Chuck that was a compliment.
Just provoking some thought and I may look a tweaks a little different (just not colored rocks).
http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/viewpoint/1221/Are_Your_Ears_Good_Enough.htm
It might surprise some that the company probably most responsible for the shift toward "data" is also the one with possibly the best "listening" training.
Harman uses it to train their staff. The results are here. |
Post removed |
@dabel Nice try. I get notifications as this is a thread I started. I am following my thread and I follow no man. Cheers. I Robot |
Post removed |
@nonoise you are the King of the GIF. That was good! |
Post removed |
I just know a lot about audio, find it fascinating, and enjoy answering questions and helping people. In doing so I help myself in the process. Because, writing concise informative answers calls for having ones thoughts in order, and writing as with most things improves with practice. So I get better at both. Plus I had a lot of time to kill at work. Now being retired I have actually cut back a bit.* But the quality is higher. This is a big plus. The people I want to help get helped even more, and the people I don't their heads explode even more. Audio you see is not a zero sum game. Do it right and we all win. *As millercarbon. Posting as my other 13 aliases is turning into a full time job. By the way have you noticed Tsushima, nonoise and fuzzball never post at the same time as me? Think about it. |
@millercarbon ...*L* Since you've seemed to have been 'detected and dejected' into the meme of 'Default Audio Buddha'....'Elected by habit, denied option, desired yet debated to the point of detest by others...; Check. Checkmate? ;) ('Bots' can't 'do this'....yet....😏...) |
At the end of a day, one has to love AG....or, find it annoying enough to still be drawn like a moth to the flame that will engulf it... ;) There are those that remain 'techie'...one learns from them, although wheat from chaff still remains work. There remains those that remind one of cats with tails entwined, slung over a clothesline (Remember those? Source of the still popular descriptive 'fail' move...), and what generally happens... The 'good natured' variety is somewhat funny....others? Not so much. Voting with @jpwarren58 on this one...volume to 9, and remember why you're here....to hear, not expound.... (...no surprise, I hope, how often I drown y'all out....) ...and I am Definitely not a 'bot....;) |
@nonoise + 1, as usual.... |
@hhscott yes they do and remember everything sits on a Ritz. |
That article would have been much more helpful if he actually provided a set of tips on what to listen for. Yes, he provided some information on how bass notes are produced and knowing the different parts of a bass note might help determine if your system is capable of distinguishing those parts and would therefore be called a "good system", but other than that info the article was extremely light on what to actually listen for. He also said determining "the same pair of colored glasses" of our hearing is of no value at all, but viewing the world through rose colored glasses means being optimistic and I've read multiple times that there is far less damage to our hearing done by listening to loud music if we actually like the music we are hearing. Something about the stress associated with not liking what we are hearing combined with the volume that actually causes hearing loss. So crank it up if you like it. |
Amen. Learning to listen may include learning to describe sound; in this regard, it might be like odor. FWIW: "Numerous studies with English speakers support this view: there are few terms for odors, odor talk is infrequent, and naming odors is difficult. However, this is not true across the world. Many languages have sizeable smell lexicons — smell is even grammaticalized. In addition, for some cultures smell talk is more frequent and odor naming easier. This linguistic variation is as yet unexplained but could be the result of ecological, cultural, or genetic factors or a combination thereof. Different ways of talking about smells may shape aspects of olfactory cognition too." SOURCE: https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/fulltext/S1364-6613(20)30277-1 |
Post removed |
This last part of the article says it all... We listen also with our own integrated history, we dont listen to sound, we listen to meaning... Only inexperienced people in acoustic think they listen to the pure "sound" measured in hertz.. A perceived timbre is like a human face....Not like an equation... Thanks for the link....
|
Chickens aside, learning how to listen, learning the vocabulary of sound is critical in the enjoyment of high end audio. My partner of 35 years has always had much better hearing than I… she is a girl. She always to differs to me to explain what she hears. We both clap our hands over our ears when hearing high resolving systems with distortion, but she differs to me because I have highly developed listening skills. Listening skills trump small differences in hearing. |
@mapman and @oldhvymec you all crack me up! |
MC has TWO types of people that follow his post. pretty obvious isn't it? The ones that say they don't like him and continue to post about HIM. Then there are others that agree with some or all or whatever amount he post and post their own thoughts about the SUBJECT. I find it all, amusing to tell the truth, to a point.. I had a guy just tell me he knew, I had a view point, but so did someone else, even though they were wrong.. LOL What do I care, as long as they DON'T come over to my place doing stupid $hit? I DON'T give a hoot. I was pointing out a series of flaws in a product but the the OP owned the product. Didn't want to hear the truth, he/she wanted to hear praise about a flawed idea and product.. What fun is that.. It's like a Baptist and Pentecostal arguing about weather the pews in the church are for sleeping in or dancing on. They are there to listen, and share above all else.. Not debate pew politics, besides the early preachers SAT and the listeners STOOD. My how things have changed.. Fanboy, maybe, for some, but for most it is a healthy respect for common ideas. TGIF retirement is tough, I'm telling you.. I had to watch them mow MY lawn, can you imagine that.. Someone else mowing your lawn.. :-) Regards |
Jeez not sure. And not everyone. As I said I follow no man. you must have selective hearing as there's a long list of members here that have said the very same things for the longest of times but have never had the need for a fanboy following to prop them up.
|
@jerryg123 , why are you singling me out for what everyone is saying? All the best, |
Roger Skoff:
I would say for the benefit of some here, applies equally well to ideas as music. Some of these guys, not you OP, but everyone can guess who I mean, they remind me of the guy who said, "Everyone learns differently. Some learn through the eyes by seeing. Some learn through the hands by doing. I learn through the mouth by talking."
|
@jerryg123 , you must have selective hearing as there's a long list of members here that have said the very same things for the longest of times but have never had the need for a fanboy following to prop them up. Maybe it's his style of self promotion that caught your eye. All the best, |