atmasphere, I was talking about vinyl records quality-control / sound-check, not cutting press-form process equipment.
"some recording studios use $5 per mile cables to make recordings” - not really, helped Sony Studios Toronto to find some interconnect issues, they have the best professional grade cables / connectors / mixers / amps / speakers / audio-processing EQ you can imagine! remember, there are only few actual cable and connectors manufacturers (OEMs), unless DIY, users typically employ cable-shop products.. |
@westcoastaudiophile So was I. In the pressing plant they don't play LPs back. Instead, they send something called a 'test pressing' back to the producer; he has to sign off on it before the plant does the pressing run. He will be listening for weird ticks, distortion caused by over-cut, that sort of thing. Quite often the mastering engineer might take on this function although it depends on the production. If the mastering engineer did their job properly as I outlined earlier, then the only variable will be if the plant introduced tick somewhere. Usually they don't. An addition test press usually goes to the artist who listens on whatever they have. Right there might be your concern but again the main thing is to make sure the LP is playable. |
@atmasphere they also play test pressings in the record plant during the manufacturing cycle. I’ve been on tours of the AS/AP/QRP facility in Salina. They have a small room next the one where all the presses are located. I’ve observed a plant engineer take a record off the press and go into that room to play it. I was told they do that periodically for quality assurance. They might not sit there with a stopwatch playing the whole thing (I don’t know), but they at least do spot checks. I can’t speak to other plants but that’s what they do at QRP. I’ll bet it’s the same at RTI, Optimal, Pallas, etc. |
@inna some fb to OP: discussing sound quality, using only price of cartridge, is pointless.. there are many $400 cart (80s price) outperforming $2k+ current offers. the biggest task of building perfect analog system is to match cart/tonearm/phono-pre/pre/amp/speakers/room to give you what you want! |
Yes but you have to be careful. Many cartridge manufacturers have a bit of "house sound" so do your research. The comment about very cheap cables in recording studios is doubtful, but even if true is meaningless. It is about getting the most from the software. Same with statements about AC to your outlets. |
@dwette +1 Thanks! |
The big question is can you enjoy your $10K cartridge more than I enjoy my $2K cartridge? I ask because I have never enjoyed a system more than my $100 Sears Silvertone suitcase stereo when I was in college. It must have had a steel stylus. Smoke a joint and listen to Stravinsky's Firebird with my girlfriend next to me in bed. I will never have that musical enjoyment again, but I do still get deeply into music sometimes. And when I'm in that musical mood, $!K cartridge, $2K, $50K, it wouldn't matter. Just give my porous brain the music. |
Yes, but you need a considerable investment in playback equipment to realize the ∆. |
Surely whichever component (including cables) is the least transparent is the rate-limiting factor? And since improving on any bottleneck component makes everything downstream from it sound better, removing bottlenecks closest to the source have the greatest potential gains? That's what baffles me about "rules" like the "10% rule" quoted above. |
@dogberry Of course you are right. My 10% statement was just meant as a general guideline for someone new to the hobby. |
Greetings, Sorry for be late to this posting, I want to make sure I had proper information on this subject. I can’t tell you the difference between a $5k and a $10k cartridge, but I can tell you the differences between a $5k and a $16k cartridge. (Retail price) It’s like the difference between driving a Lexus and a Bugatti. A Lexus will get you from point A to B in comfort, it’s fairly dependable, and looks good. A Bugatti is exhilarating. Joe Nies |
@westcoastaudiophile Your comment just cracks me up. Thanks for making me laugh. Joe |
Exotic $$$ cars & $$$ cartridges=terrible comparison. Is a Bugatti Veyron/Lamgborghi Veneno/La Ferrari ,REALLY "better" than a ...Lexus LFA? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5gmkykQOEIE
|
In my post, I didn’t mention Lexus worked with Yamaha’s audio division to perfect the LFA’s 9000 RPM scream. I have experienced a couple of random LFA sightings and it sounds like a Formula 1 engine with the intensity knob turned down. https://blog.son-video.com/en/2024/11/lexus-lfa-x-yamaha-the-roar-of-an-angel/#:~:text=The%20Lexus%20LFA%20supercar%20is,designed%20in%20collaboration%20with%20Yamaha. |
I have purchased about fifteen phono cartridges over the last dozen years, all new, in all price ranges. Among them are Benz (I once hoarded Glider SL's when they appeared scarce), Ortofon, Soundsmith, Van den Hul, and Lyra. My profile shows my two tables-both with Reed 3P's. Phono stage is a Manley Steelhead. My humble two cents is that like most of audio, beyond the sweet spot the incremental improvement is very subtle. To get to the sweet spot though you must have optimum set-up. I have already hinted at this, but to my ears in my system and thus highly individual, I love the Benz Glider SL as being a champion at the pricepoint and YET, all four of my Gliders are in long-term reserve and my Ven den Hul Crimson Strad XGW and Lyra Etna are my current daily drivers. In very general terms, as you go up the scale in a given producer's line-up you get a little more micro detail/resolution and a little more micro-dynamics. Soundstage width and imaging tend go up as well. All that said, you can easily fall into the pit of getting too hi-fi and not any happier. For example, on some recordings the Lyra Etna on my 10.5 Reed 3P can border on analytical and ever-so-slightly cold. I can then take that very same LP and place it on my other deck with a 12" Reed 3P and the Van den Hul and the "porridge is just right" with the tone and warmth restored that was lacking with the Lyra. The Lyra Etna is always faster in every respect-transients, dynamics, overall presentation. Besides my beloved Benz Gliders which simply check the boxes in every category at a very reasonable price, my other go-to sweet spot for the money is the Ortofon Cadenza Bronze. I am of the highly individual subjective opinion that both the Benz Glider SL and Ortofon Cadenza Bronze, properly set-up, provide 95% of what is attainable at 20% (or less) of the top-tier pricing. No one on this Board is more knowledgeable and reliable on this subject (again, IMHO) than Mulveling. Listen to his advice and not mine. But one thing that I do think I know is that as you go up the hierarchy you are more likely to be losing out on all that is achievable without expert set-up. I can set up and get most of what is possible with the Benz Glider or Cadenza Bronze on my own using just the SmartTractor alignment tool and a Fozgometer, but for the Ven den Hul and Lyra, I received good return on the investment by having Brian Walsh do my set-up. |
Doesn’t it bother you people that speakers sound so different? We need hifi for people that sounds the same for everyone, everywhere, all the time!!!
|