Who, do you think, designs the best looking tube-based devices?


The reason I chose specifically devices with tubes is because, in my opinion, it's much harder to design something good -not to mention gorgeous- looking with tubes and transformers sticking out.

From the ones that I know, which is not a lot, Airtight and Allnic designs stand out in my eyes. Shindo and Atma Sphere, on the other hand, do not look appealing at all. KT-Audio looks beautiful internally, whereas externally it's nothing special...yet?

I'm only asking about design, I don't care about sound :-)
audioinfidel
Check out the Audio Hungary intergrated tube amps , "but" its the sounds that matters
@galacticmayan   oooh, yeah, that's a beauty. Will add to my list of stuff I want but can't afford. Gorgeous!
My Ayon Triton III is a feast for my eyes at least.

Engström produces some drop dead gorgeous gear and Canary Audio none too shabby.

I love the aura of Kondo also.
Stuck on this--not often on used market --few months ago there was one in Canada--was still 4k plus which I could do but tight with my scrilla these days. All the wood nice and what he does with the internals is quite interesting. Check it out.

https://userweb.117.ne.jp/y-s/A-03S-E.html
audioinfidel - what’s your friggen problem? I mentioned my preferences just like everyone else here did. So why do you have an issue with my comment and no one else’s?

You wrote, “The reason I chose specifically devices with tubes is because, in my opinion, it’s much harder to design something good -not to mention gorgeous- looking with tubes and transformers sticking out.”

From that, I gather you prefer tube amps with the tubes hidden. That’s perfectly fine, that’s what you like. Everyone else stated what they like and think is appealing to them, but when I do, you have an issue with it. 

Sorry, not very familiar with Air Tight, Allnic, Shindo, or Atmasphere as those products are generally above my affordability level and not what I’m wllling to spend on a tube amp.
@lou_setriodes, do you even read what people write? The ones I like - do they have their tubes hidden?!? Everyone else, who posted a reply, seems to have understood me correctly. I was only wondering, which ones look pretty in people’s eyes.

There’s nothing wrong with tubes sticking out. However, for some "unknown reason", some look nice and some...not so much
I disagree, one of the enticing things about tube gear, besides it sounding better, IMHO, is the nice glow of tubes, and the cool retro way it looks. Why would I want to hide the most appealing qualities of a tube amp? We are all entitled to our opinions and the OP doesn’t like the looks of tubes sticking out, that’s fine, just not my cup of tea. I also dislike interconnects or speaker wire in the front of the amp too, even if it’s adventacious because it’s a shorter signal path. Keep them on the back out of the way.


As the late Roger Modjeski (RIP) of Music Reference once wrote on designing tube amps was to leave the transformers in the back and the tubes up front for aesthetics and better air flow. All of his tube amp designs have been known for very long tube life as well. I think his RM9 and RM10 are both extremely attractive looking. I much prefer that look to the ARC, cj and other tube amps where the tubes are completely hidden.
Just discovered another one, which looks plainly, but still very pretty somehow:
Triode Lab (and its sister company Finale)
Some Line Magnetic units also look decent
@davespencer, although L-7000 does look very pretty, I prefer L-9000's design. However, the difference is minute. I'd say if L-9000 is a 100, L-7000 would be 97/100 :-)
It's hard to believe that virtually everyone has overlooked the elephant in the room here, that in some ways bestrides the non-hybrid, tube audio landscape like a colossus, Vladimir Lamm & his co. Lamm.  
My 2 favorite tube amps are simply big badass beasts: for sheer “ King of the hill awesome” nothing beats the mammoth presence and sheer audacity of the [quad chassis]
Tube Research Labs GT800’s....
and for wicked absolute ‘coolness‘ the Wavestream Kinetics V8 Monoblocs have no peers either. Tubes rule... and with big enough transformers / caps / and enough output tubes, SS has nothin’ on them ( including bass )...just my 2 cents...
my old Viva Solista looks so good just sitting still.  I love that V-8 engine block chassis look...and that custom auto paint finish is the best,
of course when I turn it in and those 845 and 211 tubes light up ...I’m in love for the first time over and over again.
When I was looking, Pathos (Italia!) and Vincent (demure, but with a peek inside the boudoir) were both alluring, but in the end I went with Quicksilver, but not for looks. As I look over the variations, there are lots of nice boxes (some with tubes jutting out, others with fancy metal coffins), but they all reduce of a pedestrian, utilitarian look, at least to me. Yes, a nice wood box doesn't hurt, but from a design standpoint, it's not much of an aesthetic accomplishment. Electronluv is amazing -- almost dangerously good looking. 
Pathos
Can’t remember the name of ones that the form looked like sea creatures, with eyes, etc.
Einstein
Unison Research/Unico 



I would go with Air Tight and Shindo for my tastes. I like to see the tubes glow. Don't know why you would want to have a tube amp stuck in a box.

It is also funny how brands go through phases of popularity. I still love the classic look of the older Jolida amps that were once the rage (and great sounding). They don't make them like that any more and we have gone through a few rounds of other brands becoming popular and then falling off, even though they continue to make great gear.
+ 1 Decware (inside and out)

Cary V12s, all of them, mono blocks, and stereo units. Outside ONLY!

My Mcintosh M60s with 24K gold plate cases. Polished to perfection.

There is a few more...

Regards
I'm pretty happy with the understated, but elegant design of my VAC PA 80 80 that I've owned since the mid nineties 
Mcintosh MC2152 70th anniversary model and the CJ MV series look pretty cool to me.
Dennis Had...I had to say it...heh heh. But for me it's true, and I do care about sound as the design of anything that doesn't work (except maybe Frank Loyd Wright's leaky roofs) often kills the vibe and with it the esthetic.
It is an interesting question.   I’ve been having an ongoing discussion with the manager of my local store with respect to a couple of distribution opportunities they may have.   They carry some pretty high-end stuff, so clientele tends to look not only for performance, but also aesthetics (true “statement pieces”, if you will).  
If I name my 3 best looking designs, he would say they were the 3 least appealing to his eyes (and vice versa).  He’s more of a “bling” guy (think Jadis, CJ, etc), whereas I tend to like the simple but somewhat unusual (OMA, NAT (especially the Magma), Allnic and VAC).  We have the same ongoing debate about TTs (he loves the stuff that looks like a spaceship; whereas my tastes tend towards the VPI Classic, Thorens, Garrard).

Unfortunately for me, I have two 150+ pound slobbering, shedding mutts who don’t allow me to have pretty and/or fragile things on or near the floor.  So, I have to do with big ugly boxes, the heat generated from which keeps them at least 6 feet away.