I am considering trying Roon. I have been using my Bluesound Node but I am going to upgrade as I do enjoy streaming more and more using Tidal. It is quite an investment to get a NUC or Nucleus and then have a separate tablet to control it all.
But apart from the cost I have read some people say Roon does not sound good. Their streamer by blah blah sounds better. Is this true? For all that is required to use Roon, the hardware, the subscription and all, would Roon be popular if it made digital streaming sound bad?
I would love to hear people who have experience comment on this. There is info on the Roon Labs discussion site but as you can imagine it is saying this is BS Roon sounds great. I guess Roon as a software also has had updates, so maybe this is a thing that might have been true in the past?
Thanks all for the comments and suggestions. Airplay delivers Red Book spec. That’s what turned the corner for me since most of my 1500 or so CDs are “Regular” CDs. My small collection of SACDs I still spin in my Marantz Blu-ray player.
Relative to the post, my AB tests were against CDs in my collection vs streamed by Roon.
Agreed that poor remastering is what causes bad sound. Amazon is not the culprit- just the delivery method.
The OP poses a good question. Before I offer my experience - I want to challenge those who share their experiences ending with “and it sounds great”. Yes - Roon sounds great. But can it sound better? Unless you’ve actually done direct comparison on your system and found no discernible difference, you may not be optimizing the sound of your system - if indeed that is the goal. (It isn’t for everyone).
My experience? I paid for Roon for a year. Loved the interface - it is without peer. But curiosity called and I compared a Qobuz sourced track I know well vs the same track using my gear’s native app. No upsampling - just a direct straight up comparison. I was surpised at the result but accepted and decided to drop Roon because it did not sound as good. I would never have known had I not actually done the comparison. Now, I have more invested in digital than the average so am I benefiting in ways that others may not? Perhaps. Or, are the differences more universal than some may wish to believe? I don’t know the answer to that either.
That there are differences actually makes complete sense - even for this non-techie. Roon must run on all certified machines (clearly Windows does not run equally well on all machines). Different hardware, specs, processing speed, memory cache, memory addresses, etc. Regardless, for me, my gear, my ears, my room - no contest.
That does not invalidate Roon. Doesn’t mean it sounds bad or even that it doesn’t sound as good on some gear. But, going back to the “and it sounds great” comment. The only way to know - is to do an actual comparison on your gear, your ears, your room.
Maybe you’ll be one of the lucky ones for whom Roon both optimizes the sound and the interface.
@cleedsThanks, you’re probably right and if so is a ridiculous limitation no audiophile should accept given all the other viable alternatives with no such handicap. I think I confused Air Play with the lightning connection.
... I think Air Play may limit resolution to 24/96 ... if you haven’t already by all means do a free trial of Qobuz as it has by many accounts/reviews the best streaming sound quality and the most hi-res content available.
@zgas-musicI think you’re leaving a lot of performance potential on the table using a computer and Air Play. I just bought a relatively affordable iFi Zen Stream for only $399 (along with their iPowerX power supply to further suppress noise) and my streaming sound quality now surpasses the performance of spinning CDs. Also, I think Air Play may limit resolution to 24/96, which seems like an unnecessary limitation to have these days. Last, if you haven’t already by all means do a free trial of Qobuz as it has by many accounts/reviews the best streaming sound quality and the most hi-res content available. My $0.02 FWIW.
Commenting on above, i strongly suggest a wired connection if you can. It leads to significantly fewer dropouts etc., - although mostly if you are sending high rate data. There are many options to either lower or raise both the SQ and load in Roon (as i described above). Airplay also limits SQ options. So why? Aside from convenience - and people asking abotu ultimate SQ are not prioritizing convenience....
Even as an IT/tech guy, the options/ requirements to implement Roon makes my head swim. Found an inexpensive way to try it, figuring I could upgrade afterward. Have not looked back. It’s changed how I listen to music. Implementation…
- CDs imported to iTunes using ALAC encoding on a Windows machine.
- Roon core running on same machine.
- Apple Airplay adapters (used $30) listening on an eero mesh network.
- Using my iPhone for the UI.
Listening to Quad 63s powered by an Mc352 with Marantz front end.
Short story is after two years, I’m going to buy the perpetual subscription this year. And I’m not planning an equipment upgrade at this time. I’ve AB’d some demanding recording with the CDs with this configuration and can hear no difference. (I do hear the AAC/ALAC difference.)
I, too, wish Roon interfaced with Amazon Music, but Roon sez AZ won’t send them the data needed for it to work. So I use the Airplay rig for that, too. SQ has been fine from AZ except where they show a selection as “remastered.” Always sounds terrible…
FWIW. Intro to Roon cost me $60 for 2 two systems on the 30 day free promo. $200 annual subscription after that…
"I have read some people say Roon does not sound good." Piffle to that.
Done right it sounds fantastic with no difference between that and the native streamer app. @jjss49 said it all best. You need all the bells and whistles.
I have a similar set up as oldschool1948 and ejr1953
When I went down the streaming rabbit hole, I started with Roon and thus no experience with alternatives to Roon
I do not have a Roon Nucleus as I have no need to store files
I started with a Roon core running on a Lenovo i4 laptop with 8Gb of RAM, no SSD and wifi connected to my network - it was functional but not entirely stable
I upgraded the laptop to an i7 processor, 16Gb RAM, with some SSD and wired direct to the network switch
I do not know that the SQ improved but the stability was better requiring fewer reboots and dropped songs
For the record I've never had a song drop on Tidal, with Qobuz I drop approx 10% of the songs
In both cases I found the Roon SQ to be exceptional
I hear the best versions of the same old songs I've listened to for the last 40 years, streaming through Roon to my PS Audio DSD
I cannot recall the last time a played a physical CD
If I could change anything I'd like to remove Microsoft from the equation, not sure that would improve the SQ but all the bloat, OneDrive, AV, patching updates, etc - the timing of such is typically not convenient and I'd like to spend less time babysitting Bill Gates and more time listening to music
I'm happy with Roon and only wished I'd bought a lifetime subscription the first or second year
i'll add to #lalitk - you do not need a lot of power to run Roon -- big caveat -- unless you want to use DSP and/or synch and upsample to multiple rooms. The you may.
I trialed Roon on a 12 year old macbook pro laptop running normal software in addition. No issues at all. USB to DAC.
That's not how i deploy it today, but it works well.
I do suggest a bridge for isolation and to allow you to put roon wherever nad have your system elsewhere
This why I have the Simaudio 280D and 680D in my 2 systems. Running the Mind 2 streaming application on my IPads or IPhone. On occasion I run them through my Roon core that is installed on a MS Surface through my network. I have fiber to clean up the data stream.
95% of my streaming is internet radio, Radio Paradise in particular and I use the Moon Mind2 app and streamer in my 680D.
I have been enjoying Roon and Qobuz, running on a Roon Nucleus Plus server, connected to a PS Audio DirectStream DAC with a USB cable for several years now and find the sound quality to be awesome! I used to also have a Tidal subscription, but didn't need both of them, and had no complaints about the sound quality of that, though doing significant "A/B" testing, for some reason I can't explain, the sound quality of Qobuz seemed a tad bit better.
Before purchasing the Roon Nucleus Plus server, I ran Roon, Qobuz and Tidal on a Dell laptop, USB to the DAC and the sound quality of the USB on the Dell wasn't at all in the same league as the Roon server.
I copuld add my opinion here. I have one. I also have a nose, and a cup of coffee, none of the three are useful to you.
Roon sounds liek the systems its implemented with. As noted, the DAC is #1. A streamer ought to make little difference, but does for a few reasons. First, the software (lik Roon) must run on hardware. Isolating the hardware ground noise from the DAC is one source of improvement. While the USB inputs are often isolated, i have a 3-stage approach to ridding me of noise: 1) my own power supply for Roon; 2) a bridge between Roon and my DAC, and 3) dedicated USB power in my bridge. Note i built my own.
A second "sound thing" is the various processing performed. You can up-sample, or not. You cna choose the type of upsampling. You can choose an MQA first unfold or not. You can set buffer windows. Most of these will in the end be opportunities for improvement,
My experience is that between Tidal and a great DAC, along with just plain solid engineering in the middle (no fancy cables or routers) you deal with 99% of the sound.
In any event, if set up right, it can sound truly great. And the various features, remote capability, multi-room, synch-ing are terrific.
I run Roon on ROCK on a NUC with an LPS that i built. Warning - the NUC is an absolute power hog on turn on, my LPS is HUGE (8A regulated out). Holy carbon footprint batman.
I use both Roon and Sense. I have a PS Audio Direct Stream DAC w/ Bridge II and Innous Zenith MKII streamer. I bought the Zenith about 5 years ago and a life time Roon subscription.
On the Zenith, I did A/B testing between Roon and Logitech Media Server. I found LMS sounded better, but Roon’s interface is so much better so I stuck with Roon as my primary music management system. (I ran LMS from a NAS for years and years, long before I purchased the Zenith.)
Once I tried Sense in my music room system, there was no looking back. I still use Roon for whole house stereo to Riva Wand wireless speakers on my first floor, second floor, and backyard.
In my music room, I did A/B testing using Sense via the Zenith into a Matrix DDC using i2s to the my DAC, and Roon into Bridge II in my DAC. Sense sounds much better. Using Roon and Bridge II, I’ve found that Qobuz HIRes generally sounds better than Tidal MQA, but not by much.
For critical listening, I use Qobuz. I listen to Tidal a lot because that’s where I started and have about 20 lengthy playlists that I’m too lazy to recreate in Qobuz. And Tidal has more music to my liking (old school Soul/R&B, contemporary Jazz, and soft Rock) - and I think Qobuz playlists suck. By that I mean, Qobuz mixes way too many music types into their playlists and their definition of Soul/R&B is mostly hip hop music which I can’t stomach. Tidal’s focused playlist are so much better than Qobuz’s mixed bag playlists, and Tidal’s “My Mixes” playlists are awesome (IMHO) because they are automatically generated by Tidal based on the types of music that I play.
interesting post and ensuing discussion, i took the leap into roon in january after some 18 months of resisting... i must say i am quite pleased, don’t feel the sound is compromised but maybe i have more to learn still on this front
1) fascinating that some streamer makers feel they have i-p to protect from roon, so they don’t buy in 100%, and while they may allow roon to work on their gear (due to roon’s popularity), they may also subtly compromise its performance relative to using their own, proprietary interfaces - reminds me of a discussion on spotify’s strategy of thinking of streaming controllers we use as precious real estate to compete over...
2) i recall really figuring out roon took a good while, there are numerous ways to deploy it, at the processor/nuc level, how the music stream is taken to an ’endpoint’ then to a downstream dac, whether built in features that can affect the sound are or are not used (dsp, volume control etc) -- roon itself on its site does not make all these permutations crystal clear, and that, plus the fact that alot of audiophiles are actually older folks, usually not the most tech savvy, it makes it pretty hard for noobs
3) the roon trial thing is a red herring in my mind, cuz to try it right you have to set it up right, have the right hardware, make the right choices, and some those things are expensive and typically are not bought on a trial basis, and even if they are, one hardly fully gets their arms around all the choices and capabilities and proper setup within a typical 15-30-45 day trial period
4) i think the most confusing thing is that one needs a computer to run roon’s core program, and yet it is best not to take the music stream out of that same computer’s usb port, even though it is right there waiting to be used!! ... there is yet more hardware to buy to get a sufficiently cleaned stream delivered to your outboard dac (switches, filters, bridges, fmc and so on)... i can see some folks starting by pulling the music stream out of the core machine then saying hey why does it sound so bad...
5) then there are some units like the innuos ones, i e zen or zen mini... they can be used as an endpoint or a core or both, but using their hardware to be the core machine may compromise the speed and the sound of what is delivered
so it is alot to comprehend, much of it ample, fertile ground for eyes glazing over and getting frustrated, then on top of that some folks say it sounds bad -- holy moly!!
op, i do hope you are getting some clarity from all this nice discussion you have started with your initial post, and i wish you good luck!
In my system (high resolution, with electrostatic speakers), I've compared Roon to a simple DLNA setup, both running through an Auralic Aries G1. I get excellent sound either way.
Years ago, Auralic made firmware improvements that put Roon on parity with their own software in playback through their equipment. There is no intrinisic reason that Roon can't sound great.
Many audiophile reports of "noise" turn out to mean simply that one thing is preferred to another. This is almost always with sighted comparisons and not attempted blind. Preference may be due to expectation bias, heightened attention, or favoring something already owned. I would be wary of subtle differences (even if reported as "major") that have zero objective measurable component. Not to say that they can't exist; just that as humans, we fool ourselves easily and often.
OK. First post. Everybody's musical journey is different. We all have different setups in different rooms. It's about you. We learn from each other but it's about you. I am not trying to over complicate things, although I might be past that point. I use 2 Roon Nucleus devices, (one a Nucleus Plus) with a lifetime subscription. The other is just as a streamer into a Massdrop Airist R2R dac (yup). The other (Plus) is the core. I also use a Lumin X1. Was going to sell the Nucleus but decided to try it on the Airist dac. Well now the Airist sounds as good as the Lumin. Different but just as good. Roon is no joke. Get a Nucleus and a great dac and you will be done. All updates are automatic. Features out the wazoo. I believe that once you reach a certain plateau, a lot of the things we buy in this hobby are just different, not necessarily better. The thing is trying to find out what works for you. For me Roon is possibly the most important cog in my machine.
Roon is pretty well unrivaled in terms of options, interface, and usability. It is, however, a very heavy software. Roon prioritizes features and end user experience over sound quality (although it has improved over time).
There is a tremendous amount of network activity occurring within Roon. High amounts of network activity can contribute to the "harsh" sound often attributed to digital audio. Minimizing network activity within the server can net positive gains. I believe this is a major reason why alternatives such as Sense, Lightning DS, and Stylus are reported to sound better. Taiko set out to mitigate the impact of network activity on sound quality in their proprietary TAS software. This was a major focal point for them, and many SGM Extreme users report that streaming from Qobuz/Tidal now sounds indistinguishable from playing local files.
This is a great thread especially for someone like me who is new to streaming.
I do have a question about Roon. I understand the organization and the added value of Meta data, but how can Roon improve the sound from Tidal or Qobuz? Isn’t that what the hardware in our streamers do?
BTW, I put a USB “Y” adapter on my Node N130 and have a 4 TB hard drive and my output to the DAC on the other and The Bluesound software see’s the hard drive and I can play from it or whatever services I want. Easy Peasy.
Oh my. My post was clear. Roon does not sound the same or as good as Sense in my particular set up. This can be heard very easily unfortunately. Roon sounds great with other streamers I have heard, just not as good as Innuos’s own Sense on an Innuos server in a resolving system.
I house Roon core on the Innuos. It was my core and end point when I was using Roon. No DSP. My dac is NOS also.
I love Roon as an interface. Love it. Just wish it sounded as good as Sense on my Innuos Zenith.
I suggest the OP read the many videos and reviews on Roon and why someone would and would not use it. If you want it’s features the set up a core and DAC. The confusing part is some higher end streamers can be cores and DAC all in one.
i also agree with many here that said unless you get a super high end streamer then there is no sound quality degradation from Roon. There is something to be said for a high end all in one unit with super short paths and all high end parts and isolation. How can you go wrong with that.
I for one love Roon. I don’t do vinyl and don’t want to. Roon is the best interface and it’s way of music discovery is second to none. I will totally agree it’s not for all but if you want to explore it’s for you.
I’ve found Roon sounds better than the Innuos Sense app on Innuos Zen MkIII. Then I found Roon running on a NUC as a core and using the Zen as only a player sounds better still.
Roon is very flexible if you truly want the best streaming experience ,and Taylor to your audio system liking.
with a little lear7ng effort HQ player is by far the best out there and Roon was designed with this jus T look up the reviews, then on Roons instructions
With all Roon features turned off, what do people think Room is or is not doing that makes the sound better or worse? DSP was about the only reason I wanted to keep with Room.
No doubt written with good intentions and well-meaning sincerity, but not factual for many. There are legions of experienced streamers who will confirm that upgrading to higher quality streaming hardware unquestionably improves the sound quality. It by no means just about the DAC. It is about both the streamer/server and the DAC.
I don’t directly stream from Qobuz. I use the Innuos Sense software. Using Sense with Innuos servers/streamers sounds best if you have a nicely resolved system.
When using Roon, is the Roon Core server internal to your Innuos, or is it external and if external what hardware are you using?
I don’t directly stream from Qobuz. I use the Innuos Sense software. Using Sense with Innuos servers/streamers sounds best if you have a nicely resolved system.
Let's accept/assume that Roon streaming sounds inferior to directly streaming Qubuz, Tidal..etc.. Where, at what stage does this degradation take place? I'm assuming that you have already turned off processing/modification within Roon.
Here the answer to your question regarding how Roon sounds on an Innuos product. Roon does not sound as good as Innuos’s own Sense software. Sense sounds much better if your system is resolving and high quality. Not even close on my Zenith MK3 and Tron Atlantic dac combo. I have a lifetime Roon membership, but after comparing to Sense I can no longer listen to Roon. Roon sounds flat, a tad diffused and lacks resolution. I would only use Roon for background music with my particular system. This is true with Innuos streamers/server products. Roon can sound wonderful with other server/streamer brands.
I prefer the user experience of Roon over Sense. Sense is very good, but Roon is the best I have used. I just wish Roon sounded as good with Innuos gear in my system. Some will find Roon sounds just fine with their Innuos and that is fine for them and their systems.
Great digital sounds heavenly today and does not take a back seat to many vinyl front ends.
You buy Roon for functionality, i.e. music management, plug and play, multi room, and especially DSP. However since Qoboz does not think us Canucks deserve QBOZ and Tidal sucks, we went Amazon HD and there is no Roon Support. Don't really miss it. USB DAC in the main system, and use Fire sticks in other systems with HDMI / spdif extractors.
After doing much research I recently purchased a Innuos Zen MK3. It arrives Tuesday. I was first looking at the Mini+LPS but my dealer gave me a slight discount on the Zen so for ~$500 it made sense to get the regular Zen vs Mini+LPS
I’ll be coming from a Roon NUC. My subscription was coming due in Sept and was thinking of purchasing the lifetime. That got me on the track to search out the Innuos. So add the $700 for Roon lifetime and the Innuos made even more “Sense” :)
not sure how relevant my viewpoint is here; but the Wadax Reference Server and Dac have Roon hard wired into the operating system, including automatic upgrades, and it sounds fantastic. easily the best digital music reproduction i have heard.
Wadax fully embraces Roon, and so gets the most out of it.
If you get the Zen Mini it’s pretty much mandatory you get their upgraded LPS as it significantly increases performance. The DAC in the Mini is nothing special so plan to upgrade that asap. The thing is, once you add the LPS to the Mini you’re knocking on the door at the price of the Zen Mk3, so that’s definitely something to consider.
Thanks for the comments. The replies are interesting but still kind of confusing. I see that the Innuos Zen Mini Mk3 can work as a Roon core computer and also has a DAC built in, so maybe that is a pretty reasonably priced option to get started. For now I am discounting the few voices who insist their streamer sounds better than Roon as it seems to me like they like something so much better because they just spent several thousand dollars to buy it. This happens alot maybe too often.
Roon sounds better than ever and IMHE unless you compare to a rare very high cost SOTA streamer with proprietary software(e.g. DCS or Aurender), Roon SQ is going to be equal for you. The user experience is fantastic. Few who try the free monthly trial choose not to subscribe.
Roon is run by guys who came from Meridian and care about SQ. They get it and will continue to make improvements. New products & companies are getting added to Roon Ready all the time. This benefits us all for a few reasons:
Incompatible hardware issues impact their response to software issues
Wide adoption supports longevity
Competition among hardware makers supports innovation & quality/value
I am a vinyl lover who runs digital for musical diversity. I run Roon Core on a Sonictransporter, keep 4TB of music on a NAS, and feed both to an OpticalRendu streamer into Denafrips Pontus II DAC. I stream Qobuz via Roon. Compared to using Lumin, Linn and other DLNA/UPNP apps and Minimserver on the NAS, sound quality is equal. Reliable connectivity is better by far with Roon. Roon also integrates room correction if your're interested in that.
The integration of my personal library along w/Qobuz in Roon is hard to beat. You can use phones, tablets or laptops as remote...you may not need to buy a tablet. It looks and runs great on both my Macbook and iPhone.
I agree that Bluesound is okay, but a better streamer with a good linear power supply will definitely give you better SQ for not much investment. For Roon Core, you can trial with most computers and if you decide to stick w/Roon then add dedicated core (e.g. NUC or Sonictransporter) when you can afford that step. Cheers,
@overthemoonlet me try and help you there…in Roon settings, general…scroll down to STREAMING CONTENT PREFERENCES. Under it you will see Streaming service preference. Select Qobuz or Tidal from drop down. That’s going to ensure the version played by default is either Qobuz or Tidal, and not the mp3 from your library.
Let me know if that works.
When I moved up to the >$3000 streamer/ digital player strata, the degree of audio improvement was not subtle. Linear power supplies in high-end gear matters.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.