So lately I have been thinking about getting an Amp and using my existing Vincent SV-500 Hybrid Integrated as a Pre-Amp.
I have inquired about some amps in other threads but it just seems so hard to decide as to what will have good Synergy with my system.
Wish I could try out all the Amps that I am thinking about but that would be quite difficult.
The one that is at the top of my list (mind you I haven't personally heard any of these, just going on reviews) is the Pass Labs XA25.
But am also considering the Parasound A21+ and A23+, Benchmark AHB2 and Mystere PA21.
All of have received good reviews and comments from folks.
I suppose the Parasound, especially the A21+ would provide the best Base Response but the others would also be quite worthy.
Tomorrow, I have a Technics SL-G700 SACD Player arriving and so I will be playing with that for a little bit to see if I like it (I am pretty confident I will). My current Denon DVD Bluray Player which I was using has been acting up and I decided it was time for an upgrade.
But soon after, I think I want to try an amp. Not that I really need it, the Vincent satisfies but I am just curious to what an Amp can bring to the table in my system.
without knowing your room and system (speakers and source) and your musical preferences, it is scattershot to provide you with any real recommendations
referring to reviews are fine, but shaping a system that really works well and suits your tastes is altogether a different matter
Speakers are Martin Logan Motion 40. Sources are pretty much everything: Vinyl, CD/SACD, DSD, Qobuz, Cassette Room is about 20x15 with High Cathedral Style Ceilings
No issue with my current Integrated.
I am just wondering if a better amp would bring out more detail in the music. I don’t necessarily listen at high volumes, in fact, many times I listen at low to moderate levels, once in a while I might crank it up a little.
By the way, I just realized I probably should have posted this under Amp Section.
You could end up with worse sound you know. You really need to have clear objectives and if you are not unhappy with your integrated--keep it. "More detail" can come at a price--hard, clinical sound if you are not careful. I once did exactly what you are suggesting and was not at all impressed. In fact I preferred the sound of the much less expensive integrated by a wide margin.
The warnings here about synergy are very valid. I’m presently trying out a Van Alstine SET 400. It is well made with a lot of power. There’s a 30 day trial for his amps; you might consider a SET 120 for those speakers.
I like buying from small makers, directly, with good reputations (Salk, Quicksilver, MHDT). No question the Pass is a great amp, but the price is high, you’re paying for the name (a bit), and synergy is still a question. My two cents.
Jay. The Martin Logan Motion 40 has crossovers at 500 and 2600. Little woofers struggle to make deep bass. They have to make long excursions causing distortion at all other frequencies. Middle C is 256 Hz so those woofers are carrying a large chunk of the midrange, over an octave. Instead of another amp I think you would make a more significant improvement if you get two subwoofers. They will add the missing deep bass and if you use a full 2 way crossover on them they will relieve thos little woofers from those long excursions cleaning up your midrange significantly.
Otherwise you can not go wrong with The Parasound A21+
We would show the client a unison research primo as a step up also a hybrid much bigger soundstage and less top end glare you could easily hear the difference
Don’t let the brand fool you. Pass is it’s own sound and better with some speakers than others. You 100% need to audition it and see if it’s the right sound for you, and completely ignore the reviews.
I’ve owned Parasound in the past and while I like it, there are brands I like a lot more.
If you are auditioning in the Pass price point, I strongly recommend you also listen to Ayre and Luxman with your speakers.
I’m completely sure you’ll come out of the auditions with very strong preferences for yourself. Technically they are all fine performers, and I don't think you should bother with specs anymore. Go listen.
Are there some basic specs , between an amp. and speakers , that should be considered , for a very good matching ?Or a listening session is the only way to go .
I am thinking about a new integrated amp. but it is not possible , in Canada to listen to it.
OP, to add on to what others have said -- I want to second the idea that a sub might be a good idea. I auditioned the ML Motion 60s and their bass was fantastic, but the Motions could probably use a sub. You might reach out to Martin Logan for their opinion.
The other thing I would mention is that doing analysis on my room's EQ taught me what was missing and what was too loud; speaker and listening positioning helped a lot of that and brought sounds which were missing into existence without any change of gear. Beyond that, I bought some room treatments and now have a very balanced and full room. It stopped cold what could have been an endless chase for more gear.
To put it briefly, if you don't know how well your room is set up, you just cannot know what gear will be best to invest in.
Given the complex and low-ish impedance curve of the M-L speakers, I first of all think you would be best off with solid state amplification, even though I personally use only OTL tube amplifiers to drive ESLs. Among SS amplifier designers, I think Nelson Pass is the most brilliant and innovative. This predisposes me to suggest a Pass amplifier first of all. Ayre is also a great brand with excellent, intelligent design. Both of these companies make amplifiers that can optionally be driven in balanced mode, which is another plus. I don't know what your budget is, and you really should state it, but otherwise you cannot go wrong with Pass or Ayre.
All competently designed amps of sufficient wattage and current, low
noise and distortion, with low output impedance will sound like same -
Peter Walker of Quad fame.
Funny thing- there were no such amps around when Peter made this comment.
<rant> Why? Any amp employing feedback back in those days simply did not have enough (and gave feedback a bad reputation that has lasted to this day). Not only did they not have enough, at the time is wasn't even apply the amount of feedback needed, else the amp would oscillate. So most companies didn't do it, knowing full well there was a problem.
This gave solid state amps a reputation for being harsh and bright because that is the result of insufficient feedback. Quite literally that is why tubes are still around. I'd hardly call that 'competent' since feedback is all about control theory which has been well understood for a long time.
I have the AHB2 and find it’s sound quality is heavily dictated by the preamp it’s paired with. If you like the overall character of your Vincent integrated, the AHB2 could be a worthwhile upgrade path. If you have power hungry speakers, the Parasound may be the better choice. The Benchmark is no slouch in terms of bass control, however, and seems to dig deeper than the Halo Integrated I once owned. It’s probably the best amp I’ve owned regarding bass dynamics. I currently pair it with an Allnic L1500 preamp and the dynamics with this combo are stunning.
@helomech This comment on the AHB2 and preamp is spot on. I tried the AHB2 with my RAAL SRIa headphones and it was too fatiguing with the Benchmark HPA4 preamp (which is great).
When I put in the CODA 07x preamp with another Class D amp for the RAAL SR1a it sounded very good but there was a tiny bit of harshness. Based on my years with the AHB2 I thought the AHB2 would work with the CODA 07x because it really does not add much to the signal. I thought this even though the AHB2 sounded bad with a whole bunch of other combos I tried for the SR1a.
It turned out that the AHB2 + CODA 07x and RAAL SR1a is an excellent combo. No fatigue at all and all I am hearing is the preamp + DAC.
I owned the Parasound A23 at the same time as the AHB2 and the AHB2 was so much better on my KEF LS50's.
One word. MCINTOSH. I've hady MA 6100 in continuous operation since 1977, and it's never been serviced. It handles high resolution music with ease. I've been offered double what I paid for it, but I'll never sell it.
Pass Labs makes extraordinary amps, no doubt. That said, in order to benefit from the full spectrum of Pass Labs power and ingenuity, you really need to have the purchasing power to stick with their higher end gear. I'm not too familiar with your speakers, but what I can tell you is that adding subwoofers can dramatically spacial presentation and timing. I agree that you would serve yourself to do a scorched earth search through research and if possible, auditioning. FYI I purchased a pair of new Focal 1008 BE's for half price ($3k) and a Hegel H90 ($2k). I did not audition them. I just "knew" from my extensive study and auditioning other brands, everything from Dynaudio Special to Devore Gibbons and Line Magnetic to Naim that this pairing would work well. Indeed, the warmth of the Hegel balances the astonishing highs of the Beryllium tweeter while the Sound Engine 2 drives the bass to jaw dropping levels for a "bookshelf" speaker. At the end of the day, have fun, and just a friendly reminder, it's okay to go a little nuts with this "hobby". ✌🏽🎼
I recently demoed the Pass Labs X250.8 stereo amp from a small local Pass dealer here in Southern CA: Katli Audio in Chino Hills.
My wife and I loved it and are now setting up a trial period with the X600.8 monos. Fred from Katli is knowledgeable and a straight shooter. He does not have a wide spectrum of Pass gear, being a smaller outfit, but he has a Class A and Class AB stereo and monos to give you an idea if you wish to proceed up the Pass Labs food chain.
There is also Reno HiFi that sells exclusively Pass Labs that also allows in-home demos, but you have to also outright pay for the equipment and you also have 30 days to return it. Reno HiFi is not taking anymore new customers until Thanksgiving, however.
Best value for a true high end amp,preamp Coda #8 amplifier, 07 preamp. go to stereo times see the Excellent review on their excellent CSIB integrated amplifier melds true separates into one seamless system.
"...."Pro amps" meant for sound reinforcement systems. Quality home audio, they are not."
*sigh* A life spent going to concerts and live performances to be told I was enjoying cr*p..... :(
Thanks for that....I guess some of the ’pro audio’ stuff I apply is tasteless trash, although to my deluded ears and mind it seems to work rather well. Esp. with the ridiculous collection of speakers that please me with their ’reinforcement’ in my space....well, spaces, but that’s another rant for another forum on another day...
All the posts that conclude with "...listen to what pleases your ears, your mind..." were also conclusions of the un’woke’.....
Delusions of Illusions....
I’m surprised MC hasn’t weighed in on this thread yet.....perhaps he’s enjoying his particular collection of delusion illusion devices. ;)
All the posts about all the ’differences’ between amps, pre-amps, DACs’, speakers, cables....how they ’synergize’ differently...
Note I’ve avoided including turntables, carts, A, A/B, D, CD, streaming, streamcasters....
Or....Analog or Digital.
Or...where you have and what it may or may not have effecting what you’re listen to.....
I guess that one ’philes near-Nirvana is another’s’ Hades, even if undetected as such....*big sigh*
I guess I’ll just have to go on listening to it...deluded by my illusions. ;)
@socalml528...Lotus. You’re welcome.
I’ll take a Toyota engine with just a ’tweaked’ chip over one that has spark plugs that can make one gasp at the $ required to make it run proper.
Vincent sv500 was my first amp. When I plugged it into a decent Furman power conditioner, it sounded so much cleaner. Maybe worth a try over whole new amp upgrade.
That Vincent amp is very good if not excellent for the money. If I were you, I’d dive in fir an audition of something. Specs and marketing only tell a small piece of a product’s story. I’m sorry I wish I was familiar with those speakers because I’ve heard a bunch of amps and could probably recommend some thing.
I have a pair of Benchmark AHB2’s as mono blocks and it was the best audio decision I’ve ever made. I had a PS Audio amp prior and when I connected the Benchmark amps, I was startled by the improvement in sound quality, dynamics and resolution. Get the Benchmark...
I’d like to know more about the Crown amplifier, because it has been decades since I have heard or read about any new products under the Crown imprimatur. For example, are they class D amplifiers? Some people just categorically dislike class D amplifiers. I am not necessarily one of them, because I have not heard enough different ones to develop a general opinion. The same question might apply with regard to the Benchmark amplifiers. As regards matching preamplifiers with amplifiers, it is really very simple, and it’s easy to avoid a mismatch. You need to know the output impedance of the preamplifier and the input impedance of the amplifier. The input impedance of the amplifier should be at least 10 times the value of the output impedance of the preamplifier, in ohms. If that is the case, then the match is usually bulletproof. Typically, tube preamplifiers will have a higher output impedance than solid-state preamplifiers. Likewise, a solid-state amplifier will tend to have a lower input impedance than a tube amplifier. Consequently, mismatch problems typically arise if you try to mate a tube preamplifier with a solid-state amplifier. But this is not to say that all such matches are verboten. In the modern era, most of those matches will work, too.
I had the XA25 and loved it. Traded up to INT 25. Buy a used XA25 with warranty remaining for about $3k. If you hate it they resell in minutes. Reno Hifi used to have demo and used stock but with no new gear that used supply may be gone too.
jay73, I did expand upon speakermaster's cryptic comment about impedance. See my post at 1:15 PM today, 05-08. If you have further questions, I will be happy to respond.
I’d like to know more about the Crown amplifier, because it has been decades since I have heard or read about any new products under the Crown imprimatur. For example, are they class D amplifiers? Some people just categorically dislike class D amplifiers. I am not necessarily one of them, because I have not heard enough different ones to develop a general opinion. The same question might apply with regard to the Benchmark amplifiers.
I often see the Benchmark included in discussions of class D amplifiers. Is that because it’s lightweight and uses a switching power supply? It’s a class AB-H amplifier. It exhibits none of the high frequency distortion of the antiquated class D amps and less distortion than the cleanest class A amps. With possible exception of the Purifi Eigentakt, it’s really in a class of its own when it comes to objective performance. It’s the closest one can get to a “straight wire with gain.” Practically speaking, it’s only limited by the quality of the sources and/or preamplifier, and its maximum power output.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.