Old Amps that can still Kick Butt
Not being a believer that time necessarily = progress, I would like to offer the following example of a sonic gem that has transcended time and can totally kick butt in a modern milieu:
The Robertson 4010. I got one of these about two years ago because it was in immaculate condition, the price was so low and I was inquisitive. I hooked it up and let it warm up for a couple of days. OMG this thing was in the super amp league: Transparency to die for, slam that you couldn‘t‘ believe for for a 50W amp.. Peter Moncrieffe wasn‘t wrong in his review of this amp: this thing is in the Sterreophile Class A component category hands down. Even after all these years.
What amps have you encountered that have defied time and can still kick butt today?
I have a matched pair of Sumo Andromeda II a’s running balanced from and Audio Research pre-amp driving a similarly aged pair of Acoustat 100 hybrid electrostatics that have great slam as well as finesse. MOSFETS and Acoustats are a match made in heaven. https://www.martindareff.com/Other/HDR-Treated-Images/i-3ZfL6Gq/A |
I have the Convergent Audio Technology monoblocs. They are the CAT JL1 Signature edition. They are by far the best amps I have owned. I have owned many amps through the years but nothing comes close to these amps. They were designed in 1994 and blow away anything I have heard. The cool thing is what I paid for them. Because a design is old many people over look them. I hope to keep them forever. |
I've had my ARC Classic 60 driving my Thiel CS 3.5's for over 30 years. Superb match and I've never been tempted to change. It's fed with an ARC SP 9 mk III. Never had upgrade-itis other than one change in cables. So happy my dealer helped with this pairing as I get to just enjoy it. Sure, love to hear different things, but system synergy rules! Probably saved me a fortune. At this point, getting concerned with age of caps and what to do about it. |
I have a beautiful sounding Conrad Johnson Motif 50 watter in storage along with a Scott LK150 dual Mono Tube unit needing some TLC that is also a killer sounding amp.My current unit is a late 90's McCormack DNA 1 with a board upgrade It is a solid - open sounding brute I bought when I upgrade to Magnepan's which for those who have them know they are wonderful but "special needs" speakers |
I like Class A amps despite the heat they put out. Have several Classe DR3 VHC, and a Belles A - not many made of any of those but still excellent sounding assuming they are in good shape (which usually means some capacitor replacement at this age). There is a of of classic gear that still sounds very good - I use a 20 year old CJ Premier in my main system |
Marantz 1060 - original amps provide the best sound. Refurbished becomes necessary at some point. I have mine driving my outdoor Klipsch rock speakers and am constantly amazed at the musical qualities it is able to produce. Tried a couple of more modern amps and they sounded flat and expressionless. What a classic treasure. |
One vintage piece that is often overlooked is the Fisher 400 CX-2 preamp "The President". This was Fisher's competitor to the Marantz 7 and Mac C22. I got a chance to hear one once and OMG, it's every bit as good as either. A Marantz 7 will run you at least $7000 today. A good Mac C22 will go for as little as $4500, but to get one nice will be at least $5000. When you can find one of these Fisher preamps, in fully restored condition, will run you about $3000 - $3500. And they're beautiful. Really. With that classic Fisher look. |
I also have a Scott Lk-150, and it is a special amplifier. It’s my “back up”, but I’ve tried it in my main system in place of a very well respected, current model amp, and it competes very well. I actually prefer it with some music. I took it with me to audio stores to compare to new amps when I was looking to buy. It sounded better than all the ones I auditioned. We’d listen to the new amp first, then put the Scott in its place and listen again. I could tell the moment the salesman realized the 60 year old amp sounded better… his jaw would drop. Literally. It’s also gorgeous to look at. I haven’t heard everything out there, but I’ve owned dozens of amps, and I’ve listened to many dozen more. Something about this Scott just sounds “real”. |
One of my all time favorites was the old mid 80s PSE Studio II (80/150W) paired with my Audible Illusions - Modulus II Pre. driving Vandi 2Cis and then in the early 90s upgraded to the Studio IV. (100/195W) driving my Quad ESL 63s. Incredible sounding and performing amplifiers. By anyone's standard, then and even now, might be considered sonic gems......Jim |
Any of the old Hafler Excelinear amps..... I have run the XL280’s vertically biamped to Vandy 2ci’s forever! https://www.facebook.com/groups/hafler/?ref=share |
I am not prepared to pay $6K for Doug-Shredders Class-D love affair. My Mark Levinson 23.5 is Kick-ass, paid about $1000 and I enjoy my sound a lot. Jim Bongiorno's designs are also great and I still have a Son of Ampzilla. My 'The Nine', about 60W class-A by the same designer is exceptional but was stolen unfortunately. |
Second that Coltrane 1 I have a 1999 Plinius SA100 Mark 3 matched with the M16 Pre. Amp recently juiced by Ralph Abramo of Pliniusrepairs.com. (the Ultimate upgrade) with all new caps, relays, switches, etc. What a difference he made to an already wonderful amp. Drives Dynaudio C1 Signature monitors through Tara Labs cables. Even the Plinius integrateds are wonderful. |
@calvinandhobbes, I belong to a similar school of sound, i.e tonal accuracy and timing being the fundamental goal. Check out Croft amplifiers from UK. http://www.croftacoustics.co.uk/ |
The Music Reference RM-9 Mk.2. THE classic tube amp, better than the Marantz 8b and 9, the Mac MC75, and the ARC D76. For low impedance loads, the RM-200, "Class A" rated in Stereophile by Michael Fremer since 2002. The only tube amp I know of that puts out as much power into 4 ohms as it does into 8. |
@bdp24 My friend has an RM-9 Mk2. It is excellent. But so are McIntosh 225 and 240 amps. While this is a current amp, the Prana Fidelity Class D amp has no shortcommings. At the LA SHOW yesterday, I heard the $10K 400 watt 8 ohm amp driving the Prana two-way average efficiency speakers off of a Townshend Allegri Reference Autotransformer preamp, Silversmith cabling and EAR Classic CD player. Best in show sound (it was a limited size show with only about 70 vendors). Other than deep bass, it had superlative coherent sound, dynamic and involving. Better than a twice the price Harbeth 40.2 anniversary. Listened for 45 minutes (analog too). Never heard a autotransformer pre-amp with such slam/dynamics and colorful sound. I heard the amp several years ago and was impressed. Our records and CDs, classical, vocal, jazz and rock. Now, the entire chain of music was magnificent! https://pranafidelity.com/index.php/project/purnama-amplifier/ I use a combo of classic amps, EAR 890, radical modified Dyna ST70 and a pair of custom Altec 1459 (transformer and case only original parts). The Prana is definitely in the running to replace the custom pair and 890. |
I bought my VAC PA 100 100 tube amp and ARC LS15 tube pre amp back in 1995 and they are still going strong with no issues I just replace the tubes on both units as l thought it's probably time to replace them Just recently l bought a used Spectron musical MK ll class D amp to drive my Maggie's and l love that old amp and how it makes the Maggie's beg for mercy! |
@atmasphere -- ... Interesting info (not quoted) re: feedback. Apart from the traits of an easier-to-drive speaker with higher impedance load (i.e.: >8 ohms), benign phase angles and high to very high efficiency, getting rid of a passive cross-over is another vital measure to ensure the amp(s) is seeing an easier load, even lessening its importance the same way higher speaker impedance render cables less important. I’d even wager much of the (in my view) ludicrous tendency of over-built (and insanely expensive) amps from the likes of D’Agostino, Boulder and others are a symptom of the heavy load they’re presented with, and how they strive to be less affected by it (until thermal issues will arise in the speaker). Complex passive cross-overs are very much to blame for this, effectively making a rated, limited sensitivity somewhat of a variable (i.e.: potentially lower) - depending on the amp driving it; one that is more or less impervious to load will see the speaker deliver closer to its full potential at its rated sensitivity (insofar it’s correct to begin with), whereas an amp that is not will obviously hinder a speaker’s performance and its clean dynamic range. My 30 watt pure Class-A Belles SA30 is coupled directly to a pair of EV compression driver + horn combo with 111dB sensitivity (8 ohm version) - covering from ~600Hz on up. So, there’s another factor to consider: the range a given amp is going to cover. The Belles is practically freed from anything below ~600Hz - again, coupled directly to the CD without any intervening passive cross-over - meaning that in every conceivable way in a domestic setting it’ll simply cruise along under the best of conditions. Maybe that amp is even overkill as it is, but I’ll never part with it. |