Do you clean your records before play, after play, or once (and then never again)?
I provided a fair bit of commentary (including a Q&A w/ Walter Davies @ LAST) on LAST Record Preservative in this thread... https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/last-record-preservative-improves-the-sound |
I’ve been using Last Preservative since it was first introduced in the 1980’s. Designer/inventor Walter Davies did a lot of research into the subject of LP wear, and his products are the real deal, no snake oil. The active chemicals in the Preservative bond with vinyl on a molecular level, preserving the integrity of the bond between the molecules of the vinyl in LP’s. That prevents tiny chunks of the vinyl coming loose during play, which is one of the major forms of wear in LP grooves. Consumer tip: When the Preservative bonds with the vinyl, it "pushes" any contaminants in the LP groove to the surface. After you apply the product, you may need to reclean the LP to remove those now-freed contaminants. The Preservative has been incorrectly blamed for increasing groove noise because of this fact. |
@bradf - you might look at Rushton’s thread here, which is based on an article he wrote for Positive Feedback. There is a relationship among size of bath, number and power of transducers, frequency, etc. viz surface area of records to be cleaned. (Sorry, I don’t remember the formula--it is buried in the long thread on DIY Audio about ultrasonic cleaning). @terry9 can speak to his experiments with the number of LPs in the bath v. cleaning effectiveness. The bonus to DIY isn’t just cost-effectiveness either. You can take advantage of higher frequencies, heat control and other features that aren’t necessarily offered on the audiophile machines. |
thats when I bought VPI-16.5, after reading this: http://square-2.com/wp-content/uploads/Listener_2000sm.jpg :-) |
@mapman I came across this ultrasonic cleaner, reviewed by Fremer on his web site, Analogplanet. Even though I have a VPI 16.1, I am considering one of these in the future. I really like the advantage of being able to clean 12 records at a time. The price is considerably less then other ultrasonic on the market, and you can purchase options/attachments separately. |
I first used L'Art du Son on my Keith Monks. Then I used Walker 4 Steps enzymes and the Keith Monks fluid for re-clean from time to time. After that I tried AIVS and liked it better than Walker especially for a less "dry midrange". now I have bought a KLAudio but kept the KM (because I 😍 this machine). Now all my record collection is washed first with enzymes and second with ultrasonic. Recently I bought again a bottle of L'Art du Son for periodic re clean and find it is best sounding when I make a final clean with it. It is not expensive and if you let the fluid for 2 minutes on the record it cleans really well. And more than that it makes music sound really good to my ears. |
Budget option: I get remarkable results using London Jazz Collector's DIY cleaning solution and a 3D-printed home vacuum attachment I purchased off eBay: https://londonjazzcollector.wordpress.com/for-audiophiles/home-brew-cleaner-for-vacuum-rcms/ https://www.ebay.com/itm/291452416779 I clean new & used records on an as-needed basis. Add Blue Sticky Tack for stylus cleaning (every 5 or 6 spins), dryer sheets, and an anti-stat brush, and you'll have clean records for a song. |
For record cleaning, I have two vacuum units- a KAB EV-1 that uses our home vacuum for suction ($169) and a VPI 16.5 ($700 but I know a dealer that discounts them.) All records get a deep clean using the KAB. The VPI is used as a maintenance/before play vacuum. Deep Clean: MoFi Pure Enzyme: 5 minute soak per side Vacuum with KAB after each side Spin Clean with fluid at 2x recommended strength using Aquafina water Vacuum Fresh Sleeve Before Play: Todd The Vinyl Junkie Vinyl-Zyme Gold fluid Vacuum with VPI Notes: don't go double strength on the Spin Clean fluid if you don't have a vacuum. Also, you'll note that albums are vacuumed once before they hit the Spin Clean. You'll be shocked how much garbage still comes out in the Spin Clean vat. I'm thinking the Enzyme soak loosens the garbage in the grooves. The Spin Clean plus vacuum actually removes it. |
I clean records once on a good record cleaner: I own a VPI 16.5 but have used an Audiodeske at work (at an audio/video specialist). New as well as used ones should be cleaned in my opinion as there are lubricants used in the record manufacturing process that need to be removed. Usually I only clean them again if accidently fingerprinted, or if listening reveals something noticable has "landed" on the record and an annoying pop or click has suddenly appeared that wasn't there before. Only use an Onzow stylus cleaner. Our stylus microscope reveals it's very effective at removing grunge from the stylus--better than most brushes and fluids! PLEASE, please don't use a Magic Eraser as some suggest!! I had one customer come in with a hopelessly clogged up stylus that took me many minutes to clean and guess what he was using? Yes the Magic Eraser! Folks, M. E. is NOT a good stylus cleaner! It can leave a lot of stuff behind on the diamond that can clog up your stylus so badly it prevents proper playback! Use an Onzow and be assured it will be clean. I use one most every record just to be sure I'm not transferring dirt and debris from one record to another. My records sound clean and there's some I've owned and played quite often for over 40 years! Trust me! |
On cleaned lps, when I dip the stylus onto the ONZOW, there are sometimes tiny black crud "crap" as well as dust. I find this more when I use my Dynavector Karat. I believe the stylus profile on this cart makes a difference. I kind of find it hard to believe that proper cleaning no matter how often would harm the lp. A diamond dragging through vinyl? I think what harms the lp more is the actual playing of a record and playing a dirty record. |
On cleaned lps, when I dip the stylus onto the ONZOW, there are sometimes tiny black crud "crap" as well as dust. I find this more when I use my Dynavector Karat. I believe the stylus profile on this cart makes a difference. I kind of find it hard to believe that proper cleaning no matter how often would harm the lp. A diamond dragging through vinyl? I think what harms the lp more is the actual playing of a record and playing a dirty record. |
Czarivey, I don't use alcohol based solutions and I don't want to clean one of my records one hundred times to prove you wrong. There appears to be quite a number of people who clean records often. Most though not all of my records start sounding noisier after about 10 plays, I mean a little noisier and something that I can hear. Some others have much better playback systems than I do and more sensitive ear so they would want to clean their records more often. |
pops worth noting I also tend to rotate counterclockwise somewhat further while moving brush outward to help traps dust. Its a technique to hone a bit once tried. Main thing is end of brush is always extended beyond the perimeter of the record, with brush probably never rotated more than 20-30 degrees counterclockwise max. |
@inna Frequent cleaning can destroy smoothness of pressing in other words wax so it WOULD hurt. Cleaning should be as necessary. To me the best sign of cleaning is change to noisier playback or stylus contamination after going with just carbon fiber brush. Other than that, if stylus is clean after playback AND playback is clean, than no need no matter how long. |
I only clean them if I spot contamination between grooves. That includes fingerprints. Wherever the fingerprint is the dust gets stuck and can't get airborn out of play surface. Otherwise I use carbon fiber brush before each playback with no professional RCM usage. I have records in my collection I didn't clean for over 20 years and they still don't need cleaning. |
P.S. I should add that (IMHO) a record cleaner is the most important investment you can make in a vinyl system. Everything starts here. It never ceases to amaze me how much people will spend on a turntable, cartridge, tonearm, interconnects and phono stage with a completely inadequate cleaning approach which will negate all the other investment. Nothing else happens if you can’t get it out accurately from the grooves. |
I clean every record before each play on a Loricraft. Most of my records have been cleaned dozens of times. But I am not anal about cleaning fluids etc. Any decent one will do. You only have to observe the dust in the air in your audio room as revealed by sunlight coming through the window to realize that any record exposed for more than a few minutes in a room will have debris on it so there is no point in going crazy. |
I've thrown out my carbon fiber brushes. At best it simply pushes crap around the records (I believe anything a carbon brush would remove would not affect the play) and at worst, it's creating a static charge that attracts more crap to the record (yes, I know there are "anti-static" brushes, but I'm suspect). I clean my stylus (primarily) with a Magic Eraser, but every now and then I'll dip it into some Fun-Tak (per the recommendation of the Sound Smith). |
Mapman, Okki Nokki machine is only $500, with Audio Intelligent three step fluids it gives excellent results. I clean every 10-15 plays without thinking about it. Stylus is cleaned before playing each side. It’s annoying but there is no way around it. Yes, some old records require multiple cleanings with prolonged soaking. New records are dirty as hell too. |
I'm doing the same as Pops…. 16.5, right down to the Magic Eraser, Onzow, and dry brush. I use Audio Intelligent fluids. When lazy or the LP is pretty nice, I use the 1 step # 6. Sometimes I do the 2 step process, with # 15, and distilled water. When I use the #15, I use a designated VPI wand to vacuum the #15. Talk about coincidence, it was Basis that ruined digital for me. I could never go back. I play my Cd's in the car (-: |
I also clean every new or used record before I play it the first time on my KL Audio and put it in a new sleeve with the date that I cleaned it. The next time I play the record I generally don't clean it again before or after, I probably should do it more often since it is so easy. I wish I could say I clean the stylus each time but I often don't unless I see junk on it. |
Map- check out Rushton's thread on DIY US if you haven't-the price of entry isn't crazy, and you can arguably get better results, but it isn't about convenience. And in my estimation, you still need some sort of vacuum machine, to take advantage of different kinds of cleaning, which work synergistically. |
I wash new and used records on a VPI 16.5 one time and one time only. I give a record a quick sweep with a Hunt brush before play and clean the stylus with a brush, sometime ME and onzo zero dust after each side. I seriously dislike cleaning records! But it is my only form of playback so I have no choice. My first Basis table ruined digital for me. |
Never clean new records, all used ones go thru VPI16.5 once, if still bad then second spin on VPI with thorough scrubbing (yes I know that scrubbing does not do s#%*t but it makes me feel better about myself!) decides if LP stays or goes. Mapleshade grounded brush and Zerostat before each and every play. Still dreaming of ultrasonic cleaning machine but not going to buy it. 90+% of my listening is thru Naim CDS3 for CDs and Wadia 781 for SACDs, I am old and clinically lazy! Vinyl sounds sooo much better to my ears than digital that I am afraid to upgrade my TT or vinyl: it will spoil 90% of my listening sessions further still... |
I clean mine once on the VPI 16.5 then only a second time if they seem to still have issues when I play them. Otherwise I use a Furetech de-stat and a Carbon brush from acoustic sounds each time I play. I also clean the stylus frequently but not every side. I use the Lyra stylus cleaner but am re-using a Last Bottle and brush for convenience. |