Ayre makes a "tune up" disc. "Irrational but Efficacious!".
I haven’t used mine in a while. Thanks for reminding me!
https://www.amazon.com/Cardas-Acoustics-Irrational-Efficacious-Burn/dp/B00OY8UXME
OK...here's another tweak that really works
I recently recabled my reference 2 channel system. The upgrade in sound broke new ground in what I thought was possible with existing components. I had not, however, heard of the Matthew Bond Audio Cascade Noise Burn-In Disc - V. 2.0 until it was referenced in one of the fairly recent Forum Posts. More out of curiosity and the fact that I have had some very positive results with other assorted/sundry tweaks, I decided to give it a try. I have played the disc only a couple of times and am amazed at hearing a very real improvement in all aspects of the system and especially the glare that I really didn't know existed.
Anyway, I would enjoy hearing from any of you that has had some exposure to this or other tweaks of this kind.
Ayre makes a "tune up" disc. "Irrational but Efficacious!". I haven’t used mine in a while. Thanks for reminding me! https://www.amazon.com/Cardas-Acoustics-Irrational-Efficacious-Burn/dp/B00OY8UXME |
Purist Audio Design Luminist System Enhancer Atlas Burnin-X Luminist System Enhancer Tellurium Q and Wake Up X Most of the benefits of can be obtained from simple pink noise: https://open.qobuz.com/album/ql10ah7iv20wc
|
+1 @mrskeptic ! As Rocky the Squirrel said to Bullwinkle the Moose: "You don't have to be a squirrel to be nuts!" |
Well played, brauser. My most memorable "tweaks" are the one's I approached with a high degree of skepticism. Especially those that pegged the needle on my BS meter. Then, "something" happened. And, I think to myself: "I really wish I'd put my Depends on before I started this session." The Ayre disc comes to mind as an example. Thanks for sharing, and "volunteering" to take the abuse you're certain to take here with your post. |
This is very sad affair. Putting up with the abuse from the same typical names (like the jason bourne dude, the resident hater), over and over. We should not be scared to post anything here. I don't get it
|
Does jasonbourne52 ever have a single useful thing to say, or is his sole function to ridicule those who try to use this forum for its intended purposes? |
Clear political correctness off this forum. @thyname Jason is always polite in his criticisms. You seem to be saying that everyone can post on here, except him. Bring back free speech. I would hate this to become a forum where no-one can disagree with the overweening prats.. If I wanted that I would go to university and pull down statues to greater men than the prats. |
Do you have anything useful to say, or do you just ridicule the people who call crap, crap? |
@laoman Agree I listen to them CD's also as they are so cheap. |
I have many useful things to say, as you can see from my other posts. I am just tired of seeing Jason insult everyone who inquires about products that don't fit within his "norm". I asked an innocent question about a Zobel network on another thread and he crapped on that and tore me a new a**hole, too, for no apparent reason. It was a legitimate electrical engineering question. I've never seen him contribute anything other than to say "nay", which he seems to do fairly uniformly. If he doesn't believe any tweaks do anything, why bother reading and posting on a forum discussing tweaks? |
"And it's a CD for fu*&^'s sake! Buying to try it won't ruin anyone's financial life" Not that my financial life is of anyone's business, despite what most of the naysayers out there seem to think. Gotta save me from myself, right? LOL. :) I've learned to just ignore the people on here who share uninformed opinions about a product. I mean, they've never actually tried the product in question, but they vehemently seem to think their opinion matters. They're usually big fans of ASR, lol.
|
Thanks guys. I probably should have said that I use the Ayre Disc regularly and that what I'm experiencing with the Mathew Bond Disc is a different kind of improvement. Also, even though I still play CDs, I'm more focused now on streaming using Tidal. So all I can say is that the benefits do not seem to be source dependent. As an aside comment...it amazes me that audiophiles will spend small fortunes in hopes of system improvements through componet upgrades, but will sneer at the thought of spending $40 or less on a tweak that might have a greater real benefit.
|
@brauser , you have a very impressionable brain. You should start attending seances. |
+1
While I tend to agree with @jasonbourne52 most of the time… |
Excellent analogy @nonoise
OP: Excellent thread. FWIW, I still use the "Sheffield Lab / XLO Test & Burn-In CD" from 30 or so years ago. It works well. |
Whenever I have new components or capacitors or cables to burn-in, I just go to Youtube and search for "burn in tracks". There are actually many, they are free to use, some of them are very long (more than an hour) and they work. I try to alternate those with pink noise and it really does help the bur-in process. I suppose it can be beneficial to play those tracks every once in a while just to "remove the dust". |
It doesn't take long for a particular person to come out of the closet. They are constantly waiting for every opportunity to pounce on any one they can. I am beginning to think if this individual has every tried listening to a decent set of speaker wires. I remember hooking up my Synergist Research cables and I thought they sounded harsh at first. It turned out was hearing the high frequencies for the first time. |
"The human brain is an incredible pattern matching machine" - Jeff Bezos That is the problem. Cable break in does not exist. Audio is AC, so degaussing residual DC in a dielectric would be nullified in a couple of milliseconds of play. However if you stop flexing your cables and just leave them alone the micro-fractures from handling the face centered cubic copper wire structure might join back somewhat. However I doubt the difference is noticeable. Most likely, running a signal for a while might also strengthen a tentatively poor connection. Since the change you noticed should not happen if your cables were OK in the first place, you should really get some measuring equipment for a small fraction of your investment. Meanwhile use some antioxidating connectivity fluid. It is a good practice to do that anyway.
|
There are those who can not accept a product unless it makes perfect technical sense. I respect that, but experientially if it works, then why not enjoy the ride instead letting the lack of logic be a barrier. I personally like to know how a thing works. I also like to make improvements in my systems where I can hear things that I did not before, see a more defined image, feel more connected to the sights and sounds, etc. To me the experience trumps the logic. |
It is better if it can be shown to work either with measurements, or * blind listening tests. Then one can know that it works, even if there is no logical hypothesis to explain it.
Once we “see” a device, we then also expect a difference. We logically believe that it is (or should be) different, and we then experience it as different, even if it is not different. |
@ holmz We may have to agree to disagree on some points. I know there is always a psychological element at work, but if you have been around a lot of live acoustic music, played an acoustic instrument or been in the hobby for an extended period of time, then I do believe you can develop an 'educated ear' and can reliably tell the difference between something different versus something better. I think where the confusion often comes into play is when there is an overexposure taking place such as going to an audio/video show and visiting dozens of different rooms. Even so, though, I still believe that even in an environment like that an experienced audio/videophile can reach some valid conclusions. So for me, I pretty much trust my eyes and ears knowing that not everyone would agree, and that's OK. |
That may all be true, but the psychological element is well studied and documented, so it makes it easier believe that these things are likely based in psychology versus based in reality. If we want a way to remove the bias in believing it is all psychology, then how could we do that? |