My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab

I liked presentation #2 in the recent power cord comparison.  I felt #2 had fuller midrange, more chesty singing, more involved feeling.  I think often a sound that seems brighter is actually missing the midrange.  Would love to throw a Kubala - Sosna Realization cable in the comparison.  I have compared K-S to Audience Front Row and AU24SX.  Thanks Jay,  Ken

On the 1st video between Shunyata and Transparent, there were big differences.  I also preferred Transparent for its clarity.  On the 2nd video, it seems that the differences were smaller, and I still preferred Transparent but it wasn't as obvious.  Perhaps on the 2nd video, the Shunyata benefitted from the 3 day continuous break-in, and the Transparent didn't have the same break-in.  

I was disappointed with the Shunyata Sigma flagship power cord several years ago, for its laid back sound compared to the entry Shunyata Venom HC.  Except for the excellent clarity of the Shunyata Denali conditioner, I believe Shunyata has a house sound of being laid back.  Combining my experience with Jay's, most likely Shunyata cables behave similarly with most ancillary components.

Revealing items like the Transparent Opus have accurate focused soundstages, but not bloated soundstages.  These bloated soundstages are from relatively euphonic items.  

I would like to hear A/B's between Transparent and Nordost.  My cheap Nordost Vishnu power cord is most revealing.

Gryphon APEX is set to make an appearance on my channel. Two of the best stereo amplifiers manufactured today will face each other ONLY on my channel. You can’t get this anywhere else folks !

Please subscribe and turn on your notifications so you don’t miss when this showdown of the best stereo amp built in America goes against Denmark’s finest stereo amplifier.

Does the Apex have no natural predators as its name suggests? Is the Boulder 3060 worth the extra $43,000 dollars ?

Those questions will be answered soon !

 

 

 

 

Does the Apex have no natural predators as its name suggests? Is the Boulder 3060 worth the extra $43,000 dollars ?

Those questions will be answered soon 

Sorry but this question can ONLY be answered in "your" system. In another system the opposite may be true.

I am curious if Parametric EQ or room correction has been discussed in this thread? I have Krell XD amps. I don’t like the top end, rolled off so I EQed the top end. At first things were a little too dazzling and I had to bump it down a bit 😀. My old school audio buddies always looked for the right cable to tone things. I"ve found with PEQ or room correction, PEQ if you don’t like room correction, I am able to get the sound closer to what I want. Roon has a very easy to use 5 band EQ.

@rsf507 

Thanks for stating the obvious....

 

@bulldogger 

You can private message @viber6  about EQ. I don't use EQ per say although cables are almost acting like an EQ. 

Jay it would be thoughtful, considerate, and prudent of you to consider and contemplate the use of EQ in your system and I make that comment even though like many of us I would not have it in my system. The reason I say that is because of the distortion that has been demonstrated, shown, and revealed to be in your system which many have reasoned comes from your AC power foundation and the problems that come with it. These distortions it can be almost certain vary with conditions and whether other things on on your lines such as the air conditioner or welder so an EQ would let you correct that quickly, easily, and reliably where as switching power cords involves shutting down the system and restarting which is not always even practical so @bulldogger made a good suggestion that I hope you will not dismiss, ignore, or reject.

Of course the ideal, preferred, and best solution would be to identify, isolate, nad correct your existing AC problems at the source but that seems to be not possible for you maybe you are in a rental and if that's the case I can see why you use battery Stromtank but I don't think you can put amplifiers on that.

 

I have zero desire to use an EQ. I don't criticize those who do use EQ, but in my systems there will never be an EQ (personal preference - nothing else )

@bulldogger ROON also has the more powerful Convolution engine to do DSP. The well known, in digital audio circles, Mitch Barnett did my room and speakers remotely from Canada.

https://accuratesound.ca

Though I no longer user the filter after adding an additional acoustic panel and some furniture rearrangement. The filter was great when I needed to use it.

@clearthink 

You mentioned that many folks have heard distortion and reasoned that it comes from the AC power foundation.  Who, besides you, have posted about that?   Maybe one other person?

Dave

Bulldogger,

Exactly!  Perhaps your Krell XD amp has a beautiful midrange, but you want to extend the HF to more accurately convey the complete natural tonal balance of an instrument.  The 5th row in the concert hall has a beautiful midrange, but rolled off HF compared to the 1st row.  You use the EQ to get the tonal balance you desire, judiciously without going over the top (pun intended).  On duller recordings, I boost HF more than for more brilliant recordings.  My Rane ME 60 original version has 30 bands with center freq of 1/3 octave from the adjacent band.  It is on eBay for $200 or less.

More generally, most people don't realize that their systems are EQ'ed in various ways, especially the "purists" who say they don't want EQ.  Even Jay just admitted that much of the differences in cables can be explained by their different freq emphases.  Or it may be that different capacitor/inductor values in cables have an effect on the freq balance.  Actually, the biggest EQ effect comes from the speaker designer.  The upper end Wilson speakers have amplitude adjustments for each driver, functioning as a parametric EQ.  I don't know whether Magico has such adjustments.  I like the S7 MUCH MORE than the M3 and M6 that Jay demonstrated.  Are the drivers and cabinet design better in the S series than the M series?  No.  But the crossover networks are different, and in the S7 it is apparent that the tweeter is more dominant than it is in the M3 and M6.  So the S7 is in effect an EQ'ed version of M6, aiming for a brighter tonal balance.  You can take a conventional electronic EQ, either digital or analog, and get the S7 to sound more like the M6, and vice versa.  The differences between various EQ settings are MUCH larger than the differences between preamps, power amps.  However, an EQ is not a complete panacea, and I could never EQ a grossly inferior power amp to make it sound preferable to my reference amp.

Whatever distortion is added by an additional electronic stage such as the EQ, is vastly outweighed by the opportunity to judiciously change the tonal balance to your liking.

The most obvious example of EQ is the different tonal balance of a system in different rooms.  A large speaker in a small room is bass heavy compared to in a larger room.  Room treatments and DSP are worthwhile, but they are mostly used for bass, whereas a simple electronic EQ can be used to modify numerous frequencies from bass to HF, producing a much broader array of effects.  Of course, it gets very complex, and you have to be judicious and carefully listen for yourself to get the best results, rather than blindly trusting objective algorithms which often produce unsatisfactory subjective results.

oh god... not eq. there are dozens and DOZENS of pages already on this thread dominated by a tiny number of contributors - about which, as Jay just stated, he is not interested, again, aside from cables and naturally components.

enjoy your visit to the west coast wc!! perfect weather here in the bay area this weekend. just enough fog

watched a long 90 min utube video of an audio publication visiting CH Precision. Alot of good info but it was one long reel without any headers, separation, outline etc. brutal

I really enjoy how Jay keeps things tight and short on specific topics. I can imagine a number of videos out of this Magico tour. so cool. looking forward to any footage however it is delivered and glad Magico is recognizing your hard work.

@zprr 

Thank you. I plan to do the tour this Friday and hopefully the first video releases on Saturday. Then the interview with Mr. Wolf will come out towards the middle of next week. Lots of content will be released starting this weekend so make sure you have your notifications turned on 🙂

 

 

zprr,

Don't you acknowledge the post by bulldogger on the benefits he has obtained from EQ?  Understand that your system, no matter what it is, employs some form of EQ.  Many people give up on their 400 lb speakers in favor of an updated version, and go through the hassle of returning their heavy speakers and getting the new version.  They don't realize that a big part of the new version is merely a different EQ setting in the crossover network.  It isn't necessarily better, and it merely represents the designer's choice of the moment.  With EQ you make your own choices with much more flexibility, without braking your back and bank account.  Be open minded to the possibilities.

viber6"Understand that your system, no matter what it is, employs some form of EQ"

This is absolutely valid, accurate, and true it does not matter as a practical issue how much Jay may want to avoid EQ and deny, reject, and/or ignore its potential benefits in his system because he already has EQ and it is not only in his speaker system crossover network but in his R.I.A.A.stage with in his phono preamplifier and he has acknowledged, recognized, and accepted that he is using cables to apply equalization which is an unreliable method and not recognized as best practice for correcting his issues which we must remember is complicated by AC power delivery problems that have driven him to advocate, promote, and sell expensive battery "solution" for those problems which have also been revealed in a graph posted previously in this thread.

I think the fundamental, underlying, operative problem here is that because he is in a rental Jay can not do much about the power problems which have been guessed to include an arc welder or similar device, tool, or equipment on his "dedicated" circuit.

I do not understand some of the loud objections to considering, evaluating, and exploring the potential for EQ to resolve other problems that can not otherwise be corrected because it is one way to "fix" the high frequency distortions intruding upon the signal and originating somewhere on the AC lines.

My background was in the sciences before I went into business so it is a mystery and puzzle to me that some people deliberately, intentionally, and willfully avoid knowledge, experience, and information that has the potential to enhance and improve their lives I have seen this many times. When any of my hiring managers is interviewing new hires for roles such as engineer we probe to discover and learnt the person's alignment toward exploration and those who are already decided, fixed, and rigid in their thinking and analysis are rejected. Of course the hiring process is not perfect and some of those people get hired any way but I can tell you they do not last long in a culture of innovations such as my companies they will usually quit with in 90 days or so.

Post removed 
Post removed 

Clearthink,

Agree with your last two posts.  Innovation is dependent on being open minded and flexible, ready to experiment.  Nobody is TOTALLY open minded and willing to try new things.  I have my own limitations, and I can't try everything under the sun.  EQ is perhaps the most important of the basics, so even if I agree that AC quality is a major issue, it is not as big a factor as doing EQ.  Very rarely, my power quality is so bad that the music sounds like it has marshmallows in its mouth, and my EQ won't correct that problem, so I give up for that day, and wait until the next day.  It's like a rainy day when you can't go swimming, so you just wait until the weather is decent.  Most of the time, my AC power is OK, so EQ is essential for fully appreciating my system.

No audio system which is claimed to be neutral, actually is.  How can mechanical drivers in a box have the same tonal balance as a natural instrument of brass, wood or strings or the human voice?  IMPOSSIBLE.  The best we can do is to use our ears to EQ the system to produce a semblance of reality, or whatever is pleasing.  It is not perfect, but it is the best single intervention that produces close to the desired result.

About phono EQ--deluxe phono stages offer several EQ curves such as RIAA, AES/EBU, etc.  The actual difference is these curves is small compared to what an EQ like my Rane can do.  I have only the RIAA curve in my phono stage, but I still vary my EQ to suit the recordings I listen to.  

 viber6"Innovation is dependent on being open minded and flexible, ready to experiment."

Yes and yet you see in this very thread what happens when someone suggests, proposes, or raises a new idea or one that has not previously been properly evaluated in the context of the discussion that the response is sometimes one of vile profanity, ugly personal attacks, threats  of a crude and even sexual nature - all of these things have happened in this thread and all I am trying to so is have discussion about the things that are appropriate to what is being undertaken by Jay.

If an EQ solves the problems with your Music Reproduction system that that settles the matter for many and if they are upset, disturbed, or bothered by the use of EQ of course they can avoid it but in Jay's case he is going to have to tackle electrical AC power system issues one way or the other sooner either by getting bigger batteries or fixing the AC itself but until then EQ might be of some help to him.

I don’t know where this narrative is coming from about me having electrical issues... That said, if i have electrical issues after having 5 dedicated outlets installed then i can say with certainty that over 90% of the folks who read this thread have miserable power because most don’t have a stromtank and some don’t even have dedicated outlets....they are slinging 5 dollar power strips, panamax power surge protector or a monster unit and some are even plugging in their system in the same outlet where they plug in their TV...

So as far as i am concerned folks, most of us have absolutely no business in this hobby due to our terrible electrical system. 

I think some want us to think Jay has worse power than most.  Not sure why. It’s coming from the same source tho. No matter what kind of power you have,  dedicated lines can help. Also very likely that having a conditioner like the Stromtank will also improve most systems. When you are  at this level everything is revealed so now the improvements will be more easily recognized. When you have perfected a system to this point the next logical area to improve is the real source which is clean power. So now that’s taken care of where to look next?  It’s definitely a system worthy of the “Lab” name. You can really compare things with this system. Good job building a true reviewer tool. 

"So as far as i am concerned folks, most of us have absolutely no business in this hobby due to our terrible electrical system."

@jays_audio_lab 

I have no problem with you Jay, and I know that you have a lot of followers but considering that you were a rank beginner not too long ago, I think that was a pretty rude comment for you to make. 

Pot meet kettle.

Not disagreeing but all have been rude from time to time.

Some have been pretty petty also. 

"So as far as i am concerned folks, most of us have absolutely no business in this hobby due to our terrible electrical system."

I have a feeling Jay was being sarcastic due to the constant prodding by one poster about his so-called poor electrical system.

+1 for @ron17

And where is this arc welder coming from?

Jay didn't you say your ac was on a completely different box and/or circuit?

Could we go back to talking about the Apex and 3060? I have to know which one to buy when I hit the lotto. Hope its the Boulder they are a lot closer to me.

Clearthink,

We agree that there are two separate issues--AC power quality, and EQ.  Both are important, but you emphasize AC and I emphasize EQ.  It is highly likely that Jay's AC quality is better than mine, due to his dedicated lines and better outlets AND Stromtank.  It is also likely that my system would improve with a good battery/inverter, but even with my unknown AC quality from my excellent Shunyata Denali conditioner, the effects of EQ are life-changing.  I cannot listen to any system, mine or others' without EQ.  BTW, another common example of EQ is the loading of the MC cartridge.  I have always preferred max loading at 47K ohms.  Although some criticize the HF peaks of MC cartridges which are fully revealed at 47K, I hate the "correct" loading at a few hundred ohms which tames the HF peak but it also rolls off the upper midrange and HF, making for a relatively lifeless sound.

Most if not all recordings presented here are badly processed productions with lots of EQ and many unnatural sound effects.  It makes no sense for listeners to this stuff to criticize EQ while preaching "purity" without EQ.

Post removed 

I don’t know where this narrative is coming from about me having electrical issues ... So as far as i am concerned folks, most of us have absolutely no business in this hobby due to our terrible electrical system ...

Perhaps you are suffering short term memory loss. Earlier in this thread, another user analyzed your YT video and posted graphs showing it had spurious noises as well as what appeared to be AC harmonics. You were displeased (I’m being kind) and the details you then revealed about your AC power (which you insist even a six year old could have installed) only raised more questions, such as whether you have a 208VAC or 240VAC line that you are using to feed your 120VAC lines. (I know that sounds crazy, but that’s the information that was exchanged. ) A whole bunch of posts were deleted, including yours that contained threats, and Tammy popped into the thread with a gentle warning.

Did that refresh your memory?

It’s not difficult to see what’s happening here. You became a dealer for the Stromtank battery "solution" because you have AC problems. What doesn’t make sense is that you now refuse to acknowledge your journey’s path. Most odd, because much of the history is right in this thread.

As others have noted, it’s possible that you’re in a rental, so there may be little or nothing you can do about your AC issues. But pretending they don’t exist won’t make them go away, and you’ll have to deal them until you have Stromtanks sufficient to power your system.

Jay, installing proper dedicated AC lines isn’t rocket science but it isn’t for six year olds, either. If it’s an option for you, I encourage you to have an expert examine your AC power. He’ll tell you, among other things, why your 30A 120VAC lines are problematic, and he’ll have suggestions that could make a big difference in your system’s sound. The cost will be much less than even one of the small Stromtanks.

My guess is that Jay owns his home.  He completely renovated his garage to make a great listening room, created dedicated AC power lines and outlets.  I don't think a landlord would permit a renter to do all this.

Even if he has AC problems, that's the purpose of the Stromtank to clean it up.  Still, an inverter generates its own particular distortions, which is why ricevs' friend Oeno (great link to his comments on WBF, accessible on p 4 of the battery thread, accessible from p 406 of this thread near the top) uses the Puritan 156 filter after his inverter to filter out the inverter distortions.

Jay, how about trying your Puritan after the Stromtank?

viber6

He completely renovated his garage to make a great listening room, created dedicated AC power lines and outlets.

Did he? What’s with that 208VAC or 240VAC line for the a/c or arc welder that he’s also using for his 120VAC outlets?

Even if he has AC problems, that’s the purpose of the Stromtank to clean it up.

Right. But from what I gather, the Stromtank he can afford isn’t sufficient to power an amplifier. So he is still stuck with his AC problems.

Meanwhile, Jay is in denial and acts as though he's never heard any of this before.

Post removed 

I don't believe WC mentioned anything about an arc welder.  Sounds like something someone has fabricated.  In fact, this whole A/C thing seems fabricated.  

Sorry, I'm not buying it.

Dave

After several years of use all your power cords and the outlets/wall wiring will start to lose phlogiston. The result will be flat, uninvolving sound. You will begin to wonder where the "magic" went! Since phlogiston cannot be replaced the only solution is to replace all power cords, outlets and wall wiring. Don't forget burn-in to align the metal atoms!

Post removed 

Cleeds,

Right.  For the whole system including amps, the Stromtank 5000 is needed, at around $50K, my guess.  Nobody knows whether the power amp will benefit as much as low level electronics.  

In general, sources like DAC's, TT systems with phono preamps which are low power are the most critical component.  This is because whatever low amplitude powerline distortions are present, they are a much larger fraction of low power electronics than high power electronics.  If you try to thread a needle and you miss by a tiny 1 mm, you might as well be a mile off.  Still, it would be interesting for someone who owns a battery/inverter to do this experiment first with low power components, then add in the high power components to see if my theory is correct.

Jay, you can add your power amp to the S 2500, listen at modest levels so the S 2500 can handle the whole system, and then report your findings.

Viber,

What a short memory.....I have already described how I used my inverter for the front end and added the amp for much better sound (even though the bass was inferior due to the wimpy inferior 400 watt inverter being used).

I don’t think the Stromtanks are split phase 240V....which is what the Boulder needs. The Stromtank S2500 is rated to put out 550 watts continuous. The big Giandel system ($3K) can put out 3000+ watts all day.

My friend with the Gaindel system brought his Puritan 156 over to my house yesterday and I installed burned in Furutech outlets and Inlet using cryoed VH Audio wire. Here is his email I just received:

 

 

Short version after Furutech install: another big improvement due to the lowering of noise

greater purity of tone
timbre more beautiful but not colored
wider soundstage
great micro dynamics, harmonic shadings, instrumental shiftings
better focus
greater dimensionality


The above is from listening to vinyl only. And there are some negatives….I am hearing everything on the record, so any distortion/noise from previous plays, bad pressing, poor recording….all is only more vivid!!

One example: I have been using this Roberta Flack record (vocal, spanish guitar, bass, percussion, few strings) as a demo disc for listening for changes in sound quality because I thought it sounded good……and that was a mistake, because of how clearly I can now hear its poor scratchy condition AND its just so-so recording quality. Oh well….

 

 

I am now of the opinion that using a big Giandel Inverter with a modded Puritian 156, and a separate ground rod and Puritian ground filter are the most important things you can do to create a serious stereo. This super pure AC and grounding with more modest stereo equipment would beat super gear running on the AC with audiophile line filtering.....I have no doubt. Jay could add a modded Puritan after his Stromtank and his mind would be blown. I have decided to mod Puritans for those that want the best sound possible. You can never lower the noise enough.

Pilium are the best amps I heard. The Achilles and it’s preamp. I liked them bette than Audionet Heisenberg amps and Stern preamp. They give you the advantages of sounding perfect…imagine a solid state amp with the liquidity of a tube amp and non of the drawbacks that never ever runs out of gas and all the advantages of solid state without ever sounding dry.

no other amps do this. Their integrated amps are also amazing and basically separates in one 220 pound box with 4 transformers. I am saving for the Leonidas and it is the best integrated I ever heard.


 

@johnread57 - Jay has not tried Pillium electronics, I recall him being asked on an earlier video.