My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab

Showing 50 responses by cleeds

jays_audio_lab

Overall, qobuz seems to have better sound but not on every song. Some albums are identical.

Can you name a few tracks or albums that you think sound "better" on one service or the other? That could give us some insight into your preferences because, as we all know, something that sounds different isn’t always better.

whitecamaross


AMPLIFIERS SOUND BEST WHEN CONNECTED STRAIGHT INTO THE WALL:
yes!!!!!! This is a true fact. Amps seem to open up more when they have full control of the available electricity. I have tested this theory many times and they always sounded best to me when connected into the outlet.
Shouting is not necessary.
Your claim may be a "true fact" in your system, but the "true fact" isn’t universal, and certainly isn’t what sounds best in my system.
whitecamaross
I am going to running a very interesting experiment in about 10 days or so. I purchased a monster krell 403e and since krell stated in the manual that tube preamps arent  recommended due to the dc current  tubes pass ...
It isn't clear what you're trying to say here, because only a severely defective audio component passes DC.

whitecamaross
I am slowly trying to get used to lower listening levels but it will take me some work to not want to crank it up.
The better and more resolving the system, the easier it is to listen to it at low levels.
My issue is when I like something, I want more of it and that is in life in general ...
Understood. And of course, there's nothing like cranking it up!
whitecamaross

... The more inefficient the speaker, the more a preamp is needed ...
Why? Of course,  whatever drives the power amplifier must have sufficient gain for the amp to reach rated output. But the efficiency of the speaker has nothing to do with it.
whitecamaross

... interesting fact that most of you all don’t know, did you know that Merril Audio DID NOT send out his amps to stereophile for review because stereophile wanted $ (i can’t disclose what this was) and the manufacturer refused to be part of this corruption ? ...
Count me in among those who didn't know this "fact," which sounds more like an urban legend.

Who at Merrill Audio has made that claim? That's a pretty serious accusation to share as merely hearsay, or while remaining anonymous.
whitecamaross
If Riaa and myself are saying this, don’t take it as gospel but it should make you pump your brakes when it comes to how much you believe what magazines write.
Please note that riaa stated his claim was supported in posts
"on numerous occasions by people who work for Stereophile....mostly Atkinson" but when challenged says:
I know what Ive read. No motive to state otherwise. Not going to waste time trying .
Again, here’s a link to the actual Stereophile reviewing policy:
"Products are chosen for review in Stereophile on the basis of their relevance to the interests and needs of the magazine’s readers ... There is no connection between a product’s being selected for review and whether or not its manufacturer advertises in the magazine."

It’s rather interesting that those attacking Stereophile’s integrity do so without any substantiation other than essentially "someone told me" or "I read it somewhere."
riaa_award_collectors_on_facebook
I dont think the OP stated the policy correctly in regards to Stereophile. You dont PAY a figure (1 time shot) to have a product reviewed in their pages. You DO have to pay for X number of advertisements in their rag in order to have a product reviewed. I have seen this posted on numerous occasions by people who work for Stereophile....mostly Atkinson. Its in Black and White Print.
Do you have a link to Atkinson’s statement?
Of course you don’t, because your claim is false.

Here’s what Atkinson actually says:
"Products are chosen for review in Stereophile on the basis of their relevance to the interests and needs of the magazine’s readers. Reviewers and editors have no role in selling advertising for the magazine, and whether or not a given manufacturer purchases advertising space in Stereophile is irrelevant to a reviewer’s conclusions. There is no connection between a product’s being selected for review and whether or not its manufacturer advertises in the magazine."
For somebody not to know this means they havent been paying attention or reading the mags
Perhaps it is you who should pay closer attention to actual facts.
riaa_award_collectors_on_facebook
... If your reading comprehension skills are adequate you will see that I stated that I can understand WHY any Mag would have that policy
Sorry, but facts matter. You emphatically stated, yourself using ALL CAPS for emphasis:
Stereophile. You dont PAY a figure (1 time shot) to have a product reviewed in their pages. You DO have to pay for X number of advertisements in their rag in order to have a product reviewed.
It's fine if you now want to abandon your claim which, as I've already shown you, is in complete conflict with the magazine's stated policy:

"Products are chosen for review in Stereophile on the basis of their relevance to the interests and needs of the magazine’s readers ... There is no connection between a product’s being selected for review and whether or not its manufacturer advertises in the magazine."
tjassoc
Do you think John A is going to come out and say you have to advertise in our magazine to be reviewed ...
I know it sounds incredible, but that’s exactly what some have claimed:
riaa_award_collectors_on_facebook
Stereophile. You dont PAY a figure (1 time shot) to have a product reviewed in their pages. You DO have to pay for X number of advertisements in their rag in order to have a product reviewed. I have seen this posted on numerous occasions by people who work for Stereophile....mostly Atkinson.
... also ...
whitecamaross
... interesting fact that most of you all don’t know, did you know that Merril Audio DID NOT send out his amps to stereophile for review because stereophile wanted $ (i can’t disclose what this was) and the manufacturer refused to be part of this corruption
Of course, there’s absolutely nothing to substantiate those claims - which are just rumor and hearsay - and quite a bit to refute them in the magazine’s stated policy:

"Products are chosen for review in Stereophile on the basis of their relevance to the interests and needs of the magazine’s readers ... There is no connection between a product’s being selected for review and whether or not its manufacturer advertises in the magazine."


riaa_award_collectors_on_facebook
Wireworld is now closed...has been for about 1 month
It is not completely closed. One of my dealers can have new WW product built and shipped to you.
whitecamaross
As far as to why i think having a preamp is almost "mandatory" with difficult loads is because i have personally experienced this. Take for instance my 20.7 Magnepans; They do not come to life until you give them volume ...
But the power for your speakers comes from your amplifier, not the preamplifier.
Don't get me wrong - I'm squarely in favor of using a good preamp. But that has nothing at all to do with choice of speakers, or whether a speaker is a tricky load for the amp.
carey1110
The top ten myths WC spoke of are his experiences not necessarily the absolute truth.
That's for sure! He's even created his own myth, right here on this thread:
... The more inefficient the speaker, the more a preamp is needed ...

whitecamaross
... there are circumstance where the dac can be used as a preamp and ... dac into preamp is not the solution for every single situation ...
I wouldn't dispute that at all. Indeed, I think most systems  benefit from a good preamp, such as the ARC you've praised.

viber6
... The next reality is that HF's evaporate with distance, and it is an objective fact ...
Sorry, but sound doesn't "evaporate" at any frequency.
... there are marked HF loses at greater distances, objectively measured by microphones as well as heard by educated listeners
Of course, all frequencies diminish with distance and you can measure that loss as 6 dB with each doubling of the distance.

jays_audio_lab

Go knock on someone else’s door ... I think audioholics could use your skill set ... leave that degree in the drawer ... i am still wondering why characters like you pop up on this thread randomly and piss on my lawn ... Or they come to me for an attitude adjustment which I’m tired of doing.

It’s amazing how anytime someone questions the OP of this thread, they’re met with a firehose of dares and insult. It’s almost as absurd as using Youtube as a way to assess sound quality.

whitecamaross
I’d love to open up about how I’ve been scammed through my journey as far as purchases are concerned. I’d love to say this dealer did this to me or that to me etc but you all know I can’t ...
What is stopping you?
viber6

Right.  For the whole system including amps, the Stromtank 5000 is needed, at around $50K ...

Whoa, that's really wild. You might be able to get into a Tesla Powerwall for that kind of money. It's sure easy to see why some are exploring DIY options.

whitecamaross
... how many reviews have you read that made you buy a component and then you took it home and you weren’t impressed? ...
None. I'd never buy a component based solely on a review.
whitecamaross
... how do you tell customers that if their stuff breaks, they need to wait 2 - 3 months to get it fixed ?
It doesn’t typically take two months to get a McIntosh component repaired. I did once have a few week delay because Mac had to manufacture a new glass panel for my MR-80 tuner, which had been damaged in transit. That seems reasonable to me, because it’s unusual for a manufacturer to be willing to manufacture a part for a product many decades out of production.

McIntosh schematics and service manuals are readily available and the company has many factory authorized service centers, at least in the US. These products are readily serviceable.

That’s not to say that there haven’t been some problems for some users, but blame for some of those problems seems to be at the user end, such as the guy who famously was unwilling to return an amplifier for proper diagnosis and repair. Nothing was going to make him happy.
I was told that McIntosh refuses to hire more techs to fix product and their attitude is more like "it will get fixed whenever we get to it " and that’s Bs in my book.
That’s just hearsay, and inconsistent with my experience.
viber6
WC,
I don't mean any disrespect, but the fact is that your bias shows in that you continue to promote your own interests in mainly expensive equipment and your cultivation of high end contacts for that purpose ... There is nothing wrong with your mission, and you are entitled to it ...
So? What's your complaint? Isn't everyone here free to pursue their mission, within the limits of the forum's rules?
jetter
cleeds, after all these years of his great postings, even if WC should make an occasional mistake, we would rather listen to an expert. There are plenty of threads where negative attitudes are welcome.
My intent was to add some clarity, not to hurt your feelings. I’m not sure why you think it’s "negative" for some to bust a myth, but not for others.
thezaks
... a primer on how to post could definitely be helpful ...
No "primer" is needed. Audiogon is very clear about its rules for using the forums. You might want to read the FAQ.

Also, you might want to note this:
... all members are responsible for maintaining a professional and cordial demeanor on and off the site including our forums. We will not tolerate the use of hostile, offensive, profane or vulgar language.
techno__dude
stop saying the Mephisto is a stereo amplifier. It’s 2 mono amplifiers joined together. 2 transformers, 2 POWERCORDS.
This is not an opinion, it’s a fact.
Does it have two separate inputs? Does it have two independent outputs? If so, it's a stereo amp. The rest is just topology.
techno__dude
... Playing with words to misguide...It’s not a stereo amplifier
Are you claiming that Gryphon is "misguiding" its customers by calling it a stereo amplifier? Did you check the links I provided you: Gryphon’s website and the amp’s "Mephisto Stereo" page? The manufacturer itself clearly describes the amplifier as stereo. So perhaps rather than arguing with me you should take your issue up with Gryphon.

The "Mephisto Stereo" - that is exactly what Gryphon calls it - is indeed a dual-mono stereo amp. I’m surprised that this nomenclature causes you such confusion.
techno__dude
2 powercords, 2 transfo , 2 mirrors boards. That’s 2 mono (glued together ). You are wrong on this specific matter and simply won’t admit it.
Does the amplifier accept two independent inputs and provide two independent outputs? That’s a stereo amplifier, by definition. A mono amplifier can only drive one channel. I’m not sure why you insist otherwise - you seem to be preoccupied with the amplifier’s topology.

You might want to check out Gryphon’s website here. You'll see that Gyrphon makes it clear which of its amps are mono an which ones are stereo. The page dedicated to the Mephisto calls the amplifier "Mephisto Stereo," and rightly so. Perhaps you think the manufacturer is also "wrong on this specific matter and simply won’t admit it." You might want to contact them directly!
whitecamaross
Please let me know if any of you own or have owned 2 amplifiers at once and why.
I own four high-end amplifiers. My system is biamplified, so I need two. But it's nice to have a spare on hand.
viber6

Jay already has dedicated lines.  

It isn't clear what Jay's AC power looks like, although the last time the topic arose it looked like there was a welder or a/c unit on one of his "dedicated" audio lines. It's a topic Jay tends to prefer to avoid, hence the threat that he'll take "corrective action" if anyone questions him.

kren00061,500 posts08-19-2021 10:53am
No sneering remarks. Just respect WC’s wishes and stop talking about stuff that has no place on this thread or his channel.
This isn’t "his channel."
TAKE A HINT!!! If it bothers you that much that your stuff isn’t worthy (WC’s decision - he’s told you that a million times and he just did again in his last post - reread it) then don’t follow the thread.
This isn’t "his channel."
... NO IGNORING WC’S WISHES FROM THE USUAL DOLTS WHO CANNOT RECOGNIZE THAT THEIR STUFF SUCKS IN COMPARISON TO WHAT WC PRESENTS
Using ALL CAPS only undermines whatever point you’re trying to make. Everyone is free to post here within the forum rules. If you have complaints about participants here, take them to the moderators.
logydoghan
... Really looking forward to seeing the worst of the amps, especially those charge for big $$$ and pretends to be hifi. I would guess McIntosh being one of them ...
Really?
I’ve heard some fantastic Mac amplifiers. They don’t happen to be to my taste, but I sure don’t think they are pretenders to hi-fi.

Which Mac models have you heard that led you to this guess, @logydoghan? Hopefully you've heard them in person rather than just relying on YouTube.
jays_audio_lab
@ronres:
Any idea why i was banned? I never posted a thing on there.
That seems like a fair question. Perhaps you weren't actually "banned," but the victim of an IT snafu. Or maybe there's more to it. Either way, it seems reasonable to expect some explanation.

shannere

... You are quick to dismiss anyone who disagrees with you ... you are descending into a Harry Pearson wanna be who claims to have the golden ears so much better than ours who can now dictate the truth.  You talk about experience yet it has only a few years since the beginning of your quest ... this thread is now part of a commercial enterprise searching for viewers and dollars ...

Exactly correct.

 

jays_audio_lab

... I'm sick of hearing the same music...this has slowly made me bored ... Makes me want to sell my entire system at times and just start buying aftermarket parts for my truck to make it faster...

You've burned yourself out. It's probably an indicator that the music just isn't that important to you.

jays_audio_lab

What bothers me is the narrative. You keep insinuating that what you propose is better than the Stromtank ...

That may be his view. So what? Of course, it’s understandable that as a Stromtank dealer, you don’t care for that "narrative." But there should be room for dialogue here.

daveyf

... The question should be not whether there are DIY options to the Stromtank ... but whether the electrical system that you currently employ warrants these devices. Fremer recently did a major upgrade of his electrical service, which IMO would be more important overall than adding any of these battery devices ...

I’m not sure that it’s an either/or question, but I absolutely agree that solutions such as the Stromtank may be superfluous if you already have first class electric service supplying a nice clean install with dedicated lines. It’s amazing what a difference that can make.

daveyf

Having dedicated lines is just the start of upgrading your power supply.

Very, very true.

One has to look at the quality of the cable from the street transformer, make sure the street transformer is up to the task ( most times there are upgrade options for this, and connection options that are newer ...

Where I live, that equipment is pretty much dictated by the utility. To get improvements there (or anywhere in the utility’s network, I’ve actually been through this), you probably need to find fault with the quality of the service itself. You can do that by testing the service at the meter pan.

... an upgraded panel at the house and in home wiring upgrades ...

Oh yes. There can be bigtime improvements to be had there. Also: derated lines.

carey1110

Ricevs is there a web site for this inverted you are boasting about?

He has already posted this link. In another thread, someone has posted this link to another solution. It seems to me that with the proliferation of electric cars and continued improvement in batteries, we’re likely to see more of these kinds of products.

I’m a big believer in dedicated lines and power conditioning, but I have to wonder how bad someone’s electric service must be for any of these devices to have a sonic benefit. I haven’t tried one, though.

No, you do not need a dedicated line or fancy outlet......you are only using the house power to charge the batteries

@jays_audio_lab says the Stromtank batteries sound different depending on which power cord is used to charge them. While that seems unlikely, it means that - if true - these batteries are not as neutral as some suggest.

theaudioamp

There was no spatiality, there was simply excessive upper-mid/low high echo/reverberation. I know it is a youtube video, but it was pretty awful ... you can’t discern anything from these videos. They sound like they were recorded in a bathroom, or with added electronics reverb.

I couldn’t agree more. I think one thing Jay trades on is power of suggestion, which in his case is more the power of "pronouncement" than "suggestion." The SQ of these videos simply isn't sufficient to reach any meaningful conclusion about fidelity.

A dealer threatening a user? ... does being a verified dealer give you the paid right to be abusive to other users because you don’t like what they are saying?

Part of Jay’s issue is that he’s takes everything personally. So, if you question him or disagree, he gets, uh, let’s just say quite defensive. Over time, Jay will learn there’s much more to being a dealer than just being an audiophile. For proof, just look at any of the guys who’ve been successful in this business.

 

Jays_audio_lab

Jay isn’t the type to lay down and take a beating by the internet trolls that come in and out of this thread ... most who come in and out of this thread to attack me only see this stuff on magazines

What's your complaint, that people comment in your thread, and some dare to disagree or question you?

Don’t be mad at the dude (the messenger) who lives with this ... I don’t want to hear it. Stop shooting the messenger. Instead of hating on me, why not figure out a way to earn more income so you can better your system?

I don't think anyone here hates you, Jay, so you don't have to play a victim.

This is MY JOURNEY - NOT YOURS. However, somehow that gets overlooked?

You're not posting to a private Dear Diary and everyone here is on a journey. Perhaps that is what you overlooked. And if you choose to use this thread to promote a $16,000 battery, it seems fair to me that others be allowed to comment and even offer alternatives. That doesn't mean anyone hates you.

jays_audio_lab

I’m not embarking on the pissing match you both got going on. How about you both buy one stromtank (split the cost ) and conduct your own testing ?

You're the first audio dealer I've ever known of to equate a listening test with a "pissing match."

I got a lot of things going on that move my needles more than what you both are proposing ...

Many dealers are happy to arrange listening tests. It's part of what they offer.

 

jays_audio_lab

You should call each power conditioner brand and ask them ? Then arrive at your own conclusions... most people who spend hours pondering 🤔 and questioning are folks who aren’t even buying any of this to begin with.

Why would I do that? I have pretty extensive power conditioning already in my system that includes multiple derated 20A lines. I’ve already arrived at my own conclusions - that’s how I got here! You seem to suggest that somehow disqualifies me from commenting. Why is that?

 

jays_audio_lab

most dedicated lines only provide a direct path of electricity to your gear from the breaker box. They don’t really do sh!t else folks.

 

viber6

... I anticipate getting the most practical info from Jay, who will tell us his ranking order of sound quality from several alternatives ...

Unfortunately, in an apparent effort to promote sales of his $16,000 battery system, Jay has dismissed completely the potential value of properly configured dedicated AC lines. It's no surprise that Jay may get improved performance from his batteries if his AC power is a mess, but that info is of no value to those who've already optimized their AC power.

jays_audio_lab

...he is an industry expert ... His system and room are probably 2.5 million dollars.... Believe me, this isn’t coming from an internet forum member...

Whether your unnamed "friend" is real or imagined, whether he is an "industry expert" or not, the claim is absurdly silly:

"Streaming quality is inferior to playing files from a HD, and it is always changing based on your current bandwidth. You just never know what kind of compression you are actually listening to (it does not matter what Qobuz telling you about the quality ...

jays_audio_lab

I have been communicating with a top audio industry expert who brought to my attention something quite interesting. I am copying and pasting and what i want is to hear your thoughts on this subject.

"Streaming quality is inferior to playing files from a HD, and it is always changing based on your current bandwidth. You just never know what kind of compression you are actually listening to (it does not matter what Qobuz telling you about the quality, it is passed their control - think about the times you see Netflix/amazon and the quality changes) ..."

He is pulling your leg, Jay! No one with any credibility would put their name to that claim other than as a joke.

jays_audio_lab

5 dedicated lines... 30a, 30a, 20a, 20a, 30a(220v)

What’s the 30A "220V"AC line for? A/C?

If you have 30A receptacles on the 120VAC lines, you must have to change your power cords to 30A plugs, no?

It’s pretty clear you have some AC problems here. That certainly explains your interest in battery solutions.

grannyring

I find some Qobuz files sound better than my direct to SSD ripped CDs. Sometimes my ripped CDs sounds better. Sometimes it is a toss up ... It comes down to the individual recording every time.

Same here. And that’s the way the audio world has almost always been, right? It’s the quality of the recording that matters most. Same as it ever was.

As for the claim that, "You just never know what kind of compression you are actually listening to (it does not matter what Qobuz telling you about the quality ..." either someone is pulling Jay’s leg, or he’s pulling ours.