My first mid-fi amp and preamp came with really crummy power cords. My Primaluna came with a very thick and I assume large gauge conductor. The only one I have owned that came with a Hulk cable! 😀
Why not?
I have always wondered why if better cables produce better sound, as appears to be the consensus, I am not aware of any manufacturer that provides an aftermarket quality power cable with their product. If I am wrong please tell me. There may be instances I am not familiar with.
Wouldn't they be in the best position to test or design the optimum cable for their component? Wouldn't it be a great marketing angle to say to the customer does not need to worry or fret about selecting this expensive accessory.
"We know these cables show off our component to best effect and there is not question of listener bias or self interested market hype. We offer you the best cable to use with our components."
They could make it optional if they wanted to remain price competitive. This same thinking applies to interconnects, especially with manufacturers who make multiple interconnected components. I pose these questions in all sincerity, not particularly wishing to stir the cable controversy pot. But because it is precisely the absence of this practice that most makes me doubt the objective superiority of the whole cable enterprise.
Mostly I would like to know if I am wrong and there are some examples of manufacturers who either include, offer or recommend specific power, interconnect and speaker cable for their products. Thanks community members for offering a place to ask this question that keeps gnawing at me.
@roxy54 You make two seemingly contradictive comments in a row. First, you say my comment makes no sense and then you seem to agree with me. I approve of your second comment stating that end users prefer to make their own choices on aftermarket items. My only problem was the comment that was previously made about High-end manufacturers don't even care about the quality of their components enough to even consider these items. In reply, I stated why should I pay $10,000 to $100,000 for an item if their engineers haven't even calculated what kind of effect something might have on their equipment or don't even care what kind of accessories they provide the customer. I think it is possible that you didn't see to which comment I was answering when I made my original statement. |
+1 @pmiller115 |
I have not read all of the other posts so I may be simply repeating what others have already said. That being said, I think an issue directly relevant to your question is that we all have different tastes and perceptions of what sounds best. I think my system sounds good and if I didn't I would keep working at it until I was satisfied - if you are ever really satisfied for more than a day of so after which you continue looking for improvements. If I think any equipment manufacturer that attempts to tell its customers what sounds best with their equipment will not be well received. We each decide what sounds best and when we think we have achieved synergy with the different pieces of equipment, tweaks, etc. we own or we continue our search -which is really what this hobby is all about- until we find what we think sounds best and no one else can decide that for any one of us. It is in the interest of every equipment manufacturer to keep as many options for sound coloration open in the use of their equipment.
|
It makes no sense. Amp manufacturers supply power cords. People like specialist power cords and are free to buy them. OP’s assertion that amp makers should supply what are essentially specialized boutique cables is silly. End users like to choose their own, and even if the maker supplied a special cable, it might not work optimally in the end user’s system. as others have said. So what is there for me to learn @lovepianos? |
I've been using Shunyata gear for power distributors for my reference system and for recording. I recommend going to their web site and selecting the about button to see their youtube video. The founder has a really good explanation for the importance and science of providing clean power. Hope this helps. |
A few additions/things to consider:
1) Puritan power conditioners come with an excellent power cord (maybe because they use a different plug in their device) and allow you to upgrade it when you order it 2) Rega's tonearm cable runs straight through form the wires that connect to your cartridge into an RCA cable/connectors. No tonearm cables, removable headshells with plugs or other points of sound deterioration in the signal path. They also have an adapter plug into their PSU that is hard wired into a wall wart. No cable cost whatsoever! 3) Sutherland phono stages provide NO power cord.. He feels that anyone choosy enough to buy one of his phono stages has opinions about their favorite cord. BTW - he doesn't recommend going crazy with them. If I recall he was talking a couple hundred bucks. |
I probably have better things to spend money on, then fixing a problem that I am not sure I have. And if it is mostly psychological, or if I think that it is psychological, then it is already doubtful to work - or doubtful that I would admit that it works. Thirdly - as has been mentioned a few times, even the manufacture says that in my system, the battery option is better than a power cord. So why would I half-ass it? By doing a cable… when that is deemed as substandard to the battery?
Yeah @bigtwin - that is just more work than people want to do. They only want us to believe what they believe, and not show that is repeatable. |
@holmz Hence you yourself have just presented the perfect rationale for trying a PC in your own system, but you refuse to do that for some reason. Whatever. To each his own. Peace out. |
I ended it with a question… which was, “What would I have learned?“ It is like going to a magic show and seeing a trick. What do I learn there, from that experience? I have no idea how he did it. So what would I learn with the power cord? That it seems to work?
Listening to some power cord, is not like riding a bicycle, or learning to ski, where the experience is learning. With the power cord all we have some testimony that someone believes it works. It would be like the bicycle rider talking about the feeling of wind through the hair. But if we have not felt it, then how would we know? If we can see them riding, and we can see their hair blowing, then we can more easily believe that their hair is being blown by the wind from the riding. And we also know how to ride, then their feelings are something that can empathise with or otherwise understand. |
@holmz I said…
To which you reply…
Wow. Just…wow. If you’re saying you can’t learn through new experiences we are truly on different planets. I’ve learned a helluva lot more by keeping an open mind and listening to lots of different equipment than I ever learned by looking at measurements. At this point I’ll take @thyname advice and just give up as there’s clearly no point going any further with this and leave with some Pink Floyd lyrics that seem appropriate…
|
I would be very surprised if they were not different than, say, a lamp cord.
I certainly do not trust them to make a decision on a cable after a 250 mile drive up to the shops that sell them, and know how it will sound in my room... With my speakers and electronics, and the power where I live, relative to what the power is in the shop that sells them..
We are sort of trying to have some of that here.
Mostly blowing through funds, but it could be social signalling that I am not a sucker. Most of the social science types say that we do things without knowing the real reasons why we do them. So I am open to possibilities there.
What you describe is not “learning” so much as its is “experiencing”. What would I have learned? It is a somewhat more common theme to want to know why things work the way that they do. And also to have theories and laws to describe it’ll, so as to be able to repeat the process. Would could probably make an analogy with wine. If the SO and I are having a certain meal, I know that the Tempranillo or Grenache will be great with it, from experience. I am not exactly 100% interested in how the ph and tannins, etc. combine, but if I was a vitaculturalist I probably would be keening interested in that. And the same people consistently produce the drops year on year, and can explain how they do it.
Would you, or anyone else, agree that:
He sounds like he was an interesting and likeable fellow. I make am probably not so gracious, but I’ll try:
I cannot imagine that a cord that is connected on an expensive outlet, into and expensive input on the amp, would be better than using the same cord attached directly to the amp in a captive sense. it is not a vacuum cleaner, where we want to move it room to room. All those extra interfaces are places for trouble, and outlets that grip better, with no corroding materials have an advantage, as well as inlet power connections that do the same. They are just a lot more complicated and engineered than a captive cord, and they try to get back what is lost by not using a captive cord… or at least not give up any more ground. |
Very good point @steakster ! |
@big_greg Wrote:
My Crown Studio Reference One Amp comes with a custom permanently attached power cord that is 10AWG with a 30 amp plug that is cold welded into the amplifier by the manufacturer so you cannot remove it. They also give you a Pass & Seymour 125 volt 30 amp wall plug in the box when you buy the amp new and they recommend a licensed electrician to install a minimum125V 30A dedicated circuit, just for the Crown amp. Crown does not offer an aftermarket quality AC power cable for this amp but they do give you a permanently attached, properly designed and most importantly, a well implemented AC power cable to perfectly match this amp. See image #2 power cord:
|
Post removed |
@soix and @holmz Funny story about that. A friend lent me a pair of MIT Terminator2 speaker cables. I put them in my system, replacing some Crutchfield generic cables, and was amazed! Clarity, texture! I was so smitten I bought a pair of MIT Terminator2 interconnects just to see if what I was hearing could be further enhanced. Sure enough, better still. Enjoyed them for a couple of months, reveling in what I was hearing. Time came to give them back, which I really was sad to do. Determined i would have to get a set of my own. Replaced them with the old cable. Everything still sounded good. I could not find fault with the system. Possible conclusions; 1. I am a hopeless audiophile wannabe who should be banned from any audio show room hencewith. 2. The MIT cables magically transformed my system when I installed them and somehow left their goodness there even after they were removed. 3. My expectation of how good I expected those MITs to be clouded my judgement and dimmed by auditory memory sufficiently that I could fool myself. 4. The MIT cables did change the sound and I heard that and thought it was "better", but the change back to the original was not as drastic as I had expected and I discovered I liked that "flavor" just as much as the MITs. |
@soix : it's not going to work. They will never try anything for themselves. Trust me, I have attempted to do this several times over the years. I have even offered to send them for free power cords / cables, nothing fancy, basic good quality stuff at about $100 - $200 range. They have always refused. It is a "thing" for them. They will never try out of principle. I have given up attempting to help them. I already know the story the moment I see their very first post. It is an exercise in futility, no matter what.
|
|
Even at the top of the high end, products are built to hit certain price points, with certain parts and pieces decisions made accordingly. The car tire analogy is an accurate one - good enough to last the buyer a fair amount of time but not the best one available. Secondly, not every manufacturer spends time testing after market tweaks with their products. Some do but many are already busy enough just keeping their products available, especially given today's product pipeline shortages. |
As a scientist I can understand that if one shows something happening on a DC supply then I know that the cord changed things. And I also understand that people generally have a psychological bias to expect a change.
That seems like it is a bit of a magical way of thinking.
I would be looking for the best of group #1, before I looked for group #2. Secondly; the onus should not be upon the rational to prove that other are not hearing voices, it is upon those that hear the things to provide some evidence or reasoning that their stories have a basis is reality.
Another approach is that It is entirely possible that some gear does enjoy a change from a power cord swap. (But probably the gear that I would not be looking at.) Most of the quality gear is designed well, and putting specials cords on sub standard gear is sort like putting lipstick, or spats, onto a pig. (It does make for a better looking and more handsome pig.) It is usually pretty easy to call the distributor or manufacturer to ask them. This is sort of exactly as @bruce19 asked at the end of his post:
Here you go @bruce19: I would be asking @atmasphere, Suprateck, AR, Purifi etc. if they recommend a different power cord or not… and why? And if it has been tested?
Here is exactly what the local Swiss agent told me:
I’;ll admit that ^This^ came a surprise to me… Their MPS (power supply) is not cheap. And it sounds pretty nice.
I’ll probably get a spare Lemo connector made, and try and quantify the voltage stability. |
Why all the back and forth? Just try some better power cords — either buy used and sell at little/no loss or buy direct from the many direct sellers and take advantage of their generous trial/return policies — and if they don’t make a significant improvement stick with the generic PCs and live happily ever after. What I can’t accept is when people just reject out of hand PCs can make a difference and never even try better cables yet preach that better PCs can’t make a difference because there are no measurements to support it. That’s just willful ignorance, and as @ghdprentice as a scientist has stated and while he might not fully understand why PCs make a significant difference, in reality they do in his experience for whatever reason. Bottom line — not everything is measurable relative to what the human ear can hear. So for those of you who follow the dogma that PCs shouldn’t make a difference, you’ve got no excuse as it’s free, or very near free, to try several brands and use your ears to see if they make a difference. If they don’t, then fine you’re right where you started from with some good personal experience to support your beliefs. If you haven’t yet tried better PCs, what are you afraid of — that your preconceived world might be upset and you can’t explain why? Who cares? If you get better sound you win whether you can explain it in measurements or not. Sheesh. |
The difference is that medicine is part of science, and there are standards like double blind tests, the AMA, CDC, FDA, etc that regulate that they are “doing no harm”… just like the old Greek Hippocrates advocated. The “It feels good” branch of homeopathics, and aeroma therapy, etc. may work, or may not… but there is little evidence that it does, and is viewed as “witch doctor medicine” from a western perspective… And hence we do not have aftermarket cables on pacemakers, nor aftermarket power cords nor batteries. That gear has to work as intended, and there is no room for the subjective experience to be considered worthwhile when defibrillating. It objectively becomes pretty clear whether a defibrillator works or not.
I am looking forwards to what you come up with. I kind of like your pacemaker analogy. |
Good luck with that @bruce19 Besides, what seems to be the problem officer? Pick one cable. Anything. Try for yourself. Simple. No? What are you trying to accomplish? What are you trying to “change” here?
Nobody is going to do the work for you. You have to figure this out yourself. By trying. Or you keep reading and posting in the Internets. If that’s your thing. |
I hate to make assumptions too, so I don't @lalitk , but I will say you seem to have a talent for being abrasive even when you say you don't mean to. Being lazy or cheap are not the only reasons someone might be dismayed at the state of the cable market. Allow me to explain how I see it with a story. Suppose your doctor tells you you need a pacemaker. Once you've accepted that fact she asks if you want the standard connecting cable or the premium one. She says, "I'm obliged to tell you that there is no measurable difference between the two and no data one is better than the other and the premium one costs 100 times what the standard one does. By the way it's not covered by insurance but a lot of people like to get the premium one." Would you feel that is an acceptable state of affairs? I would not, but I bet many if not most people and maybe me too would end up buying the premium cable. That's how I feel about the hifi cable business these days. So I'm seeking ways to try and change that. As far as the personal advice on my system I think you and I both no how that goes. A bunch of recommendations with very little agreement which descends into a food fight. This thread has however stimulated some thoughts on my part and I think I will be back with a proposal about a possible way to harness some of the massive experience here to try to bring a tiny bit of light to the subject. Stay tuned. |
@lalitk Wrote:
I agree. Another way is to eliminate the power cord and wall plug. I run my amp directly to the dedicated branch circuit, sounds better in my opinion, then running it with a power cord. 😎 Mike |
So we had a few additions and corrections, here is the current summary of this thread, thanks to all contributors: Audio manufacturers who include or recommend high end cables with their equipment Burmester |