117 responses Add your response
mijostyn, you wrote { Believe it or not K horns are usually well accepted because they fit tight into a corner, are made of handsome veneers and don't look like speakers. Unfortunately, most of us do not like the sound as is. } Have you even heard a pair of Klipschorns? If you have and didn't like them they probably weren't set up correctly. I agree they probably are the most beautiful speakers extant and recently there's a newer version that's redesigned that doesn't have to fit tightly in the corners. I'm ordering a pair after my house is built and with my H.H. Scott tube amp I'll be in heaven again! Incredible bargain!!! |
I have to disagree with the opinion "Magnepans are the ugliest . . ." They have such a pure simplicity they look more beautiful than speakers costing five or even six figures. Magnepans sound to me more like live music in the opera house I go to than the kind of speakers only a television evangelist, who is probably incapable of empathy with composers who are inspired by genuine light (not physical Maxwellian photons in this world) from some higher world, would buy to show off how much he can spend. Wife acceptance factor is helped because they are light enough to be moved out of the way when not in use. Just mark the floor where they sound best. |
If you can find a pair for sale, the Jadis Eurythmie................The ’96, N.Y. Stereophile audio show, at the Waldorf, was their introduction to the US market, along with some other Jadis gear. I was part of that exhibit, as the music playing host. Many significant others, who seemed to be dragged to the show by their nerdy audiophile spouses, lol, wrote on comment cards handed out by the importer, on how beautiful they were, and how much they looked liked giant butterflies ( no kidding, and no comments from the majority of them, about the music being played ). Those music comments were left by the nerdy audiophile spouses, again, lol. |
lukaske, ’Less Is More" indeed... $ that is. ;) Nice to see that omnis are having a bit of a renaissance of interest and attention on the tech side. I’m down with that. *S* But....I think I’ll stick with my DIY Walsh. Certainly less impact on the budget for this more modestly moneyed mortal. About 1/500th of the Magister (if we’re talking cost in US$....even with my labor added I'm still far less than 30K anything...). That, and I’d be more impressed if Ilumnia had ’doubled down’ with an omni tweeter as well. I have. Zero phase distortion, too... |
Taste being subjective all I could contribute is what are the best looking speakers to me. I actually think the Thiel 2.7 speakers, which I now happily own, are about as close to "perfect" for speaker aesthetics as I can think of.They depart from the boring rectangle shape, yet aren’t a crazy, gauche design, but very sleek and contemporary with gorgeous wood finishes (mine being ebony). A really beautiful piece of furniture which IMO enhances a room. I also really like the Joseph Audio Perspectives - just a bang-on combination of slender proportions that combined a modern-with-classic look with impeccable wood finish work. Also love the Devore Fidelity O/96 speakers for a great combo of comfy-classic styling made contemporary. |
Wilson Benesch Vectors in various finishes. Form follows function fabulously. http://wilson-benesch.com/vector-floor-standing-loudspeaker/ |
Post removed |
The latest T+A Criterion looks superb finished in whitewashed oak. The speakers are refined and lowkey enough to pass as designer furniture IMO. https://www.ta-hifi.de/en/loudspeakers/criterion-ctl/criterion-s-2200-floor-standing-speaker/ |
At lot of speakers are designed to draw attention to themselves, or to look good in and of themselves. I looked for a speaker that did just the opposite, to blend in as much as possible with the room it was in, and to draw as little as possible attention to itself. That was on of the reasons I chose Magico A3's. Their appearance is refined as you can get in a plain black box that does not call attention to itself. Many, if not most, larger speakers are pure eyesores in a room, the bigger they are the more gruesome and overwhelming to a room's decor. No wonder our spouses get pissed off about having them in the house. Magico's at least are not garish or weirdly shaped as some speakers are and distract you as little as possible from the surrounding room furnishings, even though there is no ignoring them or most other large speakers. Mike |
I think the first response in this string was Sonus Faber. I have to support and agree with that opinion. My wife will not “tolerate” (I still wear pants😝) speakers that do not look like furniture. It took me some time to find the right line of speakers to grow into. Grow into meaning as my budget increased, I could count on the line of speakers to support my acoustic expectations and my wife’s “furniture” expectations. Sonus Faber has not let me down in meeting my growth goals. |
IMHO the best looking(& most impressive) are the JBL Paragons, Metregons, and Hartsfields. Not the best sounding (although not BAD). The generate the most Oohs & Ahhs. They are conversation starters, for sure. There are a lot of ‘pretty’ speakers, and a ton of great sounding speakers out there but the early JBL Line is, hands down, the most impressive looking. Again, IMHO‼️ |
Totally depends on your aesthetic and room furnishings. I'm on my third (and last) pair of Daedalus Audio speakers. Can't decide whether I love the look or the sound of them more. Heirloom pieces, crafted one at a time by a master craftsman who knows what real instruments sound like and is able to get his speakers to reproduce them accurately. Not for everyone though--we have a house full of Stickley reproductions so Lou's speakers just blend in beautifully, adding to the ambiance (my wife might say at least not detracting from it). But many people these days prefer a modern, spartan aesthetic like you see in all the magazines--places where something from Wilson or Rockport would fit right in and my Daedalus Apollo's would look out of place. |
If your home's aesthetic leans towards the resurgence of mid century modern, the Davone speaker line would fit right in. Have an Eames lounge chair in the room? The Davone Ray would look great out in front. But...I always wonder if these "form first" products live up to the sound quality of their uglier counterparts. The reviews are always from tech outlets and not traditional audio press. |
Harbeths but that depends on your decor. In our kinda modern loft sort of place, the M30.1s are gorgeous, especially on thin stands like the old Foundation. That said, I think the best looking speaker of all time is the original Quad ESL, loved by my wife as well, but we don't have the space anymore. |
When it comes to WAF, mine seemed to prefer soft lines and curvy appearances rather than straight lines, sharp edges, and form follows function approach. Naturally she liked sonus faber lute shaped speakers. Surprisingly she also really likes the verity audio Parsifal in makore finish. With the bass module facing to the rear, the monitors look like they are resting on fine furniture. |
Depending on the surrounding decor, personal taste, and budget, the understated elegance of Daedalus Audio speakers may be worth considering. From their website:
And if you research comments on them in past threads here and elsewhere I think you’ll find that their combination of "fast" and dynamic yet very natural sound character, high efficiency, high power handling capability, benign impedance characteristics, and versatility with respect to amplification hold a lot of appeal as well. And, last but not least, Lou Hinckley of Daedalus is a pleasure to deal with Good luck. Regards, -- Al |
You can't miss with fine leather: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5MXCLc0yeM&frags=pl%2Cwn All the best, Nonoise |
how about these with a fine leather finish. http://www.rossofiorentino.com/en/collections-fiesole.asp |