I agree.
They should offer an option of solid gold face plate and marble chassis for the money they're asking
They should offer an option of solid gold face plate and marble chassis for the money they're asking
64 responses Add your response
@honeybee2012, I am not sure it is anti Americanism. Sometimes companies go with previous data and if they find that a market tends to buy 1 color most of the time, then it is much more economical for the company to offer that product in 1 color. Maybe when they were offering the champagne color in the US, it did not sell that well compared to Black? I personally would love to see that champagne color as well. But if the component produces great music, then color should not matter. Of course that is just my view, and I can understand that yours would be different. |
Yeah, I have the same beef when MFG ’ S only offer sliver. Like you, no sale....but I did have to make one exception. +1 Tim. I also made one exception, Pass Labs amps. Speaking of cars honeybee2012, I agree. It seems that 90% of the cars on the road today are white/black/silver. Where have all the options gone? Back to audio, Golden Ear speakers are ONLY available in black. I think that is the first I have ever heard of speakers only available in one finish. I understand that it’s all about streamlining and cutting costs, but I don’t understand why a more expensive option finish cannot be a choice. If someone is willing to pay for a premium finish, why wouldn’t a manufacturer comply? |
I agree that different finishes/chassis colors should be made available when practical. When buying upscale components such as the Marantz Reference series, the classic champagne gold should be available. I would opt for that distinctive finish if investing in components of that pedigree. I emailed Marantz about this issue last night and look forward to their response. In the Home Theater Review of the Golden Ear Reference, the issue of the "only black" finish is addressed. Again, if you're going to invest over $8000 in a pair of speakers, you might desire a menu of finish options be available to allow a distinctiveness of appearance in your listening space. Perhaps Golden Ear will reconsider, realizing they are entering a more elite area of the marketplace. Here's hoping both companies will reassess their position. |
Long ago, I had an all black (no choice) system, but upgrading forced me into other colors (no choice). I was then cool with that, and started to enjoy mixing it up, because in a way it showcased the individual components. As I continued to upgrade, my choices became black only again. Today, I'm back to 99.5% black again. My last piece to upgrade is my line stage. One of my serious contenders for this is Coincident. Guess what, silver only! So, the bigger question is, should we compromise the sound for aesthetics? For most of us, I believe the answer would be no, so the frustration over this finish issue is well understood. Kenny |
A lot of research goes into what’s best for which market. Different colors denote different tastes, outlooks and preferences. Unfortuantely, black is considered a bad-ass color associated with aggressiveness, dominance, soldiery, stealthiness, ninjas and the like. Champagne denotes civility, sophistication, artiness, elegance and what have you. Guess which one is typically "American" to most market research departments? It’s all how we’re perceived. Despite my mention above about not judging the looks of something, I prefer the champagne look but I’m stuck with the black as well. All the best, Nonoise |
A lot of research goes into what’s best for which market. Different colors denote different tastes, outlooks and preferences. Unfortuantely, black is considered a bad-ass color associated with aggressiveness, dominance, soldiery, stealthiness, ninjas and the like. Champagne denotes civility, sophistication, artiness, elegance and what have you. Interesting research. I see black as stealth-like. I prefer it for it's ability to not call attention to itself like silver and gold do. When people have come into my listening room, they are always drawn to any silver, gold or champagne color components first. No one ever asks about a black component. That is why I prefer black. I prefer the equipment NOT to call attention to itself. I certainly do not consider it "bad-ass". Maybe in a car though. Cheers, John |
I have bought equipment from Japan just to get champagne gold components. http://www.hifido.co.jp/?lang=E&genre=1&keyword=marantz&arrival=10&limit=50&pric... |
The new Oppo UDP-205 will be available soon. And ill be available in silver. http://www.oppodigital.com/blu-ray-udp-205/ |
| Post removed |
As OP, I suggest we close this thread. Most posters are of a like mind, a reference item from a company with an esteemed history should offer their classic color scheme as an option. Especially at such a lofty price for a SACD player which is, in fact, a niche product. There is no argument with the "sound only" and the "pro black" posters. This thread was not about how the product sounds. Thanks |
if Champagne Gold is not available in the US, then maybe a parts distributor where it is available can sell & ship you a faceplate also, people need to contact marantz/hk as they likely do not read this board I do agree with the above re a high end manf. making their legacy an option - tho I hate the ARC legacy knobs... |