Does Anyone Buy Schiit for the Sake of Schiit?


Most of us I think when buying something where workmanship and materials are less critical than price will go to a discount store like Walmart of Target (I think we've all heard they about calling it Tar-zhay because it's classier than Walmart) or Costco - the sort of stores where what you buy is not the best but it's always good for what you pay for it. I'm wondering, is Schiit the audio equivalent of Target? That is, does anyone buy it because the Schiit gear is particularly good, or merely that it's good for the price? The only Schiit product that I've ever bought is the Asgard as a headphone amp, since I don't use headphones that often, and I wasn't going to put a lot of money into it. Actually, I tried the Vali 2+ at first, and that seemed rather inadequate, so I sent it back and got the Asgard instead. It seems good enough, though I don't have much to compare it to, but it seems to struggle a bit in getting to higher volume levels. 

heretobuy

I love the way people take criticism of equipment personally. Even more humorous are those of us who lecture others regarding spending habits and posit motivations for such "foolish" expenditures. Such insecurity must be grounded in jealousy or some silly economic moral imperative. 

Great post! thanks...

I will only add that my not so silly moral imperative is the ratio S.Q./ price tag, it is a "relative" tag on our flowing navigating audio journey...Relative yes for each of us , but very important for most of us...

i am with you for the gear criticism jealousy...

Criticism of gear is sometimes like boasting about ONE piece of gear though the inverse of jealousy....Not always useful... Reviews made some sense in great numbers to make a choice...Especially if we comparatively analyse them...

i am in the impossibility to listen to the gear before choosing it.... I read hundred of reviews before choosing each piece...i choose my dac and amplifier and the speakers this way with success...No regrets after 7 years with the same gear...

The brand names of my piece of gear matter for me yes, but way less than the controls method and devices used in and for their embeddings electrical, mechanical and acoustical working dimensions...because many other good pieces of gear could have replaced them, but nothing can replace  embeddings control in S.Q. improvement... Even not most upgrade on the same massive scale of improvement caused by these control methods.....

Thats all i have learned in my last INTENSE 10 years of my audio journey now....

😁😊

I love the way people take criticism of equipment personally. Even more humorous are those of us who lecture others regarding spending habits and posit motivations for such "foolish" expenditures. Such insecurity must be grounded in jealousy or some silly economic moral imperative.

I think a number of people on this thread have imagined a chip on my shoulder that really isn't there. I would have thought that when I admitted that I didn't have enough direct experience of their products to make a judgment (i.e., two headphone amps at the lower end of their price range) I would have defused that. The purpose of the question is this: There are brands such as to pick some at random, Focal, B&W, Hegel, Luxman, Martin Logan, that you would seek out because you've heard them in someone else's system, or in a showroom, or even just from reputation, and your frame of mind would be "am I ever going to be able to afford one of these", and you endeavor to get to a point where you can. The question was whether Schiit was a brand you would be sought out for its own sake. I've seen Schiit equipment well-reviewed and held to be better than other competitive brands, so this is not impossible. It could very well be that a piece of equipment specifically engineered to meet a certain price point would be superior to a piece of equipment from a prestigious brand watered down to make an entry level product. I think it would be fair to say that the majority of the people who buy Schiit do it without ever hearing it beforehand. What generally draws people is that they can offer something credible at such a low price. In the case of the Asgard, which was $200 at the time, I was buying something for a not-critical use to me and felt I could get away with paying that little, much like I'd buy washcloths at Target because how good does a washcloth have to be? I am reasonably satisfied with my purchase, for which I actually have no point of comparison with other brands.

No chip seen by me. Your perception is correct. Really good value for the money. I don’t think you can audition anywhere… and they are not comparable to McIntosh, Audio Research, Boulder and the like. Very safe bet for the money.  

Now that I think of it, Tekton seems to be an example of a maker of relatively low-priced equipment that's bought for its own sake. Also selling directly.

I would definitely agree that the main selling point is value for money. As to whether somebody with a bigger budget is seeking Schiit out for its own sake, I couldn't say. I do know that I'm personally aiming a lot higher for my next purchase - the bug bit me and I need to go bigger and better. but "solid gear that basically anybody can afford" is a killer niche. i love what they do and i love that so many people are buying $100 dacs and getting an idea of what is possible beyond the thrifts, pawn shops, and best buys of the world. i'm one of them

i will give a quick rundown of my 4 experiences with schiit gear

- bifrost mb dac - for 400 bucks second hand, a credible dac, nice warm tone, not the most resolving, little grainy... top of case sheet metal edges a little unfinished to me -- for the same price, i liked the chord mojo (original) better, though of course it is both portable and ergonomically challenged in a home rig at the same time - i felt the bifrost mb was a decent value, on par with other good offerings albeit with different strengths and weaknesses (musical paradise, older van alstine tube dacs, around the same price), at this price it made the right tradeoffs, which is to fight digit-itis and add some warmth and body to the music

- gumby - at 950 used, a step up, once again on par with other ’good’ dacs in the price range -- ayre codex, mhdt stockholm - quite natural sounding, better resolution without stridency, nice expansive image, better sibilance control - a notch better than rme adi2, topping d90 mqa which to me sounded robotic/digital, and border patrol which was too smoothed over, lacked drive and inner detail - loud clicking relay noise in the gumby bugged me when switching tracks, once again a credible upper tier performer among better 1000 dacs

- loki - got one for fun to mess with when i was trying to tame the hot treble in the spatial m3 sapphires... no brainer for 200 bucks... did the job without damaging the signal, nice it could be switched in and out easily, no obvious electronic artifacts - excellent - keeping it to have around if ever needed again

- aegir amp pair - bought for 1200 used, very well built, substantial, for my big spendors or harbeths which are medium efficiency not demanding loads -- the sq is exceptionally good used as xlr monoblocks, excellent tone/timbre with good drive and a real sense of purity for the $, was not quite as resolving as better hegel or pass but within a hair... those amps of course 2-3-4x in price... kept the pair... really like em... 

 

My Aegir amp is quite good driving high sensitivity speakers.  Sensitivities below 90dB/1W/1m... not so much

@audition__audio I love the way people take criticism of equipment personally. Even more humorous are those of us who lecture others regarding spending habits and posit motivations for such "foolish" expenditures. Such insecurity must be grounded in jealousy

Why?

+1 for the Aegirs as monos. I’m having fun driving them with a Rhumba extreme. The little Schiits have really held their own and shown me what the Rhumba is capable of. Excellent build quality.

I have bought some of their Schiit for a third small system in the garage. I enjoy it  while I am working out there and for the price to performance issue it is okay at best ......I do know however that my neighbor who I love otherwise will tell me to ; '' turn that Schiit down '' when I may have it a little too loud. I hope this helps....    

I do own saga, Freya plus preamp, Gumby. All are good.Jason and Mike Moffat knows what they are doing , superb customer service.

Everything in my life is a compromise and “good enough”. I don’t have the house with the room to do justice to outrageously good equipment, and I don’t have the income to afford outrageous equipment. It doesn’t make sense to me to pay $10,000 for speakers in this room, using a $3,000 amp and $1,000 pre-amp, with source of a less-than $1,000 CD transport or $300 turntable. Neither would it make sense to play a $10,000 integrated through $3,000 speakers. I try to balance the quality of all of it together to arrive at “good enough” and “better than my 30 year old $300 Sony receiver with 35 year old Jensen speakers, playing my old Technics cassette deck”. I learn to be satisfied with what I have and can afford.

Have to agree with those who are impressed with the Yggy - there are few DAC’s that sound any better, if any. Got the Yggy v2/OG (whatever) and it is superb in all respects.

But... it all depends upon what electronics and speakers you mate it with, what types of interfaces you use, and whether it’s burnt in and warm - once again... "synergy" makes all the difference.

And... I’ve also found that how a component "measures" is no indicator of how it sounds. In fact, many... if not... most components that measure well do not sound well... and... many... if not... most that do not measure well do not sound well.

Its all about the quality of the recording / engineering / harmonics / etc. that determines how good or poor a recording sounds with any set up.  And... the type of music makes all the difference - if you're listening to rock, rap, electronic, etc., you will never be able to discern the differences in sound quality of components, no matter what components you're using. 

My Schiit Aegir has won the day in multiple battles against seemingly sure victors, including Pass XA30.8, Van Alstine M225s… I learned there’s a reason the Aegir is on the Stereophile Class A recommendation list, and it’s not for “savin ya a dollar!” The lower cost is just icing on the cake, albeit glorious icing for sure. And my Yggdrasil OG provides amazing sound as well. There is absolutely nothing cheap quality-wise about Schiit products. 

If I can act as referee of my own thread, I think the result is that there are indeed people who do buy Schiit for the sake of Schiit. I think it would have been a little less obtuse of me to look at the price range of Schiit products. They make an amp for $1499 and a DAC for $2199, which would be a mid-level product for more conventional audio manufacturers, but the overwhelming majority of their products are in the $500 or less range, which means the actual field in which they compete is makers who concentrate on gear in that range, of which there are several. In their chosen field they are indeed a major player, both in quality and price. I would also like to emphasize that I didn't necessarily pose the question thinking one answer or the other was more likely.

@2psyop is it not more ridiculous to overspend on something without getting the quality you paid for?

Depends on what is meant by ridiculous. Some goods are purchased precisely and deliberately because they are expensive. What you actually get, including quality, may not be predominate motive.

This violates normal micro economic theory and common observation, but may be sort of explained.

I think an important consideration in audio gear is that the price is a signal in itself of quality; this is not that unreasonable. No short-cuts or compromises have been made with those thick front panels.

The snob effect is well known. There are other reasons, perhaps overlapping (conspicuous consumption, brand name, made in America - which of course Schiit is, etc), but that is a taste.

In the meantime, it does appear ridiculous, I agree. My amp goes to 11.

These kind of goods have a name, by the way - veblen goods, and they are everywhere.

 

 

noske good points all around. I suppose a certain level of snobbery can be found with other "things" other than audio ie clothes, cars, homes etc. But in the end, live and let live. Whatever someone wants to spend on audio does not really affect me, we live in a world where advertising and psychological persuasion is everywhere. Often people are influenced to believe if you have the "exquisite gold plated widgit" you are more important or more beautiful or more something. And also society, as a whole, buys into that.

I never really knew about Schiit until researching for a headphone amp for my Marantz UD5007 and Sennheiser HD800's/Audeze LCD's closed back headphones. After reading reviews on Schiit amps,  I purchased a used Lyr 2 off CAM and swapped out the stock tubes for Russian ones and truly love this little guy! 

I did stay with Schiit for the sake of Schiit. I started with the Vahalla and experiment ed with it as a preamp and that got me into tube preamps. Then I slowly got into digital, and tried the Modi and was amazed at the improvement for dollars spent. Eventually picked up a Bifrost and did not find a major improvement but more of a different sound, more analog. Now I’ve had a Yggdrasil GS and find it to be excellent, especially when paired with my Rogue Athena. I would say that I did remain loyal because the good experience I had with them. 

I think the rear mounted power switches on some items are a big design flaw, but I own a headphone amp & it's quite good.

Yes, they do. Well, I do.
Jotunheim for my Sennheiser HD800s. Very satisfied.
Freya because I wanted remote volume control and source selection and nothing else. I find it transparent in passive mode, and a little more lively in the active modes. Nice product. And cheap!
Gungnir Multibit. I thought there was a meaningful difference when inserting the Gungnir.

Good toys, very fair price and they hold their value well, so you don't bankrupt yourself swapping things in and out.

Their store in Newhall is a blast, very nice folks.

No better or worse to look down on those who spend less than to generalize about those who spend more and ascribe to these people motivations that you dont find kosher. Who cares why people buy what they buy and why even discuss it as it no ones business and you cant possibly know their motivations?

 

I bought a Schiit Modi 3 to hear how much improvement there would be from a simple DAC. Now my TV serves as a hub for all digital program sources and sends the signal to the Modi 3 over TOSlink. The sound is much improved. I think I'd want to hear an A/B test before spending to improve upon it.

I just added a used Gumby and I think it has an enjoyable and interesting sound. IMHO DACs do not sound hugely different from each other, but the R2R NOS sound is definitely a little distinct.  I think it's great to switch back and forth between that and my delta-sigma Mytek Liberty II.  Can hear the difference...both good...just different...

I have owned the Schiit Modi and Magni for headphones.  I listened to the work computer CDs and Spotify.  It was much better than the add-on computer audio card and quite listenable.  Was it audiophile quality?  No.  But who has the time or need for audiophile presentation while working?  However, it was better than anything I had ever listened to before, on those computers, and it was reasonably priced. 

I think that the company is the best USA company for audio quality in their products price range.