Hamand for the win! SkiFi for $3200 is a waste of money! Go to the Stereophile archives to read a review and test of the HF-81. Pay attention to John Atkinson's measurements.
Yeah, definitely Ham & Hifi. Super clean unit, nice inside pics, decent parts used, no apparent silliness. Nice deal. Sky-fi is well into "dreamer" territory at $3K+; they are looking to make a lot of money. I know the HF-81 model is revered, but the Eico HF-22 (amp only, and you need a pair for stereo) seemingly flies under the radar - they sound GREAT and have more power! |
Doesn’t apply to a (mostly) kit amplifier from the 1960s. What REALLY applies is good under-the-hood pics, so you can check for general wiring quality, og transformers (old wiring leads), new vs. crusty old caps, modern thermistor (in place of the solenoid), etc. Sky-fi is charging a 100%+ premium, claiming rebuild / refurb, and didn’t even bother to post internal pics - "trust us, bro". |
Generally, what @mulveling said. Skyfi's business model is to soothe the paranoid, you-get-what-you-pay-for crowd with bloated prices and cloying pseudotechnical mini-essays. The Ham & Hi-fi listing does have great pictures showing a quality rebuild. Where I diverge a bit is reading this from their listing
1. Why didn't they test the tubes? Surely a shop with the word "ham" in its name has got a tube tester somewhere. 2. If the tubes are untested, how was the amp tested? Different set of tubes? Maybe I missed that part and now I'm too lazy to go back 😃 3. Just replace the cover screws already if your local hardware store "likely" has them. Asking $855 for an amp but not bothering to get $2 worth of screws and spray painting their heads to match, I don't know, unless I'm missing something, that kinda rubs me the wrong way honestly.
|
Neither - as a Pilot 240 sounds better than the 81 (owned an 81 that I had refurbished once in the late 70's and still own a 240). Hifi poser Jeff Day brought the 81 back into focus @ one point. Didn't care for the phono sections in either, but tape through the line inputs was stellar as is CD through the 240.
DeKay |
@devinplombier I think what they mean by untested is that they can't guarantee the condition of the tubes. They're working but they don't know the specs. It's barely an issue. It also looks like they're not the rebuilders–just reselling it.. |
@devinplombier Ooof, I didn't see that - your're right it's sheer laziness & sloppiness, which is a bit disconcerting in this context. That said, the internals look really nice, and their feedback is 100% - so I would still go ahead with purchase if I really wanted that unit. You'd hope maybe they have a "known good" keeper tube set for rebuild testing, and then they pop in the unit's "original, as supplied" tubes back in at the very end (still very lazy not to re-test). OR they didn't actually rebuild it, and are just selling someone else's rebuild. The price is right, but still, just why leave these loose ends?? |
@devinplombier Yes, years ago I had a great tech who recommened & used Illinois Caps on vintage rebuilds. I’ve had Eicos & Heathkits done with both IC’s and Orange Drops. Never any problem with either of these caps. Looks like the H&H unit (yes, they are not the rebuilder - just passing it along) uses both of these caps. Also looks like they may have replaced the multi-section can cap with a standard electrolytic, which is OK - it works fine. The CE can cap used by Sky-Fi is a more premuim option. But this is also a good opportunity to work in my regular "Alps Blue Velvet" pot bashing, which Sky-Fi advertises as using in their unit. I absolutely HATE that pot; it always ruins the sound quality. Almost anything else is better. |
100% agreed, though honestly there are worse offenders out there than this little $855 amp. To wit, from the product page of a $5,995 preamp:
https://www.primaluna-usa.com/primaluna-evo-400-tube-preamplifier |
@devinplombier We all hate the Alps BV! I replaced the volume pot on my tube preamplifier. |
Sky-fi has been driving up prices for years on equipment that does not come close to what it’s worth. I honestly think they are money laundering, can’t come to any other reason for some of their pricing. I would never buy from them. The other seems a like a reasonable priced unit and looks to be in good shape. |
@squared80 1. They were the only two that are refurbished at the time of posting. 2. I wanted to draw attention to the price difference.
|
@kymanor1 Thanks. I guess.
|
The Hamand hifi - $855. I think the SkiFi Audio is ugly, and I don't trust their work. Not to mention, you would have $2345.00 left over to do all kinds of things, I don't think it's even a choice. Places like StereoRehab love this stuff and will restore it to its original state, down to the screws originally used, and you would still have two grand left over. |