Keithr is a "registered Magico hater". For years, constant drip of unfounded hate on all channels possible.
My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!
Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005
With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)
NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)
Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)
rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)
cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)
parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)
lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)
McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.
butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)
pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.
classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)
Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:
PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.
Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.
Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?
Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.
It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.
Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.
Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.
Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.
Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.
Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.
My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.
That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!
I have also read dozens of posts by keithr on WBF and Agon conveying his dislike for Magico. Anything he says about Magico sends up a red flag for me. keithr's original post was: "Alon doesn’t design the speakers, guys." I agree with henry201 that it sounded like Alon has nothing to do with the design process, which I believe is false. |
Post removed |
Post removed |
Post removed |
This discussion between keithr and rbach is interesting.... I have to agree with rbach and henry201 (and WC too, based on his comment) that keithr made it sound like Alon does not do any of the design. I honestly don't think these folks are attacking - just questioning the statement you made. I think keithr has now clarified it, so that's good. And, is it true that keithr has posts on other forums, indicating a dislike for Magico? If true, then keithr should just own his opinion and not claim that folks are attacking. If it's not true, then I understand the attacking comment, and I would question rbach's motives. Dave |
Well I don’t think Keithr’s statement that Alon wasn’t the chief designer makes him a”Mágico hater”. That’s pretty strong language and only serves to provoke. Maybe he’s not a fan of Mágico I don’t know, but stating Alon wasn’t the designer isn’t a hateful remark toward the company. Not the way I took it anyway. Im sure Alon has put together a highly specialized team of individuals to accomplish the goals of his company. I think Jay has made his Mágico’s sing and I believe he is capable of making a lot of speakers sing in his system. His relentless pursuit of making a system sing have earned appropriate recognition here on this site as well as YouTube. |
@thezaks i get it I just didn’t think his comment that Alon wasn’t the only designer d warranted the comment that’s all. Hey not a big deal we all have a right to our opinions including rbach. |
@thezaks (Dave)
I believe zprr does know what he's talking about. Your statement about Jay in your WBF post did not paint you in the same light as Jay (just a couple of crazy amp guys). Your statement was derogatory towards him. You were complaining about Jay calling Pass Lab amps "mid fi" and the way the hi end has gotten so expensive. Like I said in my previous post to you. "When I hear folks say $15k amplifiers are budget oriented, I feel the hobby has lost its way (see the crazy amp dude's YouTube channel that considers Pass Labs "mid fi"). The average Stereophile reader's system is $19k, but this is WBF after all so I guess it's expected. The reason this hobby has shrunk so much is the focus in the audiophile media and community on high priced bling of the month - I chuckled two years ago when TAS declared the $50k speaker category as "highly competitive." Dagostino is famously designed on form over function. Have you seen the internals of a Constellation compared with the expensive case? Why does carbon fibre and installation lights *on the back(!)* of a Chronosonic impress people?" Also, here are just a few posts keithr has made on Agon. I am on a business trip currently and don't have time to go through the many 'no so great posts on Magico' made by keithr on WBF. Meanwhile, Fyne F1-12s land in my room in a few weeks :) Figuring out what the perfect amp will be, but when 50 watts is enough there are so many options, mostly inexpensive. I’m surprised Jay hasn’t gone in this direction as an amp guy like me.
I have owned several Magico speakers and currently own a pair. There are many speakers I don't care for but am careful not to criticize them publicly. I have nothing personally against keithr....I just think he should read what he writes before pressing send. |
All one need to do is search "Magico" Posted by" keithR" on WBF. Hundreds of posts mainly of unfounded hate. You’ll notice they hardly make sense if you bunch them all together. I wonder if he ever even heard a pair. The funny part is that after years of searching (and hundreds more "KeithR’s Dream Speaker" posts), he ended up buying a speaker he can’t/will not use (YG Hailey). I don’t blame him, they are not that good (and I like YG). I did consider them but ended up with the Magico A5. A MUCH better speaker at half the price. But KithR will never admit to that 😶
|
Hi everyone, Part 2 - " Research and Development " drops tomorrow at 12 pm ET. Please subscribe and turn on your notifications so you are informed once the video drops. This video has outstanding video quality and it is 52 minutes long!! I urge you to watch the whole thing because if you skip through it, you'll miss a ton of things. It is jammed packed with quality content so take your time watching it.
|
The more impressive job was from Jay, rather than the Magico factory tour itself. No doubt the workmanship at Magico is top level. But let the drooling wear off, and face reality. All the "perfect" measuring tools don't mean much if the tonal balance of a particular speaker is not to anyone's liking. Alon refers to the A series as "mundane" but the M project was driven by his sonic preference for a particular HF balance. Even If I were a billionaire, I would still prefer the S7 to M6 as evidenced from Jay's videos, and likely not care for the M9. Henry201 preferred the "mundane" A5 to the 2x the price YG speaker. This show is basically promotion based on technical specs. A publication called Audio Science Review (ASR) is based on technical specs with absolutely no attention paid to listening. The ASR rightly gets no respect from most audiophiles. Jay, don't lust over your next speaker based on high price and specs. You didn't care for the M6, but your favorite speaker so far is the S7 which is less than half the price of the M6. No, it is not from your great Boulders and Stromtanks--it is because you prefer the tonal balance of the S7. Even if you win the lottery, I doubt you would prefer the M9 in your room. And don't choose the highest price flagship speaker from another company--it could easily have a tonal balance you don't like. |
I watched the whole video. I think it was in the 2nd half, nearer to the end. They go into the room just for the A series. Jay has a notice about the A series. Alon probably used the word, "mundane" or a similar word. In the earlier part, Jay lifted the heavy 50 lb face of solid aluminum cut from the 450 lb aluminum block. After all this impressive demonstration of the top materials used in the M series, maybe also for the S series, Alon notes the simpler cabinet materials in the A series. None of this matters at all. The main factors in the sound you like from your A5 come from the choice of drivers, crossovers, which determine the tonal balance you like. About 10 years ago, I borrowed the Viola Labs Concerto amplifier, $25K for merely a 100 watt stereo class AB amp. The case was cut from a solid aluminum block, and weighed 53 lbs, a lot for a tiny case which would have weighed 20 lbs if conventional materials were used. All this fancy resonance reduction for an amp whose sound was nothing special. Beware of audio jewelry. |
I have spoken to Alon on a couple of occasions. He definitely is involved in the design of the speakers in regards to its overall 'voicing'. Alon once told me that the S series was for those who needed a more bass inflected sound whereas the Q series ( at the time) was for those who liked a more refined bass sound with a little more resolution, but less output. This is where I also feel the main differences lie between the S line and his older Q line. Not sure why folks think Keithr is a Magico hater, just because someone doesn't happen to adore a speaker line doesn't make them into a hater, IMHO. |
henry201, Never mind money and prestige, showing off to your acquaintances what expensive equipment you have. Nobody should buy anything without listening first, unless you are well connected like Jay, who can buy at a sizable discount so that he can sell without taking losses. Based on my listening to Jay's videos, I prefer the S7 to the M6. I can easily afford either speaker. I wouldn't have the M6 in my listening room even if someone paid me the MSRP of $180K to be forced to listen to them. But if you happen to prefer the sound of the M6/M3 to cheaper Magicos, then you can save up to buy them. |
I think if Jay were to drop a pair of M6's into his current system it would be a different story. The Stromtank, Aurender N30, MSB Select2, Boulder 3010 / 3060 and transparent cables are a big part of the overall tonal presentation. I bet Jay would prefer the M6's over the S7's. Over the last month, Jay has gone from Transparent SC's to Gryphon Vanta SC's, I'm guessing to tame that slight aggressive (at higher volumes) tonal balance of the S7's. The M6's would be more refined yet very detailed due to the Boulders, Select2 and Transparent cables....just my opinion. |
ron17, No doubt the M6 would sound more articulate and revealing with Jay's present Boulder + Stromtank, than it did with his previous electronics on the M6. But you and I opined that the S7 is a brighter speaker than the M6. Alon himself stated his goal of the M project is to avoid the HF extension and air of many systems. He claims that this is artificial. I disagree, as I stated in several posts. It appears you have enough experience with Magico to know that the M series are warmer and richer sounding than other Magico series. Remember that differences between speakers are much greater than between electronics. The M6 will therefore have its character no matter what the electronics are, and so will the S7. So I predict that Jay would still prefer the S7 to the M6, even with his present electronics. I just hope he has the wisdom to know by now what the speaker does and what electronics do, and not have to spend crazy money on getting the M6 again just to confirm my assessment. It was one thing in the old days to get the inexpensive Luxman M900u amp several times to try in different systems, but speakers are ridiculously expensive and HEAVY. It is smarter to learn lessons than to continue to break backs and bank accounts for the sake of experimentation. The S7 with warmer electronics and cables will still have more articulation and HF info than the M6 with the most ruthless and revealing electronics and cables. |
I believe the M6 is undoubtedly the superior speaker. It has more finesse, it's more beautiful and more polite while still giving you the full scoop of resolution but served on a different plate. The S7 is more brute, I'd say probably more bass too and the type of speaker you can throw parties with and jam out. You have all the bass you could ever want but the tweeter is more forward than the M6's. I don't doubt that the M6 would sound significantly better in here with my electronics. I feel i can make just about any speaker sound phenomenal because my electronics are that incredible. If we think about the best value, well yes the S7 is the winner. I think it has the sweet spot and the best price performance than any other magico. Does this make it better than the rest? Nope... It just gives you A LOT for your hard earned dollars. |
Jay, I agree with how you described the sonic characters of the S7 and M6. Just a further word on resolution. Perhaps the M6 is more beautiful, in its even tonal balance, which ron17 also likes. But more polite is equivalent to saying that HF are reduced, compared to the more forward tweeter of the S7. Many people don't like more HF, but the upper midrange and HF are the regions that convey most of the harmonics/overtones of voices and instruments. Also, the ear is most sensitive at 3-4 kHz. Often delicate HF details get lost in the M6 type of presentation, so having more HF output is an obvious way to hear more of the delicate upper midrange/HF detail. The art of HF boosting just enough but not too much, is what yields more information content while not destroying the beauty and balance of the music. The S7 has lots of bass to balance out the forward tweeter, so the S7 is musical in that clever way. The Wilson XLF also had this U-shaped freq balance--big bass and HF, relatively depressed midrange which made the tweeter stand out. |
At 0:45, Alon recommends the early 70's jazz album, "Magico." I never heard of this, but many unamplified audiophile jazz classics come from that period. Titles like Jazz at the Pawnshop, The King James Version (Harry James as an old Big Band trumpeter; his heyday was in the 40's), Laudate (a choral group doing church music). Pawnshop is totally natural and intimate--you are sitting at the table close to the small stage, immersed. King James is more distant, but still upfront without garbage muddy reverberation. Laudate is more distant still, but with natural acoustics, again without garbage processing. Get "Magico" on vinyl and compare it to the digital file. When will your vinyl setup be ready? |
No cartridge yet. The distributor said it won’t be here until end of the month which means it probably won’t be here until next year and I’m not about to embark on buying another cartridge that takes months too or a subpart cheaper one that is readily available because the narrative will be that i bought a garbage cartridge so the comparison of the turntable vs my MSB will be unfair. So in short folks, i don’t know when the turntable will be ready because the cartridge seems to be taking long. It’s as if it is traveling on a camel’s back.Maybe Santa Claus will deliver it Christmas day? For now, just disconnect your minds from the turntable and focus on Gryphon apex and commander which will for sure be here before the stupid cartridge. |
I just finished the second video (but fast-forwarded thru some it, and was annoyed by the "music" playing under some parts, not sure why it was there). Clearly a high-tech outfit. One of several I suppose. I was left flat. Just my opinion, not more. Definitely had a "fan-boy" tone. No offense meant by that. |
All good. Just for the record, I’ve received amazing feedback from these videos. I’d say at least 90% has been nothing but excellent feedback. The other 10% is always the typical negative feedback that comes with doing this. I’m absolutely beyond HAPPY with the work I’ve done so far and I know a lot more is coming my way. My work in the Magico Factory will not be easy to top by any other YouTuber. I’ve hired an editor and bought two other cameras plus my wife helped filming. Im going to beat my last best video production and right now this is my best work to date. Be on the lookout for part 3 which is my interview with Alon. I did ask a lot of interesting questions that he’s never answered publicly. I’ve saved some footage for my members only section of my website once it launches which by the way, it already has about 40 exclusive videos in the members area. I am in the middle of testing right now so once that’s done, I will announce it.
|
ron17 and pokey77, On Youtube, I found the 1979 radio broadcast of Magico Jazztage from the Berlin Philharmonie. This is a large concert hall suited to the big audience expected for this distinguished group. The miking is close on the stage. Even with YT, the sound is exciting. Listen to the crisp plucks of the bass played by Haden. At about 5:00, look at the picture. The "reeds" are from the alto sax played by Garbarek. The sax family encompasses a large freq range, from bass to soprano. (BTW, I knew an amateur group called the Casual Sax Saxophone Sextet, LOL). The Magico alto sax has the crispness I remember from occasions on the NYC subway platform where I would hear groups like this. I stood 10 feet away for maximum thrills of the crisp tonality with bite. I threw coins into the instrument cases for a 2 min listen while waiting for the train. Better than the concert hall even the 1st row, and forget about the 10th row where the essential tonality is nearly lost. All this is best reproduced with a speaker like the S7, with electronics that reveals the bite of all the instruments--alto sax, guitar, piano, bass. |