I have the opportunity of buying a 2011 Modwright BDP-95 tubed player with outboard power supply for $1000.00. I presently have a stock BDP-105 universal player, and I'm curious as to how the audio compares between the two and whether this will give the improvement I seek for now. The modified 105 is out of my price range at this point.
High Quality Universal Player??
I’m interested in a disc player for CD, SACD, and cinema DVDs, Blue-Ray.
It MUST have equal or better sound quality than my current Cal Audio HDCD player.
Ideas? How about the Cambridge Audio Azur 651BD Universal Blu-ray/SACD/DVD/CD Player?
or the newer 751? Also, what is the difference between the 751 and 651?
I’d laos like to buy form a company large enough to stay in business for a while :)
It MUST have equal or better sound quality than my current Cal Audio HDCD player.
Ideas? How about the Cambridge Audio Azur 651BD Universal Blu-ray/SACD/DVD/CD Player?
or the newer 751? Also, what is the difference between the 751 and 651?
I’d laos like to buy form a company large enough to stay in business for a while :)
109 responses Add your response
jafant - I ripped all of my cd's onto a hard drive via my Mac Mini, and found that I liked the sound, and especially the convenience, of my file playback system well enough to sell the Sony. I still have SACD's and DVD-A discs which I have not figured out how to rip, so I need a universal player to play those discs. The Sony is a wonderful sounding player and a good value at its used price, in my opinion. |
"The Pioneer does have two USB inputs, one in the front and one in the back, and one can access a server with the 88FD to play files from the server." I stand corrected thaluzza. Thank you. It is very hard to tell from the small pics on Pioneer’s website and I missed this in the text: "The BDP-88FD is also designed to play high resolution music content from USB, disc, and hard drive devices." This Pioneer looks like a real contender in this <$2k marketspace. However, the only review I could find said that it only supported streaming from YouTube and Picasa for those that are interested. Dave |
Rwwear - With respect to the Oppo UDP-205, I am considering it, too. I actually bought the Pioneer for my living room, but I have been very impressed with it in my main audio system as a disc player. I am waiting to read owner impressions on the UDP-205’s audio performance. It seems it will have the newest, and presumably best, ESS Sabre dac. I just wanted to put the Pioneer in the mix for the consideration of others who are researching universal players. It really is a nice player for optical disc playback. For a point of reference, I have owned the aforementioned Sony, a Modwright Oppo 83-SE, an Audio Aero Capitole, a Cary 306/200, and a Naim 5i. |
The Pioneer does have two USB inputs, one in the front and one in the back, and one can access a server with the 88FD to play files from the server. I am not a Tidal subscriber, and I am not sure if one can get Tidal with the 88FD currently. I am guessing not currently, but Pioneer has begun to support Tidal in the past year or so for some of their AV receivers. The 88FD is updateable. |
But does the Pioneer come in silver thaluza? The new Oppo UDP 205 may be better than the Pioneer anyway. https://www.oppodigital.com/blu-ray-udp-205/ |
For those considering a universal player, the Pioneer
Elite BDP-88F is a contender. I just got a refurbished one from Accessories for Less
at 50% off msrp. They are sold out now, but the BDP-88F shows up for sale there
from time to time. Initial impressions are very good, especially with SACD and DVD-Audio playback. With redbook, it is not as good as my file-based playback source (Mac Mini and Yamamoto YDA-01 dac), but I am still breaking the Pioneer in, and the Pioneer is still very enjoyable to listen to nonetheless. I haven't enjoyed optical disc playback this much since I sold my Sony XA5400ES player. The Pioneer has at least two advantages over the Oppo 105D. First, it uses a much heavier transformer. The Pioneer weighs 29.5 pounds, versus the Oppo at 17.3 pounds. Second, the drawer mechanism is really nice, much better than that of the Oppo. It is smoother and very well damped. Both players use the same ES9018 ESS Sabre 32 bit chip. Having had both players in my room, I prefer the Pioneer’s fuller bodied, weightier, sound. It is more reminiscent of the Sony player that I once had. |
The new Oppo UDP-205 will be available soon. And ill be available in silver. http://www.oppodigital.com/blu-ray-udp-205/ |
mine? I just replaced my pre-amp with an ARC LS-25 MkII. I'd like to replace my Maggie 1.5 QE speakers with the 3.7i but the local dealer doesn't allow in home listening, so that is the big holdup. I am waiting for Oppo to release their new player... But better to test it with the top speaker -- maybe I'll get cone speakers... |
Sorry to hear about your Lexicon. My OppoBDP105D is not my primary player but it keeps getting better with each disc I spin through it. SACD, HDCD playback great. I'm planning on upgrading the powercord again. (Currently Nordost Shiva) Does anyone have any positive feedback on power cords for Oppo? I'm currently using Audioquest Cheetah balanced (solid silver) interconnects with upgraded DBS. I've been mostly running it through a Anthem I225 Integrated Amplifier. But it sounds superior through the Pre-output jacks, into my Levinson no. 334, or through my Classe' preamp/Levinson combo. I am still pleased with the purchass. Glad I got one before production stopped. Additionally, I can always send it out for mods. N |
2 things: So now that the Oppo BDPxxx supply is being cut off and the UDP line is coming out, what effect do you predict on the price of used BDPs> And regarding my previous 103/105; MCintosh/Yamaha post, what I was trying to get at is would I be able to appreciate the superior analog sound quality of a BDP-95 or 105 connected to my humble Rotel RX-1052 receiver and Canton Ergo speakers? The 103 is a fraction of the price and still cost more than I spent on the Rotel. Since there is very low probability of being able to demo both, I turn to the collective intelligence and experience of AG. I can pretty easily hear the superiority of my NAD C546BEE over the Oppo DV-980H I want to replace on redbooks. I could go the dedicated CD/SACD route (Marantz? Arcam?) and keep the 980 for DVD-A. There's a nice Lexicon RT-20 listed, but I fear it may be outdated. Bang-for-the-buck advice wanted. |
To all the New oppo HD 231 coming out in early Dec, will be Oppo new flagship. the 105 is excellent .the 231 will do everything a bit better still. price wise Init set yet but count on at least $1600. I know of no player that can compete evrn at double the cost . Oppo does it right just engineer only a few great products. Similar to Schiit Audio, except a Oppo is not modular .they want the$$ for future engineering they said. |
I have not evaluated the 103D vs the 105D. However reports suggest the 105D has superior "audio" circuitry. In addition , the 105D includes a headphone amplifier which is pretty nice. The 103D does not. The 105D also includes 3 digital inputs, Coax, Optical and USB. The 103D doesn't appear to. The 103D does not include XLR connections either. The 105D chassis larger and heavier and the faceplate design is different. I would say that if auditioned simultaneously you would be able to pick a wimner. Not saying the Oppo is the best spinner on the market. Just saying it's going to meet my immediate needs for multimedia. N |
unh... not a fan of McIntosh (except the looks and build quality) a quantitative assessment is impossible, esp. to 0.1 level now... Oppo has a wonderful 30 trial policy and it is very fair - you only pay shipping one way also, they are working on new players and as a universal player, it will handle video too you might want to do what I am doing - assembling some program material to really test things carefully e.g. rip 2 copies of a favorite CD; you will put one copy on each player with a few seconds time lag on one of them and then listen to the exact same passage twice - right after the other one for material, I usually pick female vocals, something with snare drums (listen for that first impulse 'hit') and high quality recordings/mastering e.g. I use the famous jazz at the Pawnshop for part of it, even tho it is not my favorite jazz |
How good of a system would one need to be able to appreciate the difference in 2 channel analog out sound quality between the Oppo BDP-103 and BDP-105D? Is it obvious on a reasonable good 2 channel receiver such as a Yamaha RS300 with some Polk towers; or do you need McIntosh separates and Sonus Fabers? And is the 105D 2.6 times better? |
CA and Oppo both use the Mediatek chipsets. http://hometheaterreview.com/cambridge-audio-azur-752bd-universal-disc-player/ Bill |
jafant, I don't own a modern Oppo player (I do own an older mod'd Oppo player), but I have to defend Oppo. The DBP-105D is special. It may not be the best CD player, DAC or streamer. But it is nearly universally praised as one of the best "Jacks of All Trades". It does nearly everything pretty well, build quality is good, support is excellent, it is not glitchy and it is a bargain compared to any other comparable product (if there is even a comparable product), or bundle of products that may be required to provide all of the same functionality. Again, may not be the best sounding CD player, DAC or streamer, but it is a competent jack of all trades at a reasonable price. Remember, it is one of the world's most highly rated Blue Ray Video player, in addition to all of the audio attributes that are important to us audiophiles. |
randy-11 wrote: "I tried out an Oppo BDP-103 vs. my current Cal Audio for a while. I liked the Oppo but it did not sound any better and it could not receive my iTunes Apple Lossless files over WiFi, so I sent it back. There is a currently active thread on this" Can you point me to that thread? This is on the "Unofficial Oppo BDP Frequently Asked Questions" site: Is Apple Lossless Audio Codec supported? LarryRS |