Dumping McIntosh for Bose

@curiousjim 

+1

+1 @oddiofyl ​​​@stereo5 

You’re done with music, its just movies now?  

I’ve been to many hifi stores that have Mac with their B&W 804’s.  They say Mac’s help tame the tweeter.  

I thought that Hugo was a movie in Paris.

Someone says something about McIntosh with bowers, is that a bad combo? I paid a lot and it sounds ok,  like someone said , it doesn’t sound better, it just makes a statement and let’s me stick my chest out a little more, now that I Done it, I guess I I rather pocket the difference 

Good luck with that.   You will probably have regrets a few months after purchasing the Bose. 

There are the Bentlys in audio and the Hugos. It’s been proven that sometimes one pays a Bently price but gets parts you’d expect to find in a Hugo. Danny Richie made youtube videos where he opened up an expensive speaker and found crossovers poorly designed and with low cost parts. So for some audio advisers out there, one often buys the more expensive brands (that is suppossed to sound better) and it does not. Buyer beware, because more money spent may just mean you can stick your chest out farther, but that's all. On the other hand, I have head Bose 901 speakers set up

with good electronics, with the equalizer set properly, and it sounded much better than it should. Food for thought..

I think we’re being punked here.  At least I hope so. 

B&W + Mc?  << shivers in fear >>

Not much midrange either.

Sell the Bentley for a Yugo and pocket big bux.

Give Audio Classics in NY a try.    

No highs, no lows, must be Bose 😁