Does anyone own a tri amped system in Florida I could hear?
That is my query. I have an audiophile friend in Australia who swears by this approach, and I am wondering just how many levels up one can go in SQ as well as full extension tone in doing this. I am a very happy balanced analog EQer for tone but want to experience everything.
Thanks! Sorry I don’t have my system posted still but I’ll put it in the next box here.
Unless you have and infinite budget. Each additional piece of equipment reduces the overall investment level of each amp, interconnect, and power cord. Also, introduces possible differences in character of the sound in the system... so, could influence coherence,
The way I think about it if I had the choice between buying 3 $2K amps and on $6K amp... the choice is simple the sound quality of a $6K or $12K or more amp is going to be much better (assuming you choose wisely).
If the choice is between one $6K amp or 3 $6K amps... but then a single $18K amp will sound better... .this is why I just can't logically get there.
I have a biamp set up. Not sure why you’d want to go full scale tri amp. Absolutely too many wires and interconnects to deal with and then the crossover machinery is very difficult to figure out which one to buy and there aren’t too many examples out there people doing this that I could find.
Further if you’re going to do tri or biamping, I would think you’d want to get a tube amplifier involved to deal with the upper drivers because that’s better for the harmonics and the solid state amplifier could handle the bass drivers. And this is the best of all possible worlds.
I have been bi-amping for many years. Moved to tri-amping, not quite a year and a half ago. Results far exceeded my expectations. I'm not in Florida, though I will be for a couple of weeks in November, but if you are ever traveling to the bold north for business or pleasure, you are welcome to contact me. I am about 15 minutes from a major airport.
No ATC store in Florida with a showroom. Dead end. Do the hi fi shows, the expos, ever have a active crossover bi or tri amp system in any of the showrooms?
My system is tri-amped and I wouldn't have it any other way. It is a worthy pursuit. I use four Pass Labs amps, 2 X260.8 mono-bloc amps for the woofers, and one each XA30.8 for the mids and the tweets. The amps never get out of class A no matter how loud I make it or how high a peak demand may be.
I believe the biggest advantage is that the mids/tweets have no idea what the woofers are doing. Yes the run a little hot, about 107 F.
An ARC Ref6 goes into a custom Marchand electronic x-over and out to the amps. Marchand has you pick the slopes and x-over points. They can be changed by ordering small pc board plug-in modules. The front panel has level control for bass/mids/highs for each channel. Very handy. Fun to fiddle with for a while, then I've found what I like and "usually" don't touch it anymore.
The source is all digital and the speakers are Hartley Reference (no longer available).
I haven't been everywhere but I have not heard anything better. Its out there but I have ceased to look for it. This is my end-game system.
With bryston it has on model t and electronic crossover and you can tri amp it.many big speakers let you tri amp.sublime acoustics h electronic crossover has a gain know that let's you match the volumn of each amp.dbx ,mini dsp,and old yamaha have electronic crossovers you can program. Mcintosh xrt 2k tri amp.i have tekton ulfbrich I tri amp.my infinity rs 1 b are tri amped as well as irs v.my vmps rm 40 is triamped. It allows you to run 1 or 2 kw amps to the base and less to mids and even less to the tweets then you dsp sound levels and make the graph flat.there is even a simple cell phone app that measures the frequencies. And make sure no peaks or trough.electronic crossover dsp and triamp is the next level up in audio.madisound and parts express have all the stuff for you to build.enjoy the hunt. Klipsch just put electronic crossover on some of thier speakers.you have to wounder why more manufactures are doing this electronic crossover..my legacy valor has a electronic 3 way crossover the wavelet.
I tri-wired my ushers using 1 pair on the bass modules and biwire to the mods/tweeter. This sounded the best and when I asked the Usher distributor, he said that’s how he hooked them up. I used 1 stereo amp that had 2 pairs of speaker terminals for each channel
The Linkwitz Orion speaker system is the only one I know of designed for tri-amping. It uses three two-channel amps plus a bespoke active crossover and EQ. Designed by the late Siegfried Linkwitz: www.linkwitzlab.com
first I would like to say that I am in the audio industry but I'm commenting on tri-amping a system and not selling anything. I am currently fully electronic and I am tri-amping my system. For me the advantages are many.
If you look at a passive crossover and you look at the tolerance levels for each component in the passive crossover, each component has a tolerance level of approximately 5%. If the average passive crossover has 10 components then this means that the sound from the left to the right speaker can be very different by a large margin.
If you use a very high quality processor/electronic crossover that crosses over each of the six drivers individually and then the processor puts all the drivers in correct phase, then there is literally no phase issues and the sound from each driver/speaker arrives at the same time to each of your ears. I'm not saying that all passive speakers sound bad but I am saying that if the electronic processor has a very high quality external mic system and you can mic your room as will as electronically crossover your speakers over then it's going to be difficult to get a passive crossover that can remotely mimic all these variables.
Yes you need extra cables and yes you need extra amplifiers for the six channels of amplification. But in the end you do have much more control over your room acoustics and you are receiving a more accurate representation of the original recording. It also makes your speakers much more efficient.
These are just my opinions and again I'm not trying to sell anything but rather just giving my opinion based on many years of trying passive versus fully electronic.
On paper, bi-amping or tri-amping can give you more control and potentially better dynamics on some ultra-high end speakers but in practice the payoff is often marginal compared to the cost, complexity, and space it demands.
A well-designed single amp driving a well-matched pair of speakers is usually simpler, more musical, and easier to live with. And don’t overlook, the heat generated by more amps in the system, after all you live in Florida :-)
And yes, I have tri-amped and bi-amped setups in the past. Won’t do it anymore since switching to an Integrated with class A watts.
Of course you are right. And I wouldn’t really know. But I still want to hear a properly tuned tri amped system to see how it compares to analog balanced equalized sound. Which is all I listen to and is still preferable to me to just about every other system I’ve heard. But my listening experience is primarily show room set ups, even very pricey ones like d’Agostino monos driving Wilsons. I’ll bet I can hear better constructed systems in the homes and listening rooms of you thoughtful serious hobbyists. Ones with personalized attention to cable looms, mods etc. if such an individual had a well put together triamped system I’d simply love to hear it.
@tlcocksHow would you know if the "wow moment" is due to tri amping and not due to all and every component, and the room. Chances that there is a mirror image of your system somewhere are pretty much nonexistant.
I would find an ATC Loudspeaker dealer who carries the SCM40 or SCM50 speakers, available either as triamplified or passive versions. Compare. This would represent end - members of what is available commercially.
Not my point. Wouldn’t adapt my system. Would one day build it from scratch. Just wanna hear one because I never have. I’d drive hours to do so. Maybe fly further. Out of state.
I agree with @knotscott concerning the variables, and not to diminish your system in any way (it seems to be very nice), but at your level it seems that triamping would be a little over the top, and more trouble than it's worth.
There are so many variables involved, that it’ll be tough to distinguish which contributions are specifically from tri-amping.
If all else is equal, typically changing from one stereo amp to two identical stereo amps (one per side) will improve separation, and perhaps clarity, but it depends on everything else in the system. Adding an active subwoofer would be considered a third amp to a configuration like this, and can improve bass extension as well as clarity if they main woofers are relieved of low bass duties, but that also depends on many other factors in the system.
A full on tri-amped system with an amp for each driver and a full complement of active crossovers could have several advantages going for it if done well, but again, it depends on several other factors.
It’s all very subjective, unique to each setup... how much improvement, if any is difficult to predict.
My gear is Bryson B135 SST2 Integrated Amp with respectable onboard DAC (see Mike Lavorgna of Twittering Machines comments), Auralic Aries Dual Femto streamer connected to integrated with Shunyata Theta digital cable, Martin Logan Montage with Transparent Music Link Plus speaker cable. The integrated has a tape loop where I connect a Charter Oak PEQ-1 studio analog EQ via Cardas Clear Sky ‘round trip’ cabling. I cut that loop in and out to taste and mood and depending upon the material listened to by simply toggling the monitor button on the Bryston remote from the listening position.
Thanks.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.
