Why would you need to pick an inexpensive padlock, when you can just break it with 2 7/8" open end wrenches prying against each other, easier than bolt cutters.
Another Golden Ear test.
A true audiophile that is able to distinguish differences in fractions of decibel and fractions of the hertz, should DEFINITELY be able to approach the pad lock with code and open it just by listening clicks... click click click...
The sound on the correct number should sound different ...
There are lock-smith pros that can do that and so I do believe they can be a REAL testers on if there any differences can be found in wires and cables.
PS. I've just successfully verified all the buses in order to prove I'm not a robot
15 responses Add your response
| Post removed |
@mahgister +1 @baylinor +1 |
| Post removed |
Before being perceived in some context, any type of sounds must be learned and we must be trained to it in this context... A locksmith dont tune piano and the reverse is true, pianist dont play with coded padlock...But any of the two can learn the trade of the other... Sound exist as a qualitative experience in some learned context....Without this learned context there is only meaningless noise... There is way much than the resolutive power of the ears measured in Hertz to understand it... Learning how to hear and how to listen has nothing to do with the sarcasm associated with the expression "golden ears"... No need to test our own ears if we learn how to use it so imperfect our ears is...Ask any acoustician... He learn his trade... I learned how to tune my room by studying acoustic in experiments, no need to claim "golden ears"...But i know at least that sound experience come mostly from acoustic controlled conditions not from mere measured gear specs...
|
