Huh? 🤔
Words and Sound
Here are some examples of brands' names that sound rather similar to the sound of their equipment.
Hard/Cold/Analytical: Focal, Kef, Bowers & Wilkins, Klipsh, JBL, Wilson, Magico, Tannoy, Splendor, Yamaha, Altec, KLH, Triangle, Alta,Totem, Monitor Audio, Luxman, Krell, Schiit,
Neutral: Tannoy, Naim, Accuphase, Hegel, Pass Labs, Marantz, Rotel
Soft/Warm/Musical: Sonus Faber, Harbeth, Dynaudio, Elac, Vienna Acoustics, Whaferdale, Audio Note, Gershman, NAD, Audiolab, SucGen, McIntosh, Denon.
Maybe, unconsciously, the founders created the brand names to send like his sound....
@djones51 +1 OP is off on so many levels. Tannoy is both Hard/Cold/Analytical and Neutral? 3 letter companies are in different categories. Audiolab, Pass Labs, the words are soft? What's colder than a lab? At lease he got this one right: Cheers, Spencer |
Post removed |
Hearing and translating what is heard from any component, cable, rack, etc., …is, well, so subjective, that it is not even funny. Let’s all adjust our hearing aids and measure our ears to add to the subject of what we “hear”. One persons brightness might be another persons cats meow. One persons lack of highs might be another persons “this is the shiznit”, as stated from Little Nicky. That is why when I read reviews or when I write my own reviews from my own perspective, it is and should be taken with a grain of salt. Sure, when more people, so statistically speaking, write positive things about audio stuff, the tendency is to believe that what is written, is the truth. Well, not entirely true. We all hear differently so you can’t say Tannoy is cold or neutral because it probably is not with certain people. How do audio things get stereotyped into sound categories? A few people write something, or a review, and then, wham, such and such is the best cold analytical device that you can buy…go buy now, because it is sterile in presentation and offers no explanation for its cold sound, a little satire mixed in here. Theoretical conversation between customer and dealer, Should I get the hard cold B&Ws for my overdamped 3” inch pile carpet listening studio, or the neutral Tannoy for the same room? The room is going to alter to some degree what you hear, on top of your own hearing deficiencies, if any…let’s measure your hearing first, then we can go from there. Just get what you like and live with the consequences, both, good or bad. You always have the option to experiment and change things up, but not before getting a hearing test, LOL. |
I am not sure how to quote a msg to reply, re Perhaps, the OP had too much rum in his eggnog.>> I realize that this theory is bit strange but still... maybe people with thinner names like thinner music... you will agree that the both the words and the sounds od Focal and Klipsh sound colder than Harbeth and Sonus Faber... often strange things happen....
re But what does a world-destroying robot need with diapers?>> did not catch that, please explain. re Hearing and translating >> still I think we can all agree that Focal and Klipsh sounds colder than Harbeth and Sonus Faber.
|
Gort wears shorts to shield his norts....'thillies' (fay, what....) What's in a name? A batch of hopes to some; as to why, some explain easily. Most want to tease an imagination, a candle for the moth...pick your flame. *s* @tomic601 ....which is Precisely why alcohol is added to eggnog.
" 'Boto of mine, junk on the line |
you think monitor audio are hard cold and analytical which models are you listening to because I've listened to both the gold generation 5 and I own the platinum 200 Gen 2 and neither of those models are hard cold and analytical maybe the equipment you have connected to them is the problem because those speakers are not hard cold and analytical sorry. |
X Havocman I find MA generally cooler compared to Sonus Faber, Harbeth... Probably some MA models are less cold than others, also not all brands in each section are equally cold or warm and certainly some models of each brand could even be moved to other section. Sometimes generalisation is a necessary evil. |
I read nearly all of Ray Kurzweil's books and studied AI. It is a fascinating subject for sure. Two books I recommend reading about the subject of when AI and humans will have equal intelligence, The Singularity is Near, and the other book, How to create a Mind (How mankind will need to adapt to AI level thinking when it is more prevalent).
|
Thanks for your recommendation ... I consider the transhumanism cult of technology and his desctruction of science, the worst ideology ever conceived by mankind... Any past ideologies and mass hypnotic religions were born to save mankind from some evil, then scapegoating a part of humanity ONLY... This cult dont scapegoat some humans amongst others , they erased them all at the end .... For they want to kill human for their own benefit a piece after another, incrementally.... You see what they means? They reduce knowledge to some part of science, and they reduce this part of science to some HIVE technology... Transhumanism is pure evil controlled and summon by corporate powers who do not answer to any democratic countries...This crisis now is a text book example of this... Only Science fiction and artists are able to depict them really.... I cannot go further in this thread... The transhumanism cult is a surprizing child of the genius of the 17 century Bernard Mandeville who depict man after Descartes like a "workable animal" which could be controlled at will....Mandeville created single-handly Capitalism and his means of controls of the mass , which in the heretic communism cult were deviated and used....Transhumanism is born from the nazi technological method but go over the nazi in creating a pure technological HIVE not like Hitler with an archaic vicking religion but with a pure technological religion...No trees are need here.... If someone is not afraid of what is behind this cult he is asleep and dont understand it at alll....
Consumerism successfully has conditioned people to speak the lanugage of music using the language of engineering, reducing music to electronics and putting acoustic experience behind... The sound we hear come from the EARS/ SPEAKERS / ROOM relation, way more than from a dac or a turntable and from an amplifier... The sound of an instrument has a " timbre playing tonal micro-structure" to be perceived and seen in surfaces dynamic and volume in your room ...The sound is not cold or analytical , neutral, or wet and musical... These description of sound has no relation to music but to engineering... A voice timbre and an instrument timbre CANNOT be cold, neutral or wet..... These words are an example of the transfer of mass consumerism marketing technology vocabulary to people and their conditioning of the music experience in a detached "sound" experience and with no relation to ACOUSTIC and psycho-acoustic... And no musical education... You see the relation between technology conditioning and market capitalism here?
«My tree is a robot with no falling leaves and he stock carbon better »- Reincarnated Rockfeller |
Post removed |