The Technics SL-G700 doesn’t fit into any neat category. It straddles
across generations of digital formats by playing discs – in CD and SACD
form – as well as streaming music from across a network or via
Bluetooth. AirPlay, Chromecast and even MQA are firmly on the menu.
Verdict We’re pleasantly surprised by the
Technics SL-G700. We half expected a compromised package that, while
packing in plenty of features, would struggle to excel with both disc
and stream. What we got was a superb sounding product that sets high
sonic standards across the board. If you can live with the clunky
operation, and on balance we can, this is a terrific buy.
SCORES
https://www.whathifi.com/us/reviews/technics-sl-g700hth |
I had a Marantz 8005 and upgraded to a Marantz SA-10 two years ago and was a big step up |
johnread57
I enjoyed reading your CD player journey. That is a very nice collection of spinners. Upon audition, I liked the ARC CD9 as well. It is a very fine Spinner.
Happy Listening! |
baylinor
Thank You for the update. Good to read that you are enjoying spinning CDs again.
Happy Listening! |
@baylinor,
Congratulations on your very successful move to improve your digital front end. It would have been easy to default to a snobbish mindset and assume that digital can not compete with your analogue front end.
Now you can easily enjoy music with either format which I’m a strong advocate of. You approached this with an open mind and good attitude. Good news is as pleased as you are you can easily improve your digital front end further for reasonable cost if the desire to do so ever strikes.
Charles |
The thing that I find interesting streaming music is down loaded music from probably a cd played music.So isn't just cd music.? |
Well, it has now been 10 days since the Denafrips Ares II has been run continuously on full power as recommended. So time to give you my final impressions as to the Ares II / Marantz CD6005 combo. First off running the Marantz through the Denafrips is like driving your car after cleaning the windshield. The veil being taken off image being way overused 🙂
For sound testing comparison, I only used vinyl I purchased that came with a CD included so there is no chance of getting a different mastering.
I used Pain of Salvation -Entropia, Riverside - Wasteland, Robert Wyatt - Shleep and UMG - Death of stereo. Rock is what I listen to 90% of the time, so this mix of soft jazzy rock to hard prog metal covers my range well.
I played songs from each of these records back and forth multiple times from my analog source to my digital one. I am happy to report that my digital source, costing about a fifth of my analog one, is now basically on par with the analog source sound wise. It is slightly different but not in a bad way. The digital offers a more defined space. Not wider per say, but better displaced. Like sounds coming from outside the speakers are better perceived. It definitely gives a little more clarity but without being harsh on most records. I repeat that I will only play the Denafrips on NOS setting. No OS for my taste.
The digital bass is also deeper, definitely more pronounced. Since all recordings sound different, I would give the nudge to analog for metal since it can lean harsh sounding. The analog definitely tames that down more than the NOS digital setting. However I give the nudge to digital for anything dark sounding. It's like replacing a 40 watt light bulb with a 75 one. On well balanced records I honestly can not prefer one over the other, and I tried. One thing I appreciate with the analog rig that I can't control with this digital setup is the phono preamp gives me the option to tame down bright records with setting it all the way down to 60 ohms as necessary. In my room I like it best on 475 ohms which gives me the clarity and wide space I like for most records. On the other hand, the Denafrips can only go brighter with the OS setting. Once you got it on NOS, it's as tamed as it's gonna get.
In the end, I do now realize the true value of digital which many analog fans on this site discard. There is no doubt that I could probably better my digital rig if I put in the same money that in my analog rig. However I won't do that since I would then have to upgrade my analog 🙂
Not that much of an upgrade fanatic.
Very happy with my digital now that it is basically on par with my analog. Highly recommend going down that road to ones who may contemplate buying CDs. With over 2,000 vinyl and less than 400 CDs, buying CDs is what I am going to do for a while. Huge plus since so many newer recordings never make it to vinyl. Life is better with music. Thanks to everyone who tried to help here.
|
Hi, After all I read here! There are many ways to go! I have ran the gamut of using a lot of stuff! From Dac's and Transport to highly modified CD players! The best overall sound was definitely switching to tubes! Like others have said they liked the Dac's with tubes! All you invested into analog and nothing into digital, you really are missing out! I had a 2 piece Dac with a Levinson 31.5 Transport! The inner detail was spectacular but still not smooth like analog or tubes in CD system! I now have an Ayon CD Tube player and it is Fantastic! Not Cheap but with top load Transport and tube Dac's! Sounds like analog without any noise! I'm an Audiophile from way back and always recommend tubes whenever possible! So if you want to hear unbelievable CD sound! You can! Also, less can be more! By bypassing my pre amp and running directly into my mono tube amps! Less Connections the better! I also recommend and use Solid Core Speaker Cables and Interconnects! Goodluck in your search for better sound!
|
While a better DAC R2R ladder will help you, if you can rip all your CDs "bit perfect" into a computer and store them on a USB flash drive with a backup copy and play the flash drive through a streamer such as a Bluesound, it will not be as difficult as you think. You might even eliminate the use of the CD player. I did this with my Bluesound Vault 2i and use storage on a flash drive because that is the only way I can index my collection by composer's folders rather than by "artist and song." I stream free radio stations from anywhere in the world especially if the atmospheric conditions weaken the antenna signals from distant classical stations for my Magnum Dynalab FT 101A FM tuner.
|
Yeah, I have a Rega Apollo and a Schiit multibit DAC. Sounds wonderful! Very ‘analog’ sound. I also want to hear that Denefrips DAC. Invest in digital and it will sound fantastic.
Sam in Massachusetts |
I have a Linn Mimik II and a Quad 99, both of which give my LP12 good competition. |
I thought I would share my cd player journey.
Stage 1 were the following:
Oppo 103D SE
followed by a major step up to my
Esoteric K03xs SE
Dissatisfied with the harshness of leading and trailing edges, I sold it
Meanwhile, I have bought and upgraded two other disc players, the Oppo204 and Pioneer LX800, that were seemingly excellent with very analog sounds c.f. the Esoteric, then I caught this unit...
Audio Research Ref CD9 tube cd player and had it upgraded including renewing the power supply that failed.
Fyi, all upgrades are limited to EMI RFI control by the Upgrade Company here.
I tried various DAC’s also during my time with the Esoteric, including the Lampizator Amber III that was also an upgraded unit. Sold that too...
Most definitely the ARDC Ref CD9 SE is the most analog experience where you don’t notice you are listening to CDs. It’s seriously seductive.
The analog experience is helped by the rest of the systems variously ARC LS10SE preamp and D240 MkII SE power amp into my MB2SE by PMC. And my other system that features right now the XP20 preamp by PassLabs into the Luxman M900u feeding into some very fine horn speakers, L’Instrument by Viking Acoustics.
The bottom line is that carefully selected cd players that are synergistic with your system will and can create a fully analog sound, better than your vinyl experiences, with no pops, clicks, or dust particles to interrupt your brain’s pleasure signals.
Listening to Leonard Cohen just now his final cd... and it’s eerie, smooth mellow, and gorgeous. The super tweeters in the speakers have plenty to pick up and blow out...
I enjoy the two bcdp’s but they are more digital and less range full than the ARC Ref CD9, and this kit is still burning-in, speakers, and the CD9 player.
|
Very recently I have listened to a Denafrips Ares that was newly imported so I will assume it is the Model II.
This was compared to a Linn DAC that had recently received one of the Companies offered upgrade treatments.
The CDT was a Wadia Model from a bygone era.
The Linn was also used with a Streamer Device as well
Both DAC’s were with components that had almost Zero usage time, and the Denafrips presented in the manner that was making it look like it was getting the upper hand in the SQ.
At this same DAC demonstration, I also received a demonstration of a New Imported Phasemation EA 350 Phonostage against a New Design All Valve Phonostage.
The TT was a SP10R with Glanz 12" Arm and a Miyajima Cartridge.
The Denafrips Ares when compared to the Linn DAC stood out for its delivery, especially knowing it was needing a extended use to allow it to really offer the truth of its capabilities.
I do recall saying that in my home a Streamer with the sort of SQ being heard would be quite welcome for a second system to be used by other family members.
Both Phon’s were in my view able to deliver a much more impressive presentation, when compared to the DAC’s but each Phon’ is close to Five Times the Purchase Value of the Denafrips Ares.
From my own personal preference, I prefer a CDT > DAC that can deliver in a manner that conjures up the thoughts of it sounding Vinyl Like, but I am sure this can mean very different thing to each assessing the experience.
The Denafrips Ares during the Demonstration, in its rawest of usage time did not offer what I refer to as a Vinyl Like delivery, the Ares and the Linn has the shared traits of a more commonly experienced CD presentation and SQ, the Clarity and Lucidity is quite noticeably present, I did suggest at the time the experience would be a great to return to when each device has had a few hundred hours of usage.
To keep the events during the demonstration in context, the Denafrips was sold to a attendee of the demonstration a few days after the event and the seller of the Ares purchased a Denafrips Terminator, I will hopefully hear this later in the year.
The All Valve Phonostage was retained by the systems owner and purchased. |
@baylinor,
Congratulations and I’m glad your early listening impressions are so favorable. I do believe that you are in store for further sound quality improvement with additional burn-in time. You have a good quality DAC and it will undoubtedly elevate sonically with a better transport connected to it. But no rush, one step at a time, get use to/ familiar with your new DAC.
Charles |
I prefer my Ares II with the Cambridge CXC transport...Cambridge sells refurb V2 units with warranty and free returns for about $350, not always, but usually available...the V1 and V2 are identical except for appearance... |
Good advice all around. To my ears, being formerly a violinist in a well-regarded orchestra and currently a research scientist, I suggest that the best western classical music available now is contained on high resolution CD disk. Much better than either the finest vinyl available and certainly better than any streamed source. I own an Esoteric K-01XD SACD player and have owned other kit from DCS and MSB Tech. To each their own! |
Great news. Please post any further updates as you get used to the new piece! |
Congrats on your purchase and happy you are so please with the results. |
The Denafrips Ares II came in early! Got it yesterday noon. Spent a few hours testing it out with my Marantz CD6005. Here are my impressions:
First off, the CD6005 needs to have the audio EX setting OFF. I had it on audio EX 2 and no sound came out. Rechecked all the connections and perplexing sat in front of it thinking what the hell? Then it downed on me that maybe the audio EX 2 being there to turn the digital signal into something more analog wasn't sending the full digital signal the DAC needed. Sure enough, once on audio EX OFF, the sound came on.
The Dac supposedly has a 100 hrs burn-in at factory before shipping. However I also read they recommend to leave the unit on fully powered for 10 days before setting it on the standby mode when not in use.
Meaning what I heard for a few hours yesterday will change, probably in a positive way.
The first and most important thing to me is to find out which of the OS or the NOS setting is best for you. It can be adjusted on the front of the unit. OS has the option of a slow or fast filter, NOS is not affected by the filters. As I found out NOS is 100% the way to go for my analog ears. A lot of folks online swear by the OS slow setting. I would bet that these folks have digital ears because that setting is basically as close to full digital sound you could get. Analytical, super clear sound, so much that it can be strident and tiring. Not my cup of tea at all. The NOS setting is musical, enveloping, makes most music sound live, without exaggerated coloration. In short it sounds as close to analog as you can get. I honestly don't understand why anyone would buy an r2r DAC and set it on OS to make it sound digital. Get a chip DAC instead. This r2r is meant to sound analog and NOS does just that. I also set the phase to positive instead of negative because I gather the majority of recordings would sound better that way. So far the sound is very big, very wide with a very clear definition between all the instruments while maintaining a solid togetherness. It's hard to understand how the sound can be that clear and well defined while having no hint of harshness but present a smooth, well rounded analog sound. It is like live music, the way I like it, not colored, or at least not overly colored. I am impressed so far and may find out a CD transport may not be necessary. I am not at analog level yet, but getting closer. Will know more in a couple weeks.
|
@pindac, I really appreciate your detailed journey regarding CDs.
It does point to me that digital can be a plus to anyone if done correctly, even to those who's systems are strictly analog vinyl. Way to keep an opened mind!
|
@holmz,what I do in the car is either stream from my server using Plex, or I use the Qobuz app on my iPhone. No need for CD's!
Yeah, but that assume one is not in the middle of nowhere, with no phone towers within hours. I mean, I understand when you say your digital knowledge is limited, but you’ve spent 20x more on your vinyl rig yet ask if trying to upgrade your $500 CD player is “futile?” Just how bad do you think digital sound is??? What the hell do you expect from a total investment of 500 bucks? How would a $500 vinyl rig including cartridge and phono pre compare to your current setup? Where does simple common sense kick in here man? C’mon. It is just pulling the 1s and 0s off of the disk. When they pushed these in the 80s it was spruicked as God’s gift to audio. But I can see the DAC and the jitter are important. I realized you've already committed to a specific upgrade but I'll add my 2 cents anyway. As important as a DAC may be, the transport is at least equally significant. The elimination of vibration and an accurate reading of the disc is where all the sound originates. If that part of the system is inferior, everything which follows will suffer. Again, it either pulls the bits off, or it has bit errors. Don't forget that you can still service your CD player.
(1) Clean the contacts with a contact cleaner.
(2) Check to see that it is level.
(3) Aftermarket Feet to assist with vibration control.
(4) Open up the unit and use dynamat - again for vibration control.
https://youtu.be/VoxC3st7WQw Do these transports all give dodgy numbers out? I am in a similar boat with a daggy old CD player. I would like to come into something like a Topping D70, but then does the transport matter at all? And then, there are also 10 MHz clock, and other rates that once can use to sync the DAC. e,g. https://nadac.merging.com/product/merging-player |
Using my personal experience as a description to assist with the OP's inquiry.
I am new to using CD in my System, it has been a Source for a few years only, to be accurate since 2016/2017.
I am quite familiar with CD and have heard it as a source in many systems and have had a fair share of CD vs Vinyl Demonstrations.
Until my commencement of using CD as a Source, I was convinced that a Vinyl Chain as a Source was the only stimulus I required.
What changed was not such that an experience with CD was responsible for the change, but more motivated by how I was perceiving the use of CD in relation to it being a Second Source to the carefully created Vinyl Source. I was forming the view Cartridge Life could be extended if CD's of the same owned Albums was to be used to create an alternate listening experience with new hard media for already owned Albums that are Vinyl.
My entrance into the use of CD was quite blunt, I put a CDP from a sons bedroom set up into my System and kicked of with my Sons CD's to get going.
Nothing special going on, but music was seemingly more convenient as I was not feeling the need to be adhered to the listening seat, I could crank up the Volume leave a few doors open and get on with a few tasks.
This evolved into a want to create the CDP experiences with better known music and hence the Journey began.
At a later period in 2017 a friend loaned me a Heavily Modified and much improved CDP and this was to show the used CDP to be very wanting.
I was impressed with the loaned CDP and began to carry out Vinyl vs CD replay comparisons, and the separation in SQ between the two sources was not too distant. It was definitely not in the same separation that was noticeable between the two CDP's.
Then came dilemma time, must return loaned CDP, must decide how to replace CDP ? CDP or CDT > DAC was now the new thought process.
During this period I also went and had demonstrations form HiFI Dealers who presented streaming sources with a value of up to £6000 and one was in a System that retails at £100 000+, I felt the streaming system presentations was not impacting on myself, or making an impression I could attach myself to and want to pursue.
I did not use my well tried and test methods of getting out and trialling devices on a shortlist.
An opportunity came along to purchase a DAC, that was a early Prototype Production from a designer who has a range of DAC's.
I took the punt and purchased the DAC.
The DAC was first auditioned at another home on a system I am very familiar with and know the CDP qualities that are available within this system. Both myself and the system owner was quite impressed with how the DAC had created very noticeable and impressive changes to the CD replay in this system.
Cutting to the chase the DAC after a period of trials with CDP's and CDT's the DAC has now found a place where it has been coupled to a Perfect Wave Memory Player Transport for the past few years.
I don't see a need to make a change as I have heard the DAC in quite a few systems with other CD Drives.
I have not spent any energy pursuing any further changes, even though I have been through a selection of COAX Cables and feel I now have a ideal Cable in use.
As a comparison to the Vinyl Source, I have chose to a selection of these with HiFi minded friends in attendance. I feel confident to claim all assessments will evaluate that the outcome of these are a close run race. I have noted that during a 'same Album' Vinyl vs CD comparison, there are differences to be detected, but let one Album play on in CD for a short extended period and there will not be any want to return to the other Source, the listening experience is totally satisfying.
For less than the outlay of a Cartridge that would be classed as quality Cartridge but not High End Spec', I have a CDT > DAC and a good selection of CD's to be replayed. I don't have to concern myself too much about a loss of SQ, as there isn't much to be detected.
I can have music sit down in the listening chair sessions and be totally content, or heard all throughout the house levels of music, through not feeling the need of being in the Listening Room, just increasing the Volume and I am free to vacate as I do not feel the need to monitor the replay extensively. My discipline developed with Vinyl will not allow me to have this attitude towards a Vinyl Replay.
My hierarchy of music replays are Vinyl
( Too Long a relationship with the care of the Vinyl Media, the reverence of the Total Luxury Cartridge Purchases, and the pursuing of knowledge for extending my understanding of the critical mechanics and geometric interfaces are a underlying obsession)
CD follows, but now with a conviction for the Source, Listening Freedom and a SQ that I did not foresee being produced.
(Thankfully the CD Media does not cause me an obsessional pursuit of furthering my knowledge)
'Amazon Alexa' an Ancillary used for convenience and gaining Speedy reminders of music I am depriving myself of listening to on the system, as well as reminding myself of forgotten past musical encounters, this is a wonderful device as a Low Tech streaming method with a SQ that has room for many improvements.
(My most extended periods of hearing music being replayed over the past 18 Months is through Alexa, the total convenience is quite unavoidable it is seemingly always turning out tunes)
Serious attempts at streaming are not seeming to become a priority, but I am optimistic that a method will be discovered to get my interest going.
|
@holmz,what I do in the car is either stream from my server using Plex, or I use the Qobuz app on my iPhone. No need for CD's! |
I forgot to mention, Audio Note UK. |
Audio Research Ref CD9 SE. |
No computer/wifi in my dedicated listening house, and intend to keep it that way. But I hear the ones who swear by streaming. Different strokes for different folks. Or more simply, different pace of living. Music to me is not a technology miracle, rather a visceral physical experience. Hence I love the physical part of playing it.
The DAC cleared customs and is in Memphis. May get it Monday. 10 days, pretty excellent from Singapore!
|
I just don’t see any reason to go back to CD’s when Roon and streaming are so good. ^That^ works with an internet connection, but in a vehicle it is easier to have bought the CD and either play it, or play it via an iPad/iPhone. |
What’s a CD? :). You know what’s on my turntable right now? The box that my MSB Discrete DAC and Premier Power Base came in, LOL! Seriously, running the Discrete direct to my Pass Labs 250.8 sounds fantastic. I can’t imagine messing around with CD’s any more when I have everything ripped in hi-def to my RS9 music server and Qobuz for streaming. To my ears, you get great sound, convenience, access to a huge music collection (I listen to mostly jazz on Qobuz and classic rock on the server) that beats a CD. Incidentally, I totally relate to your tactile desires for vinyl, where you can look at the cover and album notes, etc. But you know what? With Roon, you get album covers (I use an iPad to control everything), very interesting details on most albums and artists, lyrics to songs, and Roon will curate music for you without even getting up from your chair. I still have my vinyl collection from college (1K+ albums), but they are now more a display for my music room, although sometimes I pull an album out while its streaming, for nostalgia (and sometimes a bonus from double albums that fall out from my college days in the ‘70’s, LOL). I just don’t see any reason to go back to CD’s when Roon and streaming are so good. As usual, YMMV! |
baylinor
I am looking forward in reading your initial impressions and thoughts.
Happy Listening! |
The Denafrips Ares II was shipped yesterday. Will report on sound with the Marantz CD6005. The combo may be so pleasing I may not need to look at a transport. If so it would probably be the Audiolab 6000 CDT. |
Give your current gear a fair shake!
Have you considered these?:
* Marigo Audio Aida cd mat
* UltraBit Platinum-Plus disc treatment
* Walker Talisman demagnetizer
|
I have a Marantz player and it definitely does not suck. Maybe just good with my system. |
I would have bought the Rotel CD player.
|
Keep us updated, have you warmed up your CD player?
Left on for a few days spinning a disc..?
I’m not familiar with the spinner you purchased, I will investigate further......l
we use the McCormack UDP-1 upstairs, and the pioneer elite dv-79avi downstairs, I may bring the elite upstairs, she is a wonderful audio player, maybe even better than the McCormack, it is a close race between the 2.
|
I am itching to try Technics SL-G700. Currently backordered(?chip shortage). All-in-one solution that has been praised by a lot of owners on the forums. Don’t know whether the DAC is R/2R or 1-bit. |
I’m surprised that no one had mentioned the PS Audio cd transport combined with their DAC. I have their Perfect wave SACD transport with their PW dac.
Heavenly. It’s not cheap, but… |
Yes please report back on the new DAC. |
https://youtu.be/bb-O8JF24P@baylinor you may find this worthwhile. Looking forward to your listening impressions between the two digital components if you have the time to do so. Charles |
Just woke up, of course arrow in direction of signal, duh.
Thanks for the tip.
|
@jredeii
It's coming from Singapore so it will be a while. Plus they say they do a 100 hrs burn in and other steps before it ships, which seems like great customer service. Will update in time.
|
@soix
Arrow pointing to DAC I assume?
|
The Ares II would have been my first choice, but I needed a preamp and headphone amp, so I chose the RME. While I am loving my choice so far, I would like to hear what you think about the Ares after you have had some time with it. Exciting purchase!
|
Great. One important tip — the Wyde Eye is directional so pay attention to the directional arrows printed on the outer jacket as they are small and can be hard to see. I installed mine backwards once and it was an unpleasant experience until I figured out what was wrong. |
@soix
I already bought the one you recommended!
Thanks. |
Congrats on the Ares ll — I’m sure you’ll notice quite an improvement in transparency, soundstage, detail, etc. Just make sure you get a decent digital cable or it can undermine your performance. The Apogee Wyde Eye I recommended earlier is a solid choice, but there are others from Canare, etc. that are also very good — just make sure you get at least 1m length. Let us know what you think once the Denafrips has a few hours on it.
|
Done deal!
Ordered the R2R Denafrips Ares II
Couldn't have done it without you guys input.
Don't forget that you can still service your CD player. (1) Clean the contacts with a contact cleaner. (2) Check to see that it is level. (3) Aftermarket Feet to assist with vibration control. (4) Open up the unit and use dynamat - again for vibration control. https://youtu.be/VoxC3st7WQw |
the Marantz/Ares combo may work great with CD being a small part of your listening, and if you move up, the Marantz is great for a second system, and you may be surprised what the Ares can do with a better transport...then after, the options become endless... |
|
If you spend an equal amount on your CD player to your vinyl rig you might find cd superior |
@orenstein,
" I realized you’ve already committed to a specific upgrade but I’ll add my 2 cents anyway. As important as a DAC may be, the transport is at least equally significant. The elimination of vibration and an accurate reading of the disc is where all the sound originates. If that part of the system is inferior, everything which follows wilOrnstein,
Words of true wisdom and experience. Too often I read well meaning advice in regard to digital audio. It generally over emphasizes the DAC and treats the transport as an afterthought (Any run of the mill CD player will do). Yes a CD player or cheap transport will function, but not at a high level.
Choosing a high quality, well designed/engineered transport will result in a significant improvement (Compared to any old CD player will do mindset) in CD playback sound quality. They deserve the same level of thought and consideration as the DAC. Both are important and should be viewed as a matched pairing. No one would saay I have an excellent cartridge so the turntable, tone arm or phono stage don't matter as much. The entire front end chain matters.
Charles
" |
