Time will tell :)
334 responses
@edgewoundtootightly. Have you ever tried any of their products, or is your opinion based on speculation? Everyone is of course entitled to their opinion, and we all have an equal right to hold on to our opinions. All opinions are not, however of equal value or merit. Opinions are like butts. Everyone has one. Some are amazing, but most are full of $chiit... Thoughts are not facts and beliefs are not truths... |
Post removed |
"When Gene contacted SR’s dealers and distributors directly that is when it became actionable." Action being "Oh, we think these are good products. Let us demo them for you and explain all the differences and benefits. We will be happy to answer any question you may have." Isn't that what dealers and distributors are for? |
Post removed |
Quantum Tunneled three prong adaptor, $35.00. Perfect. Just what I need, because the $1.50 Leviton at Home Depot with two additional stickers just doesn't sound "liquid" enough, nor blacken the noise floor. It's marketing fluff like this that makes fools of people that actually believe it. Cables should sound like nothing. A cable is not a tone control, nor should it act like one. Physicists roll their eyes at this stuff. The air conditions...temperature and humidity in the listening space will have more affect on the sound than a good quality conductor that's transmitting less than 2 volts over 1-3 feet...at audio frequencies. The amount of alcohol, caffeine, or THC or whatever your drug of choice is, will have more affect on your aural/brain reception...that's hearing...system than enough conductor to send less than 2 volts over 1-3 feet of interconnect between well designed components will. That goes for a few hundred watts of speaker level signal through good quality 10-16 copper wire at audio frequencies. The amount of power compression taking place in the voice coils of dynamic loudspeakers, along with the various components of the crossover network with have more affect than the cabling....Oh sorry, the new "high-end, boutique" term now is the "loom". And...the greater amount of money one spends on the "loom" will most definitely affect the sound of the music coming out of the system...because you want to believe that "more expensive must be better." It's marketing BS over engineering. Engineers that understand the objective performance of materials cannot stand marketing people that simply make up stuff to sell a product through "subjective" standards...because subjective is emotional and cannot be measured without a brain scan to see which parts of your limbic system light up. If simply more money spent and fluffy marketing terms can make you believe that super expensive cables can tweak a high end system to make more holographic, liquidy, warm, 3 dimensional imaging...A fool and his money will be separated....making you a complete schlub for a "successful" company that took $139,950.00 in PPP money to fund a Ferrari, while letting you bail out his employees in a "downturn"...while making fun of a guy that was knocked down by a covid infection. Companies that are/were doing well during the pandemic weren't qualified to take PPP money...unless the company was dishonest about it. The SBA might just come knocking to audit some financials...unless the the goal is to pay it back. Just my opinion, of course. |
“mikado463 04-16-2021 1:34pm perkri, do even know how all this crap got started and when ? One other thing .......... if and I repeat ’if’ it’s true that Mr Denny posted up pictures of Gene’s 13 year old daughter on FB then Gene has more than enough reason(as any father would) to be outraged with Teddy.” I never posted a photo of Gene‘s daughter. Before I saw this his latest lie, I never even knew he had a daughter. But Gene prove me wrong, show us where I posted a photo of your daughter. Ted Denney III Lead Designer Synergistic Research Inc. |
It's not personal abuse George. You don't get to redefine the English language to suit your purposes. Did you actually think that by typing something here on A'gon, that Ted Denny was going to read it and that he's been keeping track of what's going on over here? You must either think very highly of yourself or your just blowing smoke and evading the fact that Ted is here, which you wanted, and now you're staying at arms length from him. With all the screaming in capital letters and exclamation marks, the insults and abuse you hurled at others, the posts you got deleted and threads you got shut down (and bragged about) because people stooped to converse with you on your level and then you went and played the victim, all of that was what, an act? All the best, Nonoise |
Had it up to my ears. Last night I let Gene have it.. Then this thread popped up! My comment to Gene is found below as "Genez". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rgun97VK7y8&t=614s&ab_channel=Audioholics |
Hey Georgie, Ted's posted twice here and you've been calling him out for the longest time to come here and I've yet to see you post anything on his threads. He's there for the taking and would likely respond to you. Instead, you take pot shots at him from afar on other threads. What's up with that? I could be mistaken and it could your posts that were removed for being abusive or uncivil instead of saying something relevant. All the best, Nonoise |
@georgehifi Interesting stuff. To your point - culture comes from the top. Four reviews from former workers with interesting and somewhat similar quotes. However, I have found you do need to take indeed and glassdoor stuff with a grain of salt since often only the people with an axe to grind take the time to post. |
Besides those who can wait for the clash, and that in the name of a hobby interest, comes the five o'clock news (if there is any with that name) to claim that some or many or most are hallucinating. Not so long ago people were tossed into flames only by showing innovation or having a wider area of thinking. Who wants to be in that place or time? Personally i do not care who will win as long we do not confuse Socrates methods in ethics and epistemology with those of dogmatism. G |
This is just typical from someone with morals who worked for a shyster company, owned by someone with the morals of a used car/real estate salesman. Find a better companyProduction Manager (Former Employee) - Santa Ana, CA - November 27, 2019 Cheers George |
So here is a question. I have a degree in physics and applied mathematics, and I think I can make really good sounding /looking cables, how do I go about pricing my cables? It seems that the pricing is all over the place, and I am not really sure why some cables are much much more expensive than others besides the material quality. The cost seems to be what the manufacturer thinks they can get away with, as no R&D data is published. So how do you go about pricing ? Thanks |
I have tried many many many cables. A lot of them are not demonstrably better than another. Do they sound different? Yes. I would live with whatever sounded best to my ears. It just so happens that I have landed with MIT....not the MIT cables most people reference when they speak of comparisons, but recent technology versions. In my case, special edition cables from Joe Abrams at Equus Audio. Once heard in a good system, you cannot un hear what they do...they allow the music to flow unhindered and with realistic presence, soundstaging and timbre! No roll offs, no dynamic constraints and no overemphasis of any particular frequencies. It’s not subtle...if you compare them to other cables it’s more of a Holy Crap moment then a beard scratcher 👂 |
Also, Fun fact...dug out some old cables I have on hand just to check my ears. They all sound different...sorry Audioholics 😔 Reminded me why I love MIT products...just so much more realistic sounding on every level! My REV MIT loom delivers better tone, articulation, clarity, dynamics, bass definition and extended airy highs. I do like to try wires with radically different designs that are clear and apparent as opposed to those with slightly different twists on the same old same old. THose tend to make the biggest differences that actually might matter to me. WHich is better/best? How much are they worth? No clue. THey are just different enough to sound different....which is better is still a totally subjectively assessment and what works best will vary case by case/system by system. MIT is one I’ve tried and use. These tend to deliver a less strident top end than most. Probably due to the network box they use which is clearly a thing. The highs are rolled off a bit. I use them for that reason if/when needed. The other is DNM Reson, my personal favorites and go-to IC. Not shielded but I have addressed that separately when needed. I find the solid wire minimalist design in their ICs deliver a more coherent sound to my ears than any others I have tried. Have not tried their speaker wires. Not sure if such thin gauge wire is really a good idea there, but hey I’m sure some go for it and are happy. Gotta be a lot of profit in such an effective minimalist design like DNM Reson, but not outrageously priced, especially used...very affordable for many, so not a big deal. The difference between DNM and MIT is about as night and day as it gets I suspect. I can easily tell which is in use at least on my main more resolving setup. SO just to summarize, I know wires CAN sound different, though not always, maybe even in most cases. The devil is in the details. Also I am not a SR fan. Too expensive, some bad karma, little concrete to back up big claims, and just no reason to deal with all that. |