Should people with no turntable or reel to reel be considered audiophiles?


Just like those driving a Porsche SUV can join PCA (digital audio fans can join Audiogon) but are certainly not Porschephiles unless they also own a coupe (Panamera owners I guess gets a pass here).

Please respond with a yes or no and we'll tally a vote for the first 100 responses.

sokogear
"...the brain information through the Axon is continuous."
If we are really disassembling it to this level, for the sake of disassembling, then saltatory conduction should not be ignored. Could that signal be called "non-continuous"? I do not know what to do with it in this case, but Nodes of Ranvier do exist.
Being an audiophile is not about what you own.  Its about how you get what you own to sound!
I still don't know what the attraction for turntables and vinyl is all about other than the looks of a $20,000 turn table.

Right now I think streaming is what it is all about.  So nice to not have to get up and down to change an album or song.  Plus playing music in hi-res is really nice to listen to.
Raul keeps posting the same nonsense repeatedly, including personal attacks about brains, behavior, etc. This is not the place for that. Do you understand what a personal attack is versus a logical argument? I doubt it. 

I forget Raul did you vote yes or no to the original question? 

Please don't bring up Trump. This is supposed to be fun. My question is the leading discussion trending on Audiogon which is what I wanted. There is no ultimate judge as to whether someone is an Audiophile or not. It would be something you would self describe. If someone wants to call themselves an audiophile, its a free country. No judge and jury - if the question was would you call them an audiophile if they don't own or never have owned a turntable and audiophile, that's your opinion and it can't be right or wrong.
But I will say they will be slightly different, but that’s an argument about distortion and a thousand other tiny little things, that add up to, better things. OCD is my friend.
Let’s be civil please. I’m an audiophile because I say it, period. All digital source then amazing analog all the way too my kimber select 6063 speaker cables. Invest the same money either way and the result is spectacular. Neither one could be called superior, but...the debate continues.
Post removed 
When you’re a Jet you’re a Jet all the way, from your first cigarette til your last dying day. 🕺🏻
It’s like an Alcoholic...You’re an Audiophile when you say you’re an Audiophile...lol
Dear @looscannon : Me neither. I pasted general information.

The issue is that all the human beens ( but sokogear. ) have an ADC at our inner ears section, this is a binary condition. This is the way the brain takes any sound we hear.

The comunication in the brain starts with those discrete electric impulses and this condition is binary too. Now the neurotransmitters comes by a chemical " condition " and I’m not talking about.

Now and I take your word as a true one: if somewhere the communication goes analog then somewhere those binary impulses goes through a DAC or something similar because the brain information through the Axon is continuous.

The trouble with all those inside the brain is the very low overall knowledge levels that the bio-neurolog or scientific gentlemans have. The very high complexity of the brain operation makes that we can’t have absolute certainty in many operation subjects down there.

Look, if you read the article I linked on how our ears works where is really complex ( and are only the ears. ) we can understand the the brain is just out of our overall operation understanding and probably could be that the subjects the neurologes know about could be not exactly as the researchs showed.

The ears have not one but at least 3 different kind of transducers along:

""" We’ see that it’s literally crammed with equalisers and dynamic compressors, including a multi‑band one. It even includes an extremely efficient filter bank, as well as a highly sophisticated analogue‑to‑digital converter. ""

Now with all those kind of transducer in the ears/brain and all those eq., compresors/limiter and the like: what in reality are we listening from the original sound signal? example: how much information are we losting from the sound of the Niagara falls due to the whole ears/brain complex process?

Btw, I don't know other persons but I'm learning a lot on this specific subject. Good.

R.


Yes!
The Porsche analogy is a good one. As millercarbon stated early on amidst a rum-induced post, it is about the driving experience and listening experience. It doesn’t matter what Porsche or audio gear gets you to your own nirvana. 
Not being able to afford the ‘67 mechanical fuel injected 911 S my friend obtained in high school around 1980 (now worth 200k), I sought 7 years ago to purchase an ‘85-89 air cooled 911. After sitting in one however, my 6’4” large frame was not comfortable and I bought a 996 with an after market supercharger... what many would consider heretical. In the time I had it (the supercharger had issues), I was in heaven... and hope to own a 911 again someday when I retire.I also own Klipsch Heresys, and yes they too are fun and give me a thrill. 

Post removed 
I seems you don't take your own message to heart, at least not really.

Considering what is happening in the world at this moment, shouldn't we trying to include people and not divide? Leave that up to Donald.

"...Porsche owners totally changed and not for the better..."
Does it mean that, relatively speaking, non-Porsche owners became better?
Can a turntable owners who does not own cylindrical record player really appreciate old jazz?
In 1982, I bought one of the first Sony CD players made.  For the next 20 years, I played nothing but CDs (even when they were going for $30 a pop).  Then I went back to vinyl, combined with SACD.  I still consider myself an audiophile - I believe the three power amps, two pre-amps, four turntables. three SACD players and multiple pairs of speakers, along with subscriptions to four audio magazines, qualifies me,  
Considering what is happening in the world at this moment, shouldn't we trying to include people and not divide? Leave that up to Donald.
Besides, it is the pursuit of audio enlightenment that we seek.The path we take is irrelevant.
Raul, I was not talking about conduction down the axon. I was talking only about the conduction between neurons which occurs in the synapse by trading off charges molecules called neurotransmitters. The action potential in the neurons axon is an entirely different process which ends with the release of those neurotransmitters. Each neuron has one axon but ends in tens of synapses which communicate with other neurons. It is all a very analog process and in no way resembles digital signal processing.
Sancho, that is an unfortunate generalization. I know several 911 owners who are great people and are always helping each other with their cars. There is also a very high rate of audiophileism in this group. Real Audiophiles like helping each other constructively with their systems and if you are honest this means pointing out some gear that was not thought out well. This is particularly true with turntables, tonearms and speakers.
You have to have a high level education to design electronic gear but I'm afraid any one can cram drivers in a box or pen a tonearm and turntable.
Panamera, Cayenne and Macan owners do not get the pass.
Actually even the new model owners who are posers for most part.

I can tell you with certainty after close to 20 years that Porsche owners totally changed and not for the better...

As for audiophiles I think the bottom line should be enjoying music.
Fort the most part it became too much about the gear, details and tweaks and very little;le focus on actual enjoyment of music...
There goes Raul again with the personal attacks....I’m reading brains are continuous and digital is not. Why not match how the brain hears?

Still vote yes the digital guys can still be considered audiophiles who listen to files, not music.
yes.

I owned a 911 Cab, traded it in on a Cayenne, then that a Touareg, but I’ve never stopped appreciating the art of the Porsche.
jssmith: I like your comment adding spin to the topic.  Replies will need another thread on the forum.  With improvements in analog and digital gear the gap is narrowing considerably. Also people are employing  tweaks and room treatment which improve S.Q. .  Like another issue SS vs tubes.   But let’s stay on the topic  regards audiophile characterisation
rixthetrick:   Correction.  sitting ON the amp .......amps are sitting on .... roller BLOCKS.  
rixthetrick:  Sitting in the amp is stout granite block with felt in between. You cannot see the felt.  It’s just to prevent vibration on the Steel plate cover .  The amps are sitting on Symposium Roller block.  I have since engineered and  built custom rack and plinths. Also added Aurender ,  enlarged room and optimised with Acoustic room treatment .  Just realized I need to update pics .   
Yes.

Since vinyl and tape (and tubes) add distortion, I would posit the opposite question.

In reality, I think anyone who has more than an average interest in gear of any level is an audiophile.
@alfa100
Just saw your system, and re-read your comment.
Well, with your list of components, you’d have to be doing something drastically wrong for it to not sound excellent.

BTW. what have you got sitting on your amps, and what does it do please?
I have a very good not inexpensive system. I don’t have TT/ R2R.  It does not matter whether I’m called audiophile or not.  I enjoy the music and very much into improving sound quality .   On another topic ; I often wonder whether a TT will sound better than my Top digital kit.  I’ve heard some excellent TT RIGS and I don’t miss anything. 
Why would you be living with that??

Follow up question-
Do you think a complex auditory signal can be sent via quantum entanglement?
Post removed 

douger
96 posts06-18-2020 11:08pm

Yes. But should someone who asks such a question be considered a troll?

No, but someone who ask the OP if their a Troll, could be!!! 

What is a troll???

Regards...
Post removed 
"geoff might know..."
I cannot wait 🥱 for him to wake up ⏰ and give 🎁 us an explanation🔮 of multidirectional 🔁 photonic 📸 cable entanglement ⚛️. 🧻🧻🧻
See there you go again, asking a goofy question. Vinyl vs digital vs reel to reel. I’m about the digital baby. My home theater would set you straight for sure.. wanna watch a movie. Ok, bring on the Cary audio 250 watt rms per channel 105 lb bad boy please. Love those 7 independent channels. Of course I don’t want to leave out the 20k I’ve spent on new and used Shunyata power cords and conditionIng. Love my Sigma Nr, now that’s a cord worth every penny. We also don’t want to leave out the 5400 simaudio Dac with hardware Mqa decoding or the hand built music server (I built that one since, you know, I like to do those things). Now I’ll give you some advise, no matter what you own, isolate the heck out of it and then do more isolating. I use mostly finite elemental slimline, cerapuc and ceraball. They are flat amazing. Oh and don’t forget the room treatments and bass traps and... you get the message. My ocd ass has been tweaking and buying and tweaking and more buying for years. Pretty much since the 80’s. My system plays movies as loud and ferocious as anyone can take. Thanks Audio physic and the sledgehammer Jbl fathom. 2 channel will always be my first love but since I can have both in the same system why not.  I must admit it would be fun to bring in a 10k vinyl rig to hear that side of things in my room but... no I hate the pops and clicks and if you were to ever hear my system you’d say why would you.  I think I qualify as an audiophile. 
I’m not sure quantum entanglement and cable entanglement are similar.
geoff might know, though he doesn’t work for NASA 🛰 anymore.
But I hear he still gets all sugared up on Tang and runs around his backyard making rocket noises, so there is a chance...🚀
geoff is long asleep.
He nods off after the 4:30 early bird special at Golden Corral.
Then it’s in bed by 7:00 after he takes his Milk of Magnesia, does a sit up and cries himself to sleep.😭
That complicates it. If the cable tangles, do directions nullify each other? Where is geoffkait to enlighten us?
glubson,

Interesting. I shall put that on the list next to the upcoming wireless quantum entanglement system. Doesn't get any faster than that...
Perfect for geoffkait’s headphone cable. We just have to figure the direction out because he will not be able to,
I would suggest a giant squid axon, but as we all know that is unmyelinated and has poor conduction velocity. Maybe good for slow songs....
thecarpathian,

Just so you do not think I was making it up...


glupson

10-18-2018 11:10pm
"Another prominent cable designer believes..."
Prominent cable designer gets three points for admitting to believe rather than claiming.

Instead of burn-in, cable risers, and all other ideas, why someone would not make cables with the principle of Schwann cells? That seems like a very logical next step. Hop-hop and there is a new dimension of "fast" in audio. My cable is faster than yours.

Come on, manufacturers who are quietly monitoring these threads to see what could be sold, try that. Nobody would be able to argue it is crap. It has worked for thousands and thousands and thousands of years and has been produced in countless billions. Now, just to figure out how to make it and that is all. What you are doing now is a copper-age joke.

We are sorry, but we have not had that length in stock since the dinosauri got extinct.