Greetings mihorn, appreciate the demonstration.
N
Power cable Advice...
Hi - I am upgrading my PC's from the basic stock to something higher end. Working with a budget up to $1,500 per cable (used will get me bigger bang for the buck) for the following products:
- Pass Labs X250.5 Power Amp
- Atma-Sphere MP-3 Preamp
- Electrocompaniet EMC1
TIA. Joey
Post removed | ||
@jaymark how are the Grover Hoffman Pharaoh's on the Atma-Sphere Digitals? | ||
Well if I had the best amplifier in the world, and matched it with the finest speakers in the world, I would probably just use lamp cord too. This is the power cable I use. I'm not affiliated with the manufacturer/seller/online-platform. Try it yourself it'll certainly please your eyes and perform like $1000 cables. "WAudio 3.3FT AC Power Cable 10AWG HiFi Audiophile Power Cord with US Plug IEC Connector" | ||
Last week several Monosaudio 902 Power cables arrived for connection to power amps, Electrocompaniet AW250R and Accuphase P-4200 in bi-amp mode. I made a two outlet receptacle from two Furutech FP-SWS(G) into a PVC box with Furutech inlet cable, internal cables are SPC 10 AWG Teflon. Cable loom Equitech 1.5Q -> Monosaudio 902 2 x 2m to the above box, then 1m 902 cables to each power amplifier. By necessity for 230V system, use the euro connectors, since a wide choice is available, rather than the std AU plugs. Not a night and day difference between Furutech FP-314Ag-II, with some notable exceptions: - Bass sounded a bit thin, left running for a few days and became 'articulate' with not so much boom and thunder, actually real bass with accuracy to boot. - Soundstage was a little deeper front to back about 0.5m - Treble much the same, not too overbearing or in your face. It's easier to hear that high hat ringing. The Monosaudio 902 cable has two layers of foil, one around each core, and the other around the three cores. This should suppress any noise that the the cables runs adjacent to standard power cabling. For my climate, copper shielding is not great as it tarnishes with the humidity. The cable size is 5.5 sqmm, about 10AWG conductors, the cable is about 5/8, 17mm diameter, has its own mind where it wants to go, so lay this flat for a day or so to iron out the curves. They are very well made, the packaging is plain cardboard, so nothing fancy, Made in China that have been around for 17 years or so, at least they have a website. Probably OEM for other cable makers. I didn't want to spend too much on power cables, for the money made a very good improvement, very happy with them, and recommended to place on the short list. | ||
Spectacular in every way! Many long hikes into the side canyons to some very exotic locales. Flipped in Lava Falls - and got stuck in an underwater eddy. A good test to see how long I could hold my breath. | ||
During the two week rafting trip down the Colorado River - through the Grand Canyon - we drank water only from the river - lots of it. No doubt the river was hugely contaminated with viruses, bacteria, protozoa, waste products and who knows what else. Thanks to the last 5 inches of the reverse osmosis pump filter, nobody got sick - ever. I did that paddle trip twice. The power to my audio system is filtered also. | ||
@derekw_hawaii Why yes you are, or the tap water is going to be safer. I also do not want to live where they use iron pipe for drinking water. | ||
Hey squared80, did you just wake up from a 40 year coma? The debate about cables making a difference was closed decades ago. Get out and experience the world and then your comments might become more meaningful. And watch out for the snake oil salesmen over on ASR. That guy doesn’t know the difference between a tape measure and a slide rule. | ||
"The Finest In the World. Probably." My goodness. :) Oh, and @jaymarkj I've got some Grover IC's and have used his speaker cables- fine stuff indeed. | ||
You got me all wrong. It took me almost 6 months to build my own monoblocks using the finest components possible Probably the finest power amplifier in the world (very "subjective" i know). Pure classA 200w/8ohm/channel, 400w/4ohm, each block weighs 100 pounds. Someone I knew in the field built a pair of speakers for me probably the finest loud speakers in the world. Unlike these oily trolls I'm here to help people stop wasting money...then again i'm not a man on a mission | ||
@classicrockfan we can give you some snake oil before you head back to ASR so you can give Amir a nice rub. | ||
Well if you are listening with lower end gear then cables will make no difference at all. That is why ASR/Amirs reviews and measurements mean nothing as the gear is all cheap garbage. @classicrockfan you are just here to make trouble, please head on back to ASR with your ilk! | ||
Post removed | ||
Post removed | ||
Post removed | ||
Well he's a football guy, he failed to notice that the OP was using Valhalla's, and he used the word "beat" more than once. It's all about winning in football! You don't win you lose! At least he into hifi, and believes in cables. I'm sure the other jocks give him a hard time 😉 | ||
@audphile1 Great post. | ||
Post removed | ||
Post removed | ||
"The cable denier sleeper cells have been woke. 🤣 @classicrockfan guess if you have junk gear you can feed it with junk cables. " subjective indeed!!! I am not a denier.. i do believe good audio cables make a significant difference but their price tags don't make them any better all coated by S.O. i don't have junk gear my system probably so much superior than yours since i know how to analyze them and i know how to design them. | ||
The cable denier sleeper cells have been woke. 🤣 @classicrockfan guess if you have junk gear you can feed it with junk cables.
| ||
@alarcono I have done both and each made a significant contribution. I started with the PS 10 and each addition of the power cables made improvements | ||
Back in March 2022: a thread about power cords and break/burn-in was started. I hate to type, so: I'm going to copy/paste some of my speculations. That a highly complex musical signal, MIGHT affect Poynting vectors and signal speeds*, in interconnects, in a much more profound manner than a simple AC (ie: a fixed 60/50 Hz) signal, in a PC, seems likely (at least) to me, as; in EVERY formula regarding *those two, a signal's frequency ( Further: the above and what I'll c/p (seems to me) lends credence to how the application of a stronger, DC voltage/field, outside a dielectric (ala Synergistic MPC and Audioquest DBS systems), might stabilize those vectors and signal speeds, PERHAPS eliminating some time smear and, "burn-in".
Happy listening! | ||
Time for a rewind (or two).
Anyone needing a rationale for experimenting with new cables in their system and/or feeling dissuaded by the Church of Denyin'tology's antiquated electrical doctrines: take heart!
Many new electrical facts have been established in the past 100 years, that support audible differences, between various cables, fuses, etc. I couldn't find anything like, "Updated Electrical Theory For Idiots", but- did manage to find something resembling a cartoon, that even a child could follow. It neither mentions AC/sinusoidal waves in wires, nor does it go into the photon propagation of electromagnetic waves. It does, however, emphasize/demonstrate how Electrical Theory has progressed, since the 1800s: (https://www.youtube.com/ These next two presuppose a certain amount of knowledge, in the field of modern Electrical Theory. Click, "continue reading" in the first link's first answer, to get its entirety. Note how it mentions the OLD, "... commonly held misconception that the flow of electricity through a wire resembles a tube filled with ping pong balls...", to which the Denyin'tologists fervently adhere: https://www.quora.com/Are- and: https://van.physics. It's an established (measured) fact that an electromagnetic wave's propagation and speed, are dependent on the materials, of which the transmission line (cable) are made (ie: Dielectric Constant/permittivity). The better (lower) the Dielectric Constant the better the flow and the longer it takes for that material, to become polarized. One reason anything that comprises an RLC circuit (ie: capacitors, cables, PC boards), takes time to, "form", or, "break/burn-in".* *Something that makes the Denyin'tologists apoplectic. https://resources.pcb. https://unlcms.unl.edu/cas/ Even the most inane (regarding the Sciences) must admit; braiding and twisting wires eliminates/reduces EMI interference. That must lend credence to various cable geometries. That better dielectrics enhance the propagation of electromagnetic waves (ie: your music signal), lends the same credence to choosing cables with better materials (ie: Polypropylene, Teflon, air, etc). Of course: anything the Church of Denyin'tology's popes can't fathom, they'll summarily dismiss. As simple a device as a fuse is: it still carries a sinusoidal signal/voltage, ALWAYS from source to load.
NOT back and forth!
Also (as mentioned above): any fuse acts as an RLC circuit, the 'C' of which will be determined by properties of its wave guide's/ conductor's surroundings (ie: glass, air, bee's wax, ceramic, end cap materials, etc).
Any commonly drawn wire will exhibit a chevron pattern in its crystal lattice, so: why not "directionality" and why OHNO Continuous Cast, single crystal wire sounds better, to so many?
Stated above are scientifically tested, measured and proven facts.
There is no "contest", or "dispute" involved.
The OP mentions Maxwell, but: obviously they have no understanding of his theory and possible ramifications as regards the above.
Anyone that feels compelled to harp on not hearing any differences, is obviously too obtuse to understand the term "variables" (as frequently mentioned) and worthy of disregard.
My only goal in these threads has ever been to encourage those with a mind to experiment with their systems, based on the latest (20th/21st Century's) findings of ACTUAL Physics/science and ignore the Cargo Cult's incessant runway building (objections, convolutions, deflections and obfuscations).
Happy listening!
| ||