I've heard big Magicos absolutely sing at the end of Constellation and Soullution Monos. It was like an undernourished boxer when driven by Dartzeel monos. I think too many on this forum, and indeed reviewers have a 100 point/5 star system of the best at x, y, and z. I'm not so sure as time goes by. I've heard all sorts of systems delivering the goods. If you asked me the best playback i ever heard was a £500,000 fm acoustics system which really sounded like live music using FM amps, and speakers. When i speak to people who are pretty dyed in the wool audiophiles, almost all of them enthuse about rooms with built in horns and valve amps.
Magico vs the world
Everywhere I look I only see people (end users and professional reviewers) raving about magico. Build quality, incredible sound, etc... everyone just loves them, especially the modern series, A3, M series, S series (mk2 variant). It is impressive for sure. But I am curious, what speakers have you heard that you compared to magico that you like as much or maybe even better?
213 responses Add your response
Post removed |
You know your Dodge Challenger Hellcat Redeye will do 0-60 in 3.4 seconds but will you admire its spectacular build compared to an Aston Martin that does it in 5.4 seconds? If you could pick one to use then give back in 3 years at no cost to you which would you pick? Yep, I have Magicos and an Aston Martin. |
I have never auditioned Magico speakers, however reviews from around the world are very positive. But then many speakers which attract expensive prices seem to attract very good reviews, sort of goes with the territory...? Maybe to be more realistic the choice of speakers is more depended on the presentation of sound; which one does one prefer. |
Hi. Yes i agree with your comments referring to The Magico speakers. They have transformed previous misconceptions of other very well known brands world wide and helped many in their Quest. There is another speaker company which is equally as good if not better,but down to taste. Gauder Akustik from Germany. Like the Magico not cheap, but top run in all aspects. For me as i am in my early 60s and i like the modern Dynamic music also of course Blues old rock and Back street Jazz. I prefer the Gauder. My current Gauder Akustik DARC 200 Big Foot Diamond/Double vision kicks arse.But they are hungry so you know what i mean. Trust me the Gauder Akustik vs the world is the main contender. Regards Alex |
I don't like the bass impact from the YG Brand of speakers. The bass is there, don't get me wrong, but it sounds underwhelming. I heard the big Magico's at RMAF in 2017. It was either their most expensive or one of their most expensive and they did sound amazing. However, I did think the highs were a tiny bit dry. |
@
lalitk
I think with magico you are paying for their exceptional cabinets with all the extensive aluminum internal bracing. But can you build a cheaper mdf or composite cabinet for cheaper with great drivers/crossover for less cash? That might be the argument against extensive aluminum cabinet. @mheinze Are you talking about the YG carmel 2? |
Looking at used prices the Magico name holds its value better than most of the boutique brands and with the new a series coming out I could see myself trying out a used pair of A5's in 5-10 years when I can score a pair. Generally speaking, the more advanced the speaker the less likely i'll be able to afford the complimentary components to drive them. so in reality i'll probably never own a pair. |
+1, @kingbarbuda. Anyone considering Magico’s, should also give a listen to Audio Solutions speakers. I have heard both Virtuoso and Figaro and found them to be very musical and a better buy. They were paired with Vitus CD Player and Integrated. I have nothing against Magico’s but IMO, they are overpriced. |
Will be hard to beat the A3 at its price point, I have looked long and hard. The YG are very nice, but I don’t think they are great value, my A3, to my ears, get me as close to the music at 1/4 the price (in Europe). The built quality is also superb. I can probably play them louder, the YG can sound strained when pushed. |
All of this defending and bashing Magico is hilarious. In my audiophile journey I have owned many speakers. Currently I do own a pair of Magico A3s. But there are a lot of great speakers and guess what? Not everyone likes the same thing or the same speakers. That is why there are many speaker manufacturers. Perhaps, something better than Magico will show up? Maybe I will own them? I thought a long time ago that Dynaudio was it for me. Then along came my Magicos and Magnepans. Bye bye Dynaudio. It happened once. It can happen again. Another thing: these speakers don’t operate in a vacuum. You need to recognize that it isn’t just about the speaker. It’s about the system, power management and cabling connected to them and the room. |
Great comments enjoy what you like YG is definely another great speaker.MAGICO is great as well it took me years to get them to sound there best.I would certainly agree that YG and MAGICO are among the best.Your 100% right Valin is a big MAGICO booster.He suddenly said the MAGICO Minis were just ok after the new models come out making me loose thousands when i sold mine.I told him this at AXPONA.Remember he gets everything on long term loan for free.Enjoy!! |
I own Hailey 2.2s actually, nice snarky comment. I've heard M, S, and Q all in dealer demos, auditions, and/or at shows. Numerous amps too (except Pass which a friend runs with apparent success). The best I've heard them was on was Gryphon. I was very interested in the brand at one time but just feel YG is superior for a sealed box, aluminum speaker and ended up purchasing a pair. More alive, better micro dynamics, magical hybrid tweeter, and Yoav's crossover is the secret sauce that brings about a musically superior experience. But YG doesn't have the Valin marketing muscle. |
Another shameless rave review, with measurements to back it up, can you imagine? It’s a travesty! https://soundstagehifi.com/index.php/equipment-reviews/1399-magico-a1-loudspeakers |
Post removed |
@ricred1 It is all in the context, you are discreet, and not mentioning brands, but this thread is about Magico and dznytz does mention the brand, so it would have been helpful if he shared more insight on his experience and give his view, that was not meant to "convince anyone of anything", more credibility. |
if you do not like Magico, why did you buy 3 different pairs? Are you a mashocist or something? I would have quit after the first pair. Money to burn? I am really interested in knowing why. Because I fell into the trap that many do with well reviewed and marketed speakers. Im simply one of those who is willing to spend his own money to actually buy something and try it out in his own home. Very few are willing to do that. First pair I bought in 2015... couldn’t make them work for me. In 2018, I thought I would try again with their latest release. Still not working for me. Then I had an opportunity to practically steal a pair of their higher end models in 2019... couldn’t go wrong so I tried it. 3 strikes and youre out for me. They could be the right speaker for you... they weren't for me. |
In the simplest of ways... everything that has received a similar amount of design and engineering time can compete and potentially “out perform” them. I, too, have not heard a Magico that I liked... and Ive owned 3 of them. So in my mind and experience, far less expensive speakers out perform Magico. |
In comparing speakers to magico I think I definitely favour traditional dynamic boxes. Not against horns though. Not that into panels just because I like build quality, bass and dynamics of boxes. I especially like metal build quality but open to any brands/speakers in that genre. If anything this is more of a thought experiment to see what can truly compete with one of the top brands out there. Especially the magico m series. Which sonus faber do you like? The Aida or Fenice? |
smodtactical, are you in principle against any particular genre of speakers? ESL, line array or quasi-line array, horn hybrid, etc. ? You seem stuck on traditional dynamic speakers. I will answer your question about the Magico. In one sense it doesn't matter which Magico is selected to answer the question. I have heard several of them, and some in very impressive systems. However, I have yet to be impressed enough to ask for a review. Perhaps at an upcoming show. I have heard more impressive demos of the top end Sonus Faber than Magico, imo. That doesn't mean in head to head comparison in my room I would pick the SF as better, but at shows it's caught my ear. Anyway, the genre is the game changer in so many respects. The King III electrostatic is what I call a "line source ESL" and its a unique sound, big, detailed, like a humongous Quad, only with better low end. To the ear of someone who loves that sound, it doesn't matter what dynamic speaker you put up against it, the ESL will win. Line source, the same thing. Omni, the same thing. Open baffle and quasi-OB, same thing. Horn and hy�bird horn, same thing, etc. So, are you bound to dynamic with the boxy colorations, because trust me, the Magico speakers have boxy colorations just like every other dynamic speaker. The superbly built Vapor Audio Joule White has boxy colorations - they all do. Have you made up your mind on genre of speaker? If not, I suggest you do, because that is the towering (pardon pun) question that should be answered first. No problem if you have the question resolved and are looking for your ultimate expression in dynamic speakers. I get that. But, is it possible that a different genre might supersede it? Have you ever owned a serious speaker in one of these other genres? (Forgive if I have missed that discussion; I'm not revisiting it all to mine it for answer when you can simply tell me) :) |
Post removed |
I recently bought a pair of YG Sonja 2.2 and the other contender was Magico M2. ( there are many other fantastic speakers but I wanted horns or sealed speakers for my room) I listened to them multiple times but with different upstream gears ( same level) and in different rooms so the comparison was not a direct one. Both are excellent speakers with a lot in common but still different. For my taste, Sonja 2.2 was a better match. The midrange and high frequency sounded more natural to me . Bass-wise, resolution Magico was ahead . Bass is a relative “weak” point on YG speakers ( very fast and natural but lack a bit of punch) Since, I got an excellent opportunity on REL 212se sub and bass is extraordinary.The integration with YG is excellent. ( might be as well with Magico but never tried) |
@freedomgli I think YG is definitely interesting. I enjoyed the Sonja 1.3, but I think they have a few problems. First it seems their cabinets are not as nice as magico’s more curved designs and especially their mixed carbon fiber + aluminum design. Second being modular I think maybe their overall cabinet quality may not be as inert as a large monolithic aluminum cabinet like magico. And finally.. I’m a bit concerned about their small bass drivers. Yoav Geva mentioned how the way they are designed they perform similarly to a 12 inch driver (their 10.25 inch)... but I just don’t know. It seems YG is just not as loved or wildly respected as magico. Is it because of their design not being as good magico. Or is it lack of marketing? Lack of dealers? I just don’t know. It seems magico puts more nuance, technology and sophistication into their speakers..monocoque carbon fiber, nanographene drivers, diamond coated beryllium. This is all fancy stuff and maybe it doesn’t translate to amazing sound... but from what I heard it does. All I can say for sure is I am definitely eager to listen to the Sonja 2.3 and perhaps compare it again to the magico m2 or m3? Maybe even m6? |