Koetsu cartridges deliver a warm, rich and “saturated” sound without sounding murky or slow sounding which is not an easy trick to pull off. The company closed recently but older cartridges can be re-tipped. My local dealer uses someone in California and is very pleased with the results. He is sending a prized Allaerte cartridge to be fixed.
That’s a perfect description @larryi I used to think they were stupid, overpriced little boxy rocks. Then I actually heard one, and have been a huge fan ever since. I have 6. One of the problems was that the North American and Euro distributers would artificially amp up the price of "premium" stones (Coral, Blue Lace) versus "base" stones (Onyx, Jade) to segment the high-end of market. The price disparity was much more modest in other markets (Japan, SE Asia). That said, they were all still expensive cartridges, and the Blue Lace I have does in fact sound better than all other stones. The Coral - eh, maybe not so much. Perhaps my Coral needs more burn in, but the Blue sounded amazing from hour #1. Could be some variation from sample to sample, too. Supposedly Koetsu bought up the whole run / supply of Platinum magnets, which is why other manufactureres don’t use them (only Lyra, in very limited fashion). They are nice sounding magnets, more smooth and creamy sound versus samarium-cobalt and neodymium. Alnico is pretty neat too, though. |
But I refuse to believe a magnet has a "sound". The magnet has an effect determined by its properties as a magnet in combination with the properties of the coils and its mass (of the magnet). The coil does not know it is being affected by a platinum magnet; it only knows the strength of the magnetic field surrounding it. I know there are mystiques surrounding the use of samarium cobalt or platinum or neodynium or other magnetizable metals (alnico?) in MC cartridges, but what is the possible mechanism, other than the above, mass, field strength, and geometry (meaning how the magnet and coil are placed in space)? Can someone ’splain me? Anyway, Koetsu cartridges are a matter of taste, as is the choice of any cartridge brand. They used to be characterized as warm and "musical" or rich sounding but some said of the Rosewood series that they were lacking in low bass and high treble. The Rosewood Signature Platinum was said to have corrected that issue with bass and treble, at the expense of having a much lower signal voltage output; I never heard one. Then came later wood bodied models like the various Urushi models and still later the stone bodied models, among which there are additional sonic differences. I have an Urushi and like it very much, but maybe it is not my very favorite LOMC cartridge. Nevertheless it is definitely not lacking in bass and treble response. I’d like to own a stone-bodied model but was unwilling to fork over the moolah. I own about 6-7 other LOMC cartridges, so the Urushi is just one in my stable. Anyway, it is impossible to disagree with Inna when he writes, "It seems that quite a number of Audiogoners have Koetsu, or a few of them." That sentence has its own escape clause. |
Koetsu is special indeed! it’s on my hunting list.. https://medialux.blog/2019/07/07/the-koetsu-story-japanese-art-part-1/ https://medialux.blog/2019/07/08/4-koetsu-compared-japanese-art-part-ii/ |
@Lewm wrote: " "It seems that quite a number of Audiogoners have Koetsu, or a few of them." That sentence has its own escape clause." I read Inna's statement to mean that Koetsu are popular among participants and some have several of them. I own two stones- a Jade- which sounded great out of the box, and a Tiger Eye, which was a bit strident for the first thirty or so hours. Both a tad tail down (I can do VTA on the fly but don't mess with it much once dialed in, except for an extraordinarily thick or thin record- most of what I listen to is pretty standard old pressings from the nadir of vinyl- the '70s) and loaded at 100 ohms. The bass has dimension, tone and a filled-in quality that my system seemed to lack with other high end cartridges. It may be a synergy with the arm- an Airline, which really seems to like a low compliance cartridge. |
@whart...Bill, that was my interpretation too. I have several also. |
Some of the best midrange you’ll ever hear. Defined, full, smooth, exciting, they open up a whole canvas of sound when compared to other cartridges. This, balanced with thunderous bass and ever so delicate and defined treble make them a joy to listen to for hours requiring no effort from the listener. That’s what makes them special. Just my opinion. |
Yo-yo, so you’ve compared two kinds of magnet set up identically in terms of geometry and field strength and whatever other parameters pertain and compared them on the same Strat ( important to use the same guitar both ways)? And listeners agree the sound is different? (Not to mention we’re talking about a guitar pickup not a cartridge.) even if it’s been done, that doesn’t explain a mechanism. |
"Dynamic conditions". The magnetic field varies during playback (however slightly), and supposedly the different magnet types have different behaviors in this respect. No that’s not a satisfactory scientific / engineering explanation, but this is sort of analogous to arguing around "all amps measuring below 0.01% THD (or whatever) must sound the same". Now the anecdotes, for which I have a unique one to this topic: I have 2 Onyxs, one an old 80s/90s short body with samarium-cobalt magnet. I acquired it with original parts, but worn stylus. It sounded absolutely glorious for about 70% or the record, before the stylus showed its age towards inner grooves. I had this rebuilt by Koetsu in 2018, specifically instructing them to keep the original magnet (because I thought this was part of its "magic"). The other is a circa 2000 Onyx Platinum that I’ve heard both in original condition, and after its own 2018 Koetsu rebuild. I draw the following observations from these examples:
IIRC people still chase old Lyra Parnassus cartridges to use as a "donor" for its platinum magnet to use in a new Olympus build. |
Post removed |
I was aware of Koetsu in 1978 through The Audio Critic, who tested one. It was the world's first cartridge to sell for - gasp! - $1000. Peter Aczel said it was the best he'd ever heard. Don't give me that bullsh*t about inflation making that $1K Koetsu worth $4K in today's dollars. There is so little material in any phono cartridge to justify the outrageous prices asked today! |
@lewm : Guitar pickups and strings determine the sound of an electric guitar. The body material/shape have no affect. The magnet material and number of coil windings is where the "magic" resides. |
Etsuro Urushi..good to know. No one forces anyone to buy luxury items. Unlike some other things. I have to pay outrageous electrical bills every month, as an example. Now this is hard to walk around, especially if renting. There is a number of people paying $10k+ for cartridges, and custom Brioni suit was about $30k the last time I read about it. |
Jason, I just read the long piece on "pickups" in Wikipedia. Seems there are a few different types and they operate in a few different ways, any set of which could affect the recorded signal in one way or another. So I would guess it is about as difficult to say what the type of magnet does to the sound from a pickup as it is to say how the magnetic material of a phono cartridge affects its sound. I am not saying there is no effect; I am only wondering how one would know or how to investigate that effect as an isolated factor. |
One observation for which I don't have an answer- the Jade sounds different than the Tiger Eye on the same system. From what I gather the innards of both cartridges are the same. The difference in the hardness of the stone is recognized, generally (you can look it up under the Moh Scale for each). I don't know how much that contributes-- neither stone absorbs resonance in the same way that something like wood would; and there was the myth that the better motor assemblies were reserved for the upper tier Koetsu but I think its just that, a myth. I will probably try Ana Mighty in France when I'm due for a retip; I gather they had some history with Koetsu back in the day. Those Medialux articles posted upstream are a pretty good introduction to the product line; sadly, the company is no more, though I understand why the family opted not to "sell the brand" to a 3rd party-- it would not have been the same. |
I like the sound of the stone-body Koetsus. Most of my friends who own or are familiar with the lineup prefer the Rosewood Signature Platinum. It is a matter of personal preference. Regardless of the science, the cartridges sound a little different. But, I suspect, a choices made between the types of stone-body cartridges is primarily based on appearance. I have seen most of the types, and my favorite look is that of the Blue Lace. |
By the way, my local dealer has sent several of his own and customer Koetsu cartridges for repair/re-tipping to Andy Kim in California. He is very pleased with what he got back. It appears that Koetsu will live on well into the future thanks to services like this one. I think it took Andy Kim a couple of week to do the repairs on an Allaerte my dealer sent to him, and the "delay" in receiving back the cartridge was because new parts had to be ordered from Allaerte. |
One thing I would advise for folks considering a retip on Koetsu: Koetsu used an "interface" type mount, where the stylus is fitted through a collar of different (softer) metal, then into a groove prepared in the boron. Glue is added mostly on the other side, opposite the collar. It’s generally a very clean looking mount under magnification, with less glue used. I believe there’s a Japanese supplier of the whole boron rod cantilever & stylus with this interface mount (Ogura?), which should be very similar to what Koetsu used. Personally, this would be my preference. The old cantilever can be removed from joint pipe, and the new one can be added in - stylus mount and all. When you compare to Euro and USA style tip mounts, they use a lot of visible glue - it either looks like a mound of cement (Benz, Van den Hul) or a clear-ish bubble (Ortofon). The interface mount will track closely to what was originally intended by Koetsu. It’s totally the owner’s perogative to try something different (and I do quite like Fritz Gygers), but it’s something to keep in mind if you want to keep your Koetsu as close to original as possible. Ana Mighty Sound in France has shown retip work that tracks beautifully with that of an original Koetsu tip. Same with suakimlp.com, in Vietnam. And I believe Joeseph Long (groovetickler) is also easily capabale of this (or anything else you might want). Those are the 3 I’d trust for keeping a Koetsu as close as possible to original performance. |
Years ago many reviews indicated the most “musical” cartridge were the Koetsu stone with the Coralstone as one of the favorites. The stone carts seemed unaffordable so I purchased the Rosewood Sig Platinum. I was bummed when it was announced the Coralstone was being discontinued without ever hearing it, but I lucked out and picked up a mint Coralstone D for a great price. Still debating whether to purchase a Ikeda tonearm and SUT to optimize the sound…another rabbit hole Grado also has a “musical” reputation, tempted to investigate someday
|
No intention change main discussion, just quick question. Me either very interested to know Koetsu. I have LP-S and Shelter 9000, wondering would expect major different vs Black Goldline or Red T, because I heard Shelter like Koetsu, so I’m hesitating move forward. Honestly, LP-S give me all I need and probably need nothing more, its very unique how analyze every instrument and with incredible dynamics all over but without take you away from music enjoyment. Also, non fatiguing but not cold, and quite delicious. Its also like larryi said in beginning. Thanks! |
I’ve had 9000 and LP-S, but not Koetsu Red or Black - though Koetsu has a rep of a very consistent "house sound". With regards to the Koetsu I’ve owned (RSP, 5 different stones) they will give you a fatter, fuller, "tonally dense" and sweeter sound than those 2 cartridges. I don’t believe they give up anything in the resolution department either, but that can be a matter of perspective. Treble is relaxed versus more aggressive MC cartridges. Shelter is interesting because they bounce around a bit between "warm" & full-bodied sounding models, versus models that are tuned for "pursuit of fine detail". The 7000 and Harmony are "pursuit of detail" models. Accord is full-bodied. 9000 is like an attempt to balance the 2 sides. My favorite is Accord, for what it’s worth. Then the 7000 and Harmony. Koetsu goes even a bit further than Accord, somehow without sacrificing perception of fine details. The LP-S I found articulate, but a bit polite and well-mannered for my tastes. It’s certainly not as warm or "romantic" as a Koetsu. And it’s not a good match for SUT because of its motor (non-magnetic coil former). All are fine cartridges, and you can see this is very much a mater of tatse, and system matching! Truth be told, my first Koetsu listen hit me like a ton of bricks when Tannoy Kensington were my main speakers - these absolutely benefit from a carrtidge with a warm, full-bodied tilt and relaxed treble like Koetsu. By contrast, Ortofon Windfeld was a poor match. Later I upgraded to Canterbury. These speakers are warm and full-bodied on their own - they still sound amazing with Koetsu, but they’re also far more accepting of other cartridges, including the Windfeld! |
Thanks a lot mulveling! Great details! I heard once Tannoy sound, not that high-end you have, i admit most impressive sound and full body, but never sound like boxed speakers. My speakers are Maggi's MG-20, i found them middle in full body, but incredible spreading sound. Interconnect can make significant differences. I used to have Transparent, its incredible at full body, with my Krell they sound muffle, probably due to un-matching gears. Now I'm using AQ, razer sharp but thin in comparison. Well, based on these descriptions i felt tempt try one Koetsu. |
Yes, I saw that video. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fQeut0__a_4 I suspect that inner workings and actual assembly processes of Koetsu cartridges was closer to the Lyra model where the Suganos’ were more involved in the final phases of the assembly and there are apprentices on site to assist. And these apprentices are now called upon to carry on the Koetsu Mantle. That must be the case, and the lore of Sugano- San as the sole maker is myth. |
Looks good to me! If they use the same formula, same parts from the same suppliers (which Koetsu spec'd and cultivated over the decades), and have skilled coil winders / cartridge assemblers - I see no reason why they wouldn't sound the same as before. Some tweaks & changes here and there might also make for an interesting new take on the classic Koetsu sound, and could be appropriate for this Koetsu v2 (v3?) launch. Then there was Koetsu's stash of platinum magnets that supposedly can't be had anymore (at least not without a LOT of investment). I wonder if that is still in play / available for future platinum models. |
I do not own a Koetsu, though eventually I will, either a vermillion or a RSP. And I certainly do not mean to crash this party. My point with the J Carr video is that I suspect that the Lyra assembly model might be based on the Koetsu model. Although it is contrary to how most of us thought a Koetsu was built, knowing that the Suganos’ did not participate in the entire assembly process does not diminish the brand at all for me. Listening to Carr’s description of the division of labor involved in making top notch cartridges just made more sense to me than a picture of the lone master slaving away. Especially given that Lyra put out 100 cartridges per month. That’s all. In any case it is very exciting that Koetsu is back. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dKDtNrN2jy8 A video on the making of Denon DL-103. Note the pride that the Japanese take in performing their work. And there is only one woman capable to wind the coils.
|