I would say that AQ is in the top five. If you did a blind test among those five, you might discover a new brand. It's certainly worth a try. There's a whole lot of hype in the audio world.
Audioquest vs. Others
I realize that this post will probably open a landslide of responses but my question is focused on the comparison of Audioquest vs other manufacturers. This is not aimed to address power cables or speaker wire but only interconnect cables. Like Audioquest, many brands offer cables in a range of prices....low, medium, high, and super high. My interest is not to compare a lower price/quality cable to one that is far superior but to ask if comparisons have been done within equal price ranges of different brands.
Yes, some systems are capable of distinguishing minute changes in a cable makeup. Some manufacturers even offer a free trial and return policy. I know that. But, in a moderately priced system, are there any opinions that would deter one from using the Audioquest brand vs another brand? Remember....staying in a comparable price range.
Yes, some systems are capable of distinguishing minute changes in a cable makeup. Some manufacturers even offer a free trial and return policy. I know that. But, in a moderately priced system, are there any opinions that would deter one from using the Audioquest brand vs another brand? Remember....staying in a comparable price range.
85 responses Add your response
Depends on the cable and the gear to which they are connected. I've heard different AQ cables with the same gear sound dull, muddied, bright to rip your ears off.That's generally the difference between the lower end, which uses long-grain copper and gold-plated connectors. The higher end uses much better PFC and PFC+ (similar to OCC copper) and typically uses silver-plated connectors. |
As I noted on another thread...presumably companies like Decware and others that make and sell speakers and electronics that also offer their own cables are offering cables that they believe bring out the best in their equipment. To that end, and as an example...here is what Decware is offering...at $340 per cable... "DECWARE REFERENCE-GRADE INTERCONNECT
A Pure
UN-insulated
SILVER
Ribbon with
an
organic https://www.decware.com/newsite/newdsr.htm Or Benchmark Media Systems @ $35 per cable https://benchmarkmedia.com/collections/a-stock/products/benchmark-rca-to-rca-coaxial-cable |
@dustsailor Please read http://ielogical.com/Audio/CableSnakeOil.php and the links to Garen Galeis articles therein. Silver does not make cables bright. IMO, AQ is an egregious fraud, selling ridiculously overpriced tone controls rather than neutral cables. |
Thank you.A salesman of Audioquest answered me that the new line of AQ sounds better that AQ Wildwood of $18000 because of the new tecnology Zero that AQ Wildwood didnt have. That tecnology give the ultra neutral sounds in the tube system or transistor system. I never heard that a cable of $3000 surpass a cable of 18000.of the same company. It is very hard to believe it |
Full loom AQ here. I have tried plenty of their cables vs some other brands such as vertere, atlas, sablon, what ever friends have vs mine. I started with two thunder power cords and a diamond AES. Once i heard the bass control AQ cables offer, in addition to detail, excellent sound staging, opennes, i could not stop. Most of my cables are PSS or PSC+. I have few firebird HC and source. I believe that's the sweet spot in the strom series. Hurricane is not bad, but firebird is has more sparkle and transparency. The only issue is its price! Have firebird zero + thunderbird bi wire speaker cables conneting my diablo 300 to kef ref 5s, it feels just as there is no cable! Dynamics, transparency, and grain free. Doesn't sound too forward to me at all. I believe AQ cables are colourless, the just allow you to hear your equipment true sound. If you have something garbage in your chain, they will expose it. The higher you go up, the more transparent, better everything. Before i started using AQ, i had a bad idea about silver cables. Turned out silver done right, would sound full, beautiful and warm even possibly, in a good way, with crazy resolution. I have friends who prefer coloured cables. I can understand using cables as system tweaks. But i prefer transparent cables that doesn't add or subtract, and getting properly voiced equipment. In my opinion, AQ cables should work in any system. If they don't work, something along the chain doesn't sound right/ neutral. I could be wrong, but i do love my cables, the extremely black background, being virtually distortion free, the energy they allow to pass unhindered, the grip. They are just awesome. |
Did anyone hear AQ Thunderbird?I am very interested in buying that cable bi wire.I have actually AQ Volcano single wire.One day the dealer in Argentina borrowed the Purist Venusta bi wire luminist y it is far superior than the Volcano. I almost decided to buying purist Corvus bi wire because the seller told that the Corvus is superior and more neutral than the Venusta.But one day I read the article of the audiobeat that they tested AQ Wildwood ( $18000 ) and AQ William tell ($3000).They said that William tell is far superior and it seems a change of amplifier more than change of cables.I really cant believe it.Is the new line of Audiowuest so good?The problem is that it is impossible to test AQ Thunderbird before buying in Argentina. |
Anybody who believes L, R, C is all that’s going onIt's not belief. Changing any of Mr K's magic parameters affects LCR. Functionally-Perfect Copper (FPC)That's a HOWLER! I consider to try Kimber, Cardas, MIT, Transparent, Nordost,+1 on everything but Nordost speaker cables. IMO, Nordost is a very colored speaker cable. It may work well with some components, but that direction is the wrong way to go. Take Cardas copper claims with a grain of iron pyrite, aka fools gold. |
I had some Audioquest Emerald ICs and always felt that there was too much HF emphasis. On paper, they were the answer to an audiophile's prayer. Functionally-Perfect Copper (FPC) wire including the connectors. I disected one of the cables and found four incredible small gauge wires, explaining the titled response. These were very expensive cables at the time. More recently, I tried some AQ Type 8 speaker cables and they were totally outclassed by Kimber 8TC. I'm sure that Audioquest has many fine cables in their current lineup but, based on my experience, they are expensive for what you get.. |
My local dealer sold me some used AQ Copperheads and G-snakes, some years ago. At one point, I had separates and used a set of "Better Cables", silver plated 99% OCC cables between the amp and preamp. These cost $80/ft. in 2006. I was using this cable, later, between my DAC and the amp, I currently own. I had to switch back to the G-snakes due to re-configuring my system set up. At the pricepoint my system is, I really couldn't hear much difference. In my mind, the Better Cables had slightly more detail but it might have been influenced by the difference I paid per foot. |
| Post removed |
Anybody who believes L, R, C is all that’s going on with cables and power cords must be living in a cave. We know it’s much more complicated than that. Everybody and his brother can find some anti-audiophile pseudo-scientific screed on the internet without breaking a sweat. This is not the 1980s, gentle readers. I used AudioQuest Truth Silver and Truth Copper air dielectric interconnects and digital cable respectively way back in the 90s. Even back then AudioQuest honored the inherent directionality of wire so the sound is more resolved, more natural and just plain better. I’m currently using AQ Carbon HDMI cables which also honor wire directionality and use some percentage of silver in the connectors which translates into a super duper picture. |
your other components should get along with audioquest the only way to know is to buy and try them. if your system is too laid back or polite and you need it to be more alert and fast maybe more lively or impactful it can help a bit. if it's too forward already it won't fit .the "front row" thing is not for everyone and can be too much and sound kind of overly loud at all volumes with no air . |
Cables are part of a system and must mate well with the other components. Forget about brand names and manufacturer malarkey. Use your ears. See http://ielogical.com/Audio/CableSnakeOil.php Ignore ALL recommendations as no one here has your gear, your room or your preferences. If you don't attend live acoustic performances, spend the money on that until you have a valid frame of reference. Audioquest is a price point manufacturer. Their cables do not share a signature sound with all gear. see https://forum.audiogon.com/posts/1785092 |
If in the AQ mode for cables stay with the highest quality (purity) conductors you can afford and always go with their FEP (teflon) dielectric. If you can afford it, the FEP tubes are the very best. If you are not in a rush you can often score a great deal on AQ cables when they launch a new line as MusicDirect and others will need to sell off inventory of the previous line. |
I just auditioned some of the newest AQ cables- with some very high prices, and can say that they are unbelievably great. In my opinion, AQ prices their cables realistically with regard to their capabilities. That being said, as you work your way through the different series, you will/should notice an increased sense of sound quality. As much of this is system dependent, YMMV. But, if you have a decent system, the AQ hierarchy seems to be well ordered- not only between series but within. Bob |
| Post removed |
I am a big fan of certain Audioquest products because they are one of the only manufactures who make pure copper solid-core cabling. Most everyone else (including super expensive items) are typically stranded. The speaker wire is excellent at the Rocket 44/88 and above level. The downside is the terminations being silver plated (why doesn't anyone use rhodium?!). The power cords are excellent too, but still suffer from silver plated plugs. I would avoid their digital and HDMI cables. Not sure about the interconnects. |
Back in the early ninetys I had Audioquest cables.My dealer let me borrow any I wanted to try.Each interconnect I tried sounded completely different from the one before it.Radically different.I actually wish they still made them like that,really fun to experiment with.The ics were all named after jewels-ruby,emerald,diamond,etc. Their entry level cables now are well built and sturdy but not very resolving,very bland.We all have to start somewhere though,so they would be a decent baseline to start with.Down the road you try something new. |
My system was only several thousand dollars total when I bought my first Audioquest cables. I know you said interconnects but the reality is all the cables made by the same guy under the same brand share the same signature sound. Might take you a long time and a lot of listening to understand this, which I happen to have done going back to 1991, so let me save you some time. There's also a whole Audioquest record label where if you like blues they have some great ones by Doug MacLeod, Terry Evans, Mighty Sam McLain and more. The gimmick as it were, all the wire used across the whole recording chain is AudioQuest. Listen to a few of these and after a while its pretty obvious what I said about the House Sound is true. The AudioQuest House Sound is articulate and detailed but weak in harmonic development and tone. It emphasizes attack relative to fundamental development. You asked about value. The well over a thousand dollar AudioQuest cables I had were easily bested by $350 worth of Synergistic Research. The SR had easily as much detail, but cleaner, with less grain and glare, and a lot more balanced fullness of fundamental tone. In terms of palpable sense of 3D depth and imaging, and dynamics both micro and macro, it wasn't even close. Took me mere minutes to decide. Then the hours and days melded into weeks fully soaking in just how much better and more sophisticated the SR cables are. That's one story. Same has been repeated across more years and brands than I can possibly recall. If I ever once heard anything compete with Synergistic and at the same price I would let you know. In fact I would probably have bought some myself. It just never has happened. Between new and used, active and non-active, there's so many different options out there I'd be as misleading as everyone else to just say what to buy. But if you don't at least find a few from Synergistic to audition, and then find yourself searching around trying to "system match" to fix the shortcomings and imbalances in what you got instead, don't blame me. |
