I agree Frank
I'm loving my SR Orange fuses!
I'm loving my SR Orange fuses!
Any tweaks I'm missing?
I have lots of ’tweaks’ added to my system.
Is there anything I’m missing?
A small cupboard, so no power conditioner possible.
A smallish budget, so most probably no Gate to try.
One small request...
Can the negative knobs please refrain from commenting.
I’m not interested in what you think of me, the products you have not tried, or my spending habits.
Only those who have experiences of possible additions, would be much appreciated.
Upgraded over the last year:
Chokes on electrical items with a switched mode power supply
Halide Bridge USB to coaxial reclocker
Akiko Triple AC Power Enhancer
Audio Prism Ground Control spades on speakers
RCA shorting plugs for inputs on my amp.
Akiko Tuning Caps on amp outputs.
Akiko Fuse Box Tuning Chip.
1 x Shumann Resonator Chatres SE + power supply
1 x Schumann Resonator CHARTRES Mk3
Black Ravioli pads for amp, Dac and power supply
Vibrapod isolation cones and feet
Akiko Universal Tuning Sticks on speaker cables.
iFi AC iPurifier.
MCRU Mains Filtration plug
Mad Scientist Nitro Nano power cables.
’LOA audio tweak’ chip.
Signal Ground solutions SGS-1 Groundng Box.
3 x Bybee iQSE - one on power board.
High Fidelity Cables MC-0.5
XLR Noise Stopper Caps.
Russ Andrews ’The Silencer.’
Audioquest Jitterbug.
iFi USB Silencer.
SR Orange fuses
PPT Omega + EMat to trial
Mad Scientist Graphene Contact Enhancer to apply
Mad Scientist Donuts coming.
Ideas?
201 responses Add your response
Excerpt from the OP. I thought this was perfectly clear and easily comprehended but obviously I was mistaken as certain members have proved quite succinctly. |
George Why do you continue to be rude? I don’t get it. Is this your crude attempt at humour? Forgive me if your keyboard bully tactics are not having the desired effect. I'm sometimes not the quickest in figuring out what others are expecting in response. You have preached. Everyone gets your point of view. A zealot indeed. Be damned, any who disagree with you. I hide in fear of your scorn. You are surely an educated, clever man; no denying. I am no match for your intellect. Your arguments are reasoned, balanced, witty. Although your comprehension skills are perhaps at times a little wayward. |
The more exploring someone does on their own the better. If you look at the Tunees you will see we start with the signal itself. We either get designs already bare bones or we strip stock products to their bare bones and begin our tuning from there. With today’s designs from around the world, doing this is very inexpensive and it doesn’t take long to discover the performance increases by getting rid of mass. How big of a performance difference thanks to the internet is being told and is jaw dropping. I have guys for example who have recently gone from $70,000.00 systems down to around $8000.00 that sound several times as good as the expensive ones. Imagine going from a $45,000.00 reference amp, pre and CDP to a $450.00 amp CDP combo with a huge musical performance increase. That’s what is taking place right now and has been proven many times over. pretty cool time to be a hi performance listener Michael |
That will change the industry Michael. I had tried many amps with my eldest daughter. A couple of A&R Cambridge A60s, a couple of my Plinius pre/power amps, Perreaux, Arcam. Over the years, she managed to blow all of them... A couple of months ago we settled on a NuForce DDA-100. What a pleasant surprise. Coupled them with my oldish Quad 11L speakers and an SMSL B1 Bluetooth receiver, and she's never been this happy. |
Hi Jerry In the past the industry press chose not to talk about Low Mass tuning after the original reviews were made on the systems we were converting (even for reviewers). It was a matter of economics for the magazines, ads = press. The best sounding systems were not the expensive ones at all, but instead were the carefully tuned ones. The technical reasons for the performance gains confused high end audio because they (HEA) had built a premise that didn't work, but they were already in up to their bank accounts. Even though some of us warned of chassis interference the high end jumped onboard bigger is better and went the opposite direction from what they should have. Now that innovation is back in the driver seat the hobby is literally changing before our ears. mg |
"I like the reasonable replies from the reasonable people." I’m not jumping into the snake oil discussion today. But the above statement = "I only want to hear from people who already agree with me." THAT, my friends, is what is killing the world today. Forget about audio. EDIT: Jerry, I am not singling you out. I think this is endemic. |
| Post removed |
George. I could be wrong ( there's always a first time for everything!) But I do not believe I have EVER told anyone here or in real life to " do as I do". I just report here what I perceive I hear, nothing more. Really could not give a rats if anyone cares or tries it themselves. There maybe some here who suggest others try some of their tweaks, that I cannot deny. Not much anyone here says is going to spoil my enjoyment of the music. Sitting in my favorite sofa and immersed in glorious sounds being delivered courtesy of my tweaked system. A few minutes ago I thought the cymbals had been moved behind me! Outstanding SQ. |
GorgehifiI’m not telling anyone what to do. I think you are delusional if that is your perception. I really struggle with your lack of rational thought. You are the one who is telling others what to do. Your way: "don’t do this. My way is the only truth. Only listen to me!" My way: "tell me what tweaks you’ve tried; I’m interested." Do you see the difference. Mine is open and inquisitive. Yours is closed. Your inability to look at this in an even handed way is disconcerting. I have an idea. You start a thread on what is the truth for audio reproduction, and I promise I will leave it alone. That then is a perfect balance. |
Hi MG Greetings and salutations this fine holiday period to your self. Exactly the state I was attempting to conjure up when I said it seemed the cymbals had moved behind me. Had a wonderful listening session last night with a lot of new to me jazz courtesy of member Oregonpapa. Very well recorded pieces on a not too shabby reproduction system if I may say so ( to my ears at least and that is all that matters!) Great days indeed! |
millercarbon - I have 32 HFTs in my main audio room. The speaker kit is the only difficult placement. No HFT works near my tweeters or mid-ranges on my Legacy Focuses. Just 1/8" difference in height of the HFT warm sound on the sides of the speakers make a significant difference. I use the Walker Talisman prior to playing every CD. I have found another dual bar magnet on Amazon which should do the same thing for $15. Another tweak which I rely on (maybe until I get better speakers like the Von Schweikert VR55s) are Shakti Hallographs which aid my speakers dispersion characteristics. I didn't like my speakers until I tuned them with the Hallographs. There are a multitude of tweaks which can work in a room. Treating the acoutical setting of a room first is 50% of the battle in hearing audio at its best. Another really cheap accessory that I've used for six years is a Magic Eraser to clean my Benz Ruby 3. It truly cleans it and fast. I used to dip my stylus in a goopy material for the prior 10 years (I forgot the name) which worked but I didn't like it as much (not as easy to use). |
FleschlerI just showed the Shakti Hallographs to my wife. She said "I think that's what single people get." No comment on you at all. I'm solely looking at me, and one of the barriers to my continued pursuit of this hobby. |
I have a dedicated (expensive) listening room (just equipment and seating). The room has built-in bass traps and only two walls have sound absorption panels. So, a pair of Hallographs behind/side of the speakers and a pair in the rear corners don't bother my wife or any visitors. They are also conversation pieces. I would give up all my other tweaks just to have them. They are essential for most speakers for focus and dispersion. They have been around for decades. Too bad too few audiophiles have experienced them but Shakti owner doesn't market them. You know the Shakti stone, doesn't work anywhere in my system but may work in others. |
thecarpathianIndeed she has. My stuff can't be ugly. And she doesn't like cables. I tried to get one of my Schumann Resonators on the wall today. Not a hope in hell. So one is behind a couch, and the other behind the tv... |
I just want to make sure I understand the naysayers. My tweaks have been: 1. Cleaning up the power Are the negative Norman's saying this is not worthwhile? 2. Equipment isolation. How about that? 3. Jitter control, and USB-S/PDIF converter, reclocking. Hogwash? 4. Improved cablingA waste of money? 5. The slightly less easy to explain tweaks.Is it all of this that I should throw in the bin? What if I've noticed an improvement in the delivery and retrieval of music? |
The couple tweaks you just singled out of the multitude you have, may not be snake oil or voodoo as they have technical merit and explanations behind them that can be easily discussed by engineers/technicians and designers that do back them, that are also easy to understand with their measurements they give. But you have many more than just those that are snake oil and voodoo. See the Electronic Engineering technical reports on them, if you can find any. So sunshine get off your horse and you figure out what is a tweak and what is BS voodoo snake oil, it’s not hard if one is not inept and or gullible. |
| Post removed |
Get off your horse doesn’t make sense in any context. I think you find the term is ’get off your High horse.’ And if I’m gullible? That’s my prerogative (means that’s my right). I’m not forcing anything on others. But you are. Unfortunately, you cannot see that you are doing exactly what you are accusing me of doing; forcing your opinions onto others. You are a charlatan George. It is something you should be proud of (once you've looked up what it means). |
And in previous posts, you said that everything I had added was tantamount to quackery, and I should think myself foolish. You did not do due diligence here George, and waded straight into your tirade unprepared, criticising all of my additions. So now you backtrack a little? I’ll take that as a crude attempt to apologise. Accepted. And thank you. I can feel a little more sanity returning, and some acceptance. I’m sorry that maths is not be your strength; over ten is a little more than a couple. |
Here are a few tweaks guaranteed to put a bee 🐝 in the bonnet of tweakaphobes and anti-audiophiles everywhere. 1. Demagnetize CDs, LPs and all cabling and power cords. 2. Isolate everything from the floor. Even Schumann frequency generators and power supplies. 3. Clean all wall outlets in ALL rooms of the house with isopropyl alcohol. 4. Always store all CDs and LPs vertically. |
The magic circle club have now a new voodoo snake oil patsy. Here's another one you can add, maybe try it on your head while listening http://www.madscientist-audio.com/0003.jpg |
| Post removed |
So much of this hobby isn’t about if you can hear or not ... but whether or not you know what to listen FOR. Right. Exactly. Unless, well kind of hesitant to bring it up. But what if there are people who really don’t care all that much for the whole listening to music aspect of it? Would they put much effort into learning what to listen for? Probably not. And, okay another one, what if there are people who think all that really matters is the sale? Speakers, amps, ideas, its all the same. When you’re selling. Nobody gives a you know what about truth, reason, when there’s a sale to be made. Heck for all we know there may be some out there so bent on winning nothing else matters they’ll skip right past even pretending to have something helpful to contribute and go straight on to the personal insults. Nah. Nevermind. Couldn’t be anyone like that. Not around here. Yeah, what to listen for. Good one. ;) |
