I just bought a new CD player and was underwhelmed with it compared to my cheaper, lower quality CD player. That’s when it hit me that my cheaper CD player is using an upgraded power cable. When I put an upgraded power cable on my new CD player, the sound was instantly transformed: the treble was tamed, the music was more dynamic and lifelike, and overall more musical.
This got me thinking as to how in the world a power cable can affect sound. I want to hear all of your ideas. Here’s one of my ideas:
I have heard from many sources that a good power cable is made of multiple gauge conductors from large gauge to small gauge. The electrons in a power cable are like a train with each electron acting as a train car. When a treble note is played, for example, the small gauge wires can react quickly because that “train” has much less mass than a large gauge conductor. If you only had one large gauge conductor, you would need to accelerate a very large train for a small, quick treble note, and this leads to poor dynamics. A similar analogy might be water in a pipe. A small pipe can react much quicker to higher frequencies than a large pipe due to the decreased mass/momentum of the water in the pipe.
That’s one of my ideas. Now I want to hear your thoughts and have a general discussion of why power cables matter.
If you don’t think power cables matter at all, please refrain from derailing the conversation with antagonism. There a time and place for that but not in this thread please.
1. What characteristics of a power cord would affect voltage (i.e.,
cause a voltage drop) - is that primarily a function of resistance and
wire gauge, or something else, and 2. What characteristics of a power cord would affect bandwidth?
Voltage drop can be caused by the connectors or the wire itself- they all respond to Ohm's Law. If you find that either are getting warm, you know for sure there is a voltage drop occurring. The geometry and materials affect bandwidth, in addition to gauge.
You cannot win any argument with any cable deniers folks. That’s the reality. They will never submit to actually trying stuff, instead, asking us to provide proof and measurements.
Yes, that is indeed the pattern that we’ve seen repeated here many times. Presumably, that’s why the OP stated:
If you don’t think power cables matter at all, please refrain from derailing the conversation with antagonism.
It’s interesting that the the deniers are so unwilling to experiment, often responding that it isn’t necessary because they know in advance what the results of a listening test would be. What’s interesting about that claim is - accepting their convictions about the influence of "placebo effect" - they are probably correct. If you’re certain you won’t hear difference, then most likely you won’t hear a difference.
Of course, if you’re unwilling to experiment and listen, you are assured to not hear any difference at all.
We might not win the argument but we sure as heck won’t lose the argument. Doesn’t everyone enjoy ye olde Whack a Mole? Whack a Mole, the sport of kings.
So here is some anecdotal on "deniers" - those who claim they hear no difference:
A bunch of them were gathered in a blind test, where some speaker cables were to be tested - generic zip cord vs. a high end speaker cable - or so they were told.
Then, the tester used the same exact cable, but, on test "b" (cable "b" to the subjects), the polarity was swapped (speakers connected out of phase).
100% of the subjects reported they heard no difference. Blind. The matter of fact, the out-of-phase "cable" sounded noticeably worse than the correct connection cable.
Stereophile recorded one sighted listening test at an audio show comparing speaker cables, and the group that preceded expensove cables actually chose the generic cables. The test itself was highly flawed though: sighted, not individual (most not in the sweet spot), not the same gauge wires, etc.
mzkmxcv Stereophile recorded one sighted listening test at an audio show comparing speaker cables, and the group that preceded expensove cables actually chose the generic cables. The test itself was highly flawed though: sighted, not individual (most not in the sweet spot), not the same gauge wires, etc.
>>>>Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. All tests are flawed. Especially when results are negative. There are simply too many things that can go wrong, too many pitfalls,to put any confidence in them. Besides, people have ulterior motives a lot of times for performing tests. You know what I’m talking about. Or even for demanding tests be done. Give me a break! Even blind tests can’t save the sorry donkey. 😢
mzkmxcv: You can build your system based upon measurements. I’ll build mine, as I have over the past 40+ years, based to some extent on measurements, but to a greater extent on what I hear. As for the science you believe to be definitively on point, I disagree with your characterization of how the measurements you present relate to how the sounds measured are processed by the human ear. But let's assume you are correct, well, then --if the current science cannot measure why I hear differences in PCs and ICs , then I submit that it is not measuring everything. Or as a scribe once said: "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
@ elizabeth
As to the kitchen magnets, I tried six of them and they are worthless as to affecting my audio and video systems. On the contrary, the E-Mats, full size, one dozen, greatly improve my sonics. Just one on the main power box significantly improved the video picture with enhanced color and brightness on my 75" Sony 940D. My wife does not want me to remove it. Since 100s have tried and purchased the E-Mats and found the same results, why knock it? I would have returned them unless they provided a very significant benefit for the cost. Again, the E-Mat is NOT a kitchen magnet. The kitchen magnet has a low level magnetism and helps hold it to some metal products. It is being used only as a convenient way to hold the inside "mystery" product that Tim Mrock uses to achieve the sonic enhancement. I don't know what the "mystery" product is but it works. As to TC product, I reserve judgement although I have applied it liberally last year. I prefer the E-Mats.
Regardless, all of us have our persons whose opinions we value and for me you don’t often hear them bragging about how much they have, know or their great hearing. They don’t need to.
People! We already established that magnetism is strictly for attaching the mat to a ferrous metal object. The principle involved has absolutely nothing to do with magnetism 🧲. That’s why the newer smaller cards are not (rpt not) magnetic. In fact we also know magnetism per se is generally bad for sound. That’s why we see preferences for non-magnetic chassis, non-magnetic screws, transformers wrapped with mu metal, etc. He-loo! Try to keep up, people! We need scamps like Elizabeth and Jitter to keep everyone straight. 😛
Geoff, thank you for establishing that the magnetism is not part of the functioning mechanism of the mat, we were all wondering about that. Just so we do not need to go back and reread 15 pages to find it, would you please refresh our memories on what is the part of the mat that creates its sonic benefits? Also, which part of the mat reduces electrical usage when placed on an electrical appliance and that also by placing it on a fuse box can improve the functioning of all electrical apparatus including television sets? I think I read it a while ago but it must have slipped from memory.
Are you claiming you are impervious to placebo? If so, you probably are the only such person alive.
Measurements go out the window once you know what product you are listening to (wether it be the brand, looks, price, or all three).
I can tell you the Dutch & Dutch 8C is a state of the art speaker (besting probably most <$20,000 even passive), and you may agree if you listened double-blind, but then if you didn’t like it when sighted, there’s no point.
I can also tell you that pretty much no person can tell the difference between 320Kbps MP3 and CD or higher, as studies have been done in treated rooms with expensive gear, and the confidence ratings were all 40%-60%. However, you may think you can.
I can’t tell you what speakers/DAC/amps you’ll like in your home, I can tell you with a high degree of certainty of what you’d like during a double-blind study though.
Uh, nobody is saying there’s no such thing as psychological bias, or whatever, but it’s silly to say those effects are always present. The same skeptics who claim it’s all psychological are the same ones who claim double blind tests will eliminate psychological bias and reveal the TRUTH. 😬
Jitter Geoff, thank you for establishing that the magnetism is not part of the functioning mechanism of the mat, we were all wondering about that. Just so we do not need to go back and reread 15 pages to find it, would you please refresh our memories on what is the part of the mat that creates its sonic benefits?
>>>>>The non magnetic part. I’m a little surprised you didn’t think of that.
Jitter Also, which part of the mat reduces electrical usage when placed on an electrical appliance and that also by placing it on a fuse box can improve the functioning of all electrical apparatus including television sets? I think I read it a while ago but it must have slipped from memory.
>>>>>I don’t know. I was kind of hoping you could tell me.
Bias is always present for everyone regarding evaluating speakers/DACs/etc., it’s just unavoidable. People claim benefits in going 24/192 over 16/44.1, and the only reason is because you think it’s better, the simple factual truth is 44.1kHz is enough unless your DACs filter is garbage, and 16Bit is enough as it’s almost always a lower noise floor than what you can hear. Same reason DSD has no benefits, and MQA is worse than CD (it’s half lossy by definition).
Sucking up RFI/EMI? Interesting. So you’re sayin it’s like a magnet for RFI/EMI? Wait’ll the military finds out about that! OMG! Don’t tell anybody RF/EMI is composed of photons, you know, which don’t have charge.
mzkmxcv357 posts01-15-2019 1:23pm I can also tell you that pretty much no person can tell the difference between 320Kbps MP3 and CD or higher, as studies have been done in treated rooms with expensive gear, and the confidence ratings were all 40%-60%. However, you may think you can. -----
Oh boy! Issue with seems to be not just with the power cords. It runs deeper than that.
Any links to the above statement?
Just curious --- do you listen to music on a clock radio speaker with Alexa?
Room: Critical Listening Laboratory of the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology
Speakers: B&W 802D ($12,000)
Amp: Classé CA-5200 ($8000, Class-A at lower wattage)
DAC: Grace m906 (>$6000)
The only instance where the confidence rating was above 60% for CD vs 320Kbps is one where it was harder to tell with 256Kbps, and that makes no sense.
Funny that 2009 study is the first that comes up when I googled it, with a broken link.
However, you were persistent enough to find it!
A big sample of a whole 13 people! With a mean age of 27!!?
Their second conclusion was fine, until the last part:
*****Trained listeners cannot discriminate between CD quality and mp3 compression (256-320kb/s),while expert listeners could*** Because they had so few individuals (13) they can't compare results from experts and non-experts. It might take at least 10 times as many individuals before they could make statistically valid observations about that. And they never defined what makes for a trained listener and what makes for an expert trained listener.
Simple statistics.
Besides, with the admittedly nice equipment you listed, are you saying that you cannot differentiate between mp3 and CD?
mzkmxcv: I have said everything relevant regarding my ability to distinguish between the cable manufacturers I mentioned above. I have no need to win an argument against alleged measurements as to why I do. But I can assure you it is not confirmation bias.It is now time for me to bow out of this thread.
@mzkmxcv: If you cannot differentiate MP3 and CD with $12,000 speakers, $9,000 Amp and over $6,000 DAC, then I seriously question your hearing. I am 100% serious on this. No joke.
Over the course of a year that you have joined Audiogon (btw with zero feedback meaning no purchases or sales), based on your remarks on amps, DACs, etc., it seems like you’re convinced that only measurements define the sound quality of a component and you won’t budge. That’s fine but don’t be so adamant in trying to convince others. Nothing wrong with the measurements (and Amirm and Archimego), but if said measurements were the only criteria to assess sound quality, we would all have Benchmark products in our racks. Everyone else would be out of business.
It seems like your only purpose in forums (and possibly in life), is to pollute every single thread questioning every single product, be it DAC (other the Topping of course), Amp, streamer, cable, etc. Asking people for double blind test in 10 (ten) seconds intervals! I wonder why.
And are you sure what you listed is your equipment? I quickly googled your username, and it appears in several forums in Massdrop discussing $15 IEMs, as well as KEF and ELAC speakers. And of course, Topping DACs!
I’ve bought stuff on Audiogon, but they were local so I paid them in cash when I met them.
None of those people in the study who were musicians/sound engineers could either. So, if they couldn’t on >$20,000 worth of gear in a near perfect room with lots of treatment, what makes you say you can? As I’ve said, hearing a difference doesn’t mean there is one, that’s all I’m trying to prove.
Measurements do tell you pretty much everything if you were listening in a double-blind study (average joe likes more bass than a sound engineer), but once you see/know the gear, measurements are far less meaningful.
Mesurements dictate the KEF Blade/2 sounds better than anything Wilson puts out, and I’ve recommended people who were eyeing Wilson to look at the KEF Blade/2 and others, and every single one agreed and chose not to get Wilson as they sounded the worse. This is not conclusive data at all, but it is worth stating.
Bias is always present for everyone regarding evaluating speakers/DACs/etc., it’s just unavoidable. People claim benefits in going 24/192 over 16/44.1, and the only reason is because you think it’s better, the simple factual truth is 44.1kHz is enough unless your DACs filter is garbage, and 16Bit is enough as it’s almost always a lower noise floor than what you can hear. Same reason DSD has no benefits, and MQA is worse than CD (it’s half lossy by definition).
>>>>Experienced listeners are not swayed by these silly psychological effects, whether they be placebo effect, reverse placebo effect, expectation bias, or just psyching yourself out. They may be great in the pharmacutical industry but have little use for advanced audiophiles. Maybe if you’re trying to convince a gullible newbie.... Speaking of DSD, I have some DSD CDs, they sound spectacular. Maybe I’m the victim of the placebo vortex. OMG! 😮
Any song offered in DSD likely has better mastering, so that’s a factor. I also believe that DXD (format used to make DSD) is just a high-rez PCM anyway, and then it’s converted to DSD on export.
I cannot believe people here are still communicating with this mzk " guy ". He is unwilling to try an aftermarket power cable, and listen for him / her self. Whatever is said to him, means absolutely nothing. He is doing what he does, as many before him. Let it go......let him / her go. Enjoy ! MrD.
A person with general anesthesia, a blind and a deaf person walk into a darkened bar with the music playing loudly and they only serve liquor in small shot glasses....
Any song offered in DSD likely has better mastering, so that’s a factor. I also believe that DXD (format used to make DSD) is just a high-rez PCM anyway, and then it’s converted to DSD on export.
Funny, all this time I thought this thread was about power cords and they sound the way they do rather than digital vs analog and magnets versus phooby dust. Maybe I need new glasses?
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.
