Borresen speakers had quite a buzz going some years ago when they started introducing things like $100,000 stand mounted speaker. And in the carefully curated scenario of audio shows, some people were saying they sounded fantastic.
So I was quite curious about Borresen speakers for a while and wanted to hear some.
I have to say I no longer feel that way. For me, they’ve lost any buzz.
And for me and I know many others part of that is that they seem to have had their pants pulled down every time one of their speakers have been measured.
I’m not necessarily in the “ measurements are the last word for loudspeakers” camp. People can enjoy loud because they did not measure neutral.
But the two Borresen speakers for which one can find measurements - x3 and X6 - have been very un impressive technically. And now there’s now been yet another review with measurements of a Borresen speaker - the 15k (British pounds!) C1 stand mounted speaker.
Measurements can be seen in this link:
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/worst-measuring-loudspeaker.11394/post-2371583
Yikes!
Just when I thought Borresen measurements couldn’t get any worse! Look at that 19 dBdown chunk out of the frequency response. And ragged upper high frequencies. And it looks like ringing in the bass again like the other models.
From my perspective:
It’s one thing if Borresen just claimed they made speakers they think sound great.
But like most such high-end speaker companies, especially pricing their gear in the stratosphere, they make all sorts of TECHNICAL claims for the superiority of their design approach, engineering, materials, etc. For lowering distortion and all the usual claims.
And if you’re gonna make such technical claims, then they should hold up to technical scrutiny. Which they don’t seem to.
In the measurements we have so far of their loudspeakers none of these technical claims of superiority seem to show up in the measurements. In fact, the evidence points towards the opposite: ringing resonances (in the bass), roller coaster frequency response with audible deviations from neutral. Both Erin and Soundstage not only showed measurements of gouges out of the frequency response, they reported they were quite audible as colorations, for instance recessed dulled portions in the frequency response. And there have been plenty of people in forms who have heard the Borresens and who reported being output by just those type of obvious colorations.
Even as a layman, the frequency response looks to me like somebody who doesn’t know what they are doing, and analysis on ASR (and I think by Erin) suggests poor crossover design as one culprit.
And this C1 speaker seems to continue the trend of their house sound.
This isn’t a plea for nobody to buy their speakers, of course. I’ve liked some speakers that don’t measure textbook perfect myself. Anybody should buy whatever they like. And I’ve defended on ASR the right for anyone to purchase and enjoy Borresens.
But from my perspective, I think I’ve seen enough to conclude the emperor has no clothes with this company. In terms of the lower line that have been measured, I personally couldn’t put up with the frequency responses I’ve seen . Even if I could’ve afforded one of their over 100 K loudspeakers, I’d be feeling kind of sheepish once the evidence from these measurements start showing that the design is not confidence inspiring in terms of their technical chops.
If I happen to be a show, were Borresen speakers were playing, I would give it a listen. But at this point, I wouldn’t seek them out.