pops
How do you like the P.A.D. / StraightWire combination in your system?
We have a few P.A.D. fans and owners here on the Panel.
Happy Listening!
pops - Octave sits at the top of level 2. I got it on Steve's recommendation that it contains the relevant technologies for "high performance" without more expensive options, which he says serve particular user preferences. My assessment of the Octave II is that they are pretty good. Certainly better than the Benchmark (Canare) or the OCOS (coax), but much less refined and precice than the Morrow. I do not have extensive experience nor the time and budget to make extensive comparisons. That said, I am not recommending the Octave II, but find it very interesting that you landed on the Maestro II in comparison with some pricier offerings. |
@jafant you are so right! I suspect you feel the same way about cables as I do! |
Sure Tom - Maestro has been discontinued for several years now. The Maestro variant was in level 4, their best, and in the same level as Virtuoso and Crescendo. I never tried the Maestro IC’s. I am not sure when Octave was introduced or exactly where it sits in the hierachy. @Theiliste - thank you, it has been an interesting journey. Jerry |
@pops Many thanks for your cable feedback very impressive! |
I have tried many speaker cables with both my 3.6 and CS6 and always seem to come back to Straightwire Maestro II. I do not believe you need a cost no object cable for Thiels unless you have similar equipment. I have tried several $$ speaker cables including: Alpha Core Goertz M2 and M3 - nice balance overal, M2 better - RC links a hassle Kimber 3035 - dull sounding, good bass however, silver/copper mix not ideal 8TC - solid, neutral, puts out what is put in, will always have a pair on hand StraightwireVirtuoso - disappointing since the Maestro is so good, grainy, Tara Labs The One - solid core not for me or Thiels IMO MIT Oracle V4 - aggressive top end, great bass Magnum M2 - good but moved up the line to V4 750 SG - a classic in my HT system. Warm full bodied holographic. slight bloat. Purist Audio Proteus - gave up too soon on these. Used them with another speaker Nirvana SL - nice, but lost in a cable co shootout with SW Maestro II AP oval 9...just to name a few. I have what is called a cable fettish! After all that SW Maestro II is in my system today. I have PAD Venustas IC's upstream. I believe you can get more out of experimentation with interconnects than speaker cables with Thiels. Of course this is my perspective in my system YMMV. Only way to know is to try IMHO.
|
Tom thanks very much for your input on cabling very interesting indeed. Do you have any idea if the 3.7s binding posts were made of 100% copper or brass when they were still in production ? A friend of mine who came over this weekend for a listen told me if they were made of brass it would be worth upgrading them for Mundorf 100% copper. |
To augment unsound’s list: Kimber was Thiel’s first OMG moment in the late 70s, and we remained fans and beta testers of each others’ products. Straightwire founded their business on Thiel’s discovery of ITT’s aerospace communications wire which was ground-breaking in the late 70s. Straightwire continued to provide our internal wire for all US-made products. Steve says that their Octave II, which I have, contains all their relevant technologies including their compressed core which pressure fuses slow-drawn strands into a single conductor. Higher-priced models climb the diminishing returns slope with mostly preferential sonic flavors. OCOS came to us via Dynaudio whose tweeter we used in the CS2 & 3 - 3.5. It is a coaxial cable which tolerates long runs very well. Today I use that cable (in double runs) in live venues, but it does not possess the finesse of the Straightwire or better wires. I haven’t found anyone to re-terminate the proprietary ends. I remember reading a 3.7 review (Stereophile or Absolute Sound) that complained about a harsh top end. Thiel intimated that Jim had used Goertz in its development - they switched - and the problem vanished. I’ve not heard Goertz, but its propagation specs are stellar. My own favorite to date is Morrow which incorporates a flat geometry, executed with individually insulated small gauge wires. Next week I’ll be directly comparing 1 meter interconnects from VoVox Sonorus, Morrow, and my own candidate for internal wiring. I’ll report my results here.
|
What do you 3.7 owners use in terms of speaker cabling and interconnects ? I have to start looking for other cables as i'm not satisfied with my Gryphon cabling, they are way too clear for the 3.7s and therefore i find the treble agressive. I will ask 2 dealers to lend my one set of Audience Front Row and Tellurium Q Statement both of them 100% copper. If you guys have any suggesttions please chime in. |
For sure! |
I'm referring to John Siau's explanation of the effects of cable length on low-frequency tightness. Shorter cables = tighter bass. Previously I had recommended long interconnects / short speaker cables. I have changed that opinion. Long interconnects introduce their own problems. Wire sucks in various ways. Keep it all short. |
jazzman7 - I perused the CODA stuff. Wow. I'd love to hear their most recent iterations. I queried John at Benchmark about more power, which he is not planning to do. He claims that THIS amp design does not increase distortion when bridged to mono - the only down-side being half the damping factor. But cutting output cables to half length gets that back. Thiel used and recommended Bryston all along. I found it somewhat less sonically sophisticated than some contenders. People say that their Cubed series takes their performance to the next level. I've grown to love the Benchmark stack, since my interest is in "just the facts" rather than my subjective experience. For my alternate reference, Bill Thalmann at Music Technology (thanks to JA) is souping up my Class´e DR6 and pair of DR9s. I realize there are more modern rigs that probably get closer to the truth, but I know and have been using this stuff since the 80s, so it serves me well. I bet his upgrades will carry the strengths of the DR design while adding some refinement via better caps and a few secret tricks. I'll report when that happens. Meanwhile, send some CODA my way so I can tell you what I think.
|
|
All - I am searching for a pair of Thiel CS3.5s for Bill Thalmann of Music Technology to use for listening to equalizer upgrades. His shop is located in Springfield, east-central Virginia. Prefer working condition, any physical condition. Borrow, rent, buy, or upgrade as trade. Any leads much appreciated.
Tom |
Since my CODA and Benchmark are pro gear and support the AES48 XLR standard I use the low cost Benchmark XLR between each preamp and amp. This is 15 foot XLR cables. |
Benchmark AND CODA together is a beautiful pairing, in any combination. I have an all Benchmark system and also a CODA system (preamp + amp). At one time I was mixing the gear and every combo of amps and preamps from CODA and Benchmark sounded so good together. I no longer mix the 2 together because of the need to incorporate my RAAL SR1a headphones. I mixed and matched the following with terrific results. - CODA 07x preamp - Benchmark LA4 preamp (sold my HPA4) - CODA #8 amp - Benchmark AHB2 mono amps Benchmark VS CODA is a simple one for me. The Benchmark is a bit clearer, detailed, and quieter. The CODA is a bit warmer, more powerful, and bit more relaxing with a bit less detail. Now I heard the CODA #16 amp recently (with CODA 07x preamp) and wow, maybe the best amp I have heard. |
jazzman7 Outstanding! As a fellow Integrated amp owner, I can hardly await for your impressions and thoughts on the new CODA CSiB V1 integrated amp.Being in this hobby for 35 years (and counting) I never thought that I could be Aurally satisfied with an integrated amp. These Products have grown and matured in the last 10 years, IMO. Happy Listening! |
Wish to thank all the folks on this forum who have assisted me in my long search for a new amp to pair with my CS 2.4s. Special shout outs to jafant, jimob, tomthiel and yyzsantabarbara. After much deliberation, made my choice for a new amp, and put in an order for a new Coda CSiB V1 integrated amp (150 watts into 8 ohms, 300 into 4, with first 18 watts in class A). This will be replacing my venerable Bryston 3BST and BP20 combo. Something of a guilty pleasure (but one in which I have my wife's blessing) and easily the most expensive purchase made in the many decades I've been involved in this wonderful hobby. Now comes the hard part ... waiting for delivery, which due to part shortages/supply chain issues most likely won't be before the middle of December and could be longer. |