My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab
Stay tuned next week... the Luxman 900u monos and preamp arrive next Thursday and I will use the esoteric k1.... I have a feeling I may be beyond shocked....
See if you can get your hands on an Audioquest Hurricane power to use with Esoteric.  You will be even more amazed!   

The breakin for the Esoteric is agonizingly long - as much as 500 per setting.  It’s worth the wait!  

I’m so looking forward to reading your review. 
I'm assuming that neither of you is running your Esoteric's with a clock?? The Used K1 had a G1 clock with it when it was traded in...hope you got the pair. Probably missing out on a lot going without it.
Riaa, I didn’t get the g1 clock. I did not want to spend that kind of money because honestly when I have to sell it, there’s no guarantee the buyer will want that clock and what am I going to do with it ? 
Hey Greginh,

Sonically what areas of Gryphon are better than the Luxman 590?
Whitecamaross will you try some Devialet monos? I heard 440 expert c with Wilson Sashas. 
No. Devialet is Russian roulette. That stuff is hard to sell according to My connections. They have offered me insane deals because they can’t move it. Unless I get it for a steal I have no intentions of trying that brand. I don’t ever try brands that I can’t sell once I’m done with them. Same with Magico speakers. Unless I steal them, I can’t ever try them. One good acquaintance of mine spent more than a year to sell his magicos and had to take a nasty hit to sell them. I need to stay with mainstream stuff. Yes some say magicos are better than Wilsons and there fine but Wilson has a big following and for every magico sold, 10 Wilsons sell. My selection of components also come from the advice I get from my connections. I wanted to try rogue audio as well and i was told to stay away. Of course I was told to try a 800d3 B&w because that’s easy to sell. 

Hi WC, why would you ever want to sell K1... At least for the next 3 or 4 years? the K1 CD/SACD player is the best single box solution on the market today.... If you ever sell it, the only way to go up the ladder without sliding down or sideways is to opt for the Esoteric multibox Grandioso. The G1 clock has existed since the days of the X-01.... It applies to K1, as well as to the multi-box Grandioso.... And likely to generations of Esoteric offerings in the future.


And if you are interested in optimizing K1.... After breaking in every filter and selecting your preferred one, is to use the G1 clock or one of its brothers.


G.


Whitecamaross I see your point it is hard to unload Devialet.  From what I heard on several speakers. They have good resolution and lively but a bit sunny if u know what I mean!
I don't like the new B&W Diamond series. Again great technically but lack warmth of older designs.  Your Sashas would kill it. Never demoed Magico! 
Guido: the k1 does not have filters like previous esoteric dacs.  They removed those filters this time around. 

Hi WC... My bad... You are correct. K1 appears to have slectable upsampling 2X, 4X, 8X, and DSD.... For filters there seems to be only an on/off toggle... No filters selection per se.


Worth testing various upsampling rates with filters turned on and off. For break-in purposes, I recommend to use the filter toggle to the on position, so to exercise the filter circuit.


G.


 

Update: luxman L509x is incredible. Musicality is outstanding and smoothness is out of this planet. I actually can’t decide what’s better. The gryphon is awesome as well but they present things differently. The luxman has the edge in terms of musicality and spaciousness. The gryphon has the slam and dynamics and punch. The gryphon presentation is as if you were at the club with the music sounding huge, deep and clean regardless of the volume. The luxman presents it as if you were at a live event with great emotion and silkiness.
Bottom line, neither is better than the other. They both do things different and it’s really about what kind of music you listen to. If you listen to instrumental music then the luxman is the way to go. If you listen to pop, hip hop, electronic dance music, rock, then gryphon diablo 300.
If you have speakers that need more silkiness and less brightness along with great mids then go with luxman 509x. If they need a sledge hammer attack then go with gryphon 300. In my current situation and with Wilson speakers, I prefer the diablo but if I had sonus fabers, B&w, klipsch horns, etc then I’d with luxman.
That said, good luck trying to find a 509x Luxman integrated.... they can’t build them fast enough and they won’t have any until end of August. I had to pay top dollar to bring mine here. That’s how bad I wanted it and I am glad I did. I’d have zero issues paying the asking price of $9500 dollars. Oh and one last thing, it runs very cool so those of you with heat concerns should have zero worries. The diablo runs very hot though. 
I can assure anyone that Luxman is not low end. That said, I can’t force anyone to believe me. Luxman has always been amazing and I have nothing bad to say about it. I am getting the Luxman 900u components next week for the 4th time... what’s that tell ya ? It’s still one of my favorites.  Will gryphon separates best it ? Maybe it but it isn’t worth the massive amount of cash. As good as gryphon is, it isn’t leaps and bounds better than luxman. Hell, I own both of their integrateds right now and I can say whatever I wish. If we talk about construction and looks, the luxman kills the gryphon. In my opinion, Rowland, esoteric and luxman are the top in terms of looks. They all make amazing looking gear. Gryphon makes amazing components but they are ugly. When you see my Luxman 509x next to the gryphon diablo 300, the diablo looks like a thing from the movie predator. Not pretty at all.

whitecamaross


talk about the sonic differences between the Mark Levinson No. 585 integrated, Luxman L509x integrated and Gryphon Diablo 300 integrated.

Happy Listening!

585: good mids and highs. Ok bottom end. 
Inferior to 2 below. 

luxman 509x: smooth, liquid, silky highs and awesome mids. Good bass. Never fatiguing regardless of volume level. 

diablo: big bass, detailed, amazing speaker control. It can get a tad bright when cranked up. Source needs to be carefully selected with this piece. 

Perhaps a case of reading interpretation but The Luxman sonic description by WC is the antithesis of so called low fi. My interpretation is that the Luxman 509x is fabulous sounding. If I had to rely "solely" on the written description of WC the Luxman 509x would be my choice. 
Charles
Whitecamaross  & others how would  the 509 x compared  to the 590 ax II ? Is Luxman better than Pass int-60?
I would agree with Charles - if based solely on what WC wrote about the three, my choice would be the Luxman.

Dave
I'd never call the Diablo ugly. It's minimalist, uncluttered and modern. I quite appreciate it's looks and sound. 
Regarding the Gryphon Diablo 300...which sources were used to come to your conclusion on "careful selection"? Thanks.

diablo: big bass, detailed, amazing speaker control. It can get a tad bright when cranked up. Source needs to be carefully selected with this piece.

Hey Chazzy,

The Diablo looks like a BLACK Xerox Copier/Fax Machine. If that thing was Off-White or Tan in color you would think it belongs on a secretary’s desk. Im sure it sounds wonderful thou. If they ever redesign its looks to something acceptable I will be sure to pick one up. The fact that MANY people think the looks is a problem (go on other Forums) suggests the company should rethink its design. When people discuss MAC, Luxman, D’agostino or any other high end brands (based on their appearance) you rarely hear that as a reason why somebody WONT buy their product. I dont care if 50-60% of the Audiophile community LOVES the Gryphon looks....You cant afford to have 40-50% not want it simply because its not something they want to be prominently displayed in their room/rack. They are losing plenty of potential sales, including mine, just based on that alone which is NOT good in this small niche audiophile market.

Great points about the looks.  I have known folks who have bought amps for their looks and others who have not bought amps because of looks.   Of course, amps that look beautiful to some might not be attractive to others.  That must be a tough thing for an amp company.

I myself don't care as much about looks - I am all about performance.  If I was looking for something like the Diablo had killer sound in my price-point, I wouldn't care about the looks.  In fact, Predator-like looks would do me just fine  :-)

Dave
Riaa: you stole the words out of my mouth. You nailed it. Gryphon isn’t making a fashion statement. The Luxman integrated exposes how ugly it is. Of course if all you have in your room is the gryphon then you don’t have another piece to compare it to 
Ok so it’s a dog fight here today... I left my Luxman on since I got it last Friday and now it’s an entire different animal. I pushed both hard just now and the Luxman just stays smooth, no shouting, no nothing. Now the gryphon is sounding darker and less detailed than the Luxman. Oh crap !
The Gryphon looks like it should have wheels and clean your carpet like a Roomba 
Hahahah. Yep, I hope gryphon keeps reading my thread. They need to make their products nicer looking. Why do the top Japanese brands make such gorgeous equipment and some domestic brands like rogue, constellation, ps audio etc look like some stuff you find at someone’s garage sale ? 
I would never buy an equipment without a physical volume knob. Nothing beats a physical vol knob.
Contrary to what all reviewers think, i personally dislike chunky, fancy, heavy remote. Becos remotes get thrown around, dropped, sit on and prone to failure. Best to keep it light, durable and simple. The gryphon remote is chunky and stand on legs.
i can understand that. I do believe that "old school" design is more reliable. Think about it, what if the screen on the gryphon went out? you can't turn it on or off or listen to it, but if the meters on the luxman went out you can still fire it up and listen. I can't lie, for the money it is very hard to beat luxman. My step father still has a luxman integrated he bought back in 1994 and it just finally went bad. That is 24 years of flawless performance. What else can you possibly ask for? Anytime i have owned luxman i always felt like i don't ever have to worry about it breaking. Just a sense of trust. 
3 hours into the listening session at low to less than moderate volume levels and the luxman keeps its distance from the diablo 300. The loudness button on the luxman is incredible. If you have neighbors, a wife that complains about you blasting music too loud at night (mine complains) or you just don’t want to bother others, then this button saves your life.
I will say the luxman may lose to the gryphon in massive attack when cranked up and also sometimes i may hear a little better separation on the gryphon. Soundstage size is really the same. If you have hungry speakers then the gryphon would be perfect. This does not mean the luxman won’t work, but if you get trigger happy and decide to blast it really loud then the luxman may not flex enough muscle for you at that volume level, but the gryphon won’t have an issue.

Lastly, those of you who are "purists" and against the loudness feature on the luxman, all you need to know is that i am trying to find enjoyment at any volume level and this button does the trick. Most other amps fall apart at low volume levels unless it's pure class a power. If being a "purist" means i need to hear my music sound like garbage because i can't use a certain feature then i don't want that component. All those brands that are proud to be "neutral" are the type of brands of stay away from. Here are a few brands i can tell you what their sound signature is like:

Luxman: smooth, silky, detailed, big soundstage, zero fatigue
Rowland: lively feeling to the music as if you were at the venue listening in person. 
Gryphon: Big, bold, powerful, amazing bass control (hercules sound signature)
Classe: Dark sounding, laid back and relaxed. 
Hegel: Amazing bottom end control, not bright, not laid back. Powerful sounding
Mark Levinson: Amazing mids, good highs, so so bass control

You may be wondering, then who the hell is dead neutral with no sound signature? well... Boulder would be that brand. Too cold, sterile, neutral, no sound signature of any kind which makes it a hell of a challenge to make it sound the way you want it. 
Nice findings  -whitecamaross
make sure that you have a few marathon listening sessions, 8, 10, 12 hours of listening, to ensure that one product does induce fatigue over the others (at this performance/price level).  This practice is an excellent tool for evaluating any product.Happy Listening!
The description of the Boulder isn’t " neutral " it has a sonic signature of cold/cool, analytical, sterile/clinical. If you were in a room and someone was singing , playing the piano, guitar, saxophone etc. If this was done without use of electronics or amplification then you have pure natural or neutral sound (nothing but you and performer in the shared space).

The result would anything but cold or sterile (quite the opposite, vibrant, rich and very emotionally engaging interaction with the musicians) as the Boulder is described above by whitecamaross . Nope, the Boulder has a signature and it isn’t "neutral".
Charles
I concur with Charles.
 It's funny that a lot of people describe neutral like that and when it is full, natural, organic, as being colored and warm. Just because it has those traits doesn't mean it still can't be open, detailed, fast, dynamic, etc.
It’s a dog fight here between integrateds. I left both on all night long and I’m listening now.... things have morphed now that both were left on for over 24 hours. 
Luxman ( founded in 1925) was making integrated when Gryphon wasn't even born. Luxman has expertise every audio company would only dream off. 
Good post techno dude. Both integrateds are stellar and incredible in so many different ways. Tomorrow I will be receiving the Luxman 900u amps and the preamp. First time ill be listening to Luxman 900u in mono. On Thursday I’m picking up the new wireworld gold series 8 speaker cables to try. 
Whitecamaross I urge  you to try Nordost  Leif line and up! I had wireworld 7 eclipse and my new Hemindall is better!
Btw I am seriously looking into a 590axii! After high praise from  Whitecamaross!

whitecamaross, huge thank you for sharing your findings in comparing the different gear. Its especially valuable that instead of saying something like its miles better; its in another league you actually provide with very specific and clear differences and details. Very helpful stuff.

When you have a chance can you give your opinion on the differences between Luxman c900u+M900u (stereo mode)  combo and 509x integrated.

Thanks!

I bought my Diablo about 3 months ago, and to sound it’s best it needs a long burn in period, about 200 hours. How does it sound? Well as WC said the sound is Hercules style, and it was ment to be so by Mr. Flemming, the mind and owner of Gryphon. The sound has to be like life music, it has to be dynamic as music really is! The bass is powerful and very controlled, the mids are natural, not fake and the hights are very extended and smooth. Zero listening fatigue, the soundstage is wide and deep if present in the recording, otherwise not. It gets very hot , and to me that’s not a problem. You have to consider that’s the first 10% of its power is in class A.
To me it’s an amazing amp, it doesn’t sound like hifi, but as real music!
Cheers

Kw6: it’s not the integrated. It’s the 509x....
denon: thanks. As far as the finale of this show, they are already here packed in my garage. They landed here today. Luxman 900u monos and preamp. 4th owning this stuff but it’s the first time doing it mono.
I don’t expect the 9500 integrated to
hang with 45k worth of Luxman gear.
I expect the combo to attempt to take down the Rowland 925s if anything.

So yes the gryphon 300 and Luxman 900u are excellent. Both present different walls of sound. It’s almost like saying Lamborghini vs Ferrari. It’s about taste and flavor at that point. Bottom line guys, neither blows away the other. If your budget is 9500 then get the Luxman. Don’t feel bad for not getting the gryphon. You aren’t missing anything. The only time I can recommend the gryphon is if you have crazy hard to drive speakers. Something like rockports. For the money, the Luxman is better no question. But overall, they are both excellent.
Don’t get all worked up as far as what’s better. The only thing is the gryphon is certainly harder to get but so is the Luxman 509x. Both are just outstanding for little money.
PLEASE DONT CONFUSE THE LUXMAN 590 with 509!!!!!! 
now the esoteric k1 is the best component I own... incredible