My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab

Showing 34 responses by denon1

Whitecamaross, thank you for a great forum thread, I cant resist and ask  how do you rate the Sonus Faber Amati Futura? How do they compare with others you have/had, specifically Monitor Audio platinum 300mk2?

Whitecamaross,

Great info. Please, when you done comparing Plnius with Pass on Sonus Faber, send detailed update.

I had plinius SB301 several years ago and to me it had great bass and midrange but was not that dead quiet as the pass 250.8.

Since your had both pass 250.8 and 350.8, what is the biggest difference between them?


Also what is the most obvious difference between SF Futura and Cremonese?

Thank you for all your very valuable reports.

Witecamaross,
thanks much for a feedback on pass. Your comments are easy to understand and right to the point. No dealer has been explaining 
the difference between 250.8 and 350.8 that simple and well.
The new Sonus Faber tradition line is using the same tweeter and midrange found in Cremonesse. So may be it is true what some people are  saying that the new Tradition line is faster, more open and resolving.
Please keep reporting.


I had all pliniuses except SA-Ref. Even so being very good, the SB 301 mk1 I had, drove SF Anniversario. Yes it had great bass, yes it had terrific midrange, but highs were grainy and most important to me - lack of instrument separation in compare with my Pass int-250.8 integrated. But looks like Mk2 version of Sb-301 is much better if it can beat Pass 350.8. I know Vince, great guy, not sure if he still sells pliniuses, since he so involved  with msb. In US , I can strongly recommend  Eric Love from audio surroundings. He sell plinius brand. 
I cant wait until Witecamaross will get a chance to listen to Plunus SA-REF. Vince told me that its in league of its own.  
Whitecamaross, I don’t have any experience with black system, but please if you have a chance get your hands on Plinius SA-REF. I am very curious what are you going to hear with it and ref 6 pre-amp and SF speakers.
Whitecamaross, I think you need to change cables. The Wireworld silver 7 cables are ok cables but with your speakers and amps they are now below the level of your system. In my set-up they have  sounded leaner that purist, shunyata or tara labs

Riaa, based on your previous post, I see that you got the Accuphase E-800 integrated.  I followed your advise from some older forums and bought Luxman 590axII that is much better than 509x to my ears. Thank you for that. But this E-800 has a really great specs, so I was wondering how good it is?

Thank you.

Whitecamaross, how do you find the Wilson audio Sasha 2 in compare with Revel,  Monitor audio , Sonus Faber  and others?

Thank you for what you are doing. Very useful information.

whitecamaross,

please let s know how luxman 509x stuck up against diablo 300 and other integrated that you tested before. Also will be interesting how combo of luxman d-08u and 509x compares against esoteric k1/diablo 300

Thank you.

Greginns,
 Did you actually compare side by side luxman 509x and 590axii? Instead of just staiting that 590 is better than 509x (and not only on this thread and forum) may be you care to share what exactly is better? What speakers you compared them on and other parts of your system?
thank you.

whitecamaross, huge thank you for sharing your findings in comparing the different gear. Its especially valuable that instead of saying something like its miles better; its in another league you actually provide with very specific and clear differences and details. Very helpful stuff.

When you have a chance can you give your opinion on the differences between Luxman c900u+M900u (stereo mode)  combo and 509x integrated.

Thanks!

Whitecamaross, last week I got the Luxman 509x and agree that its a great integrated, especially considering its price. What do you running it with: Esoteric k1 or Luxman d-08u?. Currently I am running it with luxman d-05u and feel that in order to fully shine 509x needs a better, more resolving/dynamic source. If possible can you describe what you hear different running 509x with esoteric frond end versus luxman cdp?

Thanks!


I am currently running luxman 509x with Canton reference 3k speakers. I like the sound better than when I had gryphon diablo 300 that I sold due to financial reasons. Gryphon is more powerful for sure with more micro details, but luxman has this smoothness that allows me to listen for hours with out any fatigue and gryphon when pushed loud had some brightness. Please don't tell me I have to change cables and stuff ( I had all top of the line sigma shunyata cables and denali conditioner and still sound had some brightness when gryphone when it has been driven hard. And this was the same with canton speakers and sonus faber serafino speakers. Luxman does not exhibit it  and have the refined sound with great bass and mids. Highs are natural and sweet. Interesting I had to sell the all  shunyata sigma cables and denali due to financial reason and instead bought triod wire labs for power cables and wireworld silver eclipce series 8 speaker cables and niagra 1000 power cond. To my surprise the cables sound great and I don't miss anything without shunyata. Very shocking to me.

And with all due respect to dguartarnut, I disagree with your comments that Luxman 509x sound reminds 70s receivers. Yes gryphon diabloe 300 is little more 3d, more dynamic and detailed, but it does not have the smoothness of 509x.  After having many dynamic and powerfull integrated in my house (pass int-250, gamut, plinius hiato, ML 585,  gryphon diblo 300, I now understand that for me most important part is to avoid that digital grinding/noise, that contribute to brightness and fatigue. So from now on Luxman is my preference for near future.

WC, please continue with your great thread and ignore purists and trolls. The way you describe sound differences between the gear is down to earth clear and understandable for people like me. Very valuable information. Thank you.

WC, if you can, get your hands on Canton reference 3k. I recently got one and in my room/system they are better than the Sonus Faber Serafinos.  Great speakers , especially considering their price.

WC, like you did with the amplifiers , can you rank the speakers you had in your house so far. Thanks!
yyz, I throw my humble one, don’t buy anything that expensive without demoing it with the speakers you have or will buy. When I sold my Gryphon Diablo 300 to finance emergency situation, I did a lot of research and based on that research I bought luxman 509x. After 200 hours of brake in, in spite of the all proper variables like resolution, imaging, lack of digital glare, good bass, I still had the feeling that something amiss, so when opportunity came,I jumped and got a Pass int-250 and once I had it and compared with luxman, I realized that pass (gryphon also) have that sound that you feel that you are listening to the music, with luxman in my system I felt that I’m listening the hifi device. When somebody on this forum made a brief comment that listening to the luxman 509x reminded him sound of the receiver from 70s, I was outraged, but now I kind of agree with that. Long story short, no matter what anybody saying, no matter how reputable these people are, always try to demo with the components you have or about to get before you commit.
WC, what is your opinion on the bass of the Momentum? In the August issue of the Positive feedback the R.Youman compares pass labs INT-250 against momentum integrated and according to him the bass of the INT-250 is better. Overall he is stating that Momentum is more 3d with better air and space, but for the almost 1/4 price of the momentum the pass labs INT-250 is pretty good.
WC, are you thinking about selling your Esoteric K1? is anything you dont like about it?
+1 for Eric Love (great guy) and Plinius. I had a lot of Plinius modes ( all the way up to SB301) with the exception of their reference amplifier. Great amps but noisy power supply. They released new reference amplifier now with totally new power transformer. Should be great amplifier. The problem with Plinius brand that its poorly marketed and represented here in US.

WC, please let us know details of your compare of esoteric k1 vs.  luxman d-08u. Should be very interesting.

Thank you.

WC, I agree with grey9, the wireworld cables may not be the best cables to use on this level. Try purist, Kubala, shunysta, or stealth latest v16 generation. With wireworld you may not hear full potential of your system. 

Lets be objective here before we go too negative and this great forum turns to anther trolling disaster. I don’t think that latest .8 series of the pass can be characterized as euphonic. I heard 350.8, 250.8 and last thing I call them is to be euphonic. Yes the pass amps may be less refined than luxman 900u, but I personally in my home had luxman 509x, Gryphon Diablo 300 and pass int-250 and to my ears the pass int-250 is more musical, natural sounding than Luxman 509x, On higher volumes with my speakers (SF Amati tradition and Canton ref 3k) the luxman sounded strained and too hi fi with lack of decay on all frequencies. Pass sounded relaxed with great bass, mids and highs and much better soundstage and decay than luxman 509x. I can summarize it now that to me luxman 509x sounded like refined hifi device and pass sounded like music. The gryphon diablo 300 overall is better than pass int-250 (better dynamic swings and micro details) . Overall the Gryphon Diablo 300 was closer to life music than pass int-250. Even so some people may prefer liquidity of the pass (midrange) to gryphon.

I re-read this thread and noticed that WC after he did not get a deal on pass XA-200.8 started to be very negative to pass labs that he praised before.

I have no doubts what WC hears with his system using oppo 205 vs lampizator. yes some differences  can be attributed to ICs and speaker cables, but overall (if I understood WC correctly) experience that make WC to say that he did not hear big difference between oppo 205 and lampizator pacific that 15-20 more expensive is alarming.  WC when you had Esoteric grandioso K1 and got lampizator, did you compare two of them, did you hear any difference that made you keep lampizator?  It cannot be that oppo 205 dac sound is in the same ball park as lampizator pacific.


Several things can attribute to a bad sound on the WC video related to Accupahse E-800. There may be no synergy between components;
I was told that E-800 need at least 200-300 hours of burning before sounding its best.
Anyway next week I’m going to get E-800 delivered and I will compare it with my luxman 590 axii, which (I totally agree with WC) is outstanding integrated and bettered pass int-250 in my system.
My current speakers are Sonus Faber Amator iii, but I probably replace them with coming out in September Marten Parker Trio.
WC, regardless of price, do you think Accuphase E-800 is not as good as Luxman 590AXII? 
Thanks.
WC, thank you for the info on a speaker cables. This is what cannot be found on most prof. review sides. Much appreciated.
WC, did you have a chance to compare Odin speaker cables with Wireworld platinum 7 or 8? If you did, can you report your findings?
Thanks.
Fro those who bothered with Viber - just ignore his posts. By criticizing Viber constantly - you guys also flooding this forum and  make it worse. Obviously Viber is in his own world, ,let it be...
WC, please don't forget to share your experience/opinion comparing 
vivaldi with esoteric k1.
Thanks.
Inna, you said "I will take used Accuphase class A integrated over new Luxman every day" Can you please elaborate on this? Did you hear latest Luxman 590axII?. Currently I have accuphase e-800 and luxman 590axII. And I would say that it depends on the speakers. On my Sonus Faber I prefer Luxman. More involving with bigger sounstage, better dynamics and the same level of details. Accuphase has great synergy with B&W speakers. Overall (to me) it possess great tonality but more suitable for more near field, intimate listening. It generates very delicate, refined sound, but its less involving than Luxman. The Accuphase class A separates like A-75 and A-250 monos and their top models pre-amps are the different ball game so.
kren0006, with luxman 590axii - magico A3  and even A5, latest sonus faber nova series (btw SF did a very good job on them -easy to drive, fast, detailed, well balanced), proac, harbeth,  focal kanta 2/3,   and even sopra 2.
To me luxman 590axii class A is better than pass int-250. And I had pass int-250 twice in my system. Pass may be a little more dynamic, but luxman is more organic with great bass and details. It does not have that harshness/hardness that many class AB (with exception of megabuck amplifiers) have. A while ago I made a comment that out of many integrated I had in my house (accuphase e-800, e-470, plinius hiato, gamut 150 le, pass int-60 and plass int-250, luxman 509x, gryphon diablo 300 and some others) I rated accuphase e-800 as number one followed by luxman 590axii and Gryphon. After many hours of listening in my system to me now the luxman 590axii takes number one spot (again for me) on that list followed by Gryphon 300 and pass int-250. Of course speaker matching/synergy is a must.