Blocking the propaganda


I have a friend who lives in the boondocks who is without question the foremost expert in this Country on a certain vintage turntable. I will leave the particulars out so as to avoid making him the focus of this discussion or letting someone else figure out who I am talking about. He said something to me recently that I always knew on a certain level but have not seen "transparently" until his comment. His statement is this; "audio magazines including Stereophile are useful for birdcages and if you run out of toilet paper and nothing else". This was in the context of discussing Mike Fremer's preference for 9" arms. I have concluded that he is absolutely correct, but only for those who have the guts to really dive into audio with open eyes and willing to expend the effort to focus all of their attention and for lack of a better word, devotion, to figuring out the truth for themselves. This person I speak of has unquestionably done that. He has engineered his own products that make his turntable of choice as good as it can get. He thinks outside the box. Convention or "accepted thought" mean nothing to him. The analogy that comes to mind is wine. I know of many who will not buy a wine unless some critic has given it a 90 or above. When someone points out how silly it is to rely on published numbers from someone they don't know, they claim that they rely on experts and numerical ratings because they lack the patience, time and resources to taste wine options for themselves. What it boils down to is intellectual laziness. I intend to filter out 100% of what I read in magazines and even audio boards as absolutely unreliable. I have no doubt that I will fall short, but it is a lofty goal nonetheless. We all ought to forge our own trail(s) with sweat and effort and open minds and avoid laziness. Apologies to those who don't appreciate sermons. 
128x128fsonicsmith
@onhwy61 
the guts to really dive into audio with open eyes and willing to expend the effort to focus all of their attention and for lack of a better word, devotion...
And I thought listening to music was supposed to be enjoyable
.

hey on hwy 61. Thank your for your sense of humor. Gave me a good laugh

What about the OP comment of "filterering out 100% of what I read"? Whats the point of reading at all. 
High end audio is an interactive sport. There’s no time for sitting around and flapping one’s gums. He not busy being born is busy dying.

Made the scene
Week to week
Day to day
Hour to hour
The gate is straight
Deep and wide
Break on through to the other side
Break on through to the other side
Break on through
Break on through
Break on through
Post removed 
@glupson- This place is relatively tame in my experience. I did a lot of legal work in the era when the Internet was first exploding, and I dealt with a variety of characters, from hard core hackers to people involved in various crimes that would fit into the ’cyber crime’ category today.
Don’t take any of it personally. Just find your niche here-- there’s plenty of give and take where you can get good information or exchange ideas. Audiogon remains a good forum despite it’s somewhat kludgey format and the moderators seem to be ok too- not too heavy handed unless really necessary.
Most of Geoff’s pokes and prods aren’t particularly nasty-- I wouldn’t read too much into it.
I think the philosophical threads are an open invitation to controversy but really, I don’t see this thread as particularly harsh or venal. That may not be worth anything to you- just trying to help put this into perspective.

@geoffkait- that line was from George Carlin, no?

Another bloviating manure spreader joins the fray. But why? He doesn’t ever actually say anything, other than lob dud grenades at your friend and humble narrator. Oh, well, what’s another stalker or two? If I was baiting you I did an excellent job. 🐟

My favorite oxymoron? Military intelligence.
+1 last comments by glupson, tomcy6. I don’t think comments made by geoff are propaganda or have to do with propaganda. They always strike me as childish fits, like those of a 5 yr old boy, meant to draw attention to HIM. There are many people here at AG who don’t really care about the topic, they just want others to notice them, talk about them.
I was under the assumption this thread is supposed to be about blocking propaganda, not spreading it. Like a manure spreader. 
tomcy6, steakster, wharf,


Thanks for your thoughts guys. We are pretty much on the same page and I mostly ignore geoffkait, too.


However interesting his character may be and limp sense of humor he has, he does cross the line often.

In another thread, he called for a person’s death {"drop dead"), made fun of another member’s cancer, ridiculed me through my parents, etc. And all of that on an audio-hobby chat forum. He gets by with that because he is "quirky". I do not respond to his direct insults to me, but above-mentioned examples are what should not be allowed in these threads.

His posts about audio-topics became irrelevant long ago (in two posts, they frequently support opposite views), although there may be a word or two that is worth thinking about from time to time.

I have always thought of these forums as a bar you can come to and chat, argue a bit, leave as you wish, and forget about it as soon as you step out. Having said that, there are behaviors that would not get you far in the bar. If you are lucky, they would get you thrown out of it.
Glupson,

geoffkait thinks that his posts are brilliant and funny. He doesn’t care that most people don’t share that opinion. He loves to get into back and forths that provide no useful information or humor. Unless you enjoy going back and forth with him, just ignore him. He will never stop insulting anyone who engages with him, so it’s up to you to decide how much of that stuff you want to read.
steakster
@glupson geoffkait is actually Cliff Clavens from Cheers. With 10,000+ posts, this is his barstool. Curiously, he hasn’t learned

how or why to do this.

Perhaps, IT is beyond his area of expertise.

>>>>>Oh, great! Another old hippy. Welcome aboard, Zippy.
I haven't subscribed to any audio magazine publications for a good number of years, but I do  believe that publications like Stereophile, Audio Review and others, helped gel my interest in audio - going back to the early 80s. Back then, aside from a good and helpful audio dealer (some 90 miles from where I lived) there was not allot of sources, other than the audio mags, to find the latest in audio equipment, music reviews, dedicated articles regarding the love of audio etc. There was no audio forums, no information on a particular manufactures latest piece of audio gear - at the click of a mouse and little in review of good music.
While I read their reviews with some skepticism, I found the audio mags. (as I do today's audio forums) to be a helpful, interesting and sometimes controversial source of opinion and information.
While I understand the OPs point of view, there are a good many who do not live in, or near, an area that makes auditioning a large variety of audio components, feasible. Any info. that helps to narrow the search is helpful.
Just because I have an interest in audio, firearms, photography etc. and have over and enough of my own opinions, doesn't mean that I can't or shouldn't, value and appreciate the opinions or experiences of others...Jim 
Post removed 
Checkout the latest TAS. Four full-page ads for wire: Morrow, Kharma, WireWorld, Kimber and Ansuz. Pricey ads, I bet! Propaganda, for sure! Audio jewelry for the well-heeled! Get out that Platinum card!
Yes, my sense of humor is a bit out there, I suppose, if someone doesn’t, you know, have a sense of humor.
@glupson- don't freak on @geoffkait - he's an interesting, quirky character here, and I doubt he meant anything personal by what he said. You were just the target of convenience for his humor, which is actually pretty funny sometimes if you spend long enough in these corridors. I think most people try to get or contribute what they can and just disregard the rest. I'm not making excuses for geoff, just suggesting that his sense of humor is a bit out there, and you shouldn't get upset by whatever is said here. The nice thing about the Internet is that you can turn it off. :)
Nite. 
glupson, I don’t know what’s wrong with you but I didn’t do any of those things you accuse me of. Maybe it’s time for you to take a time out.

geoffkait,

I am not sensitive today. There are things whoever raised you, and you over time, should have taught you. Do not make fun of anyone’s cancer and do not mention people’s parents (in words or implied) in any way that could be taken as an insult to those parents. While you are at that, if you ever get tempted, do not mention people’s children either. Even if it is a mostly anonymous Internet forum, do not spill the garbage that you would not tell a person to their face.
Sometimes people define themselves by what the vehemently reject.

Part of the package of tribalism. One of the oldest faults in humanity.

The source point for most of humanity's woes.
Speaking of buttholes, welcome aboard, Georgie boy! Where ya been hidin’?
psyop
geoffkait never really has anything to say of real value. Mostly he posts here to entertain himself. I put him into the category of “butthole”.
https://cdn4.vectorstock.com/i/1000x1000/18/53/clapping-cheerful-emoticon-vector-3841853.jpg
glupson
geoffkait,

"Was glupson raised by wolves?"


No, I was not. I was raised by my parents. This is the second time you are asking about my parents. Is there any particular reason your interest in them is unexpectedly high?

>>>>I didn’t mention your parents. I suggested you were raised by wolves. They wouldn’t be your parents. Are you a wolf? 🐺 Sensitive today, aren’t we? 
There are certain reviewers in the camera world that garner a following mostly due to charisma and attempts at being iconoclastic. Even when they are shown to be inconsistent and even dead wrong their “followers” will admit no flaw. 

As as far as cars, performance and race tracks the single most effective upgrade on any car of any type is tires. The very best of them won’t last a weekend. They’re not called ‘black crack’ for no reason. 

Anyway, I have found the internet to be a truly excellent tool in all of these sorts of things. The challenge of sorting out the signal from the noise can be daunting. Finding the right forum with the right people is huge. But they’re out there. I’ve only had my high end audio equipment for a week and have never had any desire or pretense to be an audiophile before I got it. Whether or not this forum is one of those jewels or not I can’t tell yet. But so far I’ve gotten excellent advice despite my level of ignorance in the matter and I’ve learned tons in this short week thanks to a number of kind and patient folks here 

I can tell that there are a few here that do not suffer fools and who may lack a little tact. But that’s not always a bad thing in the right measure. 
geoffkait never really has anything to say of real value. Mostly he posts here to entertain himself. I put him into the category of “butthole”.
geoffkait,

"Was glupson raised by wolves?"


No, I was not. I was raised by my parents. This is the second time you are asking about my parents. Is there any particular reason your interest in them is unexpectedly high?
n80, whart,

Huh, I accidentally lucked out by never going on the track. It would have been humiliating had it not been for self-conscious acceptance of my very low limits. At least I am fine at the stoplight. Same with audio-equipment, buying better than a boombox while accepting that someone else will set up something better, and me not feeling the urge to convince the whole world my set-up beats theirs is sort of a blessing. Still, intermittently reading magazines and forums brings some new light to approaches I may never even consider undertaking. I keep my cars and audio equipment stock while learning what else may be done with them. As far as Michael Fremer's reviews go, they are a little too excited and frequently appear predictable for me to continue reading more than two, or at most three, paragraphs. They may be valuable reading for someone else and are probably worthwhile altogether, but they do ooze polarization. No wonder that readership opinions appear to be extreme opposites of the spectrum. I think his articles are a perfect example of "There is someone who will appreciate it so let it be. If you do not like it, skip it and do not get mad."
@n80- I agree that there is as much snark in the car world on the Internet, but because most of the fora are marque specific, it filters out a lot of people who would go on Rennlist (or whatever) and trash Porsches in favor of something else.
Most of the performance of cars is down to the driver in my estimation. (Obviously, we aren’t talking about top speed runs, but those are of little interest to me).
I know there is a huge aftermarket for tweaks and performance improvements, but as you’ve said, they’re measurable for the most part- increased HP, torque, whatever. (I participated in one of those some years ago by agreeing to pay for a fancy exhaust system if it won the test, with the understanding that the manufacturer would refund me if not; it didn’t and I got my money back without a problem).
The best car analogy I can draw is that despite performance figures, "better technology" and overall better performance, safety and convenience,  there is something so immediate about driving a light, old, well balanced car- road feel and not being cosseted in an environment of comfort that removes you from the driving experience.
New bling, whether hi-fi or cars, doesn’t really get my attention or interest. I quit reading the car mags quite a while ago too, and am well out of it when it comes to that world now. (I did get to have one of my cars reviewed by R&T as the feature car some years ago, and that was a blast, but it really didn’t change the driving experience or the value of the car at the end of the day. It was just a fun opportunity that I got to take advantage of, during the years when I would be humiliated on the track by much better drivers).
Glupson, it gets just as crazy if not more so in the automotive world. There are so many more intangibles than the simple physics would suggest. The fancier and pricier the cars the worse it gets. Any given machine that performs too well and too effortlessly is presumed to have lost some sort of spiritual essence..... for example. 

The car car world is fortunate to have race tracks though. That is where all the hype goes away. That is where a moderately experienced driver like me blows the doors off a 911 Turbo driven by a new or cautious driver in my pedestrian Nissan 350z while a gifted driver in a Miata on slicks passes us both and we are all made to look motionless by a Ferrari Challenge 458 that arrived in fancy 18 wheeler. The stopwatch does not lie. 

And trust me, the amateur photography world is nearly as bad as the audiophile world. And you can have a $30,000 Phase One body with a $10,000 lens and take bad pictures all day. There also seems to be quite a niche in photography for people who love the gear...and make no mistake, some of it is exquisite to behold...who rarely take pictures. They will tell you your $2000 Nikon is junk and they have the engineering knowledge to tell you why. And yet some of them do not have the talent to produce an actual work of art. Rather, they tend to produce what Ansel Adams called a sharp photo of a fuzzy concept. 

To to bring this around to the OP’s point, the manufacturers and the retailers prey on these aspects of all of these hobbies. And why wouldn’t they? For them there is nothing worse than someone deciding that what they already have is all they really want and need. 
2psyop
One cannot really argue with the fascinating hobby of audio or how many people will spend ridiculous amounts of money on fancy boxes of wires that make musical noise. We all like what we like. To me, what is more curious and telling is what it reveals in people. Some who are arrogant, some who are instigators, others who are intelligent and reasonable and many who are helpful. Many are just stubborn salesman who want to push a brand they like. The hobby is fun, the people in it do not often know what they reveal about themselves.

Gosh, that’s fascinating.
Michael reviewed an early turntable of mine. I had never been in the industry before and it was my first product so I was surprised that he was interested.  During the process he couldn't have been more professional.  

Bruce
Anvil Turntables
One cannot really argue with the fascinating hobby of audio or how many people will spend ridiculous amounts of money on fancy boxes of wires that make musical noise. We all like what we like. To me, what is more curious and telling is what it reveals in people. Some who are arrogant, some who are instigators, others who are intelligent and reasonable and many who are helpful. Many are just stubborn salesman who want to push a brand they like. The hobby is fun, the people in it do not often know what they reveal about themselves.
Can anyone answer this question? Why does glupson come across so frequently as an intruder, an interloper, a leering 12 year old, nervously paging through his first Playboy? Or am I being too harsh? Is this another case of me shooting fish in a barrel? Was glupson raised by wolves? All the lonely trolls, where do they all come from? 😳
n80,

I, kind of, hoped it was a fiction, but in these waters similar things get fiercely defended so I accepted it as a possibility that someone would be considering. Most of the hobbies are ridiculous to outsiders and some aspects are really hard to swallow even for those in the hobby. Just take a peek at cables threads, fuses, and what not.

Having said that, automobile-associated hobby is less prone to these debates as acceleration, speed, forces, etc., are widely-accepted parameters and are relatively easy to measure so people have less ground to argue on. Not that things do not get debated and, at some point, it may get silly, too. Now, acceleration when driven hard with and without air conditioning...does it matter as much as blue vs. green fuse?
Glupson, my explanation about Bentleys was pure fiction. A little satire aimed at the audiophile stereotype. Not really my place to do so since I am a beginner at this and have other hobbies that likely sound equally ridiculous to those outside the hobby. 
Fremer is a total mouthbreathing uppity snob, who debunked his entire "Hi end" career by comparing the love of his life (that piece of overpriced glitter) Caliburn tt against the el cheapo Technics 1200. It was soo refreshing to observe all that hot air escape his lungs and deflate the chest cavity...LOL!!!!!!
n80,

Thanks for explanation about Bentleys and gas stations. It is an interesting theory, and probably a Bentley practice. I wonder how other manufacturers go around it, if it is really a problem.

Now, the actual post about Bentley owners filling their own tanks being posers is still a little unclear. It seems that the problem would be with the gas station and not the person who is holding a hose.
geoffkait,

I am not kidding at all. I am really curious why an owner filling a tank would be a poser. I did notice some post earlier mentioning a Bentley car, but post about filling a tank confused me.
This thread has nothing to do with listening to music.  Instead, it is an opportunity to use language to establish credibility.  As satisfying as it may be to see your expression published on a forum, in the end a writer has to choose between enlightenment or self-aggrandizement.

I would encourage writers in an informational forum (like this one) to steer clear of using platitudes and fallacious arguments to support their positions.  The purpose here is to support fellow audio enthusiasts, not to assuage some deep-seated feelings of insecurity.
So, I make this comment again and again for all who wish to read it:

As a former dealer, I can tell you that we picked products based on their sound and quality as well as manufacturer support in the way of handling customer complaints, fixing broken items, and providing advertising co-op funds.  If you were a dealer, you would understand all this--being funny with that statement, of course.

Any dealer who will not let you listen to a component IN YOUR LISTENING ROOM is not worth dealing with, period.  Your room, as we all know, is the most important part of the listening experience.

As for the OP, no big deal.  Take everything you want home and see if it meets YOUR needs.  If not, take it back.  A customer, especially a high-dollar customer, is the most important part of the triangle.  We all read the "trades" because we are interested in them.  People who believe everything they read get what is coming to them.  Most here are not that gullible, so the OP just reinforced that thought, I think.  

Take it home, hook it up, listen, and then buy or don't buy.  Pretty simple, and no "advice" needed or your vote against "advice" needed.  The end.

(PS If the OP is using the trades to line his birdcage, he has more $$ than I do to waste.  Why not cancel your subscription and buy a newspaper when you need bird cage liners?)
As a reminder...I find out about many great recordings I would have missed because of Stereophile reviews. Music...remember that part of this passion? Try it out, go to a few live concerts per week and relax folks...
Most Bentleys have very delicate fuel injectors and EFI processors that control them. Standard cheap filling station pump hoses tend to spend ages out in the elements and particularly in warm climates the heat that the hoses are exposed to can cause the release of certain hydrocarbons that can be misinterpreted by the sensors in the EFI system as indicating a lower oxygen content in the fuel than is actually there. This causes the EFI system to retard valve timing slightly. This does not harm the engine or the EFI but can result in a slight decrease in performance. Some say it is imperceptible but serious Bentley owners say they can feel it in the seat of their pants under hard acceleration.
glupson
"Any Bentley owner filling own tank is a poser"

Why?

>>>>You’re kidding, right?

I like the audiophile mags, and I like audiophile discussion forums.
Without the Absolute Sound, I might never have found Harbeth speakers. Or chosen the AudioQuest Dragonfly as my dac. Each on opposite ends of the price spectrum, but both major players in my happiness.

Because they make the music I love sound amazing.

PS: one unsung thing about the audiophile mags is how much music i’ve discovered through their reviews of equipment. Great.
Although Michael Fremer’s attitude occasionally deserves a raised eyebrow or two, how did his personality become a topic of this thread?

Does everybody on this thread even agree what "high-end" means? I asked on multiple threads what high-end is and I have never gotten an answer. Just like amg56 I have gotten many labels for myself, though.

Does anyone think that pictures of equipment, in Stereophile at least, do not help figuring out how the piece looks like? Angles are usually not conductive to getting a true idea of the looks.
When you are getting older and closer to dying...  And, you think that now is all we get?  If you have lots of money?  You will spend all it takes to try to distract yourself away from your deepest fear.  "What a beautiful shiny tonearm!"..."Now I need something else that is the very best (expensive) to keep me distracted."    etc.. etc.

I think their fear of dying drives them. They need to own the very best now.  Mix that with having money, and audio manufacturers will oblige that dark need. They feel its almost their duty to charge exorbitant amounts to make this slowly dying soul feel something which is all absorbing.      And, then they die.